文档审查
- 作者仓库星标 90,172
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 storybook
- 领域
- 文档
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @storybookjs · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: docs-review
description: Review, improve, rewrite, author, or plan Storybook documentation in /docs. Use this when asked…
category: 文档
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# docs-review 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:PRD、RFC、README、项目说明或知识库整理。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Scope / Use This Skill When / Use a Light Touch When”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于PRD、RFC、README、项目说明或知识库整理,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Scope / Use This Skill When / Use a Light Touch When”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文出现了 `/docs` 这类斜杠命令;如果你的 Agent 支持命令触发,优先用命令开场,再补充目标和边界。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Scope / Use This Skill When / Use a Light Touch When”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: docs-review
description: Review, improve, rewrite, author, or plan Storybook documentation in /docs. Use this when asked…
category: 文档
source: storybookjs/storybook
---
# docs-review
## 什么时候使用
- 用于审阅代码、文档或方案并给出可执行反馈 适合处理README、PRD、RFC、教程和知识库文档,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代的步骤;通常不需要…
- 面向PRD、RFC、README、项目说明或知识库整理,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Scope / Use This Skill When / Use a Light Touch When」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "docs-review" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Scope / Use This Skill When / Use a Light Touch When
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Documentation Review
Scope
This skill applies to documentation files in /docs and docs-owned snippet files in docs/_snippets/. Do not use this skill for non-docs files (code, configuration, READMEs outside /docs).
Use This Skill When
- Asked to review, improve, rewrite, or author documentation in
/docs. - Asked for advice on page structure, doc type, audience, or content strategy for
/docs. - Asked to fix formatting, style, or compliance issues in
/docs.
Use a Light Touch When
- The request is a trivial grammar or typo fix that does not need full diagnosis.
- The page is already structurally sound and only needs minor editorial cleanup.
Reference Files
This skill uses four reference files under references/. Load them in order and only as needed:
| File | Owns | When to Load |
|---|---|---|
references/docs-principles.md |
North star, quality dimensions, dual-reader requirement | Always — read first |
references/docs-strategy.md |
Modes, doc types, intervention thresholds, page-shape guidance | Always — read second |
references/docs-antipatterns.md |
Diagnosis patterns and corrective moves | When diagnosing a weak or confusing draft |
references/storybook-style.md |
Editorial, MDX components, frontmatter, formatting, validation rules | In maintenance mode, or as the final pass of edit modes |
Ownership Rules
- Strategy references do not own formatting or component rules.
storybook-style.mddoes not own doc-type or intervention logic.- This file (
SKILL.md) owns workflow and handoffs only.
Workflow
Follow this sequence for every request. Steps 1–4 are diagnosis; steps 5–7 are action.
1. Determine the Requested Outcome
Read the user's request and map it to a mode:
| Request Pattern | Mode |
|---|---|
| "Fix links, callouts, formatting" | maintenance |
| "Make this clearer", "improve this page" | improve |
| "This doc is a mess; rewrite it" | rewrite |
| "Draft docs for feature X" | author |
| "What kind of page should this be?" | strategy |
| "Review this doc" (unspecified) | hybrid — see below |
Hybrid behavior: For vague asks like "review this doc":
- If the draft is obviously weak or the ask implies planning → critique-first (lead with diagnosis).
- If the page is decent and the ask implies cleanup → improve-first (lead with edits).
Default: When ambiguous, default to improve, not maintenance.
2. Determine the Primary Doc Type
Read the page and classify it using the doc types in references/docs-strategy.md:
concept— explains what something is and why it matterstask— walks the reader through accomplishing a goalreference— lookup for options, API, or configtroubleshooting— diagnose and fix a problemmigration— move from one version or approach to anotherdecision guide— choose between options
Always select one primary type, even if the page contains secondary elements.
After selecting the primary type, identify any secondary sections — sections with their own heading whose content follows a different doc type's shape. Note these for Step 3. See "Common Secondary Sections" in references/docs-strategy.md for expected combinations.
3. Diagnose the Draft
Evaluate the page against the quality dimensions in references/docs-principles.md, in order:
- Intent clarity
- Audience fit
- Information shape
- Conceptual clarity
- Task usability
- Example quality
- Economy
For secondary sections, evaluate dimensions 3 (Information Shape) and 5 (Task Usability) against the secondary section's own doc type, not the page's primary type. All other dimensions apply page-wide.
If the page shows signs of structural weakness, load references/docs-antipatterns.md and check for common patterns.
4. Choose the Intervention Level
Use the thresholds in references/docs-strategy.md:
- No structural issues, minor style problems →
maintenance - Structure is okay but framing, order, or examples are weak →
improve - Structure is wrong for the page's job →
rewrite - Page does not exist →
author - User wants advice, not edits →
strategy
Hard rule: When the draft is structurally weak, do not stop at sentence-level edits. Reorder, split, replace examples, or rewrite the page shape.
Split/escalation rule: If the dominant job is unclear or the page serves multiple unrelated jobs, switch to strategy mode or recommend a page split before polishing. Well-structured secondary sections (see references/docs-strategy.md) are not a reason to split.
5. Improve or Plan
Execute based on the chosen mode:
maintenance: Apply editorial and compliance fixes. Loadreferences/storybook-style.mdas primary guide.improve: Strengthen framing, order, explanation, and examples. Keep the page's identity. Usereferences/storybook-style.mdfor the final pass.rewrite: Materially replace the page. Preserve sound content; discard or restructure the rest. Usereferences/storybook-style.mdfor the final pass.author: Write the page from scratch using the primary doc type's shape as a guide. Usereferences/storybook-style.mdfor the final pass.strategy: Return a planning artifact containing:- Audience
- Page job
- Primary doc type
- Recommended outline
- Split/merge recommendation (if applicable)
- Preserve list (content worth keeping)
- Do not edit files or run validation.
When editing, you may also improve docs-owned snippet files in docs/_snippets/ if example quality depends on them.
6. Apply Storybook Style
For edit modes (maintenance, improve, rewrite, author):
- Load
references/storybook-style.mdif not already loaded. - Apply voice, tone, heading, link, component, and frontmatter rules.
- This step is always downstream of structural and editorial work — never the first pass.
7. Validate
For edit modes only:
yarn fmt:write
yarn docs:check
Fix any errors reported by yarn docs:check, then run it again to confirm.
Do not run validation in strategy mode or when no files were edited.
Handoffs
- PR creation: Do not create a PR automatically. If the user asks for end-to-end execution including a PR, hand off to the
prskill. - Snippet files: This skill may edit files in
docs/_snippets/when example quality requires it, but does not own snippet creation for non-docs purposes.
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核