前端设计
- 作者仓库星标 48,015
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 agent-skills
- 领域
- 工程开发
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @addyosmani · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: frontend-ui-engineering
description: Builds production-quality UIs. Use when building or modifying user-facing interfaces. Use when c…
category: 工程开发
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# frontend-ui-engineering 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Overview / When to Use / Component Architecture”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Overview / When to Use / Component Architecture”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Overview / When to Use / Component Architecture”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: frontend-ui-engineering
description: Builds production-quality UIs. Use when building or modifying user-facing interfaces. Use when c…
category: 工程开发
source: addyosmani/agent-skills
---
# frontend-ui-engineering
## 什么时候使用
- 把工程方向的常用动作沉淀成 Agent 可调用的技能 适合处理工程开发场景下的代码实现、调试、重构、测试或代码审查,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代…
- 面向代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Overview / When to Use / Component Architecture」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "frontend-ui-engineering" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Overview / When to Use / Component Architecture
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Frontend UI Engineering
Overview
Build production-quality user interfaces that are accessible, performant, and visually polished. The goal is UI that looks like it was built by a design-aware engineer at a top company — not like it was generated by an AI. This means real design system adherence, proper accessibility, thoughtful interaction patterns, and no generic "AI aesthetic."
When to Use
- Building new UI components or pages
- Modifying existing user-facing interfaces
- Implementing responsive layouts
- Adding interactivity or state management
- Fixing visual or UX issues
Component Architecture
File Structure
Colocate everything related to a component:
src/components/
TaskList/
TaskList.tsx # Component implementation
TaskList.test.tsx # Tests
TaskList.stories.tsx # Storybook stories (if using)
use-task-list.ts # Custom hook (if complex state)
types.ts # Component-specific types (if needed)
Component Patterns
Prefer composition over configuration:
// Good: Composable
<Card>
<CardHeader>
<CardTitle>Tasks</CardTitle>
</CardHeader>
<CardBody>
<TaskList tasks={tasks} />
</CardBody>
</Card>
// Avoid: Over-configured
<Card
title="Tasks"
headerVariant="large"
bodyPadding="md"
content={<TaskList tasks={tasks} />}
/>
Keep components focused:
// Good: Does one thing
export function TaskItem({ task, onToggle, onDelete }: TaskItemProps) {
return (
<li className="flex items-center gap-3 p-3">
<Checkbox checked={task.done} onChange={() => onToggle(task.id)} />
<span className={task.done ? 'line-through text-muted' : ''}>{task.title}</span>
<Button variant="ghost" size="sm" onClick={() => onDelete(task.id)}>
<TrashIcon />
</Button>
</li>
);
}
Separate data fetching from presentation:
// Container: handles data
export function TaskListContainer() {
const { tasks, isLoading, error } = useTasks();
if (isLoading) return <TaskListSkeleton />;
if (error) return <ErrorState message="Failed to load tasks" retry={refetch} />;
if (tasks.length === 0) return <EmptyState message="No tasks yet" />;
return <TaskList tasks={tasks} />;
}
// Presentation: handles rendering
export function TaskList({ tasks }: { tasks: Task[] }) {
return (
<ul role="list" className="divide-y">
{tasks.map(task => <TaskItem key={task.id} task={task} />)}
</ul>
);
}
State Management
Choose the simplest approach that works:
Local state (useState) → Component-specific UI state
Lifted state → Shared between 2-3 sibling components
Context → Theme, auth, locale (read-heavy, write-rare)
URL state (searchParams) → Filters, pagination, shareable UI state
Server state (React Query, SWR) → Remote data with caching
Global store (Zustand, Redux) → Complex client state shared app-wide
Avoid prop drilling deeper than 3 levels. If you're passing props through components that don't use them, introduce context or restructure the component tree.
Design System Adherence
Avoid the AI Aesthetic
AI-generated UI has recognizable patterns. Avoid all of them:
| AI Default | Why It Is a Problem | Production Quality |
|---|---|---|
| Purple/indigo everything | Models default to visually "safe" palettes, making every app look identical | Use the project's actual color palette |
| Excessive gradients | Gradients add visual noise and clash with most design systems | Flat or subtle gradients matching the design system |
| Rounded everything (rounded-2xl) | Maximum rounding signals "friendly" but ignores the hierarchy of corner radii in real designs | Consistent border-radius from the design system |
| Generic hero sections | Template-driven layout with no connection to the actual content or user need | Content-first layouts |
| Lorem ipsum-style copy | Placeholder text hides layout problems that real content reveals (length, wrapping, overflow) | Realistic placeholder content |
| Oversized padding everywhere | Equal generous padding destroys visual hierarchy and wastes screen space | Consistent spacing scale |
| Stock card grids | Uniform grids are a layout shortcut that ignores information priority and scanning patterns | Purpose-driven layouts |
| Shadow-heavy design | Layered shadows add depth that competes with content and slows rendering on low-end devices | Subtle or no shadows unless the design system specifies |
Spacing and Layout
Use a consistent spacing scale. Don't invent values:
/* Use the scale: 0.25rem increments (or whatever the project uses) */
/* Good */ padding: 1rem; /* 16px */
/* Good */ gap: 0.75rem; /* 12px */
/* Bad */ padding: 13px; /* Not on any scale */
/* Bad */ margin-top: 2.3rem; /* Not on any scale */
Typography
Respect the type hierarchy:
h1 → Page title (one per page)
h2 → Section title
h3 → Subsection title
body → Default text
small → Secondary/helper text
Don't skip heading levels. Don't use heading styles for non-heading content.
Color
- Use semantic color tokens:
text-primary,bg-surface,border-default— not raw hex values - Ensure sufficient contrast (4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text)
- Don't rely solely on color to convey information (use icons, text, or patterns too)
Accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA)
Every component must meet these standards:
Keyboard Navigation
// Every interactive element must be keyboard accessible
<button onClick={handleClick}>Click me</button> // ✓ Focusable by default
<div onClick={handleClick}>Click me</div> // ✗ Not focusable
<div role="button" tabIndex={0} onClick={handleClick} // ✓ But prefer <button>
onKeyDown={e => {
if (e.key === 'Enter') handleClick();
if (e.key === ' ') e.preventDefault();
}}
onKeyUp={e => {
if (e.key === ' ') handleClick();
}}>
Click me
</div>
ARIA Labels
// Label interactive elements that lack visible text
<button aria-label="Close dialog"><XIcon /></button>
// Label form inputs
<label htmlFor="email">Email</label>
<input id="email" type="email" />
// Or use aria-label when no visible label exists
<input aria-label="Search tasks" type="search" />
Focus Management
// Move focus when content changes
function Dialog({ isOpen, onClose }: DialogProps) {
const closeRef = useRef<HTMLButtonElement>(null);
useEffect(() => {
if (isOpen) closeRef.current?.focus();
}, [isOpen]);
// Trap focus inside dialog when open
return (
<dialog open={isOpen}>
<button ref={closeRef} onClick={onClose}>Close</button>
{/* dialog content */}
</dialog>
);
}
Meaningful Empty and Error States
// Don't show blank screens
function TaskList({ tasks }: { tasks: Task[] }) {
if (tasks.length === 0) {
return (
<div role="status" className="text-center py-12">
<TasksEmptyIcon className="mx-auto h-12 w-12 text-muted" />
<h3 className="mt-2 text-sm font-medium">No tasks</h3>
<p className="mt-1 text-sm text-muted">Get started by creating a new task.</p>
<Button className="mt-4" onClick={onCreateTask}>Create Task</Button>
</div>
);
}
return <ul role="list">...</ul>;
}
Responsive Design
Design for mobile first, then expand:
// Tailwind: mobile-first responsive
<div className="
grid grid-cols-1 /* Mobile: single column */
sm:grid-cols-2 /* Small: 2 columns */
lg:grid-cols-3 /* Large: 3 columns */
gap-4
">
Test at these breakpoints: 320px, 768px, 1024px, 1440px.
Loading and Transitions
// Skeleton loading (not spinners for content)
function TaskListSkeleton() {
return (
<div className="space-y-3" aria-busy="true" aria-label="Loading tasks">
{Array.from({ length: 3 }).map((_, i) => (
<div key={i} className="h-12 bg-muted animate-pulse rounded" />
))}
</div>
);
}
// Optimistic updates for perceived speed
function useToggleTask() {
const queryClient = useQueryClient();
return useMutation({
mutationFn: toggleTask,
onMutate: async (taskId) => {
await queryClient.cancelQueries({ queryKey: ['tasks'] });
const previous = queryClient.getQueryData(['tasks']);
queryClient.setQueryData(['tasks'], (old: Task[]) =>
old.map(t => t.id === taskId ? { ...t, done: !t.done } : t)
);
return { previous };
},
onError: (_err, _taskId, context) => {
queryClient.setQueryData(['tasks'], context?.previous);
},
});
}
See Also
For detailed accessibility requirements and testing tools, see references/accessibility-checklist.md.
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Accessibility is a nice-to-have" | It's a legal requirement in many jurisdictions and an engineering quality standard. |
| "We'll make it responsive later" | Retrofitting responsive design is 3x harder than building it from the start. |
| "The design isn't final, so I'll skip styling" | Use the design system defaults. Unstyled UI creates a broken first impression for reviewers. |
| "This is just a prototype" | Prototypes become production code. Build the foundation right. |
| "The AI aesthetic is fine for now" | It signals low quality. Use the project's actual design system from the start. |
Red Flags
- Components with more than 200 lines (split them)
- Inline styles or arbitrary pixel values
- Missing error states, loading states, or empty states
- No keyboard navigation testing
- Color as the sole indicator of state (red/green without text or icons)
- Generic "AI look" (purple gradients, oversized cards, stock layouts)
Verification
After building UI:
- Component renders without console errors
- All interactive elements are keyboard accessible (Tab through the page)
- Screen reader can convey the page's content and structure
- Responsive: works at 320px, 768px, 1024px, 1440px
- Loading, error, and empty states all handled
- Follows the project's design system (spacing, colors, typography)
- No accessibility warnings in dev tools or axe-core
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核