Agent规划
- 作者仓库星标 435
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 nvim
- 领域
- 工程开发
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @benbrastmckie · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 较高消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: skill-implementer
description: Execute general implementation tasks following a plan. Invoke for general implementation work. T…
category: 工程开发
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# skill-implementer 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Context References / Trigger Conditions / Execution Flow”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Context References / Trigger Conditions / Execution Flow”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文出现了 `/implement` 这类斜杠命令;如果你的 Agent 支持命令触发,优先用命令开场,再补充目标和边界。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Context References / Trigger Conditions / Execution Flow”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: skill-implementer
description: Execute general implementation tasks following a plan. Invoke for general implementation work. T…
category: 工程开发
source: benbrastmckie/nvim
---
# skill-implementer
## 什么时候使用
- 把工程方向的常用动作沉淀成 Agent 可调用的技能 适合处理工程开发场景下的代码实现、调试、重构、测试或代码审查,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代…
- 面向代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Context References / Trigger Conditions / Execution Flow」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "skill-implementer" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Context References / Trigger Conditions / Execution Flow
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Implementer Skill
Thin wrapper that delegates general implementation to general-implementation-agent subagent.
IMPORTANT: This skill implements the skill-internal postflight pattern. After the subagent returns, this skill handles all postflight operations (status update, artifact linking, git commit) before returning. This eliminates the "continue" prompt issue between skill return and orchestrator.
Context References
Reference (do not load eagerly):
- Path:
.opencode/context/formats/return-metadata-file.md- Metadata file schema - Path:
.opencode/context/patterns/postflight-control.md- Marker file protocol - Path:
.opencode/context/patterns/subagent-continuation-loop.md- Continuation loop pattern - Path:
.opencode/context/patterns/context-exhaustion-detection.md- Context exhaustion heuristics - Path:
.opencode/context/patterns/file-metadata-exchange.md- File I/O helpers - Path:
.opencode/context/patterns/jq-escaping-workarounds.md- jq escaping patterns (Issue #1132)
Note: This skill is a thin wrapper with internal postflight. Context is loaded by the delegated agent.
Trigger Conditions
This skill activates when:
- Task type is "general", "meta", or "markdown"
- /implement command is invoked
- Plan exists and task is ready for implementation
Execution Flow
Stage 1: Input Validation
Validate required inputs:
task_number- Must be provided and exist in state.json- Task status must allow implementation (planned, implementing, partial)
# Lookup task
task_data=$(jq -r --argjson num "$task_number" \
'.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == $num)' \
specs/state.json)
# Validate exists
if [ -z "$task_data" ]; then
return error "Task $task_number not found"
fi
# Extract fields
task_type=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.task_type // "general"')
status=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.status')
project_name=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.project_name')
description=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.description // ""')
# Validate status (only block terminal states)
if [ "$status" = "completed" ] || [ "$status" = "abandoned" ] || [ "$status" = "expanded" ]; then
return error "Task is in terminal state [$status]"
fi
Stage 2: Preflight Status Update
Update task status to "implementing" BEFORE invoking subagent.
Run the centralized status update script, which atomically updates state.json, TODO.md (task entry + Task Order), and the plan file:
bash .opencode/scripts/update-task-status.sh preflight "$task_number" implement "$session_id"
Note: The script handles all three updates (state.json status/timestamps/session_id, TODO.md [PLANNED] -> [IMPLEMENTING] in both task entry and Task Order, and plan file status -> [IMPLEMENTING]) in a single call. No additional Edit or jq operations are needed.
Stage 3: Create Postflight Marker
Create the marker file to prevent premature termination:
# Ensure task directory exists
padded_num=$(printf "%03d" "$task_number")
mkdir -p "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}"
cat > "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/.postflight-pending" << EOF
{
"session_id": "${session_id}",
"skill": "skill-implementer",
"task_number": ${task_number},
"operation": "implement",
"reason": "Postflight pending: status update, artifact linking, git commit",
"created": "$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)",
"stop_hook_active": false
}
EOF
Stage 3a: Calculate Artifact Number
Read next_artifact_number from state.json and use (current-1) since summary stays in the same round as research/plan:
# Read next_artifact_number from state.json
next_num=$(jq -r --argjson num "$task_number" \
'.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == $num) | .next_artifact_number // 1' \
specs/state.json)
# Implement uses (current - 1) to stay in the same round as research/plan
# If next_artifact_number is 1 (no research yet), use 1
if [ "$next_num" -le 1 ]; then
artifact_number=1
else
artifact_number=$((next_num - 1))
fi
# Fallback for legacy tasks: count existing summary artifacts
if [ "$next_num" = "null" ] || [ -z "$next_num" ]; then
padded_num=$(printf "%03d" "$task_number")
count=$(ls "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/summaries/"*[0-9][0-9]*.md 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
artifact_number=$((count + 1))
fi
artifact_padded=$(printf "%02d" "$artifact_number")
Note: Implement does NOT increment next_artifact_number. Only research advances the sequence.
Stage 4a: Memory Retrieval (Auto)
Retrieve relevant memories from the memory system to inject into the delegation context.
Skip if: clean_flag is true in the delegation context (from --clean command flag).
# Check clean_flag
if [ "$clean_flag" != "true" ]; then
memory_context=$(bash .opencode/scripts/memory-retrieve.sh "$description" "$task_type" "" 2>/dev/null) || memory_context=""
fi
# memory_context will be empty string if:
# - clean_flag is true (skipped)
# - memory-index.json missing or empty
# - no keywords matched any entries
# - script exited with error
If memory_context is non-empty, it will be injected into the Stage 5 prompt alongside the format specification from Stage 4b. If empty, no memory block is injected.
Stage 4: Prepare Delegation Context
Prepare delegation context for the subagent:
{
"session_id": "sess_{timestamp}_{random}",
"delegation_depth": 1,
"delegation_path": ["orchestrator", "implement", "skill-implementer"],
"timeout": 7200,
"task_context": {
"task_number": N,
"task_name": "{project_name}",
"description": "{description}",
"task_type": "{task_type}"
},
"artifact_number": "{artifact_number from Stage 3a}",
"effort_flag": "{effort_flag from command, null if not set}",
"model_flag": "{model_flag from command, null if not set}",
"plan_path": "specs/{NNN}_{SLUG}/plans/MM_{short-slug}.md",
"metadata_file_path": "specs/{NNN}_{SLUG}/.return-meta.json"
}
Note: The artifact_number field tells the agent which sequence number to use for artifact naming (e.g., 01, 02). Summary uses the same round number as the research and plan that preceded it.
Model/Effort Flags: If model_flag is set (haiku, sonnet, opus), pass it as the model parameter on the Task tool to override the agent's frontmatter default. If effort_flag is set (fast, hard), include it as prompt context for reasoning depth guidance.
CRITICAL: No Source Reading Before Delegation -- Between preparing the delegation context (Stage 4) and spawning the sub-agent (Stage 5), the lead skill MUST NOT read, grep, glob, or analyze source files. The plan file and state.json are the only files the lead reads. All codebase exploration (reading source files, grepping for patterns, using MCP tools) is the exclusive responsibility of the sub-agent after it is spawned.
Stage 4b: Read and Inject Format Specification
Read the summary format file and prepare it for injection into the subagent prompt. This ensures the subagent always has the full format specification in its context, regardless of whether it reads the file itself.
format_content=$(cat .opencode/context/formats/summary-format.md)
The format content will be included as a delimited section in the Stage 5 prompt (see below).
Stage 5: Invoke Subagent
CRITICAL: You MUST use the Task tool to spawn the subagent.
Required Tool Invocation:
Tool: Task (NOT Skill)
Parameters:
- subagent_type: "general-implementation-agent"
- prompt: [Include task_context, delegation_context, plan_path, metadata_file_path,
AND the format specification from Stage 4b as shown below]
- description: "Execute implementation for task {N}"
Format Injection: Include the format specification from Stage 4b in the prompt as a clearly-delimited section:
<artifact-format-specification>
## CRITICAL: Summary Format Requirements
You MUST follow this format specification exactly when writing the implementation summary.
Non-compliance will be caught by postflight validation.
{format_content from Stage 4b}
</artifact-format-specification>
Place this section AFTER the delegation context JSON and BEFORE any other instructions.
Memory Context Injection: If memory_context from Stage 4a is non-empty, include it in the prompt as a separate block:
{memory_context from Stage 4a -- already wrapped in <memory-context> tags}
Place the memory context block AFTER the format specification and BEFORE the task-specific instructions. Do NOT inject an empty <memory-context> block when no memories were retrieved.
DO NOT use Skill(general-implementation-agent) - this will FAIL.
The subagent will:
- Load implementation context files
- Parse plan and find resume point
- Execute phases sequentially
- Create/modify files as needed
- Create implementation summary
- Write metadata to
specs/{NNN}_{SLUG}/.return-meta.json - Return a brief text summary (NOT JSON)
Stage 5a: Validate Subagent Return Format
If the subagent's text return parses as valid JSON, log a warning (v1 pattern instead of v2 file-based pattern). Non-blocking -- continue to read metadata file regardless.
Stage 5b: Self-Execution Fallback
CRITICAL: If you performed the work above WITHOUT using the Task tool (i.e., you read files,
wrote artifacts, or updated metadata directly instead of spawning a subagent), you MUST write a
.return-meta.json file now before proceeding to postflight. Use the schema from
return-metadata-file.md with status value "implemented" and the appropriate artifact information.
If you DID use the Task tool (Stage 5), skip this stage -- the subagent already wrote the metadata.
Stage 5c: Continuation Loop Init
Initialize continuation tracking before entering the postflight loop:
continuation_count=0
max_continuations=3
# Create loop-guard file to track count across potential interruptions
task_dir="specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}"
cat > "${task_dir}/.continuation-loop-guard" << EOF
{
"session_id": "${session_id}",
"continuation_count": 0,
"max_continuations": 3,
"created": "$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)"
}
EOF
Note: The loop guard ensures that even if the skill is interrupted between iterations, the next invocation can read the count and enforce the limit.
Postflight (ALWAYS EXECUTE)
The following stages MUST execute after work is complete, whether the work was done by a subagent (Stage 5) or inline (Stage 5b). Do NOT skip these stages for any reason.
Continuation Loop
The postflight stages below run inside a loop. Each iteration processes the return from one
subagent execution. If the subagent returns partial with a handoff_path, a successor
subagent is spawned and the loop continues (up to max_continuations).
while true; do
Stage 6: Parse Subagent Return (Read Metadata File)
Read the metadata file:
metadata_file="specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/.return-meta.json"
if [ -f "$metadata_file" ] && jq empty "$metadata_file" 2>/dev/null; then
status=$(jq -r '.status' "$metadata_file")
artifact_path=$(jq -r '.artifacts[0].path // ""' "$metadata_file")
artifact_type=$(jq -r '.artifacts[0].type // ""' "$metadata_file")
artifact_summary=$(jq -r '.artifacts[0].summary // ""' "$metadata_file")
phases_completed=$(jq -r '.metadata.phases_completed // 0' "$metadata_file")
phases_total=$(jq -r '.metadata.phases_total // 0' "$metadata_file")
# Extract completion_data fields (if present)
completion_summary=$(jq -r '.completion_data.completion_summary // ""' "$metadata_file")
roadmap_items=$(jq -c '.completion_data.roadmap_items // []' "$metadata_file")
memory_candidates=$(jq -c '.memory_candidates // []' "$metadata_file")
# Extract handoff_path for continuation loop (if present)
handoff_path=$(jq -r '.partial_progress.handoff_path // ""' "$metadata_file")
else
echo "Error: Invalid or missing metadata file"
status="failed"
fi
Stage 6a: Validate Artifact Content
If subagent status indicates success ("implemented" or "partial") and artifact_path is non-empty, validate the summary artifact against format requirements. This is non-blocking -- warnings are logged but do not prevent postflight from completing.
if [ "$status" = "implemented" ] || [ "$status" = "partial" ]; then
if [ -n "$artifact_path" ] && [ -f "$artifact_path" ]; then
echo "Validating summary artifact..."
if ! bash .opencode/scripts/validate-artifact.sh "$artifact_path" summary --fix; then
echo "WARNING: Summary artifact has format issues (non-blocking). Review output above."
fi
fi
fi
Note: The --fix flag attempts auto-repair of missing metadata fields. Validation failures are logged but do not block status update or git commit.
Stage 6b: Commit Phase Progress (Inside Loop)
After each subagent completes (whether implemented, partial, or failed), commit the work:
git add -A
git commit -m "task ${task_number} phase ${phases_completed}: implementation progress
Session: ${session_id}
" || echo "Note: Nothing to commit or commit failed (non-blocking)"
This ensures each subagent's progress is checkpointed in git before proceeding.
Stage 7: Update Task Status (Postflight)
If status is "implemented":
Step 1: Run the centralized status update script to update state.json (status -> "completed", timestamps), TODO.md ([IMPLEMENTING] -> [COMPLETED] in task entry + Task Order), and plan file (status -> [COMPLETED]):
bash .opencode/scripts/update-task-status.sh postflight "$task_number" implement "$session_id"
Step 2: Add completion_summary to state.json (implementer-specific, not covered by centralized script):
if [ -n "$completion_summary" ]; then
jq --arg summary "$completion_summary" \
'(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == '$task_number')).completion_summary = $summary' \
specs/state.json > specs/tmp/state.json && mv specs/tmp/state.json specs/state.json
fi
Step 3: Add roadmap_items for non-meta tasks (implementer-specific):
# For non-meta tasks: add roadmap_items (if present and non-empty)
if [ "$task_type" != "meta" ] && [ "$roadmap_items" != "[]" ] && [ -n "$roadmap_items" ]; then
jq --argjson items "$roadmap_items" \
'(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == '$task_number')).roadmap_items = $items' \
specs/state.json > specs/tmp/state.json && mv specs/tmp/state.json specs/state.json
fi
Step 4: Propagate memory candidates (if any) with append semantics:
if [ "$memory_candidates" != "[]" ] && [ -n "$memory_candidates" ]; then
# Append new candidates to existing array (append semantics, not overwrite)
jq --argjson new_candidates "$memory_candidates" \
'(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == '$task_number')).memory_candidates =
((.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == '$task_number')).memory_candidates // []) + $new_candidates' \
specs/state.json > specs/tmp/state.json && mv specs/tmp/state.json specs/state.json
fi
Note: Uses // [] fallback and + append so research candidates (from skill-researcher) and implementation candidates coexist on the same task entry.
Step 5: Remove from Recommended Order section (non-blocking, not covered by centralized script):
if source "$PROJECT_ROOT/.opencode/scripts/update-recommended-order.sh" 2>/dev/null; then
remove_from_recommended_order "$task_number" || echo "Note: Failed to update Recommended Order"
fi
Break loop — proceed to Stage 8 (Link Artifacts).
If status is "partial":
Keep status as "implementing" but update resume point. This path remains inline because the centralized update-task-status.sh maps postflight:implement to "completed" only -- it has no "partial" mapping.
jq --arg ts "$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)" \
--argjson phase "$phases_completed" \
'(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == '$task_number')) |= . + {
last_updated: $ts,
resume_phase: ($phase + 1)
}' specs/state.json > specs/tmp/state.json && mv specs/tmp/state.json specs/state.json
TODO.md stays as [IMPLEMENTING].
Update plan file (if exists): Update the Status field to [PARTIAL]:
.opencode/scripts/update-plan-status.sh "$task_number" "$project_name" "PARTIAL"
Continuation decision:
if [ -n "$handoff_path" ] && [ -f "$handoff_path" ] && [ "$continuation_count" -lt "$max_continuations" ]; then
# Increment counter and update loop guard
continuation_count=$((continuation_count + 1))
jq --argjson count "$continuation_count" \
--arg ts "$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)" \
'.continuation_count = $count | .last_updated = $ts' \
"${task_dir}/.continuation-loop-guard" > "${task_dir}/.continuation-loop-guard.tmp" \
&& mv "${task_dir}/.continuation-loop-guard.tmp" "${task_dir}/.continuation-loop-guard"
# Log handoff for visibility
echo "Spawning successor subagent (continuation $continuation_count/$max_continuations)"
echo "Handoff: $handoff_path"
# Prepare successor delegation context (see Stage 5 for base context)
# Injected fields:
# - delegation_depth: incremented by 1
# - continuation_context: { is_successor: true, continuation_number: N, handoff_path: ..., progress_path: ..., previous_phases_completed: N }
# Spawn successor subagent via Task tool with updated context
# (Same as Stage 5, but with continuation_context injected into delegation context JSON)
# Continue loop — next iteration reads successor's metadata
continue
else
if [ -z "$handoff_path" ]; then
echo "Partial return with no handoff_path. User must re-run /implement to resume."
else
echo "Max continuations ($max_continuations) reached. Returning partial."
fi
# Break loop — proceed to Stage 8
break
fi
If no handoff_path: Break loop, report partial (user must resume). If continuation_count >= max_continuations: Break loop, report partial (max reached).
If status is "failed":
Keep status as "implementing" for retry. Do not update plan file (leave as [IMPLEMENTING] for retry).
Break loop — proceed to Stage 8.
done # End Continuation Loop
Stage 8: Link Artifacts
Add artifact to state.json with summary.
IMPORTANT: Use two-step jq pattern to avoid Issue #1132 escaping bug. See jq-escaping-workarounds.md.
if [ -n "$artifact_path" ]; then
# Step 1: Filter out existing summary artifacts (use "| not" pattern to avoid != escaping - Issue #1132)
jq '(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == '$task_number')).artifacts =
[(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == '$task_number')).artifacts // [] | .[] | select(.type == "summary" | not)]' \
specs/state.json > specs/tmp/state.json && mv specs/tmp/state.json specs/state.json
# Step 2: Add new summary artifact
jq --arg path "$artifact_path" \
--arg type "$artifact_type" \
--arg summary "$artifact_summary" \
'(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == '$task_number')).artifacts += [{"path": $path, "type": $type, "summary": $summary}]' \
specs/state.json > specs/tmp/state.json && mv specs/tmp/state.json specs/state.json
fi
Update TODO.md (if implemented): Link artifact using the automated script:
bash .opencode/scripts/link-artifact-todo.sh $task_number '**Summary**' '**Description**' "$artifact_path"
If the script exits non-zero, log a warning but continue (linking errors are non-blocking).
Stage 9: Git Commit
Commit changes with session ID:
git add -A
git commit -m "task ${task_number}: complete implementation
Session: ${session_id}
Stage 10: Cleanup
Cleanup runs after the continuation loop exits. The .postflight-pending marker persists across loop iterations to ensure the SubagentStop hook fires correctly.
Remove marker, metadata, and loop-guard files:
rm -f "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/.postflight-pending"
rm -f "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/.postflight-loop-guard"
rm -f "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/.continuation-loop-guard"
rm -f "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/.return-meta.json"
Stage 11: Return Brief Summary
Return a brief text summary (NOT JSON). Example:
Implementation completed for task {N}:
- All {phases_total} phases executed successfully
- Key changes: {summary of changes}
- Created summary at specs/{NNN}_{SLUG}/summaries/MM_{short-slug}-summary.md
- Status updated to [COMPLETED]
- Changes committed
Error Handling
See rules/error-handling.md for general patterns. Skill-specific behaviors:
- Input validation errors: Return immediately with error message
- Metadata file missing: Keep status as "implementing", do not cleanup marker, report to user
- Git commit failure: Non-blocking (log and continue)
- Subagent timeout: Return partial status, keep "implementing" for resume
Pre-Delegation Boundary
Before spawning the implementation sub-agent, this skill MUST NOT:
- Read source files - Source files are read by the sub-agent, not the lead
- Grep or glob the codebase - Codebase exploration is sub-agent work
- Use MCP tools - Domain tools (LSP, build, etc.) are for sub-agent use only
- Analyze source code - Code analysis belongs to the implementation agent
- Run build or test commands - Verification is done by the sub-agent
The pre-delegation phase is LIMITED TO:
- Reading the plan file to locate phases and extract the plan path
- Reading state.json and TODO.md for status updates
- Preparing the delegation context JSON
- Reading the summary format file for injection (Stage 4b)
- Spawning the sub-agent with the Task tool
MUST NOT (Postflight Boundary)
After the agent returns -- whether with status implemented, partial, or failed -- this skill MUST proceed immediately to Stage 6 (read metadata file). The skill MUST NOT:
- Read source files - Source files were the subagent's responsibility
- Edit source files - All implementation work is done by the subagent
- Run build/test commands - Verification is done by the subagent
- Use MCP tools - Domain tools are for subagent use only
- Grep or glob the codebase - Analysis is subagent work
- Write summary/reports - Artifact creation is done by the subagent
Continuation Policy: If the subagent returned
partialstatus WITH ahandoff_pathin its metadata, the lead skill MAY spawn a successor subagent to continue the work automatically (see Continuation Loop in Postflight). This is the preferred path for context exhaustion recovery.If the subagent returned
partialstatus WITHOUT ahandoff_path, the lead skill MUST report partial and let the user re-run/implementto resume.If the subagent returned
failedstatus, the lead skill MUST NOT attempt to continue or "fill in" the subagent's work. Report the failure and let the user investigate.
The postflight phase is LIMITED TO:
- Reading agent metadata file (.return-meta.json)
- Updating state.json via jq
- Updating TODO.md status marker via Edit or script
- Linking artifacts in state.json
- Git commit
- Cleanup of temp/marker files
Reference: @.opencode/context/standards/postflight-tool-restrictions.md
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核