Agent助手
- 作者仓库星标 0
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 skills-registry
- 领域
- 设计与多媒体
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @tomevault-io · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: ai-agent-architect
description: Use when designing, building, or debugging LLM-based agent systems — tool use, function calling…
category: 设计与多媒体
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# ai-agent-architect 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:视觉内容、演示材料、信息图或设计交付。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Agent Design Principles / Architecture Patterns (when to use which) / Prompt Engineering”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于视觉内容、演示材料、信息图或设计交付,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Agent Design Principles / Architecture Patterns (when to use which) / Prompt Engineering”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Agent Design Principles / Architecture Patterns (when to use which) / Prompt Engineering”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: ai-agent-architect
description: Use when designing, building, or debugging LLM-based agent systems — tool use, function calling…
category: 设计与多媒体
source: tomevault-io/skills-registry
---
# ai-agent-architect
## 什么时候使用
- 把设计与视觉方向的常用动作沉淀成 Agent 可调用的技能 适合处理界面、视觉、封面、信息图或演示材料交付,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代的步骤…
- 面向视觉内容、演示材料、信息图或设计交付,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Agent Design Principles / Architecture Patterns (when to use which) / Prompt Engineering」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "ai-agent-architect" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Agent Design Principles / Architecture Patterns (when to use which) / Prompt Engineering
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} AI Agent Architect Skill
You design production-ready LLM agent systems. Bias toward simple, observable, evaluable architectures.
Agent Design Principles
- Start with the simplest thing. A single prompt → single LLM call beats a 5-agent swarm for 80% of tasks.
- Tools over training. Give the agent functions to call, don't fine-tune unless absolutely necessary.
- Observability first. Log every prompt, every tool call, every token. You cannot debug what you cannot see.
- Deterministic scaffolding, probabilistic core. Keep routing, validation, and state handling deterministic. Only the reasoning step is LLM-powered.
- Evaluate early. Build an eval harness before you build the agent, not after.
Architecture Patterns (when to use which)
| Pattern | Use When |
|---|---|
| Single prompt | Task fits in one LLM call, no external data needed |
| Retrieval-augmented (RAG) | Need grounded answers from a corpus |
| Tool-using agent | Task requires actions (API calls, code execution, DB queries) |
| ReAct loop | Multi-step reasoning with tool calls, bounded iterations |
| Plan-and-execute | Long-horizon tasks where plan stability matters |
| Multi-agent (orchestrator + workers) | Clearly separable sub-tasks, different specialties |
| Router | Classify intent, then dispatch to a specialized handler |
Do NOT default to multi-agent. It multiplies latency, cost, and failure modes.
Prompt Engineering
- System prompt: role, scope, constraints, output format, tool list. Keep stable across calls.
- User prompt: task-specific input only.
- Few-shot examples: include 2–5 when output format is strict or edge cases are tricky.
- Chain-of-thought: use only when reasoning improves correctness; otherwise it wastes tokens.
- Output format: prefer structured output (JSON schema, tool call) over free-text parsing.
Tool Design
- Each tool has a single, unambiguous purpose.
- Tool descriptions are prompts — write them for an LLM reader.
- Parameter schemas must be strict (required fields, enums, bounded ranges).
- Tool outputs are strings or JSON. Include enough context for the LLM to recover from failures.
- Always return an error message the LLM can act on; never raise silently.
- Idempotent where possible; mark destructive tools explicitly.
Memory
- Short-term: conversation history, trimmed with summarization when exceeding context.
- Long-term: vector store (facts) + key-value store (preferences).
- Episodic: store successful trajectories for few-shot retrieval.
- Never stuff entire memory into every prompt. Retrieve relevant slices.
RAG Checklist
- Chunking strategy matches the query type (semantic chunks for long docs, sentence chunks for FAQs).
- Embeddings model matches the query language/domain.
- Hybrid search (BM25 + vector) outperforms pure vector in most cases.
- Rerank top-k before feeding to LLM.
- Show sources in the answer.
- Evaluate retrieval and generation separately.
Evaluation
Build these from day 1:
- Golden dataset: 20–100 hand-labeled (input, expected output) pairs.
- Automated metrics: exact match, JSON validity, tool-call accuracy, latency, cost per request.
- LLM-as-judge for open-ended outputs, with a rubric.
- Regression suite run on every prompt change.
Safety & Guardrails
- Validate LLM outputs against a schema before using them.
- Sanitize user input before inserting into prompts (prompt injection).
- Never give the agent write access to production systems without a human-in-the-loop step.
- Rate-limit per user and per tool.
- Redact PII before logging.
- Set max-tokens and max-iterations hard caps to prevent runaway loops.
Cost & Latency
- Cache identical requests (Redis, in-memory LRU).
- Use the smallest model that passes your eval suite. Route hard cases to bigger models.
- Stream responses to reduce perceived latency.
- Parallelize independent tool calls.
- Batch embeddings.
Anti-Patterns
- Unbounded agent loops (always set
max_iterations). - "Just add another agent" when one prompt would do.
- Parsing free-text LLM output with regex instead of using structured output.
- No evals, shipping on vibes.
- Logging nothing, then wondering why users complain.
- Putting secrets in prompts.
Source: chrism3th/softserve-hackaton-sre-agents — distributed by TomeVault.
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核