Gemini 助手
- 作者仓库星标 0
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 skills-registry
- 领域
- 工程开发
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @tomevault-io · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 即装即用
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: gemini
description: Smart Gemini CLI delegation skill. Activate this skill at the START of processing any user reque…
category: 工程开发
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# gemini 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Step 1: Read the Experience Log / Step 2: Score the Task / Strong Gemini signals (+2 each)”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Step 1: Read the Experience Log / Step 2: Score the Task / Strong Gemini signals (+2 each)”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文出现了 `/path` 这类斜杠命令;如果你的 Agent 支持命令触发,优先用命令开场,再补充目标和边界。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Step 1: Read the Experience Log / Step 2: Score the Task / Strong Gemini signals (+2 each)”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: gemini
description: Smart Gemini CLI delegation skill. Activate this skill at the START of processing any user reque…
category: 工程开发
source: tomevault-io/skills-registry
---
# gemini
## 什么时候使用
- 把工程方向的常用动作沉淀成 Agent 可调用的技能 适合处理工程开发场景下的代码实现、调试、重构、测试或代码审查,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代…
- 面向代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Step 1: Read the Experience Log / Step 2: Score the Task / Strong Gemini signals (+2 each)」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "gemini" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Step 1: Read the Experience Log / Step 2: Score the Task / Strong Gemini signals (+2 each)
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Gemini Smart Delegation Skill
Route tasks to Google's Gemini CLI (1M token context window) intelligently. The key behavior: always evaluate FIRST, then decide — never start a big task without checking.
Step 1: Read the Experience Log
Before doing anything else, read the experience log:
cat ~/.claude/skills/gemini/experience.md
The log contains:
[AUTO_APPROVE]entries — task types to always send to Gemini, no prompt needed[AVOID]entries — task types where Gemini underperformed, handle with Claude instead
Step 2: Score the Task
Strong Gemini signals (+2 each)
- Files involved are likely >50KB total (codebase scan, large logs, big documents)
- Task is purely read/analysis — no file editing needed
- Task matches an
[AUTO_APPROVE]pattern in experience.md - User explicitly says "use gemini", "ask gemini", "let gemini handle"
Mild Gemini signals (+1 each)
- Multiple files need to be read and cross-referenced
- Task involves summarization or extraction from long content
- Token conservation would meaningfully benefit the conversation
Disqualifiers (skip Gemini entirely)
- Task matches an
[AVOID]pattern in experience.md → handle with Claude, mention why - Task requires writing or editing files
- Task requires iterative tool-use loops
- Task is short and simple
Step 3: Decision Branch
Score >= 2 AND matches an [AUTO_APPROVE] pattern:
→ Go straight to Gemini — skip the question → Briefly note: "Routing to Gemini (auto-approved: [pattern name])"
Score >= 2 but NO prior auto-approve for this pattern:
→ Use AskUserQuestion with this exact structure:
Question: "This task looks like a good fit for Gemini (large context / token savings). How should I handle it?"
Header: "Route to Gemini?"
Options:
1. label: "Use Gemini & remember this task type"
description: "Delegate to Gemini now, and auto-route similar tasks in the future without asking"
2. label: "Use Gemini, just this once"
description: "Delegate to Gemini now, but ask again next time"
3. label: "Claude handles it"
description: "Skip Gemini for this task"
Score < 2:
→ Handle with Claude normally, no question needed
Step 4: After the User Chooses
Option 1 — "Use Gemini & remember this task type":
- Append an
[AUTO_APPROVE]entry to experience.md (format below) - Run Gemini
- Present output labeled
[Gemini Response]
Option 2 — "Use Gemini, just this once":
- Run Gemini
- Present output labeled
[Gemini Response] - Do NOT write to experience.md
Option 3 — "Claude handles it":
- Handle with Claude normally
- Do NOT write to experience.md
Step 5: Running Gemini
Standard headless call
gemini -p "COMPLETE SELF-CONTAINED PROMPT" --output-format text --yolo 2>&1
Pipe large file content
cat /path/to/large/file | gemini -p "YOUR INSTRUCTION" --output-format text --yolo 2>&1
Multi-file analysis
gemini -p "$(printf 'Analyze these files:\n\n=== file1 ===\n'; cat file1; printf '\n\n=== file2 ===\n'; cat file2; printf '\n\nTask: YOUR INSTRUCTION')" --output-format text --yolo 2>&1
Important: Gemini headless is single-shot — craft a complete, self-contained prompt with all needed context included.
Step 6: Post-Result Dissatisfaction Detection
After presenting Gemini output, watch the user's next message for dissatisfaction signals:
Signals: "wrong", "not good", "that's off", "redo this", user corrects the output, user asks Claude to redo the same task
When detected:
- Use AskUserQuestion:
Question: "Should I mark this task type as a poor fit for Gemini and handle it with Claude going forward?" Options: - "Yes, log it" — description: "Record this as an [AVOID] pattern" - "No, just this once" — description: "Don't log anything" - If user picks "Yes, log it" → append an
[AVOID]entry to experience.md - If this task type had an existing
[AUTO_APPROVE]entry, update it to[AVOID] - Confirm: "Noted. I'll handle this type of task myself from now on."
Experience Log Entry Formats
AUTO_APPROVE entry
---
### [AUTO_APPROVE] YYYY-MM-DD
**Pattern**: one-line description of the task type (e.g., "Full Go codebase read-only analysis")
**Trigger keywords**: keywords that identify this pattern
**Reason**: why Gemini is well-suited for this
AVOID entry
---
### [AVOID] YYYY-MM-DD
**Pattern**: one-line description of the task type
**What went wrong**: brief failure description from user feedback
**Lesson**: what to do instead next time
Decision Table
| Condition | Action |
|---|---|
| Matches [AUTO_APPROVE] | Go straight to Gemini, no question |
| Matches [AVOID] | Use Claude, explain why |
| Large/complex, no prior record | AskUserQuestion (3 options) |
| Small/simple task | Claude handles, no question |
| User picks "remember this type" | Write AUTO_APPROVE + run Gemini |
| User flags poor result | AskUserQuestion → write AVOID |
Source: audi0417/claude-gemini-router — distributed by TomeVault.
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核