数据分析
- 作者仓库星标 36,312
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 agents
- 领域
- 工程开发
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 92 / 100 · 已通过审计
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @wshobson · v1.0.0 · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: competitive-landscape
description: Analyze competition, identify differentiation opportunities, and develop winning market position…
category: 工程开发
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# competitive-landscape 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Overview / Porter's Five Forces / Force 1: Threat of New Entrants”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Overview / Porter's Five Forces / Force 1: Threat of New Entrants”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Overview / Porter's Five Forces / Force 1: Threat of New Entrants”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: competitive-landscape
description: Analyze competition, identify differentiation opportunities, and develop winning market position…
category: 工程开发
source: wshobson/agents
---
# competitive-landscape
## 什么时候使用
- 把工程方向的常用动作沉淀成 Agent 可调用的技能 适合处理工程开发场景下的代码实现、调试、重构、测试或代码审查,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代…
- 面向代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Overview / Porter's Five Forces / Force 1: Threat of New Entrants」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "competitive-landscape" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Overview / Porter's Five Forces / Force 1: Threat of New Entrants
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Competitive Landscape Analysis
Comprehensive frameworks for analyzing competition, identifying differentiation opportunities, and developing winning market positioning strategies.
Overview
Understand competitive dynamics using proven frameworks (Porter's Five Forces, Blue Ocean Strategy, positioning maps) to identify opportunities and craft defensible competitive advantages.
Porter's Five Forces
Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
Force 1: Threat of New Entrants
Barriers to Entry:
- Capital requirements
- Economies of scale
- Switching costs
- Brand loyalty
- Regulatory barriers
- Access to distribution
- Network effects
High Threat: Low barriers, easy to enter (e.g., simple SaaS tools) Low Threat: High barriers (e.g., regulated industries, hardware)
Analysis Questions:
- How easy is it for new competitors to enter?
- What would it cost to launch a competing product?
- Are there network effects or switching costs protecting incumbents?
Force 2: Bargaining Power of Suppliers
Supplier Power Factors:
- Supplier concentration
- Availability of substitutes
- Importance to supplier
- Switching costs
- Forward integration threat
High Power: Few suppliers, critical inputs (e.g., cloud infrastructure providers) Low Power: Many alternatives, commoditized (e.g., generic services)
Analysis Questions:
- Who are our critical suppliers?
- Could they raise prices or reduce quality?
- Can we switch suppliers easily?
Force 3: Bargaining Power of Buyers
Buyer Power Factors:
- Buyer concentration
- Volume purchased
- Product differentiation
- Price sensitivity
- Backward integration threat
High Power: Few large customers, standardized products (e.g., enterprise deals) Low Power: Many small customers, differentiated product (e.g., consumer subscriptions)
Analysis Questions:
- Can customers easily switch to competitors?
- Do few customers generate most revenue?
- How price-sensitive are buyers?
Force 4: Threat of Substitutes
Substitute Considerations:
- Alternative solutions
- Price-performance tradeoff
- Switching costs
- Buyer propensity to substitute
High Threat: Many alternatives, low switching cost (e.g., productivity software) Low Threat: Unique solution, high switching cost (e.g., ERP systems)
Analysis Questions:
- What alternative ways can customers solve this problem?
- How do substitutes compare on price and performance?
- What's the cost to switch to a substitute?
Force 5: Competitive Rivalry
Rivalry Intensity Factors:
- Number of competitors
- Industry growth rate
- Product differentiation
- Exit barriers
- Strategic stakes
High Rivalry: Many competitors, slow growth, commoditized (e.g., email marketing) Low Rivalry: Few competitors, fast growth, differentiated (e.g., emerging AI tools)
Analysis Questions:
- How many direct competitors exist?
- Is the market growing or stagnant?
- How differentiated are offerings?
- Are competitors competing on price or value?
Forces Analysis Summary
Create a scorecard:
| Force | Intensity (1-5) | Impact | Key Factors |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Entrants | 3 | Medium | Low barriers but network effects |
| Supplier Power | 2 | Low | Many cloud providers |
| Buyer Power | 4 | High | Enterprise customers concentrated |
| Substitutes | 3 | Medium | Manual processes alternative |
| Rivalry | 4 | High | 10+ direct competitors |
Overall Assessment: Moderate industry attractiveness with high rivalry and buyer power
Blue Ocean Strategy
Identify uncontested market space through value innovation.
Four Actions Framework
Eliminate: What factors can be eliminated that the industry takes for granted?
Reduce: What factors can be reduced well below industry standard?
Raise: What factors can be raised well above industry standard?
Create: What factors can be created that the industry never offered?
Strategy Canvas
Map your offering vs. competitors on key factors.
Example: Budget Hotels
High | ★ Traditional Hotels
| ★ Budget Hotels (new)
|
Low |___________________________________
Price Luxury Convenience Cleanliness
Budget Hotel Strategy:
- Eliminate: Luxury amenities, room service
- Reduce: Lobby size, staff
- Raise: Cleanliness, online booking
- Create: Self-service kiosks, mobile app
Value Innovation
Find the sweet spot: Lower cost + higher value
Steps:
- Map industry competing factors
- Identify factors to eliminate/reduce (cost savings)
- Identify factors to raise/create (differentiation)
- Validate that combination creates new market space
Competitive Positioning
Positioning Map
Plot competitors on 2-3 key dimensions.
Example Dimensions:
- Price vs. Features
- Complexity vs. Ease of Use
- Enterprise vs. SMB Focus
- Self-Service vs. High-Touch
- Generalist vs. Specialist
How to Create:
- Choose 2 dimensions most important to customers
- Plot all competitors
- Identify gaps (white space)
- Validate gap represents real customer need
Example:
High Price
|
| ★ Enterprise A ★ Enterprise B
|
| ● Our Position (gap)
|
| ★ Competitor C ★ Competitor D
|
Low Price |____________________________________________
Simple Complex
Differentiation Strategy
How to Differentiate:
Product Differentiation
- Unique features
- Superior performance
- Better design/UX
- Integration ecosystem
Service Differentiation
- Customer support quality
- Onboarding experience
- Response time
- Success programs
Brand Differentiation
- Trust and reputation
- Thought leadership
- Community
- Values alignment
Price Differentiation
- Premium positioning
- Value positioning
- Transparent pricing
- Flexible packaging
Positioning Statement Framework
For [target customer]
Who [statement of need or opportunity]
Our product is [product category]
That [statement of key benefit]
Unlike [primary competitive alternative]
Our product [statement of primary differentiation]
Example:
For e-commerce companies
Who struggle with email marketing automation
Our product is an AI-powered email platform
That increases conversion rates by 40%
Unlike Klaviyo and Mailchimp
Our product uses AI to personalize at scale
Competitive Intelligence
Information Gathering
Public Sources:
- Company websites and blogs
- Press releases and news
- Job postings (hint at strategy)
- Customer reviews (G2, Capterra)
- Social media and forums
- Glassdoor (employee insights)
- SEC filings (public companies)
- Patent filings
Direct Research:
- Customer interviews
- Win/loss analysis
- Sales team feedback
- Product demos and trials
- Conference attendance
Competitor Profile Template
For each key competitor, document:
Company Overview:
- Founded, HQ, funding, size
- Leadership team
- Company stage and trajectory
Product:
- Core features
- Target customers
- Pricing and packaging
- Technology stack
- Recent launches
Go-to-Market:
- Sales model (self-serve, sales-led)
- Marketing strategy
- Distribution channels
- Partnerships
Strengths:
- What they do better than anyone
- Key competitive advantages
- Market position
Weaknesses:
- Gaps in product
- Customer complaints
- Operational challenges
Strategy:
- Stated direction
- Inferred priorities
- Likely next moves
Competitive Pricing Analysis
Price Positioning
Premium (Top 25%):
- Superior product/service
- Strong brand
- High-touch sales
- Enterprise focus
Mid-Market (Middle 50%):
- Balanced value
- Standard features
- Mixed sales model
- Broad market
Value (Bottom 25%):
- Basic functionality
- Self-service
- Cost leadership
- High volume, low margin
Pricing Comparison Matrix
| Competitor | Entry Price | Mid Tier | Enterprise | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Competitor A | $29/mo | $99/mo | Custom | Subscription |
| Competitor B | $49/mo | $199/mo | $499/mo | Subscription |
| Us | $39/mo | $129/mo | Custom | Subscription |
Analysis:
- Are we priced competitively?
- What does our pricing signal?
- Are there gaps in our packaging?
Go-to-Market Strategy
Market Entry Strategies
Direct Competition:
- Head-to-head against established players
- Requires differentiation and resources
- Example: Better features at lower price
Niche Focus:
- Target underserved segment
- Become specialist vs. generalist
- Example: "Salesforce for real estate"
Disruptive Innovation:
- Target non-consumers or low end
- Improve over time to move upmarket
- Example: Freemium model disrupting enterprise
Platform Play:
- Build ecosystem and network effects
- Aggregate complementary services
- Example: Marketplace or API platform
Beachhead Market
Characteristics of Good Beachhead:
- Specific, reachable segment
- Acute pain you solve well
- Limited competition
- Willing to pay
- Can lead to expansion
Example: Instead of "project management software", target "project management for construction teams"
Competitive Advantage
Sustainable Advantages
Network Effects:
- Value increases with users
- Example: Slack, marketplaces
Switching Costs:
- High cost to change
- Example: CRM systems with data
Economies of Scale:
- Unit costs decrease with volume
- Example: Cloud infrastructure
Brand:
- Trust and reputation
- Example: Security software
Proprietary Technology:
- Patents or trade secrets
- Example: Algorithms, data
Regulatory:
- Licenses or approvals
- Example: Fintech, healthcare
Testing Your Advantage
Ask:
- Can competitors copy this in < 2 years?
- Does this matter to customers?
- Do we execute this better than anyone?
- Is this advantage durable?
If "no" to any, it's not a sustainable advantage.
Competitive Monitoring
What to Track
Product Changes:
- New features
- Pricing changes
- Packaging adjustments
Market Signals:
- Funding announcements
- Key hires (especially leadership)
- Customer wins/losses
- Partnerships
Performance Metrics:
- Revenue (if public or disclosed)
- Customer count
- Growth rate
- Market share estimates
Monitoring Cadence
Weekly:
- Product release notes
- News mentions
Monthly:
- Win/loss analysis review
- Positioning map updates
Quarterly:
- Deep competitive review
- Strategy adjustment
Annually:
- Major strategy reassessment
- Market trends analysis
Quick Start
To analyze competitive landscape:
- Identify competitors - Direct, indirect, and future threats
- Apply Porter's Five Forces - Assess industry attractiveness
- Create positioning map - Visualize competitive space
- Profile top 3-5 competitors - Deep dive on key rivals
- Identify differentiation - What makes you unique
- Analyze pricing - Where do you fit?
- Assess advantages - What's defensible?
- Develop strategy - How to win
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核