测试助手
- 作者仓库星标 3,367
- 许可证 MIT
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 atopile
- 领域
- 通用
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 94 / 100 · 已通过审计
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @atopile · MIT
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- macOS · Linux · Windows
- 底层运行要求
- Node.js · Python
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: solver
description: How the Faebryk parameter solver works (Sets/Literals, Parameters, Expressions), the core invari…
category: 通用
runtime: Node.js / Python
---
# solver 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:通用任务拆解、检查和交付。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Quick Start / Relevant Files / Dependants (Call Sites)”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于通用任务拆解、检查和交付,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Quick Start / Relevant Files / Dependants (Call Sites)”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Quick Start / Relevant Files / Dependants (Call Sites)”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: solver
description: How the Faebryk parameter solver works (Sets/Literals, Parameters, Expressions), the core invari…
category: 通用
source: atopile/atopile
---
# solver
## 什么时候使用
- 把通用方向的常用动作沉淀成 Agent 可调用的技能 适合处理通用任务拆解、检查、交付和复盘,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代的步骤;通常不需要额外…
- 面向通用任务拆解、检查和交付,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Quick Start / Relevant Files / Dependants (Call Sites)」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "solver" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Quick Start / Relevant Files / Dependants (Call Sites)
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> Node.js / Python | 读取文件、写入/修改文件 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Solver Module
The solver is the heart of atopile's parameter subsystem: it symbolically simplifies and checks constraint systems built from Parameters, Literals (Sets), and Expressions.
If you are touching solver internals, read these first:
src/faebryk/core/solver/README.md(concepts, set correlation, append-only graphs, canonicalization)src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/invariants.py(the actual invariants enforced during expression insertion)
Quick Start
import faebryk.core.node as fabll
import faebryk.library._F as F
from faebryk.core.solver.defaultsolver import DefaultSolver
from faebryk.libs.test.boundexpressions import BoundExpressions
E = BoundExpressions()
class _App(fabll.Node):
x = F.Parameters.NumericParameter.MakeChild(unit=E.U.dl)
app = _App.bind_typegraph(tg=E.tg).create_instance(g=E.g)
x = app.x.get().can_be_operand.get()
E.is_subset(x, E.lit_op_range(((9, E.U.dl), (11, E.U.dl))), assert_=True)
solver = DefaultSolver()
res = solver.simplify(g=E.g, tg=E.tg, terminal=True).data.mutation_map
lit = res.try_extract_superset(app.x.get().is_parameter_operatable.get(), domain_default=True)
assert lit is not None
Relevant Files
- Solver runtime + orchestration:
src/faebryk/core/solver/defaultsolver.py(DefaultSolver, iteration loop, terminal vs non-terminal)src/faebryk/core/solver/solver.py(solver protocol + helper APIs)
- Mutation machinery (this is where “graphs are append-only” is handled):
src/faebryk/core/solver/mutator.py(Mutator,Transformations,MutationStage,MutationMap, tracebacks)
- Symbolic layer (canonical forms + invariants):
src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/invariants.py(insert_expression(...)invariant pipeline)src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/canonical.py(canonicalization passes)src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/*(structural + expression-wise algorithms)
- Domain objects (what users actually create in graphs):
src/faebryk/library/Parameters.py(ParameterOperatables, domains, compact repr)src/faebryk/library/Expressions.py(expression node types, predicates, assertables)src/faebryk/library/Literals.py(Sets; numeric/boolean/enum literals)
- Test helpers:
src/faebryk/libs/test/boundexpressions.py(concise graph + expression construction for tests)
Dependants (Call Sites)
- Library components (
src/faebryk/library/): define parameters/constraints (e.g.R.resistance) - Compiler + frontends: translate
atoconstraints into solver expressions - Picker backend: uses solver simplification + bounds extraction to prune candidate parts
How to Work With / Develop / Test
Mental Model (the parts that matter for correctness)
1) Literals are Sets (and correlation is subtle)
- A literal like
100kOhm +/- 10%is a Set (a range), not a scalar. - Singleton sets are self-correlated; all other sets are treated as uncorrelated, even with themselves.
- This is why
X - Xis not necessarily{0}whenXis a range, but is{0}whenXis a singleton.
- This is why
2) Symbols (Parameters) introduce correlation
- A
Parameterbehaves like a mathematical symbol (variable), not a Python variable. - Correlation between symbols is created via asserted constraints, most notably:
Is(A, B).assert_()/A.alias_is(B)creates a strong “these are the same” correlation.IsSubset(A, X).assert_()/A.constrain_subset(X)constrainsAto be withinX.IsSubset(X, A).assert_()/A.constrain_superset(X)constrainsAto accept at leastX.
3) Expressions are graph objects (not just Python trees)
Expressions are nodes in the Faebryk graph that point at operand nodes. This matters because…
4) The underlying graphs are append-only
The solver cannot “edit” an expression in-place. Instead it:
- builds a new graph containing transformed/copied nodes,
- records a mapping from old nodes → new nodes (
MutationMap), - leaves the old graph untouched.
Development Workflow
- Reproduce in a minimal graph (prefer tests +
BoundExpressions). - Run
DefaultSolver().simplify(...)and inspect the resultingMutationMap. - If you’re changing rewrite logic, make sure you understand and preserve the invariant pipeline in
src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/invariants.py::insert_expression. - Add/adjust algorithms in
src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/*(most logic lives there, not inmutator.py).
Testing
- Solver tests live in
test/core/solver/:test/core/solver/test_solver.pytest/core/solver/test_literal_folding.pytest/core/solver/test_solver_util.py
Run a tight loop while iterating:
ato dev test --llm test/core/solver -k invariant -qato dev test --llm test/core/solver/test_solver.py::test_simplify -q
Best Practices
Prefer explicit simplify(...) arguments
DefaultSolver.simplify has a compatibility layer that accepts (tg, g) or (g, tg). In new code, prefer named args:
res = DefaultSolver().simplify(g=g, tg=tg, terminal=True)
mutation_map = res.data.mutation_map
Use the Mutator/insert_expression pipeline, not ad-hoc rewrites
When you “create” or “rewrite” an expression, you are really requesting that the solver insert something into the transient graph while upholding invariants. The canonical place where this happens is:
src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/invariants.py::insert_expression
If you bypass this, you will almost certainly violate an invariant and get:
- duplicate/congruent expressions,
- multiple incompatible bounds on an operand,
- predicates used as operands,
- missed literal folding, or
- contradictions that don’t point back to the real root cause.
Core Invariants (source of truth: insert_expression)
The invariant pipeline is sequencing-sensitive. At a high level it enforces (paraphrased):
- No predicate operands:
Op(P!, ...)is rewritten to use boolean literals where possible - Predicate literal rules:
P{S|True} -> P!;P!{S/P|False} -> Contradiction;P!{S|True} -> P! - No literal inequalities: inequalities involving literals are rewritten into subset constraints
- No singleton supersets as operands:
f(A{S|{x}}, ...) -> f(x, ...) - No congruence: congruent expressions are deduplicated (with optional rules for uncorrelated congruence)
- Minimal subsumption: stronger constraints subsume weaker ones; redundant ones become irrelevant
- Single “merged” superset/subset per operand (e.g. intersected supersets)
- No empty supersets/subsets: empty-set constraints are contradictions
- Fold pure literal expressions into literals (and re-express as subset/superset where appropriate)
- Terminate certain literal subset constraints to stop churn
- Canonical form: expressions are created/normalized into canonical operators
When adding a new algorithm, the easiest way to stay correct is to construct a new ExpressionBuilder
and let insert_expression do the hard work.
Internals & Runtime Behavior
Instantiation & Dependencies
DefaultSolver()holds state: when called withterminal=False, it can keep a reusable internal state for incremental solving.- Terminal vs non-terminal:
terminal=True(default) is more powerful but not intended to be reused as incremental state.terminal=Falseruns only non-terminal algorithms and storesreusable_statefor subsequent calls.
- Graph scoping:
simplify(..., relevant=[...])is the intended hook to avoid “solve the entire world”.
Data Structures
MutationStage: one algorithm application over an input graph → output graph, with aTransformationsobject.MutationMap: a chain of stages; lets you:- map old → new operables (
map_forward) - map new → old sources (
map_backward) - extract current bounds as literals (
try_extract_superset; subset extraction is typically via the mapped operable’stry_extract_subset()) - generate tracebacks for “why did this change?” (see
Tracebackinmutator.py)
- map old → new operables (
Debugging & Logging
Useful config flags (see src/faebryk/core/solver/utils.py):
SLOG=1: debug logging for solver/mutatorSPRINT_START=1: log start of each phaseSVERBOSE_TABLE=1: verbose mutation tablesSSHOW_SS_IS=1: include subset/is predicates in graph printoutsSMAX_ITERATIONS=N: raise early if stuck looping (helps catch bad rewrites)
In failures, look for Contradiction / ContradictionByLiteral output: it prints mutation tracebacks back to
origin expressions/parameters, which is usually the shortest path to the actual bug.
Performance
- Prefer restricting scope via
relevant=[...]when you can. - Avoid creating huge numbers of near-duplicate expressions; congruence + subsumption help, but churn still costs.
- If you add an algorithm, make it idempotent (or explicitly mark/terminate what you produce) to avoid infinite iteration.
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核