Agent审查
- 作者仓库星标 1,017
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 CloudBase-MCP
- 领域
- 安全
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @TencentCloudBase · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 即装即用
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: skill-authoring
description: Design, improve, and evaluate reusable agent skills with high-quality SKILL.md files, precise tr…
category: 安全
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# skill-authoring 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:安全审计、密钥扫描、权限检查或风险分析。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“When to use this skill / Repo-managed CloudBase skill review / How to use this skill (for a coding agent)”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于安全审计、密钥扫描、权限检查或风险分析,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“When to use this skill / Repo-managed CloudBase skill review / How to use this skill (for a coding agent)”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“When to use this skill / Repo-managed CloudBase skill review / How to use this skill (for a coding agent)”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: skill-authoring
description: Design, improve, and evaluate reusable agent skills with high-quality SKILL.md files, precise tr…
category: 安全
source: TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-MCP
---
# skill-authoring
## 什么时候使用
- 用于审阅代码、文档或方案并给出可执行反馈 适合处理安全审计、密钥扫描、权限检查和风险分析,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代的步骤;通常不需要额外 A…
- 面向安全审计、密钥扫描、权限检查或风险分析,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「When to use this skill / Repo-managed CloudBase skill review / How to use this skill (for a coding agent)」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "skill-authoring" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> When to use this skill / Repo-managed CloudBase skill review / How to use this skill (for a coding agent)
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Skill Authoring
Create and refine reusable agent skills with better trigger quality, cleaner structure, stronger behavioral guidance, and more reliable evaluation.
When to use this skill
Use this skill when you need to:
- Create a new
SKILL.md - Improve an existing skill's
nameordescription - Review whether a skill is too broad, too narrow, or poorly structured
- Audit a local skill collection such as
config/source/skillsfor redundancy, trigger overlap, or weak boundaries - Split a large skill into
SKILL.mdplusreferences/,assets/, orscripts/ - Design evaluation prompts and review whether a skill triggers and behaves correctly
Repo-managed CloudBase skill review
When the task targets config/source/skills, apply these guardrails in addition to the normal skill-authoring workflow:
This section is the repo-managed CloudBase skill review baseline for this repository.
- Keep frontmatter complete and normalized, including
version - Keep examples inside the skill's declared platform and scope
- Keep shared operational rules in one canonical source instead of copying large blocks across neighboring skills
- If the skill claims a rule is mandatory, show that rule in at least one example
- When giving a recommended default, also explain the tradeoff behind it
- Do not infer public CNB / OpenClaw / ClawHub paths from the source tree; verify the actual published structure before writing fallback links or marketplace-facing URLs
- If a skill mentions raw URLs, blob URLs, or marketplace-consumed paths, check live reachability before finalizing the text
- Put standalone-install fallback guidance where the user needs it: keep the top-level note short, and place sibling-skill fallback links next to the actual cross-skill reference
Do NOT use for:
- General documentation writing that is not about skills
- README polish or marketing copy
- Prompt tweaks that do not affect skill structure or behavior
- Rule files unrelated to
SKILL.md
How to use this skill (for a coding agent)
Identify the task class first
- Determine whether the request is about creating a new skill, reviewing an existing skill, or improving trigger quality, structure, or evaluation
Optimize the trigger surface early
- Draft
nameand especiallydescriptionbefore expanding the body - Put realistic trigger language into
description, not only into the body
- Draft
Design behavior, not just documentation
- Make the main
SKILL.mdtell the agent what to do after the skill triggers - Use references for deeper guidance, not as a substitute for behavioral rules
- Make the main
Load supporting materials only when needed
- Use the routing table to decide which reference file to read
- Avoid loading every reference file by default
Use collection-level review when the request is about many skills
- When reviewing
config/source/skills, check overlap, duplication, trigger boundaries, and progressive disclosure across neighboring skills - Prefer evidence-based findings with concrete file references and rewrite guidance
- Treat source layout, published skills-repo layout, and marketplace-consumed layout as different surfaces until you verify they are the same
- When reviewing
Evaluate before considering the skill complete
- Create should-trigger and should-not-trigger prompts
- Run them, review the results, and iterate on the skill
Routing
| Task | Read |
|---|---|
Write or improve name and description |
references/frontmatter-patterns.md |
| Design skill anatomy and progressive disclosure | references/structure-patterns.md |
| Draft a new skill or review an existing one | references/templates.md |
Audit config/source/skills for quality, redundancy, and overlap |
references/repo-skill-review.md |
| Review repo-managed CloudBase source skills | references/cloudbase-skill-review.md |
| Build evaluation prompts and review outcomes | references/evaluation.md |
| Compare good examples, weak examples, and rewrites | references/examples.md |
Quick workflow
- Identify the skill's job, boundary, and closest neighboring skills.
- Draft
nameanddescriptionwith realistic trigger language. - If the task targets
config/source/skills, readreferences/repo-skill-review.md, then loadreferences/cloudbase-skill-review.mdfor CloudBase-specific standards before proposing rewrites. - If the skill text will mention published URLs or fallback paths, verify the public structure and at least one real URL before writing.
- Write the main
SKILL.mdso it changes agent behavior after trigger. - Move deep detail into
references/,assets/, orscripts/as needed. - Run evaluation prompts and revise until trigger quality and behavior are stable.
Minimum self-check
- Is the
nameshort, intentional, and stable? - Does the
descriptionexplain both capability and trigger conditions? - Does the main
SKILL.mdchange agent behavior after trigger? - Are non-applicable scenarios explicit?
- Does routing point to the right reference file for each task?
- If the skill references public URLs or standalone-install fallback paths, were those URLs verified against the actual published surface instead of guessed from local directories?
- Are evaluation prompts present for both should-trigger and should-not-trigger cases?
- Can you explain why this skill stays distinct from its nearest neighbors?
- If reviewing a skill collection, can you point to redundancy, overlap, and missing boundaries with concrete evidence?
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核