技能 Improve
- 作者仓库星标 19,707
- 作者仓库 Claude-Code-Game-Studios
Skill Improve
Runs an improvement loop on a single skill: test → fix → retest → keep or revert.
Phase 1: Parse Argument
Read the skill name from the first argument. If missing, output usage and stop:
Usage: /skill-improve [skill-name]
Example: /skill-improve tech-debt
Verify .claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md exists. If not, stop with:
"Skill '[name]' not found."
Phase 2: Baseline Test
Run /skill-test static [name] and record the baseline score:
- Count of FAILs
- Count of WARNs
- Which specific checks failed (Check 1–7)
Display to the user:
Static baseline: [N] failures, [M] warnings
Failing: Check 4 (no ask-before-write), Check 5 (no handoff)
If baseline is 0 FAILs and 0 WARNs, note it and proceed to Phase 2b.
Phase 2b: Category Baseline
Look up the skill's category: field in CCGS Skill Testing Framework/catalog.yaml.
If no category: field is found, display:
"Category: not yet assigned — skipping category checks."
and skip to Phase 3.
If category is found, run /skill-test category [name] and record the category baseline:
- Count of FAILs
- Count of WARNs
- Which specific category rubric metrics failed
Display to the user:
Category baseline: [N] failures, [M] warnings ([category] rubric)
If BOTH static and category baselines are 0 FAILs and 0 WARNs, stop: "This skill already passes all static and category checks. No improvements needed."
Phase 3: Diagnose
Read the full skill file at .claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md.
For each failing or warning static check, identify the exact gap:
- Check 1 fail → which frontmatter field is missing
- Check 2 fail → how many phases found vs. minimum required
- Check 3 fail → no verdict keywords anywhere in the skill body
- Check 4 fail → Write or Edit in allowed-tools but no ask-before-write language
- Check 5 warn → no follow-up or next-step section at the end
- Check 6 warn →
context: forkset but fewer than 5 phases found - Check 7 warn → argument-hint is empty or doesn't match documented modes
For each failing or warning category check (if category was assigned in Phase 2b), identify the exact gap in the skill's text. For example:
- If G2 fails (gate mode, full directors not spawned): skill body never references all 4 PHASE-GATE director prompts
- If A2 fails (authoring, no per-section May-I-write): skill asks once at the end, not before each section write
- If T3 fails (team, BLOCKED not surfaced): skill doesn't halt dependent work on blocked agent
Show the full combined diagnosis to the user before proposing any changes.
Phase 4: Propose Fix
Write a targeted fix for each failure and warning. Show the proposed changes as clearly marked before/after blocks. Only change what is failing — do not rewrite sections that are passing.
Ask: "May I write this improved version to .claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md?"
If the user says no, stop here.
Phase 5: Write and Retest
Record the current content of the skill file (for revert if needed).
Write the improved skill to .claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md.
Re-run /skill-test static [name] and record the new static score.
If a category was assigned, also re-run /skill-test category [name] and record the new category score.
Display the comparison:
Static: Before [N] failures, [M] warnings → After [N'] failures, [M'] warnings
Category: Before [N] failures, [M] warnings → After [N'] failures, [M'] warnings (if applicable)
Combined change: improved / no change / worse
Phase 6: Verdict
Count the combined failure total: static FAILs + category FAILs + static WARNs + category WARNs.
If combined score improved (combined failure count is lower than baseline): Report: "Score improved. Changes kept." Show a summary of what was fixed in each dimension.
If combined score is the same or worse:
Report: "Combined score did not improve."
Show what changed and why it may not have helped.
Ask: "May I revert .claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md using git checkout?"
If yes: run git checkout -- .claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md
Phase 7: Next Steps
- Run
/skill-test static allto find the next skill with failures. - Run
/skill-improve [next-name]to continue the loop on another skill. - Run
/skill-test auditto see overall coverage progress.
- 流狐分类
- 工程开发
- 作者声明 Agent
- 未找到明确声明;不据此推断已兼容或已测试
- 静态检查
- 88 / 100 · 启发式扫描,不代表运行安全
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @Donchitos · 未声明 license
- 流狐 Token 估算
- 低消耗
- 流狐接入估算
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 未发现要求
- 检测到的系统要求
- 未声明
- 底层运行要求
- 未声明
- 检测到的文件与系统行为
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 检测到的网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 无(仅作为资料)
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
作者没有在当前 SKILL.md 中定义固定输出样例。 Read the skill name from the first argument. If missing, output usage and stop: Verify .claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md exists. If not, stop with: "Skill '[name]' not found."
Run /skill-test static [name] and record the baseline score: Count of FAILs Count of WARNs
Look up the skill's category: field in CCGS Skill Testing Framework/catalog.yaml. If no category: field is found, display: "Category: not yet assigned — skipping category checks."
Read the full skill file at .claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md. For each failing or warning static check, identify the exact gap: Check 1 fail → which frontmatter field is missing
Write a targeted fix for each failure and warning. Show the proposed changes as clearly marked before/after blocks. Only change what is failing — do not rewrite sections that are passing.
Record the current content of the skill file (for revert if needed). Write the improved skill to .claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md. Re-run /skill-test static [name] and record the new static score.
# Skill Improve
Runs an improvement loop on a single skill:
test → fix → retest → keep or revert.
---
## Phase 1: Parse Argument
Read the skill name from the first argument. If missing, output usage and stop:
```
Usage: /skill-improve [skill-name]
Example: /skill-improve tech-debt
```
Verify `.claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md` exists. If not, stop with:
"Skill '[name]' not found."
---
## Phase 2: Baseline Test
Run `/skill-test static [name]` and record the baseline score:
- Count of FAILs
- Count of WARNs
- Which specific checks failed (Check 1–7)
Display to the user:
```
Static baseline: [N] failures, [M] warnings
Failing: Check 4 (no ask-before-write), Check 5 (no handoff)
```
If baseline is 0 FAILs and 0 WARNs, note it and proceed to Phase 2b.
### Phase 2b: Category Baseline
Look up the skill's `category:` field in `CCGS Skill Testing Framework/catalog.yaml`.
If no `category:` field is found, display:
"Category: not yet assigned — skipping category checks."
and skip to Phase 3.
If category is found, run `/skill-test category [name]` and record the category baseline:
- Count of FAILs
- Count of WARNs
- Which specific category rubric metrics failed
Display to the user:
```
Category baseline: [N] failures, [M] warnings ([category] rubric)
```
If BOTH static and category baselines are 0 FAILs and 0 WARNs, stop:
"This skill already passes all static and category checks. No improvements needed."
---
## Phase 3: Diagnose
Read the full skill file at `.claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md`.
For each failing or warning **static** check, identify the exact gap:
- **Check 1 fail** → which frontmatter field is missing
- **Check 2 fail** → how many phases found vs. minimum required
- **Check 3 fail** → no verdict keywords anywhere in the skill body
… 作者原文负责流程事实;流狐只索引当前章节、要点、文件与命令。
章节 -> Phase 1: Parse Argument → Phase 2: Baseline Test → Phase 2b: Category Baseline → Phase 3: Diagnose → Phase 4: Propose Fix → Phase 5: Write and Retest
要点 -> static · Check 1 fail · Check 2 fail · Check 3 fail · Check 4 fail · Check 5 warn · Check 6 warn · Check 7 warn
文件/命令 -> .claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md · /skill-test static [name] · category: · CCGS Skill Testing Framework/catalog.yaml · /skill-test category [name] · context: fork · git checkout -- .claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md · /skill-test static all
内容 SHA-256 -> 59acf2a29994
方法与流程
适用与边界
原文中的明确线索
.claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md、/skill-test static [name]、category:、CCGS Skill Testing Framework/catalog.yaml、/skill-test category [name]、context: fork、git checkout -- .claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md、/skill-test static all