运维部署
- 作者仓库星标 1,897
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 skillshare
- 领域
- 通用
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @runkids · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 即装即用
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: skillshare-release
description: >- End-to-end release workflow for skillshare. $ARGUMENTS specifies the version (e.g., v0.19.0).…
category: 通用
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# skillshare-release 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:通用任务拆解、检查和交付。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Prerequisites / Workflow / Phase 1: Validate”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于通用任务拆解、检查和交付,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Prerequisites / Workflow / Phase 1: Validate”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文出现了 `/changelog` 这类斜杠命令;如果你的 Agent 支持命令触发,优先用命令开场,再补充目标和边界。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Prerequisites / Workflow / Phase 1: Validate”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: skillshare-release
description: >- End-to-end release workflow for skillshare. $ARGUMENTS specifies the version (e.g., v0.19.0).…
category: 通用
source: runkids/skillshare
---
# skillshare-release
## 什么时候使用
- 用于组织测试、定位失败并形成修复闭环 适合处理通用任务拆解、检查、交付和复盘,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代的步骤;通常不需要额外 API Key…
- 面向通用任务拆解、检查和交付,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Prerequisites / Workflow / Phase 1: Validate」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "skillshare-release" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Prerequisites / Workflow / Phase 1: Validate
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} End-to-end release workflow for skillshare. $ARGUMENTS specifies the version (e.g., v0.19.0).
Prerequisites
- All feature work merged to current branch
- Working directory clean (
git statusshows no uncommitted changes)
Workflow
Phase 1: Validate
Run full test suite and code quality checks. Fix any failures before proceeding.
make check # fmt-check + lint + test (builds binary first)
If tests fail: fix them, don't skip. Do not ask the user — fix and re-run.
Phase 2: Changelog
Invoke /changelog $VERSION to generate the changelog entry.
This handles:
- Collecting commits since last tag
- Categorizing by conventional commit type
- Writing user-facing CHANGELOG.md entry
- Syncing website changelog (
website/src/pages/changelog.md)
Review the output before proceeding.
Phase 3: Release Notes (Maintainer Only)
Check if running as maintainer:
git config user.name # Should match "Willie" or maintainer identity
If maintainer:
Read the most recent specs/RELEASE_NOTES_*.md as a style reference, then generate specs/RELEASE_NOTES_<version>.md (no v prefix, e.g., RELEASE_NOTES_0.19.0.md).
Structure:
- Title:
# skillshare vX.Y.Z Release Notes - TL;DR section with numbered highlights
- One
##section per feature/fix — describe what changed in plain language, with a CLI example or code block if relevant - Include migration guide if breaking changes exist
Wording rules (same user-facing standard as CHANGELOG):
- Describe what changed from the user's perspective, not how the code changed
- Never mention: function names, variable names, struct fields, file paths, Go syntax, internal APIs
- ✅ Good: "Sync now auto-creates missing target directories and shows what it did"
- ❌ Bad: "upgraded
Server.mufromsync.Mutextosync.RWMutexand applied a snapshot pattern across 30 handlers" - Keep it concise — a short paragraph per feature is enough
If not maintainer: Skip this phase.
Phase 4: Version Bump
Update the version in skills/skillshare/SKILL.md frontmatter:
metadata:
version: vX.Y.Z
This ensures skillshare upgrade --skill detects the new version correctly.
Phase 5: Commit & Tag
git add -A
git commit -m "chore: release vX.Y.Z"
git tag vX.Y.Z
Do NOT push yet — wait for user confirmation.
Phase 6: Draft Announcements
Prepare two drafts for user review:
GitHub Release Notes — concise, user-facing summary suitable for the GitHub release page. Shorter than RELEASE_NOTES, highlight top 3-5 changes with one-liners.
Social media post — 2-3 sentences max, casual tone, mention the version and 1-2 headline features. No hashtag spam.
Tone: short, direct. Don't oversell. The user will edit before posting.
Phase 7: Present & Confirm
Show the user:
- Test results (pass/fail)
- CHANGELOG.md diff
- RELEASE_NOTES file (if generated)
- Version bump diff
- GitHub release draft
- Social media draft
Wait for user approval before pushing:
git push origin HEAD --tags
Rules
- Fix, don't skip — if tests fail, fix them before continuing
- User perspective — all written output is for users, not developers
- Short drafts — announcements default to concise; user will ask for more detail if needed
- No fabricated links — never invent URLs or references
- Verify before claiming — grep source before stating a feature exists
- Ask before push — never push or publish without explicit user confirmation
- Commit message — always
chore: release vX.Y.Z - No competitive references — never mention competitor repos in commit messages or notes
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核