GitHub 助手
- 作者仓库星标 1,408
- 作者仓库 skill-from-masters
Skill from GitHub
When users want to accomplish something, search GitHub for quality projects that solve the problem, understand them deeply, then create a skill based on that knowledge.
When to Use
When users describe a task and you want to find existing tools/projects to learn from:
- "I want to be able to convert markdown to PDF"
- "Help me analyze sentiment in customer reviews"
- "I need to generate API documentation from code"
Workflow
Step 1: Understand User Intent
Clarify what the user wants to achieve:
- What is the input?
- What is the expected output?
- Any constraints (language, framework, etc.)?
Step 2: Search GitHub
Search for projects that solve this problem:
{task keywords} language:{preferred} stars:>100 sort:stars
Search tips:
- Start broad, then narrow down
- Try different keyword combinations
- Include "cli", "tool", "library" if relevant
Quality filters (must meet ALL):
- Stars > 100 (community validated)
- Updated within last 12 months (actively maintained)
- Has README with clear documentation
- Has actual code (not just awesome-list)
Step 3: Present Options to User
Show top 3-5 candidates:
## Found X projects that can help
### Option 1: [project-name](github-url)
- Stars: xxx | Last updated: xxx
- What it does: one-line description
- Why it's good: specific strength
### Option 2: ...
Which one should I dive into? Or should I search differently?
Wait for user confirmation before proceeding.
Step 4: Deep Dive into Selected Project
Once user selects a project, thoroughly understand it:
- Read README - Understand purpose, features, usage
- Read core source files - Understand how it works
- Check examples - See real usage patterns
- Note dependencies - What it relies on
- Identify key concepts - The mental model behind it
Extract:
- Core algorithm/approach
- Input/output formats
- Error handling patterns
- Best practices encoded in the code
Step 5: Summarize Understanding
Present what you learned to user:
## Understanding [project-name]
### Core Approach
How it solves the problem...
### Key Techniques
1. ...
2. ...
### Limitations
- ...
### What I'll encode in the skill
- ...
Does this look right? Should I proceed to create the skill?
Wait for user confirmation.
Step 6: Create Skill via skill-creator
Hand off to skill-creator with:
- Clear purpose - What the skill does
- Methodology - The approach learned from the project
- Step-by-step process - Concrete instructions
- Quality criteria - What good output looks like
- Common pitfalls - What to avoid (learned from project issues/docs)
Important: The skill should encode the knowledge from the project, not just wrap the tool. The skill should work even without the original project installed.
Example
User: "I want to write better commit messages"
Step 2 - Search:
commit message convention stars:>100 sort:stars
Step 3 - Present:
## Found 4 projects
### Option 1: conventional-commits/conventionalcommits.org (4.2k ⭐)
- Specification for human and machine readable commit messages
- Why: Industry standard, used by Angular, Vue, etc.
### Option 2: commitizen/cz-cli (15k ⭐)
- CLI tool for creating conventional commits
- Why: Battle-tested, lots of adapters
### Option 3: carloscuesta/gitmoji (14k ⭐)
- Emoji guide for commit messages
- Why: Visual, fun approach
Which one interests you?
User: "Let's go with conventional commits"
Step 4 - Deep dive:
- Read the specification
- Understand types (feat, fix, docs, etc.)
- Learn about scopes, breaking changes
- Study real-world examples
Step 5 - Summarize:
## Understanding Conventional Commits
### Core Approach
Structured format: <type>(<scope>): <description>
### Key Types
- feat: new feature
- fix: bug fix
- docs: documentation
- ...
### Benefits Learned
- Automated changelog generation
- Semantic versioning
- Clear history
Ready to create a commit message skill based on this?
Step 6 - Create skill with these principles encoded
Important Notes
- Always get user confirmation - At step 3 (project selection) and step 5 (before creating)
- Prefer learning over wrapping - Encode the knowledge, not just "run this tool"
- Check license - Mention if project has restrictive license
- Credit the source - Include attribution in generated skill
- Quality over speed - Take time to truly understand the project
What This Skill is NOT
- NOT a package installer
- NOT a tool wrapper
- It's about learning from the best projects and encoding that knowledge into a reusable skill
- 流狐分类
- 工程开发
- 作者声明 Agent
- 未找到明确声明;不据此推断已兼容或已测试
- 静态检查
- 88 / 100 · 启发式扫描,不代表运行安全
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @GBSOSS · 未声明 license
- 流狐 Token 估算
- 低消耗
- 流狐接入估算
- 即装即用
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 未发现要求
- 检测到的系统要求
- 未声明
- 底层运行要求
- 未声明
- 检测到的文件与系统行为
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 检测到的网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 无(仅作为资料)
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
作者没有在当前 SKILL.md 中定义固定输出样例。 Workflow
Clarify what the user wants to achieve: What is the input? What is the expected output?
Search for projects that solve this problem: Search tips: Start broad, then narrow down
Show top 3-5 candidates:
Once user selects a project, thoroughly understand it: Read README - Understand purpose, features, usage Read core source files - Understand how it works
Present what you learned to user:
# Skill from GitHub
When users want to accomplish something, search GitHub for quality projects that solve the problem, understand them deeply, then create a skill based on that knowledge.
## When to Use
When users describe a task and you want to find existing tools/projects to learn from:
- "I want to be able to convert markdown to PDF"
- "Help me analyze sentiment in customer reviews"
- "I need to generate API documentation from code"
## Workflow
### Step 1: Understand User Intent
Clarify what the user wants to achieve:
- What is the input?
- What is the expected output?
- Any constraints (language, framework, etc.)?
### Step 2: Search GitHub
Search for projects that solve this problem:
```
{task keywords} language:{preferred} stars:>100 sort:stars
```
**Search tips:**
- Start broad, then narrow down
- Try different keyword combinations
- Include "cli", "tool", "library" if relevant
**Quality filters (must meet ALL):**
- Stars > 100 (community validated)
- Updated within last 12 months (actively maintained)
- Has README with clear documentation
- Has actual code (not just awesome-list)
### Step 3: Present Options to User
Show top 3-5 candidates:
```markdown
## Found X projects that can help
### Option 1: [project-name](github-url)
- Stars: xxx | Last updated: xxx
- What it does: one-line description
- Why it's good: specific strength
### Option 2: ...
Which one should I dive into? Or should I search differently?
```
**Wait for user confirmation before proceeding.**
### Step 4: Deep Dive into Selected Project
Once user selects a project, thoroughly understand it:
1. **Read README** - Understand purpose, features, usage
2. **Read core source files** - Understand how it works
3. **Check examples** - See real usage patterns
… 作者原文负责流程事实;流狐只索引当前章节、要点、文件与命令。
章节 -> When to Use → Workflow → Step 1: Understand User Intent → Step 2: Search GitHub → Step 3: Present Options to User → Found X projects that can help
要点 -> Search tips · Quality filters (must meet ALL) · Wait for user confirmation before proceeding. · Read README · Read core source files · Check examples · Note dependencies · Identify key concepts
文件/命令 -> tools/projects · algorithm/approach · Input/output · issues/docs · conventional-commits/conventionalcommits.org · commitizen/cz-cli · carloscuesta/gitmoji
内容 SHA-256 -> f03accd2d032
方法与流程
适用与边界
原文中的明确线索
tools/projects、algorithm/approach、Input/output、issues/docs、conventional-commits/conventionalcommits.org、commitizen/cz-cli、carloscuesta/gitmoji