文档审查
- 作者仓库星标 90,172
- 作者仓库 storybook
Documentation Review
Scope
This skill applies to documentation files in /docs and docs-owned snippet files in docs/_snippets/. Do not use this skill for non-docs files (code, configuration, READMEs outside /docs).
Use This Skill When
- Asked to review, improve, rewrite, or author documentation in
/docs. - Asked for advice on page structure, doc type, audience, or content strategy for
/docs. - Asked to fix formatting, style, or compliance issues in
/docs.
Use a Light Touch When
- The request is a trivial grammar or typo fix that does not need full diagnosis.
- The page is already structurally sound and only needs minor editorial cleanup.
Reference Files
This skill uses four reference files under references/. Load them in order and only as needed:
| File | Owns | When to Load |
|---|---|---|
references/docs-principles.md |
North star, quality dimensions, dual-reader requirement | Always — read first |
references/docs-strategy.md |
Modes, doc types, intervention thresholds, page-shape guidance | Always — read second |
references/docs-antipatterns.md |
Diagnosis patterns and corrective moves | When diagnosing a weak or confusing draft |
references/storybook-style.md |
Editorial, MDX components, frontmatter, formatting, validation rules | In maintenance mode, or as the final pass of edit modes |
Ownership Rules
- Strategy references do not own formatting or component rules.
storybook-style.mddoes not own doc-type or intervention logic.- This file (
SKILL.md) owns workflow and handoffs only.
Workflow
Follow this sequence for every request. Steps 1–4 are diagnosis; steps 5–7 are action.
1. Determine the Requested Outcome
Read the user's request and map it to a mode:
| Request Pattern | Mode |
|---|---|
| "Fix links, callouts, formatting" | maintenance |
| "Make this clearer", "improve this page" | improve |
| "This doc is a mess; rewrite it" | rewrite |
| "Draft docs for feature X" | author |
| "What kind of page should this be?" | strategy |
| "Review this doc" (unspecified) | hybrid — see below |
Hybrid behavior: For vague asks like "review this doc":
- If the draft is obviously weak or the ask implies planning → critique-first (lead with diagnosis).
- If the page is decent and the ask implies cleanup → improve-first (lead with edits).
Default: When ambiguous, default to improve, not maintenance.
2. Determine the Primary Doc Type
Read the page and classify it using the doc types in references/docs-strategy.md:
concept— explains what something is and why it matterstask— walks the reader through accomplishing a goalreference— lookup for options, API, or configtroubleshooting— diagnose and fix a problemmigration— move from one version or approach to anotherdecision guide— choose between options
Always select one primary type, even if the page contains secondary elements.
After selecting the primary type, identify any secondary sections — sections with their own heading whose content follows a different doc type's shape. Note these for Step 3. See "Common Secondary Sections" in references/docs-strategy.md for expected combinations.
3. Diagnose the Draft
Evaluate the page against the quality dimensions in references/docs-principles.md, in order:
- Intent clarity
- Audience fit
- Information shape
- Conceptual clarity
- Task usability
- Example quality
- Economy
For secondary sections, evaluate dimensions 3 (Information Shape) and 5 (Task Usability) against the secondary section's own doc type, not the page's primary type. All other dimensions apply page-wide.
If the page shows signs of structural weakness, load references/docs-antipatterns.md and check for common patterns.
4. Choose the Intervention Level
Use the thresholds in references/docs-strategy.md:
- No structural issues, minor style problems →
maintenance - Structure is okay but framing, order, or examples are weak →
improve - Structure is wrong for the page's job →
rewrite - Page does not exist →
author - User wants advice, not edits →
strategy
Hard rule: When the draft is structurally weak, do not stop at sentence-level edits. Reorder, split, replace examples, or rewrite the page shape.
Split/escalation rule: If the dominant job is unclear or the page serves multiple unrelated jobs, switch to strategy mode or recommend a page split before polishing. Well-structured secondary sections (see references/docs-strategy.md) are not a reason to split.
5. Improve or Plan
Execute based on the chosen mode:
maintenance: Apply editorial and compliance fixes. Loadreferences/storybook-style.mdas primary guide.improve: Strengthen framing, order, explanation, and examples. Keep the page's identity. Usereferences/storybook-style.mdfor the final pass.rewrite: Materially replace the page. Preserve sound content; discard or restructure the rest. Usereferences/storybook-style.mdfor the final pass.author: Write the page from scratch using the primary doc type's shape as a guide. Usereferences/storybook-style.mdfor the final pass.strategy: Return a planning artifact containing:- Audience
- Page job
- Primary doc type
- Recommended outline
- Split/merge recommendation (if applicable)
- Preserve list (content worth keeping)
- Do not edit files or run validation.
When editing, you may also improve docs-owned snippet files in docs/_snippets/ if example quality depends on them.
6. Apply Storybook Style
For edit modes (maintenance, improve, rewrite, author):
- Load
references/storybook-style.mdif not already loaded. - Apply voice, tone, heading, link, component, and frontmatter rules.
- This step is always downstream of structural and editorial work — never the first pass.
7. Validate
For edit modes only:
yarn fmt:write
yarn docs:check
Fix any errors reported by yarn docs:check, then run it again to confirm.
Do not run validation in strategy mode or when no files were edited.
Handoffs
- PR creation: Do not create a PR automatically. If the user asks for end-to-end execution including a PR, hand off to the
prskill. - Snippet files: This skill may edit files in
docs/_snippets/when example quality requires it, but does not own snippet creation for non-docs purposes.
- 流狐分类
- 文档
- 作者声明 Agent
- 未找到明确声明;不据此推断已兼容或已测试
- 静态检查
- 88 / 100 · 启发式扫描,不代表运行安全
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @storybookjs · 未声明 license
- 流狐 Token 估算
- 低消耗
- 流狐接入估算
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 未发现要求
- 检测到的系统要求
- 未声明
- 底层运行要求
- 未声明
- 检测到的文件与系统行为
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 检测到的网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 无(仅作为资料)
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
作者没有在当前 SKILL.md 中定义固定输出样例。 This skill applies to documentation files in /docs and docs-owned snippet files in docs/snippets/. Do not use this skill for non-docs files (code, configuration, READMEs outside /docs).
Asked to review, improve, rewrite, or author documentation in /docs. Asked for advice on page structure, doc type, audience, or content strategy for /docs. Asked to fix formatting, style, or compliance issues in /docs.
The request is a trivial grammar or typo fix that does not need full diagnosis. The page is already structurally sound and only needs minor editorial cleanup.
This skill uses four reference files under references/. Load them in order and only as needed: File · Owns · When to Load references/docs-principles.md · North star, quality dimensions, dual-reader requirement · Always — read first
Strategy references do not own formatting or component rules. storybook-style.md does not own doc-type or intervention logic. This file (SKILL.md) owns workflow and handoffs only.
Follow this sequence for every request. Steps 1–4 are diagnosis; steps 5–7 are action.
# Documentation Review
## Scope
This skill applies to documentation files in `/docs` and docs-owned snippet files in `docs/_snippets/`. Do not use this skill for non-docs files (code, configuration, READMEs outside `/docs`).
## Use This Skill When
- Asked to review, improve, rewrite, or author documentation in `/docs`.
- Asked for advice on page structure, doc type, audience, or content strategy for `/docs`.
- Asked to fix formatting, style, or compliance issues in `/docs`.
## Use a Light Touch When
- The request is a trivial grammar or typo fix that does not need full diagnosis.
- The page is already structurally sound and only needs minor editorial cleanup.
## Reference Files
This skill uses four reference files under `references/`. Load them in order and only as needed:
| File | Owns | When to Load |
|------|------|--------------|
| `references/docs-principles.md` | North star, quality dimensions, dual-reader requirement | Always — read first |
| `references/docs-strategy.md` | Modes, doc types, intervention thresholds, page-shape guidance | Always — read second |
| `references/docs-antipatterns.md` | Diagnosis patterns and corrective moves | When diagnosing a weak or confusing draft |
| `references/storybook-style.md` | Editorial, MDX components, frontmatter, formatting, validation rules | In `maintenance` mode, or as the final pass of edit modes |
### Ownership Rules
- Strategy references do not own formatting or component rules.
- `storybook-style.md` does not own doc-type or intervention logic.
- This file (`SKILL.md`) owns workflow and handoffs only.
## Workflow
Follow this sequence for every request. Steps 1–4 are diagnosis; steps 5–7 are action.
### 1. Determine the Requested Outcome
Read the user's request and map it to a mode:
… 作者原文负责流程事实;流狐只索引当前章节、要点、文件与命令。
章节 -> Scope → Use This Skill When → Use a Light Touch When → Reference Files → Ownership Rules → Workflow
要点 -> hybrid · Hybrid behavior · Default · one · secondary sections · Hard rule · Split/escalation rule · maintenance
文件/命令 -> /docs · docs/snippets/ · references/ · references/docs-principles.md · references/docs-strategy.md · references/docs-antipatterns.md · references/storybook-style.md · maintenance
内容 SHA-256 -> 6a6ddbd3b3cc
方法与流程
适用与边界
原文中的明确线索
/docs、docs/snippets/、references/、references/docs-principles.md、references/docs-strategy.md、references/docs-antipatterns.md、references/storybook-style.md、maintenance