Agent审查
- 作者仓库星标 1,187
- 叉子 185
- 作者更新于 2026年6月14日 10:01
- 作者仓库 claude-code-skills
- 领域
- 工程开发
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @daymade · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 即装即用
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: skill-reviewer
description: Reviews and improves Claude Code skills against official best practices. Supports three modes -…
category: 工程开发
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# skill-reviewer 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Setup (Auto-Install Dependencies) / Three Modes / Mode 1: Self-Review”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Setup (Auto-Install Dependencies) / Three Modes / Mode 1: Self-Review”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文出现了 `/tmp` 这类斜杠命令;如果你的 Agent 支持命令触发,优先用命令开场,再补充目标和边界。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Setup (Auto-Install Dependencies) / Three Modes / Mode 1: Self-Review”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: skill-reviewer
description: Reviews and improves Claude Code skills against official best practices. Supports three modes -…
category: 工程开发
source: daymade/claude-code-skills
---
# skill-reviewer
## 什么时候使用
- 用于审阅代码、文档或方案并给出可执行反馈 适合处理工程开发场景下的代码实现、调试、重构、测试或代码审查,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代的步骤;通常…
- 面向代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Setup (Auto-Install Dependencies) / Three Modes / Mode 1: Self-Review」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "skill-reviewer" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Setup (Auto-Install Dependencies) / Three Modes / Mode 1: Self-Review
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Skill Reviewer
Review and improve Claude Code skills against official best practices.
Setup (Auto-Install Dependencies)
Before using this skill, ensure skill-creator is installed for automated validation.
Auto-install sequence:
# 1. Check if skill-creator exists
SKILL_CREATOR=$(find ~/.claude/plugins/cache -name "skill-creator" -type d 2>/dev/null | head -1)
# 2. If not found, install it
if [ -z "$SKILL_CREATOR" ]; then
claude plugin marketplace add https://github.com/daymade/claude-code-skills
claude plugin install skill-creator@daymade-skills
SKILL_CREATOR=$(find ~/.claude/plugins/cache -name "skill-creator" -type d 2>/dev/null | head -1)
fi
echo "skill-creator location: $SKILL_CREATOR"
Three Modes
Mode 1: Self-Review
Check your own skill before publishing.
Automated validation (run after setup):
# Quick validation
python3 "$SKILL_CREATOR"/*/quick_validate.py <target-skill>
# Security scan
python3 "$SKILL_CREATOR"/*/security_scan.py <target-skill> --verbose
Manual evaluation: See references/evaluation_checklist.md.
Mode 2: External Review
Evaluate someone else's skill repository.
Review Workflow:
- [ ] Clone repository to /tmp/
- [ ] Read ALL documentation first
- [ ] Identify author's intent
- [ ] Run evaluation checklist
- [ ] Generate improvement report
Mode 3: Auto-PR
Fork, improve, and submit PR to external skill repository.
Auto-PR Workflow:
- [ ] Fork repository (gh repo fork)
- [ ] Create feature branch
- [ ] Apply additive improvements only
- [ ] Self-review: respect check passed?
- [ ] Create PR with detailed explanation
Evaluation Checklist (Quick)
| Category | Check | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Frontmatter | name present? | |
| description present? | ||
| description in third-person? | ||
| includes trigger conditions? | ||
| Instructions | imperative form? | |
| under 500 lines? | ||
| workflow pattern? | ||
| Resources | no hardcoded paths? | |
| scripts have error handling? |
Full checklist: references/evaluation_checklist.md
Core Principle: Additive Only
When improving external skills, NEVER:
- Delete existing files
- Remove functionality
- Change primary language
- Rename components
ALWAYS:
- Add new capabilities
- Preserve original content
- Explain every change
❌ "Removed metadata.json (non-standard)"
✅ "Added marketplace.json (metadata.json preserved)"
❌ "Rewrote README in English"
✅ "Added README.en.md (Chinese preserved as default)"
Common Issues & Fixes
Issue: Description Not Third-Person
# Before
description: Browse YouTube videos and summarize them.
# After
description: Browses YouTube videos and generates summaries. Use when...
Issue: Missing Trigger Conditions
# Before
description: Processes PDF files.
# After
description: Extracts text from PDFs. Use when working with PDF files or when the user mentions PDFs, forms, or document extraction.
Issue: No Workflow Pattern
Add checklist for complex tasks:
## Workflow
Copy this checklist:
\`\`\`
Task Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: ...
- [ ] Step 2: ...
\`\`\`
Issue: Missing Marketplace Support
Adding or validating marketplace.json (plugin boundaries, source/skills
layout, whether skills are independently toggleable) is the marketplace-dev
skill's domain — don't author it from a template here. Ensure marketplace-dev
is available (auto-install it if missing), then follow its workflow and
references/cache_and_source_patterns.md.
PR Guidelines
When submitting PRs to external repos:
Tone
❌ "Your skill doesn't follow best practices"
✅ "This PR aligns with best practices for better discoverability"
❌ "Fixed the incorrect description"
✅ "Improved description with trigger conditions"
Required Sections
- Summary - What this PR does
- What's NOT Changed - Show respect for original
- Rationale - Why each change helps
- Test Plan - How to verify
Template: references/pr_template.md
Self-Review Checklist
Before submitting any PR:
Respect Check:
- [ ] No files deleted?
- [ ] No functionality removed?
- [ ] Original language preserved?
- [ ] Author's design decisions respected?
- [ ] All changes are additive?
- [ ] PR explains the "why"?
References
references/evaluation_checklist.md- Full evaluation checklistreferences/pr_template.md- PR description template- Best practices: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/best-practices
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核