Agent审查
- 作者仓库星标 435
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 nvim
- 领域
- 设计与多媒体
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @benbrastmckie · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: skill-consult
description: Route design consultations to domain-specific design partner agents Thin wrapper that routes des…
category: 设计与多媒体
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# skill-consult 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:视觉内容、演示材料、信息图或设计交付。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Context Pointers / Trigger Conditions / Direct Invocation”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于视觉内容、演示材料、信息图或设计交付,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Context Pointers / Trigger Conditions / Direct Invocation”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文出现了 `/consult` 这类斜杠命令;如果你的 Agent 支持命令触发,优先用命令开场,再补充目标和边界。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Context Pointers / Trigger Conditions / Direct Invocation”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: skill-consult
description: Route design consultations to domain-specific design partner agents Thin wrapper that routes des…
category: 设计与多媒体
source: benbrastmckie/nvim
---
# skill-consult
## 什么时候使用
- 把设计与视觉方向的常用动作沉淀成 Agent 可调用的技能 适合处理界面、视觉、封面、信息图或演示材料交付,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代的步骤…
- 面向视觉内容、演示材料、信息图或设计交付,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Context Pointers / Trigger Conditions / Direct Invocation」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "skill-consult" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Context Pointers / Trigger Conditions / Direct Invocation
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Consult Skill
Thin wrapper that routes design consultation requests to domain-specific design partner agents.
IMPORTANT: This skill implements the skill-internal postflight pattern. After the subagent returns, this skill handles all postflight operations (artifact linking, git commit) before returning.
Context Pointers
Reference (do not load eagerly):
- Path:
.opencode/context/formats/subagent-return.md - Purpose: Return validation
- Load at: Subagent execution only
Note: This skill is a thin wrapper. Context is loaded by the delegated agent, not this skill.
Trigger Conditions
This skill activates when:
Direct Invocation
- User runs
/consult --legalcommand
Routing
domain=legalroutes tolegal-analysis-agent- Future:
domain=investor,domain=technical,domain=competitor
When NOT to trigger
Do not invoke for:
- Contract review (use skill-legal / legal-council-agent)
- Market research (use skill-market)
- Competitive analysis (use skill-analyze)
Execution Flow
Stage 1: Input Validation
Validate required inputs:
domain- Required, currently only "legal" supportedinput_type- Required, one of: file_path, inline_text, design_question, task_numbersession_id- Required
# Validate domain
case "$domain" in
legal) agent="legal-analysis-agent" ;;
*) return error "Unsupported domain: $domain. Currently supported: legal" ;;
esac
# Validate input type
case "$input_type" in
file_path|inline_text|design_question|task_number) ;;
*) return error "Invalid input_type: $input_type" ;;
esac
Stage 2: Resolve Task Context (if task-attached)
If task_number is provided, resolve task directory for artifact storage:
if [ -n "$task_number" ]; then
task_data=$(jq -r --argjson num "$task_number" \
'.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == $num)' \
specs/state.json)
if [ -z "$task_data" ]; then
return error "Task $task_number not found"
fi
project_name=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.project_name')
padded_num=$(printf "%03d" "$task_number")
task_dir="specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}"
metadata_file="${task_dir}/.return-meta.json"
mkdir -p "$task_dir"
else
# Standalone mode: no task directory, agent writes report to a temp location
metadata_file="specs/tmp/consult-meta-${session_id}.json"
fi
Stage 3: Prepare Delegation Context
{
"task_context": {
"description": "{description or input summary}",
"task_type": "founder"
},
"domain": "legal",
"input_type": "{file_path | inline_text | design_question | task_number}",
"file_path": "{file path if applicable}",
"inline_text": "{inline text if applicable}",
"design_question": "{design question if applicable}",
"task_number": "{task number if task-attached, null otherwise}",
"metadata_file_path": "{metadata_file}",
"metadata": {
"session_id": "{session_id}",
"delegation_depth": 1,
"delegation_path": ["orchestrator", "consult", "skill-consult"]
}
}
Stage 4: Invoke Agent
CRITICAL: You MUST use the Task tool to spawn the agent.
Required Tool Invocation:
Tool: Task (NOT Skill)
Parameters:
- subagent_type: "{agent}" (e.g., "legal-analysis-agent")
- prompt: [Include all delegation context fields]
- description: "Legal design consultation"
The agent will:
- Understand user intent via Socratic dialogue
- Translate document language to attorney perspective
- Identify translation gaps
- Suggest reframings with rationale
- Write consultation report
- Write metadata file
- Return brief text summary
Stage 4b: Self-Execution Fallback
CRITICAL: If you performed the work above WITHOUT using the Task tool (i.e., you read files,
wrote artifacts, or updated metadata directly instead of spawning a subagent), you MUST write a
.return-meta.json file now before proceeding to postflight. Use the schema from
return-metadata-file.md with the appropriate status value for this operation.
If you DID use the Task tool, skip this stage -- the subagent already wrote the metadata.
Postflight (ALWAYS EXECUTE)
The following stages MUST execute after work is complete, whether the work was done by a subagent or inline (Stage 4b). Do NOT skip these stages for any reason.
Stage 5: Read Metadata File
if [ -f "$metadata_file" ] && jq empty "$metadata_file" 2>/dev/null; then
status=$(jq -r '.status' "$metadata_file")
artifact_path=$(jq -r '.artifacts[0].path // ""' "$metadata_file")
artifact_type=$(jq -r '.artifacts[0].type // ""' "$metadata_file")
artifact_summary=$(jq -r '.artifacts[0].summary // ""' "$metadata_file")
else
status="failed"
fi
Stage 6: Link Artifacts (if task-attached)
If a task number was provided, link the consultation artifact to the task:
if [ -n "$task_number" ] && [ -n "$artifact_path" ]; then
# Add consultation artifact to state.json
jq --arg path "$artifact_path" \
--arg type "$artifact_type" \
--arg summary "$artifact_summary" \
'(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == '$task_number')).artifacts += [{"path": $path, "type": $type, "summary": $summary}]' \
specs/state.json > specs/tmp/state.json && mv specs/tmp/state.json specs/state.json
fi
Stage 7: Git Commit (if task-attached)
if [ -n "$task_number" ]; then
git add -A
git commit -m "task ${task_number}: legal design consultation
Session: ${session_id}
"
fi
Stage 8: Cleanup
rm -f "$metadata_file"
Stage 9: Return Brief Summary
Design consultation complete ({domain}):
- Input: {input type and description}
- Translation gaps: {N} identified
- Consultation report: {artifact_path}
- Task attached: {task_number or "standalone"}
- Advisory: recommend attorney review for high-stakes materials
Return Format
Brief text summary (NOT JSON).
Error Handling
Unsupported Domain
Return immediately with supported domain list.
Task Not Found (if task-attached)
Return error, do not proceed.
Metadata File Missing
Return partial status with progress from agent output.
Git Commit Failure
Non-blocking: Log failure but continue.
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核