论文审查
- 作者仓库星标 0
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 skills-registry
- 领域
- 写作
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @tomevault-io · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- Python
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 网络行为
- 允许外网请求
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: research-paper
description: Enterprise-grade autonomous research paper generation skill for AI coding agents — full papers…
category: 写作
runtime: Python
---
# research-paper 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:文章、文案、发言稿、润色或结构化表达。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“1. When to activate / Slash commands (preferred) / Natural-language triggers”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于文章、文案、发言稿、润色或结构化表达,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“1. When to activate / Slash commands (preferred) / Natural-language triggers”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、会按任务需要访问外部网络、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;会按任务需要访问外部网络;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文出现了 `/research`、`/paper`、`/literature-review`、`/whitepaper`、`/thesis` 这类斜杠命令;如果你的 Agent 支持命令触发,优先用命令开场,再补充目标和边界。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“1. When to activate / Slash commands (preferred) / Natural-language triggers”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: research-paper
description: Enterprise-grade autonomous research paper generation skill for AI coding agents — full papers…
category: 写作
source: tomevault-io/skills-registry
---
# research-paper
## 什么时候使用
- 用于审阅代码、文档或方案并给出可执行反馈 适合处理文章、文案、润色、翻译、总结和结构化表达,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代的步骤;通常不需要额外…
- 面向文章、文案、发言稿、润色或结构化表达,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「1. When to activate / Slash commands (preferred) / Natural-language triggers」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;会按任务需要访问外部网络;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "research-paper" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> 1. When to activate / Slash commands (preferred) / Natural-language triggers
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> Python | 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令 | 会按任务需要访问外部网络
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Research Paper
A production-grade agent skill that turns any compatible coding agent (Claude Code, OpenCode, Cursor, Cline, Codex, Aider, Amp, Antigravity, and 50+ others) into a multi-agent research system:
Orchestrator → Researcher → Methodologist → Analyst → Visualizer → Writer → Citation engine → Validator → Reviewer → Publisher.
It produces full, citation-heavy, visually rich, publication-ready outputs in arXiv / IEEE / ACM / Nature / Harvard styles, plus literature reviews, theses, technical whitepapers, survey papers, and policy briefs.
This file is the entry point. It is intentionally compact. Heavier guidance (instructions, workflows, engines, validators, rubrics) lives in the topic folders below and is loaded on demand via Claude Code's filesystem tools (progressive disclosure).
1. When to activate
Slash commands (preferred)
| Command | What it does |
|---|---|
/research <topic> |
Full empirical research paper |
/paper <topic> |
Same as /research, more permissive |
/literature-review <topic> |
Systematic / scoping / narrative literature review |
/whitepaper <topic> |
Industry / technical whitepaper |
/thesis <topic> |
Thesis / dissertation chapter |
/survey <topic> |
State-of-the-art / survey paper |
/policy <topic> |
Policy brief or full policy paper |
Common options (any command):
--style [harvard|apa|ieee|mla|chicago|nature|arxiv-numeric],
--format [arxiv|ieee|acm|nature|harvard|...],
--depth [quick|standard|comprehensive],
--sources [N],
--visualizations [auto|N|none],
--audience [academic|technical|executive|general].
Natural-language triggers
- "Write a research paper / academic paper / scientific paper on …"
- "Do a literature review / systematic review on …"
- "Format this draft as IEEE / ACM / arXiv / Nature / Harvard / APA …"
- "Write a thesis chapter / dissertation chapter on …"
- "Produce a whitepaper / survey paper / policy brief on …"
- "Analyze this dataset and write up the findings as a paper."
- "Add citations / bibliography / references in
<style>." - "Peer-review this draft / validate the methodology."
Do NOT activate for
Blog posts, marketing copy, tweets, casual answers, or single-paragraph explanations. Those are handled normally without this skill.
2. Operating principles (read every time)
- Anchor to TODAY's date FIRST. Before any planning, search,
or writing, determine today's actual date — via system clock
(
date -u +%Y-%m-%d), runtime context, or asking the user. Never default silently to the training-data cutoff. Year ranges (--years last-3) are computed from today, not from the model's training year. Full protocol:instructions/freshness.md. - Plan before writing. Always start with the research plan in
orchestration/pipeline.md. Never jump into prose. - Progressive disclosure. Only read the file you need for the current step. Never preload the whole skill.
- Evidence first. Every non-trivial claim is backed by a citation, dataset, equation, or explicit derivation.
- No hallucinated citations. Never invent DOIs, page numbers,
authors, or volumes. Mark gaps with
[CITATION NEEDED]or[UNVERIFIED]and surface them inKnown gaps. - Reproducibility. Datasets, code, environments, seeds, and hyperparameters are documented end-to-end.
- Dual register. Maintain academic rigor and a "Plain-English
summary" for non-specialists (see
prompts/simplification-prompts.md). - Visual-by-default. Comparisons, trends, distributions, structure,
geography, and processes always get a figure or table
(see
visualization_engine/decision-engine.md). - Self-review. Run the simulated peer-review pass
(
review_pipeline/) and the publication checklist (quality_control/publication-checklist.md) before delivery. - No silent failures. Anything missing surfaces in a
Known gapsblock at the end of the paper. - Multi-agent ready. For long papers, dispatch sub-agents per
orchestration/agents.md.
3. Top-level workflow
intake → plan → lit-review → methodology → data-analysis →
visualization → drafting → citations → validation → review → ship
Each step has a dedicated playbook. Read it, do the step, persist the
artifact to disk, move on. Detailed master pipeline:
orchestration/pipeline.md.
4. Format selection
When the user does not specify a format, infer it:
| Signal | Use template |
|---|---|
| ML / NLP / AI / preprint / arxiv-style | templates/arxiv-paper.md |
| Engineering / hardware / signal / IEEE conference | templates/ieee-paper.md |
| HCI / systems / SIGCHI / SIGGRAPH / ACM | templates/acm-paper.md |
| Biology / medicine / Nature / Science / structured | templates/nature-paper.md |
| Social science / business / humanities / Harvard | templates/harvard-paper.md |
| Literature / systematic / scoping / meta review | templates/literature-review.md |
| Thesis chapter / dissertation | templates/thesis-chapter.md |
| Whitepaper / industry / enterprise | templates/whitepaper.md |
| Survey / state-of-the-art | templates/survey-paper.md |
| Policy brief / regulatory | templates/policy-paper.md |
If still ambiguous, ask once, then proceed.
5. Citation style selection
Map domain → default style if not specified:
- CS / engineering / physics → IEEE numeric
- ML / AI / preprint → author–year (Harvard / APA-compatible)
- Biology / medicine / Nature → Nature numeric superscript
- Social science / business / humanities → Harvard (or APA)
- Law / history → Chicago
Style rules: citation_engine/citation-styles.md. Per-style modules:
citation_engine/styles/. The deterministic formatter is
toolchains/format_bibliography.py.
6. Visualization decision (summary)
Full rules: visualization_engine/decision-engine.md and
visualization_engine/visualization-guide.md. Rendering happens via
toolchains/generate_charts.py; if Python is unavailable, the skill
falls back to Markdown tables + Mermaid diagrams — never silently
skips a planned figure.
| Communication goal | Recommended figure |
|---|---|
| Compare discrete categories | Bar / horizontal bar / lollipop |
| Show trend over time | Line / multi-line |
| Show distribution | Histogram / violin / box plot |
| Show relationship | Scatter + regression line |
| Show correlation among many vars | Heatmap |
| Show parts of a whole | Stacked bar (preferred over pie) |
| Show flow / transformation | Sankey |
| Show structure / pipeline | Architecture / flowchart |
| Show process / decision | Mermaid flowchart |
| Show geography | Choropleth / point map |
| Show timeline of events | Timeline / Gantt |
| Show conceptual hierarchy | Mind map / tree |
| Side-by-side metrics | Comparative table |
7. Tooling expectations
This skill works in three tiers, gracefully degrading:
| Tier | Capabilities |
|---|---|
| 0. Pure prose (no tools) | Outline + draft + Markdown tables + Mermaid diagrams |
| 1. + Filesystem read/write | Persist sections, bibliography, validation reports |
| 2. + Python (pandas/matplotlib) | Real charts (PNG + SVG), statistical validation, data analysis |
| 2+. + Web search / fetch | DOI verification, source retrieval, retraction checks |
| 2+. + Pandoc (optional) | Output to PDF / DOCX / HTML / LaTeX / RTF / EPUB / ODT / PPTX |
If a tier is missing, the skill detects it and adapts — no silent failures.
See toolchains/README.md for setup.
Output formats
The skill produces Markdown by default. For other formats, run the output converter:
python toolchains/convert_output.py --input paper-final.md --to pdf --out paper.pdf
python toolchains/convert_output.py --input paper-final.md --to docx
python toolchains/convert_output.py --input paper-final.md --to html
python toolchains/convert_output.py --input paper-final.md --to tex
python toolchains/convert_output.py --input paper-final.md --to epub
Supported targets (via Pandoc): md (always), html, docx, pdf
(needs LaTeX), tex, rtf, epub, odt, pptx.
Self-test:
python toolchains/convert_output.py --self-test
The user can also request a non-Markdown output directly:
/research "topic" --output paper.pdf
/research "topic" --output paper.docx
8. Output contract
Every artifact this skill produces includes, at minimum:
- Title — specific, ≤ 15 words.
- Authors / Affiliation block — placeholders if not provided.
- Abstract — 150–300 words, structured.
- Keywords — 4–8.
- Plain-English summary — 5–10 sentences.
- Numbered sections following the chosen template.
- At least one figure and one table for any paper > 1500 words (unless purely theoretical and explicitly opted out).
- In-text citations in the chosen style.
- Full reference list with DOIs / URLs.
- Limitations section.
- Future work section.
- Reproducibility statement (data, code, environment, seeds).
- Appendices for derivations, hyperparameters, prompts, raw outputs.
Anything missing is surfaced in a final Known gaps block —
never silently swallowed.
9. Long-context strategy
For papers > ~10,000 words:
- Persist every artifact to disk before moving on
(
paper-spec.md→outline.md→bibliography.yaml→methodology.md→analysis/findings.md→figures-plan.md→sections/<NN>-<name>.md→paper-draft.md→paper-cited.md→paper-final.md). - Read only the section being drafted (plus the outline) at any time.
- Cross-section consistency is enforced by the outline + a final cover-to-cover read pass.
Full strategy: long_context/strategy.md.
10. Multi-agent orchestration
For deep / parallel runs, dispatch sub-agents:
| Agent | Reads | Writes |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | prompts/literature-search.md |
bibliography.yaml, lit-themes.md |
| Methodologist | prompts/methodology-design.md |
methodology.md |
| Analyst | prompts/data-analysis.md |
analysis/findings.md |
| Visualizer | prompts/visualization-planning.md |
figures-plan.md, figures/ |
| Writer (×N) | prompts/writing-prompts.md |
sections/<NN>-<name>.md |
| Citator | prompts/citation-prompts.md |
paper-cited.md |
| Validator | validators/ |
validation/ |
| Reviewer (×3) | prompts/review-prompts.md |
review/ |
Topology: orchestration/agents.md.
11. Failure handling
- Missing data → synthetic illustrative dataset, clearly labeled.
- Unverifiable source →
[UNVERIFIED], listed inKnown gaps. - Conflicting evidence → explicit "Contradictions in the literature" subsection.
- Out-of-scope request → narrow scope, list dropped sub-topics in
Future work. - Token / context pressure → see §9.
Full failure-handling matrix: orchestration/failure-handling.md.
12. Where to look next
- Plan a paper →
orchestration/pipeline.md - Pick a template →
templates/ - Write a section →
prompts/writing-prompts.md - Add citations →
citation_engine/,workflows/citation-pipeline.md - Make charts →
visualization_engine/,workflows/visual-generation-pipeline.md - Validate stats →
methodology_engine/statistical-methods.md,toolchains/statistical_validation.py - Self-review →
review_pipeline/,rubrics/academic-quality.md - Ship it →
quality_control/publication-checklist.md
Always prefer reading the specific file you need over re-reading this one.
Source: aniketkrs/research-paper — distributed by TomeVault.
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核