LangChain 助手
- 作者仓库星标 0
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 skills-registry
- 领域
- AI 智能
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @tomevault-io · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 需要 · OpenAI / Anthropic
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- Python
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 允许外网请求
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: langchain-agents-langchain-code
description: Use when editing a non-agentic LCEL pipeline — composing Runnables, retrievers, embeddings, chat…
category: AI 智能
runtime: Python
---
# langchain-agents-langchain-code 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“When to use LCEL vs createagent / Things the docs won't warn you about / Production rules of thumb”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“When to use LCEL vs createagent / Things the docs won't warn you about / Production rules of thumb”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、会按任务需要访问外部网络、需要准备 OpenAI / Anthropic API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;会按任务需要访问外部网络;需要准备 OpenAI / Anthropic API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“When to use LCEL vs createagent / Things the docs won't warn you about / Production rules of thumb”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: langchain-agents-langchain-code
description: Use when editing a non-agentic LCEL pipeline — composing Runnables, retrievers, embeddings, chat…
category: AI 智能
source: tomevault-io/skills-registry
---
# langchain-agents-langchain-code
## 什么时候使用
- 把 AI / Agent方向的常用动作沉淀成 Agent 可调用的技能 适合处理AI Agent、提示词、模型评估与自动化推理,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查…
- 面向提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「When to use LCEL vs createagent / Things the docs won't warn you about / Production rules of thumb」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;会按任务需要访问外部网络;需要准备 OpenAI / Anthropic API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "langchain-agents-langchain-code" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> When to use LCEL vs createagent / Things the docs won't warn you about / Production rules of thumb
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> Python | 读取文件、写入/修改文件 | 会按任务需要访问外部网络
安全层 -> 需要准备 OpenAI / Anthropic API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} LangChain (LCEL): editorial guidance
For API reference (full Runnable list, parser types, retriever interfaces), use the mcpdoc MCP tools: fetch_docs("https://docs.langchain.com/oss/python/langchain/..."). This skill is the opinions layer.
When to use LCEL vs create_agent
LCEL is for non-agentic flows: deterministic pipelines (RAG, summarization, classification, structured extraction). The pipeline runs once, end-to-end, no loop, no tool-calling LLM driving control flow.
If the task involves an LLM deciding which tools to call, don't use LCEL — use create_agent(...) + middleware. Trying to bolt agentic behavior onto an LCEL chain is the most common mistake here. The dividing line: does the LLM choose what happens next, or does the code? If LLM, agents. If code, LCEL.
Things the docs won't warn you about
chain.invoke(x)wherexis a string but the chain expects a dict will silently coerce in some configurations and fail in others — pass a dict explicitly.init_chat_modelreads provider creds from env (OPENAI_API_KEY,ANTHROPIC_API_KEY). It will not prompt; missing env raises at first call, not at construction.- Parsers are part of the chain.
chat_model.invoke(...)returns anAIMessage; pipe throughStrOutputParser()to get a plain string. - Middleware does NOT apply to LCEL chains. Middleware is
create_agent-only. For chains, use chain-levelchain.with_retry(...)andchain.with_fallbacks([...])instead. with_structured_outputdoes not stream — it accumulates the full response and returns the validated object. If you need streaming AND typed output, you can't have both via this API.
Production rules of thumb
- Always wrap production chains with
.with_retry(stop_after_attempt=3, wait_exponential_jitter=True)for resilience to transient model failures. - For provider redundancy, use
.with_fallbacks([cheaper_model_chain])— fallback chains run if the primary raises. The fallback is a full chain, not just a model. - For typed output, use
model.with_structured_output(PydanticModel)before composing into the chain. Validation is automatic; you get the Pydantic instance, not a dict. - For RAG, add a guardrail stage that returns "I don't know" when
len(context) == 0. Without it, the LLM hallucinates from empty context. - For RAG, consider a reranker between retriever and prompt. Recall@k improves substantially. The retriever's first 20 results passed through a reranker that picks the top 5 outperforms a retriever that fetches 5 directly.
When to reach for what
| Need | Tool |
|---|---|
| LLM + tools, deciding what to do next | create_agent (NOT LCEL) |
| Deterministic transformation (text → structured) | LCEL with with_structured_output |
| RAG over a vector store | LCEL with RunnableParallel of retriever + question |
| Multi-step pipeline with branches | LCEL with RunnableBranch or upgrade to StateGraph if branches need state |
| Streaming token output | LCEL chain (most parsers stream); NOT with_structured_output |
| Async at scale | LCEL .ainvoke / .astream |
Doc URLs to fetch with mcpdoc
https://docs.langchain.com/oss/python/langchain/lcel.md— LCEL primerhttps://docs.langchain.com/oss/python/langchain/structured-output.md—with_structured_outputhttps://docs.langchain.com/oss/python/langchain/runnables.md— Runnable types and methodshttps://docs.langchain.com/oss/python/langchain/retrievers.md— retriever interfaceshttps://docs.langchain.com/oss/python/langchain/chat-models.md—init_chat_modeland provider model names
When you need a specific class signature or kwarg, fetch from these. Don't guess at constructor args.
Source: cwijayasundara/agent_cli_langchain — distributed by TomeVault.
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核