数据库迁移
- 作者仓库星标 0
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 skills-registry
- 领域
- 工程开发
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @tomevault-io · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 即装即用
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: re-frame2-implementor
description: > Use when this capability is needed. This skill is workflow + guidance layered on the spec corp…
category: 工程开发
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# re-frame2-implementor 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“When NOT to use this skill / Cardinal rules (one-liners; full text in [references/cardinal-rules.md](references/cardinal-rules.md)) / Phase 1 — lock the decisions”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“When NOT to use this skill / Cardinal rules (one-liners; full text in [references/cardinal-rules.md](references/cardinal-rules.md)) / Phase 1 — lock the decisions”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“When NOT to use this skill / Cardinal rules (one-liners; full text in [references/cardinal-rules.md](references/cardinal-rules.md)) / Phase 1 — lock the decisions”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: re-frame2-implementor
description: > Use when this capability is needed. This skill is workflow + guidance layered on the spec corp…
category: 工程开发
source: tomevault-io/skills-registry
---
# re-frame2-implementor
## 什么时候使用
- 把工程方向的常用动作沉淀成 Agent 可调用的技能 适合处理工程开发场景下的代码实现、调试、重构、测试或代码审查,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代…
- 面向代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「When NOT to use this skill / Cardinal rules (one-liners; full text in [references/cardinal-rules.md](references/cardinal-rules.md)) / Phase 1 — lock the decisions」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "re-frame2-implementor" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> When NOT to use this skill / Cardinal rules (one-liners; full text in [references/cardinal-rules.md](references/cardinal-rules.md)) / Phase 1 — lock the decisions
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} re-frame2-implementor
This skill is workflow + guidance layered on the spec corpus at spec/. The spec is the contract; the reference impl under implementation/ is one worked example, not normative.
The job is to walk the engineer through two phases:
- Phase 1 — lock the load-bearing decisions (target language, substrate, scope, identity primitive, persistent data, concurrency, schema mechanism, hot-reload).
- Phase 2 — implement EPs in dependency order (001 → 002 → 006 → 004 → 009, then optional EPs per Phase 1 scope), validated by the conformance corpus.
When NOT to use this skill
Full skill-disambiguation matrix lives at skills/README.md §Skill routing — single source. In brief: not for authoring on the CLJS reference, greenfield bootstrap, v1→v2 migration, live-app inspection, or pattern-rationale reading.
Cardinal rules (one-liners; full text in references/cardinal-rules.md)
- Spec is the contract. When
implementation/andspec/disagree, the spec wins. - Phase 1 before Phase 2. Lock decisions in writing before writing code.
- Dependency order. EP 001 → 002 → 006 → 004 → 009 are the foundation; optional EPs sit downstream.
- Substrate-agnostic phrasing. Write to "the identity primitive", "the render-tree", "the reactive container" — not to hiccup / Reagent / keywords.
- No core.async equivalents. Async effects ride host primitives; cross-frame work is run-to-completion-drained.
- JVM-runnability for testing. Pure transitions and pure sub computations must be callable from a non-substrate harness.
- Conformance corpus is the acceptance test. Score is
passed / claimed-applicable; a fixture you can't make pass without outside sources is a spec gap. - Spec gap → draft a GitHub issue against
day8/re-frame2and ask before filing. Don't paper, don't invent, don't extrapolate from the reference — but don't auto-file either. Show the engineer the drafted title + body, restrict the body to public spec-quoted evidence (no private port source), and wait for explicit OK before runninggh issue create. The skill runs in the engineer's port repo; spec gaps reach the framework maintainers via the upstream repo's GitHub issues — never viabd(re-frame2's internal tracker, never invoked from a published skill). - Per-issue approval gate for any cross-repo side effect. Before running
gh issue createagainst a repo other than the one the engineer is working in, show the full draft (title, target repo, label set, body) and wait for explicit "yes" / "go" / "file it". Invoking the skill is consent to the workflow, not to each cross-repo write. Seereferences/cardinal-rules.md§9. - Pin the spec corpus. The kickoff prompt names a specific
day8/re-frame2commit/tag; verify the checkout's HEAD and origin before reading the spec, and record the pinned hash inDECISIONS.md(preamble before D1). An unverified checkout is not the contract. - Honour the reserved
:rf/*scheme. Framework-owned ids live under the single root namespace:rf/*(and its sub-namespaces); user code MUST NOT register under:rf/*. Reserved fx-ids and reserved app-db keys (:rf/machines,:rf/route, …) are part of the contract. A port that ignores the scheme fails conformance fixtures that assert:rf.*operation ids. Perspec/Conventions.md; the "where does each surface live" map isspec/Ownership.md.
Phase 1 — lock the decisions
Walk references/phase-1-decisions.md and produce a locked-decision record using the references/decision-record.md template. The seven decision blocks (D1 target language, D2 substrate, D3 scope, D4 the always-required realisation decisions — Implementor-Checklist Part 2's F1–F6 / S1–S3 / Sub1–Sub2 / V1–V3 / T1–T3 / E1–E2, sub-numbered 1:1 with the checklist, D5 schema mechanism, D6 integration story, D7 capability tag set) are detailed there; the canonical option matrices live in spec/Implementor-Checklist.md.
Output of Phase 1: a single dated decision record committed to the port's own repo.
Phase 2 — walk the spec corpus
With Phase 1 locked, walk references/phase-2-impl-order.md EP-by-EP. The leaf carries, for each EP: what to read first, the contract to expose, how the CLJS reference realised it (as one example, not normative), what the conformance fixtures check, common spec-gap traps.
Dependency order is fixed: EP 001 Registration → 002 Frames → 006 Reactive substrate → 004 Views → 009 Instrumentation, then a first conformance pass against the :core/* fixtures. Optional EPs (010 Schemas, 008 Testing, 005 State machines, 012 Routing, 011 SSR, 013 Flows, 014 HTTP, 007 Stories) follow in the order Phase 1 declared yes for them.
Source discipline
Three tiers, in priority order:
spec/— the contract. Read in numeric order.spec/Implementor-Checklist.md— the decision-ordered companion.implementation/— a worked example. Useful for "how did someone solve X?" Never useful as a contract claim.
If implementation/ and spec/ disagree, the spec wins.
Conformance
The corpus at spec/conformance/ is host-agnostic data. Harness shape, the EDN-handler-body DSL, capability tagging, scoring, and the spec-gap-vs-implementation-bug distinction are all in references/conformance.md. The corpus is the acceptance test for Goal 2 — AI-implementable from the spec alone.
Kickoff and output
references/kickoff-prompt.md— paste-ready prompt for the engineer to drop into a fresh Claude session opened in the root of their port repo.references/output-format.md— the standard agent-output shape: implementation summary, capability tags claimed, conformance score, decisions made, spec gaps filed.
Done — "v1-complete against <capability tag set>"
- Phase 1 decision record committed to the port's repo.
- All in-scope EPs have a working implementation.
- The port exposes
spec/API.md, adapted to host idiom. - Conformance score is
(claimed-applicable) / (claimed-applicable). - Non-spec-gap failures fixed in the port; spec-gap failures filed as GitHub issues against
day8/re-frame2. - Port's README states claimed capability tags and conformance score.
Reference files (all one level deep)
references/cardinal-rules.md— the eleven rules in prose + anti-pattern corollaries.references/phase-1-decisions.md— Phase 1 walkthrough, seven decision blocks.references/decision-record.md— fill-in template for the locked-decision record.references/phase-2-impl-order.md— EP-by-EP implementation order.references/reference-impl-tour.md— guided tour of the CLJS reference; what's substrate-specific vs pattern-required.references/conformance.md— corpus harness, DSL, capability tagging, scoring.references/kickoff-prompt.md— fresh-session kickoff prompt.references/output-format.md— agent-output shape.
Authoritative contract: spec/. Decision companion: spec/Implementor-Checklist.md. Conformance: spec/conformance/. CLJS reference (worked example): implementation/. Full skill-disambiguation matrix: skills/README.md §Skill routing — single source.
Source: day8/re-frame2 — distributed by TomeVault.
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核