ios-clean

工程开发 社区 v1.0.0
解读按原文结构重写,命令、链接、术语均保留;右侧可核对作者原始 SKILL.md

原文结构

  • When to invoke this skill:Cleans up StateServer, DebugOverlay, accessor codegen output, and app-side hooks installed by /ios-qa. This is a convenience wrapper — the structural Release-build guard (Package.swift conditional + CI
  • Preamble (run first):原文以此为独立章节。
  • Plan Mode Safe Operations:In plan mode, allowed because they inform the plan: $B, $D, codex exec/codex review, writes to ~/.gstack/, writes to the plan file, and open for generated artifacts.

适用与边界

  • 当前原文没有单列适用场景。
  • Handling 5+ options — split, never drop:AskUserQuestion caps every call at 4 options. With 5+ real options, NEVER drop, merge, or silently defer one to fit. Pick a compliant shape: Batch into ≤4-groups — for coherent alternatives (e.g. version bumps,
  • Claimed Limitations Need Evidence:A claimed limitation or requirement ("the API can't do this", "X requires a credential", "that's impossible on this platform") is a material claim. State one only with the verbatim error, the documented statement, or a live probe in hand — pattern-matching a…

原文中的明确线索

  • 要点:「Treat the skill file as executable instructions, not reference.」、「Boil the Ocean」、「plan → review → ship」、「host MCP variant」、「native」、「Conductor rule (read before the MCP rule)」、「prose form」、「Auto-decide preferences still apply first」
  • 文件与命令codex execcodex review~/.gstack/openmcpAskUserQuestionheadlessinteractivePROACTIVE

流狐整理:以上内容来自当前 SKILL.md 的章节与原词;未补写作者没有声明的工具、兼容性或能力。

流狐档案 作者与许可取自来源;运行、权限和网络为流狐检测或估算
流狐分类
工程开发
作者声明 Agent
未找到明确声明;不据此推断已兼容或已测试
静态检查
92 / 100 · 启发式扫描,不代表运行安全
作者 / 版本 / 许可
@garrytan · v1.0.0 · 未声明 license
流狐 Token 估算
较高消耗
流狐接入估算
需简单配置
是否需要外部 API Key
未发现要求
检测到的系统要求
macOS · Linux · Windows
底层运行要求
Bun
检测到的文件与系统行为
  • 只读
  • 允许写入 / 修改
  • Shell 执行
检测到的网络行为
允许外网请求
安装命令数
无(仅作为资料)

档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。

需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。

输出预览 ios-clean.preview
# Writing Style (skip entirely if EXPLAINLEVEL: terse appears in the preamble echo OR the user's current message explicitly requests terse / no-explanations output)

- Gloss curated jargon on first use per skill invocation, even if the user pasted the term.
- Frame questions in outcome terms: what pain is avoided, what capability unlocks, what user experience changes.
- Use short sentences, concrete nouns, active voice.
- Close decisions with user impact: what the user sees, waits for, loses, or gains.
- User-turn override wins: if the current message asks for terse / no explanations / just the answer, skip this section.
- Terse mode (EXPLAIN_LEVEL: terse): no glosses, no outcome-framing layer, shorter responses.

讨论

基于 GitHub Discussions。登录 GitHub 即可参与讨论、点赞、订阅更新。