数据分析
- 作者仓库星标 0
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 FarmFriend-Terminal-React
- 领域
- 通用
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @0-CYBERDYNE-SYSTEMS-0 · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 即装即用
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- Python
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 读取环境变量
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: Hugging Face Evaluation Manager
description: This skill enables you to manage, track, and analyze evaluation results for machine learning mod…
category: 通用
runtime: Python
---
# Hugging Face Evaluation Manager 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:通用任务拆解、检查和交付。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Overview / When to Use This Skill / Key Capabilities”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于通用任务拆解、检查和交付,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Overview / When to Use This Skill / Key Capabilities”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、读取环境变量、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、读取环境变量;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件、读取环境变量。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Overview / When to Use This Skill / Key Capabilities”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: Hugging Face Evaluation Manager
description: This skill enables you to manage, track, and analyze evaluation results for machine learning mod…
category: 通用
source: 0-CYBERDYNE-SYSTEMS-0/FarmFriend-Terminal-React
---
# Hugging Face Evaluation Manager
## 什么时候使用
- Hugging Face Evaluation Manager 是一个通用扩展技能,按 SKILL 适合处理通用任务拆解、检查、交付和复盘,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可…
- 面向通用任务拆解、检查和交付,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Overview / When to Use This Skill / Key Capabilities」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、读取环境变量;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "Hugging Face Evaluation Manager" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Overview / When to Use This Skill / Key Capabilities
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> Python | 读取文件、写入/修改文件、读取环境变量 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Hugging Face Evaluation Manager for FF-Terminal
Overview
This skill enables you to manage, track, and analyze evaluation results for machine learning models used in agricultural applications. It provides tools for adding structured evaluation data to model cards, comparing performance across different models, and maintaining comprehensive evaluation histories.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when you need to:
- Track evaluation results for crop yield prediction models
- Compare performance of different disease detection models
- Monitor model accuracy for weather forecasting systems
- Add evaluation metrics to agricultural ML model cards
- Benchmark models against industry standards
- Track model performance over growing seasons
- Evaluate precision agriculture algorithms
Key Capabilities
1. Agricultural Model Types Supported
- Crop Yield Prediction: Regression models for yield forecasting
- Disease Detection: Classification models for plant disease identification
- Weather Prediction: Time series models for weather and climate forecasting
- Soil Analysis: Models for soil property prediction and recommendations
- Pest Detection: Computer vision models for pest identification
- Irrigation Optimization: Models for water usage optimization
- Harvest Timing: Models for optimal harvest prediction
2. Evaluation Metrics
- Regression Metrics: MAE, MSE, RMSE, R² for continuous predictions
- Classification Metrics: Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-Score, AUC-ROC
- Time Series Metrics: MAPE, SMAPE, Directional Accuracy
- Custom Agricultural Metrics: Yield prediction accuracy, disease detection rates
- Economic Metrics: Cost-benefit analysis, ROI calculations
- Environmental Metrics: Resource efficiency, sustainability scores
3. Data Sources for Evaluation
- Historical Farm Data: Past seasons' performance data
- Cross-Validation: K-fold validation on agricultural datasets
- Field Trials: Real-world testing on actual farms
- Simulation Results: Controlled environment testing
- Benchmark Datasets: Standard agricultural ML benchmarks
Prerequisites
- Hugging Face account with model repository access
- HF_TOKEN environment variable set
- Python packages:
huggingface_hub,pandas,numpy,scikit-learn - Evaluation data in structured format (CSV, JSON)
Usage Workflow
Step 1: Prepare Evaluation Results
Format your evaluation data:
import pandas as pd
# Create evaluation results dataframe
eval_results = pd.DataFrame({
"model_name": ["CropYieldNet_v1", "CropYieldNet_v2"],
"mae": [0.15, 0.12],
"rmse": [0.22, 0.18],
"r2_score": [0.87, 0.91],
"dataset": "US_Corn_Yields_2020-2023",
"test_samples": 1000
})
Step 2: Generate Evaluation Report
Create comprehensive evaluation summary:
def generate_eval_report(eval_results, model_name):
report = f"""
# Model Evaluation Report: {model_name}
## Performance Metrics
- **Mean Absolute Error**: {eval_results['mae']:.3f}
- **Root Mean Square Error**: {eval_results['rmse']:.3f}
- **R² Score**: {eval_results['r2_score']:.3f}
## Dataset Information
- **Test Dataset**: {eval_results['dataset']}
- **Sample Size**: {eval_results['test_samples']:,}
- **Evaluation Date**: {pd.Timestamp.now().strftime('%Y-%m-%d')}
## Agricultural Context
This model was evaluated on historical crop yield data spanning multiple
growing seasons and geographic regions. Performance metrics reflect
real-world prediction accuracy for yield forecasting applications.
"""
return report
Step 3: Update Model Card
Add evaluation results to model card:
from huggingface_hub import update_repo_metadata
# Prepare model card content
model_card_content = f"""
---
language: en
tags:
- agriculture
- crop-yield
- regression
license: mit
metrics:
- mae
- rmse
- r2
---
# {model_name}
## Model Description
{model_description}
## Evaluation Results
{evaluation_report}
## Usage
```python
from transformers import AutoModelForSequenceClassification
model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained("your-username/{model_name}")
"""
Update model card
update_repo_metadata( repo_id="your-username/your-model", token=your_hf_token, metadata=model_card_content )
### Step 4: Track Performance Over Time
Maintain evaluation history:
```python
def track_model_performance(model_id, new_results):
# Load existing evaluation history
history_file = f"eval_history_{model_id.replace('/', '_')}.json"
try:
with open(history_file, 'r') as f:
history = json.load(f)
except FileNotFoundError:
history = []
# Add new evaluation results
new_entry = {
"timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat(),
"results": new_results,
"version": get_current_model_version(model_id)
}
history.append(new_entry)
# Save updated history
with open(history_file, 'w') as f:
json.dump(history, f, indent=2)
Agricultural Evaluation Best Practices
Seasonal Validation
- Evaluate models across multiple growing seasons
- Account for seasonal variations and climate patterns
- Test on different geographic regions and soil types
- Consider weather variability and extreme events
Real-World Testing
- Validate predictions against actual farm outcomes
- Include economic impact assessments
- Test on diverse farming operations and scales
- Consider practical deployment constraints
Benchmark Comparisons
- Compare against baseline agricultural models
- Include industry-standard benchmarks
- Reference academic literature and established methods
- Provide context for performance metrics
Integration with FF-Terminal Tools
This skill works seamlessly with other FF-Terminal capabilities:
- Data Analysis: Use
analyze_datatool to explore evaluation results - Visualization: Create performance charts and comparison plots
- Model Training: Integrate with training pipelines for continuous evaluation
- Automation: Schedule regular model performance monitoring
Example Use Cases
1. Crop Yield Model Evaluation
# Evaluate yield prediction model
yield_model = "CropYieldNet_v2"
test_data = load_yield_test_data("2023_season_data.csv")
# Run evaluation
predictions = yield_model.predict(test_data)
metrics = calculate_regression_metrics(test_data["actual_yield"], predictions)
# Generate and save report
eval_report = generate_eval_report(metrics, yield_model)
update_model_card("your-org/crop-yield-predictor", eval_report)
2. Disease Detection Model Comparison
# Compare multiple disease detection models
models = ["PlantDiseaseNet_v1", "PlantDiseaseNet_v2", "ResNet50-PlantDisease"]
test_images = load_disease_test_set("plant_disease_test/")
results = []
for model in models:
predictions = model.predict(test_images)
metrics = calculate_classification_metrics(test_images["labels"], predictions)
results.append({"model": model, **metrics})
# Create comparison report
comparison_report = create_comparison_table(results)
update_model_card("your-org/plant-detection-suite", comparison_report)
3. Model Performance Tracking
# Track model performance over time
model_id = "your-org/weather-forecaster"
new_eval_results = evaluate_weather_model(model_id, "2024_data")
# Add to performance history
track_model_performance(model_id, new_eval_results)
# Generate performance trend analysis
trend_analysis = analyze_performance_trends(model_id)
update_model_card(model_id, trend_analysis)
Advanced Features
Automated Evaluation Pipelines
- Set up continuous evaluation on new data
- Automated model card updates
- Performance alerting and notifications
- Integration with CI/CD pipelines
Comparative Analysis
- Multi-model comparison reports
- Statistical significance testing
- Performance ranking and leaderboards
- Cross-dataset generalization analysis
Economic Impact Assessment
- Cost-benefit analysis for model deployment
- ROI calculations for agricultural applications
- Resource optimization recommendations
- Risk assessment and mitigation strategies
Troubleshooting
Common Issues
- Metric calculation errors: Verify data formats and column names
- Model card update failures: Check repository permissions and token validity
- Performance inconsistencies: Ensure consistent evaluation protocols
- Data quality issues: Validate test data quality and representativeness
Error Recovery
- Implement validation checks for evaluation data
- Use backup evaluation methods for edge cases
- Maintain audit trails of evaluation processes
- Provide clear error messages and recovery guidance
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核