数据库搜索
- 作者仓库星标 1
- 许可证 MIT
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 agent-toolkit
- 领域
- 工程开发
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 94 / 100 · 已通过审计
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @000001000000 · MIT
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- Python
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- Shell 执行
- 读取环境变量
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 允许外网请求
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: osint-dorking
description: Use this skill whenever a user asks for OSINT dorks, Google dorks, GHDB queries, Shodan filters…
category: 工程开发
runtime: Python
---
# osint-dorking 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Why this workflow / Examples / Safety and scope rules”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Why this workflow / Examples / Safety and scope rules”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、执行终端命令、读取环境变量、写入/修改文件、会按任务需要访问外部网络、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、执行终端命令、读取环境变量、写入/修改文件;会按任务需要访问外部网络;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、执行终端命令、读取环境变量、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Why this workflow / Examples / Safety and scope rules”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: osint-dorking
description: Use this skill whenever a user asks for OSINT dorks, Google dorks, GHDB queries, Shodan filters…
category: 工程开发
source: 000001000000/agent-toolkit
---
# osint-dorking
## 什么时候使用
- osint-dorking 是一个工程开发方向的技能,扩展 Agent 在写代码、做 review、跑测试这类场景下的能力 适合处理工程开发场景下的代码实现、调试、重构、测试或代码审查,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下…
- 面向代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Why this workflow / Examples / Safety and scope rules」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、执行终端命令、读取环境变量、写入/修改文件;会按任务需要访问外部网络;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "osint-dorking" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Why this workflow / Examples / Safety and scope rules
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> Python | 读取文件、执行终端命令、读取环境变量、写入/修改文件 | 会按任务需要访问外部网络
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} OSINT Dorking Skill
This skill teaches an agent how to reliably answer OSINT dorking requests. It currently uses GHDB as a robust baseline data source and can be extended with additional dork sources.
Why this workflow
Exploit-DB pages can enforce anti-bot protections and rate limits. Instead of scraping HTML pages, use the official GHDB XML feed from the ExploitDB GitLab repository through the bundled helper script.
Primary data source used by the helper:
Examples
Use these as few-shot references for what strong, practical dorks look like.
- Exposed environment files:
- Dork: inurl:.env OR intitle:"index of" ".env"
- Why useful: helps detect leaked runtime secrets in misconfigured deployments.
- Open directory listings:
- Dork: intitle:"index of" "backup" OR intitle:"index of" "/uploads"
- Why useful: surfaces browseable file indexes that may expose sensitive artifacts.
- WordPress configuration backups:
- Dork: intitle:"index of" "wp-config.php.bak"
- Why useful: identifies accidental backup exposure of database credentials.
- Database dump files:
- Dork: ext:sql "dump" ("db" OR "backup")
- Why useful: finds potentially exposed SQL exports for defensive verification.
- Git metadata exposure:
- Dork: intitle:"index of" ".git"
- Why useful: highlights repositories accidentally exposed via directory listing.
Safety and scope rules
- Only provide dorking guidance for authorized, legal, and defensive use.
- If the user requests clearly unauthorized targeting, refuse and offer benign alternatives (hardening checks, self-audit queries, training/lab examples).
- Prefer least harmful, discovery-focused dorks over intrusive guidance.
- Do not provide step-by-step exploitation instructions.
Procedure
- Clarify intent and constraints.
- Ask what technology, file type, product, or exposure class the user wants to detect.
- If needed, ask whether they want broad discovery or highly specific dorks.
- Query dork data via bundled script.
- Run commands from this skill directory:
skills/osint-dorking. - Run:
- ./scripts/search.sh --keyword "
" --limit 10
- ./scripts/search.sh --keyword "
- Equivalent direct Python entrypoint:
- python3 scripts/search_dorks.py --keyword "
" --limit 10
- python3 scripts/search_dorks.py --keyword "
- For category filters:
- ./scripts/search.sh --keyword "
" --category "Files Containing Juicy Info" --limit 10
- ./scripts/search.sh --keyword "
- For exact reproducibility in machine-readable format:
- ./scripts/search.sh --keyword "
" --format json --limit 20
- ./scripts/search.sh --keyword "
- If results are weak, iterate.
- Try synonyms and related products.
- Switch between broad and narrow terms.
- Use multiple keywords with match-any mode:
- ./scripts/search.sh --keyword "wordpress" --keyword "wp-config" --match any --limit 20
- Respond with curated output.
- Return a concise list including:
- GHDB ID
- Category
- Dork query
- Why it is relevant
- Add a short caution reminding the user to test only systems they own or are authorized to assess.
- If the feed cannot be fetched.
- Retry once with --refresh.
- If network still fails, rely on cached data at data/ghdb.xml.
- Tell the user the data may be stale and provide date context if available.
Output template
Use this structure in responses:
Match 1:
- ID:
- Category:
- Dork:
- Relevance:
- ID:
Match 2:
- ID:
- Category:
- Dork:
- Relevance:
- ID:
Notes for agents
- Preferred entrypoint is ./scripts/search.sh because it handles Python interpreter selection and forwards args safely.
- Prefer running the local script over direct Fetch calls to exploit-db pages.
- Keep answers practical and defensive.
- If the user asks for more, expand with adjacent categories and safer variants.
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核