前端测试
- 作者仓库星标 8
- 许可证 Apache-2.0
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 controlkeel
- 领域
- 工程开发
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 94 / 100 · 已通过审计
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @aryaminus · Apache-2.0
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 即装即用
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: align
description: Interview the user about their goal before any plan or code. Reach shared understanding of what…
category: 工程开发
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# align 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Protocol / Non-negotiable rules / What you produce”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Protocol / Non-negotiable rules / What you produce”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Protocol / Non-negotiable rules / What you produce”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: align
description: Interview the user about their goal before any plan or code. Reach shared understanding of what…
category: 工程开发
source: aryaminus/controlkeel
---
# align
## 什么时候使用
- align 是一个工程开发方向的技能,扩展 Agent 在写代码、做 review、跑测试这类场景下的能力 适合处理工程开发场景下的代码实现、调试、重构、测试或代码审查,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Age…
- 面向代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Protocol / Non-negotiable rules / What you produce」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "align" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Protocol / Non-negotiable rules / What you produce
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Align Skill
Reach a shared design concept with the user before any plan or code is written. The most expensive misalignment is the one caught after implementation — catch it here instead.
Protocol
Call
ck_contextto load current session state, domain pack, and any prior goals or decisions already recorded.Call
ck_memory_searchwith the user's stated goal to surface prior aligned work on the same area before asking redundant questions.Ask the user one question at a time. For each question, provide your recommended answer so the user can confirm, adjust, or replace it — never leave them staring at a blank.
Work through the alignment tree in this order:
What — What is the exact outcome? What is explicitly out of scope? Why — What problem does this solve? What is the success signal? Who — Who uses the result? Which roles, systems, or integrations are affected? Layers — Which system layers does this touch? (schema, services, APIs, UI, infra, third-party) Record each touched layer explicitly — this drives vertical slice decomposition later. Acceptance criteria — What does "done" look like? What would a failing test catch? Reframe vague requirements into concrete, testable conditions. Edge cases — What breaks if inputs are invalid, empty, or unexpected? Constraints — Budget, timeline, tech stack limits, compliance requirements, or must-not-change areas. Assumptions — What are you assuming about the environment, tech stack, data sources, or integrations? Surface these explicitly before proceeding. Unknowns — What do you not know yet? What needs a spike or research before implementation starts?
After each resolved decision, call
ck_memory_recordwith typedecisionto persist it. Future agents resuming this work will recover these without asking again.When alignment is complete, call
ck_goal(mode:record, horizon:session) to record the aligned goal with its acceptance criteria and touched layers.Tell the user the alignment is complete and recommend the next step:
- If the work is multi-layer and will need decomposition → activate
plan-slice. - If the work is a single small change that fits in one task → proceed to
ck_review_submit(plan_phase:narrowed_decision).
- If the work is multi-layer and will need decomposition → activate
Non-negotiable rules
- Never skip alignment and go straight to planning or code, even for "small" tasks. A missed constraint at this stage compounds into blocked findings or rework later.
- Do not produce a plan, PRD, or code during this skill. The output is a recorded goal and a set of decisions — nothing else.
- If the user says "just do it," record what you know so far, note the unknowns explicitly, and move forward — but surface the open questions as warnings so they can surface as findings if they bite later.
- Planning is always human-in-the-loop. The agent asks; the human decides. Never answer your own alignment questions and continue as if the human agreed.
What you produce
At the end of this skill:
- A
ck_goalrecord with: objective, acceptance criteria, touched layers, known constraints, explicit assumptions, open unknowns. - One or more
ck_memory_recordentries (type:decision) for each resolved design choice. - A clear recommendation on whether to proceed to
plan-sliceor directly tock_review_submit.
Additional resources
- For the full governed workflow, see references/workflow.md
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核