Agent写作
- 作者仓库星标 435
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 nvim
- 领域
- 工程开发
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @benbrastmckie · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 较高消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: skill-grant
description: Grant proposal research and drafting with funder analysis. Invoke for grant tasks. Thin wrapper…
category: 工程开发
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# skill-grant 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Context References / Trigger Conditions / Workflow Type Routing”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Context References / Trigger Conditions / Workflow Type Routing”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文出现了 `/implement`、`/grant`、`/plan`、`/fix-it`、`/research` 这类斜杠命令;如果你的 Agent 支持命令触发,优先用命令开场,再补充目标和边界。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Context References / Trigger Conditions / Workflow Type Routing”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: skill-grant
description: Grant proposal research and drafting with funder analysis. Invoke for grant tasks. Thin wrapper…
category: 工程开发
source: benbrastmckie/nvim
---
# skill-grant
## 什么时候使用
- 把工程方向的常用动作沉淀成 Agent 可调用的技能 适合处理工程开发场景下的代码实现、调试、重构、测试或代码审查,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代…
- 面向代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Context References / Trigger Conditions / Workflow Type Routing」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "skill-grant" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Context References / Trigger Conditions / Workflow Type Routing
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Grant Skill
Thin wrapper that delegates grant work to grant-agent subagent.
IMPORTANT: This skill implements the skill-internal postflight pattern. After the subagent returns, this skill handles all postflight operations (status update, artifact linking, git commit) before returning. This eliminates the "continue" prompt issue between skill return and orchestrator.
Context References
Reference (do not load eagerly):
- Path:
.claude/context/formats/return-metadata-file.md- Metadata file schema - Path:
.claude/context/patterns/postflight-control.md- Marker file protocol - Path:
.claude/context/patterns/file-metadata-exchange.md- File I/O helpers - Path:
.claude/context/patterns/jq-escaping-workarounds.md- jq escaping patterns (Issue #1132)
Note: This skill is a thin wrapper with internal postflight. Context is loaded by the delegated agent.
Trigger Conditions
This skill activates when:
- Task type is "present" and task_type is "grant"
- Grant workflow requested via flags (--draft, --budget) or /implement routing
- Present extension is available
Workflow Type Routing
This skill routes to grant-agent with one of five workflow types:
| Workflow Type | Preflight Status | Success Status | TODO.md Markers |
|---|---|---|---|
| funder_research | researching | researched | [RESEARCHING] -> [RESEARCHED] |
| proposal_draft | planning | planned | [PLANNING] -> [PLANNED] |
| budget_develop | planning | planned | [PLANNING] -> [PLANNED] |
| progress_track | (no change) | (no change) | (no change) |
| assemble | implementing | completed | [IMPLEMENTING] -> [COMPLETED] |
| fix_it_scan | (no change) | (no change) | (no change) |
Note: The assemble workflow is triggered via /implement N command (not /grant), which routes to skill-grant when the task type is "present" and task_type is "grant".
Input Parameters
Required Parameters
task_number- Task number (must exist in state.json with language="present" and task_type="grant")workflow_type- One of: funder_research, proposal_draft, budget_develop, progress_track, assemblesession_id- Session ID from orchestrator
Optional Parameters
focus- Focus prompt for workflow direction (used by all workflow types)
Prompt Usage by Workflow Type:
| Workflow | focus Parameter | Example |
|---|---|---|
| funder_research | Research focus | "Focus on NIH institutes" |
| proposal_draft | Drafting guidance | "Emphasize innovation and methodology" |
| budget_develop | Budget guidance | "Include 3 conferences/year, emphasize personnel" |
| progress_track | Summary focus | "Focus on budget utilization" |
| assemble | Assembly options | "Include executive summary" |
Execution Flow
Stage 1: Input Validation
Validate required inputs:
task_number- Must be provided and exist in state.jsonworkflow_type- Must be one of: funder_research, proposal_draft, budget_develop, progress_track, assemblefocus- Optional prompt for workflow direction
# Lookup task
task_data=$(jq -r --argjson num "$task_number" \
'.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == $num)' \
specs/state.json)
# Validate exists
if [ -z "$task_data" ]; then
return error "Task $task_number not found"
fi
# Extract fields
task_type=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.task_type // "present"')
status=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.status')
project_name=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.project_name')
description=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.description // ""')
# Validate language is "present"
if [ "$task_type" != "present" ]; then
return error "Task $task_number has language '$task_type', expected 'present'"
fi
# Validate workflow_type
case "$workflow_type" in
funder_research|proposal_draft|budget_develop|progress_track|assemble|fix_it_scan)
;;
*)
return error "Invalid workflow_type: $workflow_type. Expected one of: funder_research, proposal_draft, budget_develop, progress_track, assemble, fix_it_scan"
;;
esac
Stage 2: Preflight Status Update
Update task status based on workflow type BEFORE invoking subagent.
Status Mapping by Workflow Type:
| Workflow Type | state.json status | TODO.md marker |
|---|---|---|
| funder_research | researching | [RESEARCHING] |
| proposal_draft | planning | [PLANNING] |
| budget_develop | planning | [PLANNING] |
| progress_track | (no change) | (no change) |
| assemble | implementing | [IMPLEMENTING] |
Update state.json (for workflows that change status):
# Determine preflight status based on workflow type
case "$workflow_type" in
funder_research)
preflight_status="researching"
preflight_marker="[RESEARCHING]"
;;
proposal_draft|budget_develop)
preflight_status="planning"
preflight_marker="[PLANNING]"
;;
progress_track)
preflight_status="" # No status change
preflight_marker=""
;;
assemble)
preflight_status="implementing"
preflight_marker="[IMPLEMENTING]"
;;
fix_it_scan)
preflight_status="" # No status change (non-destructive scan)
preflight_marker=""
;;
esac
# Update state.json if status change needed
if [ -n "$preflight_status" ]; then
jq --arg ts "$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)" \
--arg status "$preflight_status" \
--arg sid "$session_id" \
'(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == '$task_number')) |= . + {
status: $status,
last_updated: $ts,
session_id: $sid
}' specs/state.json > specs/tmp/state.json && mv specs/tmp/state.json specs/state.json
fi
Update TODO.md: Use Edit tool to change status marker to the workflow-specific in-progress state.
Update plan file (for assemble workflow only):
# Update plan file status for assemble workflow
if [ "$workflow_type" = "assemble" ]; then
.claude/scripts/update-plan-status.sh "$task_number" "$project_name" "IMPLEMENTING" 2>/dev/null || true
fi
Stage 3: Create Postflight Marker
Create the marker file to prevent premature termination:
# Ensure task directory exists
padded_num=$(printf "%03d" "$task_number")
mkdir -p "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}"
cat > "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/.postflight-pending" << EOF
{
"session_id": "${session_id}",
"skill": "skill-grant",
"task_number": ${task_number},
"operation": "${workflow_type}",
"reason": "Postflight pending: status update, artifact linking, git commit",
"created": "$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)",
"stop_hook_active": false
}
EOF
Stage 4: Prepare Delegation Context
Extract pre-gathered forcing_data (if present from Stage 0):
# Extract forcing_data from task metadata
forcing_data=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.forcing_data // null')
Detect revision mode (for assemble workflow):
# Check if task has parent_grant field (indicates revision task)
parent_grant=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.parent_grant // ""')
revises_directory=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.revises_directory // ""')
if [ -n "$parent_grant" ] && [ "$workflow_type" = "assemble" ]; then
is_revision="true"
# Validate revises_directory exists
if [ ! -d "$revises_directory" ]; then
return error "Revision target not found: $revises_directory"
fi
else
is_revision="false"
revises_directory=""
fi
Prepare delegation context for the subagent:
{
"session_id": "sess_{timestamp}_{random}",
"delegation_depth": 1,
"delegation_path": ["orchestrator", "grant", "skill-grant"],
"timeout": 3600,
"task_context": {
"task_number": N,
"task_name": "{project_name}",
"description": "{description}",
"task_type": "present",
"task_type": "grant"
},
"workflow_type": "funder_research|proposal_draft|budget_develop|progress_track|assemble",
"focus_prompt": "{optional focus - passed to agent for guidance}",
"forcing_data": "{pre-gathered forcing data from Stage 0, or null}",
"is_revision": "{boolean - true if task has parent_grant field}",
"revises_directory": "{grants/{N}_{slug}/ - path to existing grant if revision}",
"metadata_file_path": "specs/{NNN}_{SLUG}/.return-meta.json"
}
Stage 5: Invoke Subagent
CRITICAL: You MUST use the Agent tool to spawn the subagent.
Required Tool Invocation:
Tool: Agent (NOT Skill, NOT Plan)
Parameters:
- subagent_type: "grant-agent"
- prompt: [Include task_context, delegation_context, workflow_type, focus_prompt, is_revision, revises_directory, metadata_file_path]
- description: "Execute {workflow_type} workflow for task {N}"
DO NOT use Skill(grant-agent) - this will FAIL.
The subagent will:
- Execute the specified workflow (funder_research, proposal_draft, budget_develop, progress_track, assemble)
- Use the focus_prompt to guide its output
- Create workflow-specific artifacts in
specs/{NNN}_{SLUG}/{subdir}/ - Write metadata to
specs/{NNN}_{SLUG}/.return-meta.json - Return a brief text summary (NOT JSON)
Stage 5a: Validate Return Format
Validate the return format:
If subagent returned JSON to console:
- Log warning: "Subagent returned JSON to console instead of brief summary"
- Continue with metadata file parsing (Stage 6)
If subagent returned brief text summary:
- This is expected behavior
- Continue to Stage 6
Stage 5b: Self-Execution Fallback
CRITICAL: If you performed the work above WITHOUT using the Agent tool (i.e., you read files,
wrote artifacts, or updated metadata directly instead of spawning a subagent), you MUST write a
.return-meta.json file now before proceeding to postflight. Use the schema from
return-metadata-file.md with the appropriate status value for this operation.
If you DID use the Agent tool, skip this stage -- the subagent already wrote the metadata.
Postflight (ALWAYS EXECUTE)
The following stages MUST execute after work is complete, whether the work was done by a subagent or inline (Stage 5b). Do NOT skip these stages for any reason.
Stage 6: Read Metadata File
Read the metadata file:
metadata_file="specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/.return-meta.json"
if [ -f "$metadata_file" ] && jq empty "$metadata_file" 2>/dev/null; then
meta_status=$(jq -r '.status' "$metadata_file")
artifact_path=$(jq -r '.artifacts[0].path // ""' "$metadata_file")
artifact_type=$(jq -r '.artifacts[0].type // ""' "$metadata_file")
artifact_summary=$(jq -r '.artifacts[0].summary // ""' "$metadata_file")
else
echo "Error: Invalid or missing metadata file"
meta_status="failed"
fi
Handle in_progress status: If metadata file shows status: "in_progress", the subagent was interrupted:
if [ "$meta_status" = "in_progress" ]; then
# Extract partial progress info
partial_stage=$(jq -r '.partial_progress.stage // "unknown"' "$metadata_file")
partial_details=$(jq -r '.partial_progress.details // ""' "$metadata_file")
# Keep preflight status (researching, planning)
# Do not cleanup - resume is possible
echo "Subagent interrupted at stage: $partial_stage"
echo "Details: $partial_details"
fi
Stage 7: Update Task Status (Postflight)
Map workflow_type + metadata status to final state.json status:
Postflight Status Mapping:
| Workflow Type | Meta Status | Final state.json | Final TODO.md |
|---|---|---|---|
| funder_research | researched | researched | [RESEARCHED] |
| funder_research | partial | researching | [RESEARCHING] |
| proposal_draft | drafted | planned | [PLANNED] |
| proposal_draft | partial | planning | [PLANNING] |
| budget_develop | drafted | planned | [PLANNED] |
| budget_develop | partial | planning | [PLANNING] |
| progress_track | tracked | (no change) | (no change) |
| progress_track | partial | (no change) | (no change) |
| assemble | assembled | completed | [COMPLETED] |
| assemble | partial | implementing | [IMPLEMENTING] |
| fix_it_scan | scanned | (no change) | (no change) |
| fix_it_scan | partial | (no change) | (no change) |
| any | failed | (keep preflight) | (keep preflight marker) |
Update state.json (if status changed to success):
# Determine postflight status based on workflow type and meta_status
case "$workflow_type" in
funder_research)
if [ "$meta_status" = "researched" ]; then
postflight_status="researched"
postflight_marker="[RESEARCHED]"
fi
;;
proposal_draft|budget_develop)
if [ "$meta_status" = "drafted" ]; then
postflight_status="planned"
postflight_marker="[PLANNED]"
fi
;;
progress_track)
postflight_status="" # No status change for progress tracking
postflight_marker=""
;;
assemble)
if [ "$meta_status" = "assembled" ]; then
postflight_status="completed"
postflight_marker="[COMPLETED]"
fi
;;
fix_it_scan)
postflight_status="" # No status change for fix-it scan
postflight_marker=""
;;
esac
# Update state.json if status change to success
if [ -n "$postflight_status" ]; then
jq --arg ts "$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)" \
--arg status "$postflight_status" \
'(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == '$task_number')) |= . + {
status: $status,
last_updated: $ts
}' specs/state.json > specs/tmp/state.json && mv specs/tmp/state.json specs/state.json
fi
Update TODO.md: Use Edit tool to change status marker to the final success state.
Update plan file (for assemble workflow):
# Update plan file status for assemble workflow
if [ "$workflow_type" = "assemble" ]; then
if [ "$meta_status" = "assembled" ]; then
.claude/scripts/update-plan-status.sh "$task_number" "$project_name" "COMPLETED" 2>/dev/null || true
elif [ "$meta_status" = "partial" ]; then
.claude/scripts/update-plan-status.sh "$task_number" "$project_name" "PARTIAL" 2>/dev/null || true
fi
fi
On partial/failed: Keep status at preflight level for resume.
Stage 8: Link Artifacts
Add artifact to state.json with summary.
IMPORTANT: Use two-step jq pattern to avoid Issue #1132 escaping bug. See jq-escaping-workarounds.md.
Determine artifact type for filtering:
# Map workflow_type to artifact type for state.json
case "$workflow_type" in
funder_research)
artifact_filter_type="report"
;;
proposal_draft)
artifact_filter_type="draft"
;;
budget_develop)
artifact_filter_type="budget"
;;
progress_track)
artifact_filter_type="summary"
;;
assemble)
artifact_filter_type="grant"
;;
esac
Update state.json with artifact:
if [ -n "$artifact_path" ]; then
# Step 1: Filter out existing artifacts of same type (use "| not" pattern to avoid != escaping - Issue #1132)
jq '(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == '$task_number')).artifacts =
[(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == '$task_number')).artifacts // [] | .[] | select(.type == "'"$artifact_filter_type"'" | not)]' \
specs/state.json > specs/tmp/state.json && mv specs/tmp/state.json specs/state.json
# Step 2: Add new artifact
jq --arg path "$artifact_path" \
--arg type "$artifact_type" \
--arg summary "$artifact_summary" \
'(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == '$task_number')).artifacts += [{"path": $path, "type": $type, "summary": $summary}]' \
specs/state.json > specs/tmp/state.json && mv specs/tmp/state.json specs/state.json
fi
Update TODO.md: Link artifact using count-aware format. Apply the four-case Edit logic from @.claude/context/patterns/artifact-linking-todo.md.
Artifact type labels and parameterization:
- funder_research:
field_name=**Research**,next_field=**Plan** - proposal_draft:
field_name=**Draft**,next_field=**Description** - budget_develop:
field_name=**Budget**,next_field=**Description** - progress_track:
field_name=**Progress**,next_field=**Description** - assemble:
field_name=**Grant**,next_field=**Description**
Stage 9: Git Commit
Commit changes with session ID:
# Commit message based on workflow type
case "$workflow_type" in
funder_research)
commit_action="complete funder research"
;;
proposal_draft)
commit_action="create proposal draft"
;;
budget_develop)
commit_action="develop budget"
;;
progress_track)
commit_action="update progress"
;;
assemble)
commit_action="assemble grant materials"
;;
esac
git add -A
git commit -m "task ${task_number}: ${commit_action}
Session: ${session_id}
On commit failure: Non-blocking. Log the failure but continue with success response.
Stage 10: Cleanup
Remove marker and metadata files:
rm -f "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/.postflight-pending"
rm -f "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/.postflight-loop-guard"
rm -f "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/.return-meta.json"
Stage 11: Return Brief Summary
Return a brief text summary (NOT JSON) based on workflow type.
Funder Research Success:
Funder research completed for task {N}:
- Identified {count} potential funders matching criteria
- Top recommendation: {funder_name} ({reason})
- Created report at specs/{NNN}_{SLUG}/reports/{MM}_funder-analysis.md
- Status updated to [RESEARCHED]
- Changes committed with session {session_id}
Proposal Draft Success:
Proposal draft created for task {N}:
- Drafted {count} of {total} required sections
- Focus applied: "{focus_prompt}" (if provided)
- Created draft at specs/{NNN}_{SLUG}/drafts/{MM}_narrative-draft.md
- Status updated to [PLANNED]
- Recommend: Run /grant {N} --budget next, then /plan {N}
Budget Development Success:
Budget developed for task {N}:
- Created {count} line items across {categories} categories
- Total budget: {amount}
- Focus applied: "{focus_prompt}" (if provided)
- Created budget at specs/{NNN}_{SLUG}/budgets/{MM}_line-item-budget.md
- Status updated to [PLANNED]
- Recommend: Run /plan {N} to create implementation plan
Assemble Success:
Grant materials assembled for task {N}:
- Output directory: grants/{N}_{slug}/
- Files created: narrative.md, budget.md, checklist.md
- Assembly options applied: "{focus_prompt}" (if provided)
- Status updated to [COMPLETED]
- Changes committed with session {session_id}
Progress Tracking Success:
Progress summary updated for task {N}:
- Overall completion: {percentage}%
- {completed_count} sections completed, {pending_count} in progress
- Created summary at specs/{NNN}_{SLUG}/summaries/{MM}_progress-summary.md
- Status unchanged (progress tracking only)
- Changes committed with session {session_id}
Partial Return:
Grant {workflow_type} partially completed for task {N}:
- {completed_actions}
- {failed_action} failed: {reason}
- Partial artifact created at specs/{NNN}_{SLUG}/{subdir}/{filename}
- Status remains [{preflight_marker}] - run /grant {N} {flag} to continue
Fix-It Scan Workflow (Direct Execution)
When workflow_type=fix_it_scan, this skill performs direct execution (no subagent) following the interactive tag scanning pattern from /fix-it.
IMPORTANT: This workflow does NOT delegate to a subagent. It executes all steps directly within the skill context.
Step F1: Locate Grant Directory
# Check for grant directory in specs/ (active task)
padded_num=$(printf "%03d" "$task_number")
if [ -d "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}" ]; then
grant_dir="specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}"
# Check for grant directory in grants/ (completed grant)
elif [ -d "grants/${task_number}_${project_name}" ]; then
grant_dir="grants/${task_number}_${project_name}"
else
return error "Grant directory not found for task ${task_number}. Checked:
- specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/
- grants/${task_number}_${project_name}/"
fi
Step F2: Scan for Tags
Extract tags from grant-specific file types (.tex, .md, .bib):
# Initialize tag arrays
declare -a fix_tags
declare -a note_tags
declare -a todo_tags
declare -a question_tags
# Scan LaTeX files (% comment prefix)
while IFS= read -r line; do
fix_tags+=("$line")
done < <(grep -rn --include="*.tex" "% FIX:" "$grant_dir" 2>/dev/null || true)
while IFS= read -r line; do
note_tags+=("$line")
done < <(grep -rn --include="*.tex" "% NOTE:" "$grant_dir" 2>/dev/null || true)
while IFS= read -r line; do
todo_tags+=("$line")
done < <(grep -rn --include="*.tex" "% TODO:" "$grant_dir" 2>/dev/null || true)
while IFS= read -r line; do
question_tags+=("$line")
done < <(grep -rn --include="*.tex" "% QUESTION:" "$grant_dir" 2>/dev/null || true)
# Scan Markdown files (<!-- comment prefix)
while IFS= read -r line; do
fix_tags+=("$line")
done < <(grep -rn --include="*.md" "<!-- FIX:" "$grant_dir" 2>/dev/null || true)
while IFS= read -r line; do
note_tags+=("$line")
done < <(grep -rn --include="*.md" "<!-- NOTE:" "$grant_dir" 2>/dev/null || true)
while IFS= read -r line; do
todo_tags+=("$line")
done < <(grep -rn --include="*.md" "<!-- TODO:" "$grant_dir" 2>/dev/null || true)
while IFS= read -r line; do
question_tags+=("$line")
done < <(grep -rn --include="*.md" "<!-- QUESTION:" "$grant_dir" 2>/dev/null || true)
# Scan BibTeX files (% comment prefix)
while IFS= read -r line; do
fix_tags+=("$line")
done < <(grep -rn --include="*.bib" "% FIX:" "$grant_dir" 2>/dev/null || true)
while IFS= read -r line; do
note_tags+=("$line")
done < <(grep -rn --include="*.bib" "% NOTE:" "$grant_dir" 2>/dev/null || true)
while IFS= read -r line; do
todo_tags+=("$line")
done < <(grep -rn --include="*.bib" "% TODO:" "$grant_dir" 2>/dev/null || true)
while IFS= read -r line; do
question_tags+=("$line")
done < <(grep -rn --include="*.bib" "% QUESTION:" "$grant_dir" 2>/dev/null || true)
Step F3: Early Exit if No Tags
total_tags=$((${#fix_tags[@]} + ${#note_tags[@]} + ${#todo_tags[@]} + ${#question_tags[@]}))
if [ "$total_tags" -eq 0 ]; then
echo "## No Tags Found"
echo ""
echo "Scanned files in: $grant_dir"
echo "No FIX:, NOTE:, TODO:, or QUESTION: tags detected."
echo ""
echo "Nothing to create."
return 0 # Not an error - just no work to do
fi
Step F4: Display Tag Summary
## Tag Scan Results
**Grant Directory**: {grant_dir}
**Tags Found**: {total_tags}
### FIX: Tags ({count})
- `{file}:{line}` - {message}
...
### NOTE: Tags ({count})
- `{file}:{line}` - {message}
...
### TODO: Tags ({count})
- `{file}:{line}` - {message}
...
### QUESTION: Tags ({count})
- `{file}:{line}` - {message}
...
Step F5: Interactive Task Type Selection
Use AskUserQuestion to let user select which task types to create:
{
"question": "Which task types should be created from grant tags?",
"header": "Grant Task Types",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{"label": "FIX: Combined fix task", "description": "Combine {N} FIX:/NOTE: tags into single task"},
{"label": "NOTE: Documentation task", "description": "Update context from {N} NOTE: tags"},
{"label": "TODO: Individual tasks", "description": "Create tasks for {N} TODO: items"},
{"label": "QUESTION: Research tasks", "description": "Create research tasks for {N} QUESTION: items"}
]
}
Only show options for tag types that were found.
Step F6: Individual TODO Selection (if TODO selected)
If user selected TODO tasks, prompt for individual selection:
{
"question": "Select TODO items to create as tasks:",
"header": "TODO Selection",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{"label": "{TODO message}", "description": "{file}:{line}"},
...
]
}
For >20 TODO items, add "Select all" option.
Step F7: TODO Topic Grouping (if 2+ TODOs selected)
When multiple TODOs are selected, offer grouping options:
{
"question": "How should TODO items be grouped into tasks?",
"header": "Topic Grouping",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{"label": "Accept suggested topic groups", "description": "Creates {N} grouped tasks based on shared topics"},
{"label": "Keep as separate tasks", "description": "Creates {N} individual tasks"},
{"label": "Create single combined task", "description": "Creates 1 task containing all items"}
]
}
Topic detection uses:
- Shared key terms in TODO messages
- Same file proximity
- Section similarity (based on line numbers)
Step F8: Individual QUESTION Selection (if QUESTION selected)
If user selected QUESTION tasks, prompt for individual selection:
{
"question": "Select QUESTION items to create as research tasks:",
"header": "QUESTION Selection",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{"label": "{QUESTION message}", "description": "{file}:{line}"},
...
]
}
Step F9: QUESTION Topic Grouping (if 2+ QUESTIONs selected)
When multiple QUESTIONs are selected, offer grouping options (same pattern as TODO).
Step F10: Create Tasks
For each selected task type, create tasks with language="present" and task_type="grant":
FIX Task Creation:
next_num=$(jq -r '.next_project_number' specs/state.json)
slug="fix_grant_${task_number}_issues"
description="Fix embedded FIX: and NOTE: issues in grant ${task_number}"
# Update state.json
jq --arg ts "$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)" \
--arg desc "$description" \
--argjson parent "$task_number" \
'.next_project_number = ($next_num + 1) |
.active_projects = [{
"project_number": $next_num,
"project_name": "'"$slug"'",
"status": "not_started",
"task_type": "present",
"task_type": "grant",
"description": $desc,
"parent_task": $parent,
"created": $ts,
"last_updated": $ts
}] + .active_projects' \
specs/state.json > specs/tmp/state.json && mv specs/tmp/state.json specs/state.json
TODO Task Creation (per selected/grouped item):
# Same pattern, with language="present", task_type="grant" and parent_task=$task_number
QUESTION Task Creation (per selected/grouped item):
# Same pattern, with language="present", task_type="grant" and parent_task=$task_number
Step F11: Update TODO.md
For each created task, prepend entry to TODO.md ## Tasks section:
### {NEW_N}. {Title}
- **Effort**: TBD
- **Status**: [NOT STARTED]
- **Task Type**: grant
- **Parent Task**: Task #{N}
**Description**: {description}
Step F12: Git Commit
git add specs/state.json specs/TODO.md
git commit -m "task ${task_number}: create fix-it tasks from grant tags
Created {count} tasks from embedded tags in grant directory.
Session: ${session_id}
Step F13: Return Summary
Grant fix-it scan completed for task {N}:
- Scanned: {grant_dir}
- Tags found: {total_tags} (FIX: {fix_count}, NOTE: {note_count}, TODO: {todo_count}, QUESTION: {question_count})
- Tasks created: {created_count}
- Created task numbers: #{X}, #{Y}, #{Z}
- Parent grant status unchanged
- Changes committed with session {session_id}
Next steps:
- /research {NEW_N} to begin work on created tasks
- Review tasks in TODO.md
Error Handling
Input Validation Errors
Task not found: Return immediately with error message:
Grant skill error for task {N}:
- Task not found in state.json
- Verify task exists with /task --sync
- No status changes made
Invalid workflow_type: Return immediately with error message:
Grant skill error for task {N}:
- Invalid workflow_type: {provided_value}
- Expected one of: funder_research, proposal_draft, budget_develop, progress_track, assemble, fix_it_scan
- No status changes made
Wrong language: Return immediately with error message:
Grant skill error for task {N}:
- Task has language '{language}', expected 'present'
- Use /grant {N} to update task type or use appropriate skill
- No status changes made
Metadata File Missing
If subagent didn't write metadata file:
- Keep status at preflight level (researching, planning)
- Do not cleanup postflight marker
- Report error to user with resume guidance
Grant skill error for task {N}:
- Subagent did not write metadata file
- Task remains [{preflight_marker}] for resume
- Postflight marker preserved
- Run /grant {N} {flag} to retry
Git Commit Failure
Non-blocking error. Log failure but continue with success response:
Grant {workflow_type} completed for task {N}:
- {workflow_results}
- [Warning] Git commit failed: {error}
- Manual commit recommended: git add -A && git commit
Subagent Timeout
Return partial status if subagent times out (default 3600s):
- Check for partial metadata file (may have in_progress status)
- Keep status at preflight level for resume
- Report partial progress if available
Grant {workflow_type} timed out for task {N}:
- Subagent exceeded timeout limit
- Partial progress: {partial_details}
- Status remains [{preflight_marker}]
- Run /grant {N} {flag} to continue
Fix-It Scan Errors
Grant directory not found:
Grant fix-it scan error for task {N}:
- Grant directory not found
- Checked: specs/{NNN}_{project_name}/ and grants/{N}_{project_name}/
- No tasks created
- Ensure grant directory exists before running fix-it scan
No tags found (not an error - informational):
Grant fix-it scan completed for task {N}:
- Scanned: {grant_dir}
- No FIX:, NOTE:, TODO:, or QUESTION: tags found
- Nothing to create
Empty selection (user selected nothing):
Grant fix-it scan completed for task {N}:
- Tags found: {total_tags}
- No task types selected
- No tasks created
Git commit failure (non-blocking):
Grant fix-it scan completed for task {N}:
- Tasks created: {count}
- [Warning] Git commit failed: {error}
- Manual commit recommended: git add specs/ && git commit
Return Format
This skill returns a brief text summary (NOT JSON). The JSON metadata is written to the file and processed internally.
Example successful return (proposal_draft with prompt):
Proposal draft created for task 500:
- Drafted 5 of 7 required sections
- Focus applied: "Emphasize innovation and methodology"
- Created draft at specs/500_research_ai_safety_funders/drafts/01_narrative-draft.md
- Status updated to [PLANNED]
- Recommend: Run /grant 500 --budget next
Example partial return:
Grant proposal_draft partially completed for task 500:
- Completed problem statement, methodology, impact sections
- WebFetch failed for funder template retrieval
- Partial draft saved at specs/500_research_ai_safety_funders/drafts/01_narrative-draft.md
- Status remains [PLANNING] - run /grant 500 --draft to continue
Example failed return:
Grant skill error for task 999:
- Task not found in state.json
- No artifacts created
- No status changes made
- Verify task exists with /task --sync
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核