Studio 测试
- 作者仓库星标 103,397
- 作者仓库 supabase
Studio Testing Strategy
How to write and structure tests for apps/studio/. The core principle: push
logic out of React components into pure utility functions, then test those
functions exhaustively. Only use component tests for complex UI interactions.
Use E2E tests for features shared between self-hosted and platform.
When to Apply
Reference these guidelines when:
- Writing new tests for Studio code
- Deciding which type of test to write (unit, component, E2E)
- Extracting logic from a component to make it testable
- Reviewing whether test coverage is sufficient
- Adding a new feature that needs tests
Rule Categories by Priority
| Priority | Category | Impact | Prefix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Logic Extraction | CRITICAL | testing- |
| 2 | Test Coverage | CRITICAL | testing- |
| 3 | Component Tests | HIGH | testing- |
| 4 | E2E Tests | HIGH | testing- |
Quick Reference
1. Logic Extraction (CRITICAL)
testing-extract-logic- Remove logic from components into.utils.tsfiles as pure functions: args in, return out
2. Test Coverage (CRITICAL)
testing-exhaustive-permutations- Test every permutation of utility functions: happy path, malformed input, empty values, edge cases
3. Component Tests (HIGH)
testing-component-tests-ui-only- Only write component tests for complex UI interaction logic, not business logic
4. E2E Tests (HIGH)
testing-e2e-shared-features- Write E2E tests for features used in both self-hosted and platform; cover clicks AND keyboard shortcuts
Decision Tree: Which Test Type?
Is the logic a pure transformation (parse, format, validate, compute)?
YES -> Extract to .utils.ts, write unit test with vitest
NO -> Does the feature involve complex UI interactions?
YES -> Is it used in both self-hosted and platform?
YES -> Write E2E test in e2e/studio/features/
NO -> Write component test with customRender
NO -> Can you extract the logic to make it pure?
YES -> Do that, then unit test it
NO -> Write a component test
1. Extract Logic Into Utility Files (CRITICAL)
Remove as much logic from components as possible. Put it in co-located
.utils.ts files as pure functions: arguments in, return value out.
File naming:
- Utility:
ComponentName.utils.tsnext to the component - Test:
tests/components/.../ComponentName.utils.test.tsmirroring the source path
// ❌ Logic buried in component — hard to test without rendering
function TaxIdForm({ taxIdValue, taxIdName }: Props) {
const handleSubmit = () => {
const taxId = TAX_IDS.find((t) => t.name === taxIdName)
let sanitized = taxIdValue
if (taxId?.vatPrefix && !taxIdValue.startsWith(taxId.vatPrefix)) {
sanitized = taxId.vatPrefix + taxIdValue
}
submitToApi(sanitized)
}
return <form onSubmit={handleSubmit}>...</form>
}
// ✅ Logic extracted to .utils.ts — trivially testable
// TaxID.utils.ts
export function sanitizeTaxIdValue({ value, name }: { value: string; name: string }): string {
const taxId = TAX_IDS.find((t) => t.name === name)
if (taxId?.vatPrefix && !value.startsWith(taxId.vatPrefix)) {
return taxId.vatPrefix + value
}
return value
}
// TaxIdForm.tsx — thin shell
const handleSubmit = () => {
const sanitized = sanitizeTaxIdValue({ value: taxIdValue, name: taxIdName })
submitToApi(sanitized)
}
2. Test Every Permutation (CRITICAL)
Once logic is extracted, test exhaustively. Every code path needs a test:
- Valid inputs (happy path for each branch)
- Invalid / malformed inputs
- Empty values, null values, missing fields
- Edge cases (timestamps with colons, special characters, boundary values)
// ❌ Only happy path
test('parses a filter', () => {
expect(formatFilterURLParams('id:gte:20')).toStrictEqual({ column: 'id', operator: 'gte', value: '20' })
})
// ✅ Every permutation
test('parses valid filter', () => { ... })
test('handles timestamp with colons in value', () => { ... })
test('rejects malformed filter with missing parts', () => { ... })
test('rejects unrecognized operator', () => { ... })
test('allows empty filter value', () => { ... })
3. Component Tests for Complex UI Only (HIGH)
Only write component tests when there is complex UI interaction logic that cannot be captured by testing utility functions alone.
Valid reasons: conditional rendering from user interaction sequences, popover open/close with keyboard/mouse, multi-step form transitions.
Not valid: testing a calculation or transformation that happens to live
in a component — extract to .utils.ts and unit test instead.
// Studio component test conventions
import { fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react'
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event'
import { customRender } from 'tests/lib/custom-render' // always use customRender, not raw render
import { addAPIMock } from 'tests/lib/msw' // API mocking in beforeEach
4. E2E Tests for Shared Features (HIGH)
If a feature exists in both self-hosted and platform, create an E2E test. Cover mouse clicks AND keyboard shortcuts (Tab, Enter, Escape, Arrow keys).
Extract reusable interactions into e2e/studio/utils/*-helpers.ts. Use
try/finally for resource cleanup. For E2E execution details, see the
studio-e2e-tests skill.
Codebase References
| What | Where |
|---|---|
| Util test examples | apps/studio/tests/components/Grid/Grid.utils.test.ts, apps/studio/tests/components/Billing/TaxID.utils.test.ts, apps/studio/tests/components/Editor/SpreadsheetImport.utils.test.ts |
| Component test examples | apps/studio/tests/features/logs/LogsFilterPopover.test.tsx, apps/studio/tests/components/CopyButton.test.tsx |
| E2E test example | e2e/studio/features/filter-bar.spec.ts |
| E2E helpers pattern | e2e/studio/utils/filter-bar-helpers.ts |
| Custom render | apps/studio/tests/lib/custom-render.tsx |
| MSW mock setup | apps/studio/tests/lib/msw.ts (addAPIMock) |
| Test README | apps/studio/tests/README.md |
| Vitest config | apps/studio/vitest.config.ts |
| Related skills | studio-e2e-tests (running E2E), vitest (API reference), vercel-composition-patterns (component architecture) |
- 流狐分类
- 写作
- 作者声明 Agent
- 未找到明确声明;不据此推断已兼容或已测试
- 静态检查
- 88 / 100 · 启发式扫描,不代表运行安全
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @supabase · 未声明 license
- 流狐 Token 估算
- 低消耗
- 流狐接入估算
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 未发现要求
- 检测到的系统要求
- 未声明
- 底层运行要求
- 未声明
- 检测到的文件与系统行为
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 检测到的网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 无(仅作为资料)
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
作者没有在当前 SKILL.md 中定义固定输出样例。 Reference these guidelines when: Writing new tests for Studio code Deciding which type of test to write (unit, component, E2E)
Priority · Category · Impact · Prefix 1 · Logic Extraction · CRITICAL · testing- 2 · Test Coverage · CRITICAL · testing-
Quick Reference
testing-extract-logic - Remove logic from components into .utils.ts files as pure functions: args in, return out
testing-exhaustive-permutations - Test every permutation of utility functions: happy path, malformed input, empty values, edge cases
testing-component-tests-ui-only - Only write component tests for complex UI interaction logic, not business logic
# Studio Testing Strategy
How to write and structure tests for `apps/studio/`. The core principle: push
logic out of React components into pure utility functions, then test those
functions exhaustively. Only use component tests for complex UI interactions.
Use E2E tests for features shared between self-hosted and platform.
## When to Apply
Reference these guidelines when:
- Writing new tests for Studio code
- Deciding which type of test to write (unit, component, E2E)
- Extracting logic from a component to make it testable
- Reviewing whether test coverage is sufficient
- Adding a new feature that needs tests
## Rule Categories by Priority
| Priority | Category | Impact | Prefix |
| -------- | ---------------- | -------- | ---------- |
| 1 | Logic Extraction | CRITICAL | `testing-` |
| 2 | Test Coverage | CRITICAL | `testing-` |
| 3 | Component Tests | HIGH | `testing-` |
| 4 | E2E Tests | HIGH | `testing-` |
## Quick Reference
### 1. Logic Extraction (CRITICAL)
- `testing-extract-logic` - Remove logic from components into `.utils.ts` files
as pure functions: args in, return out
### 2. Test Coverage (CRITICAL)
- `testing-exhaustive-permutations` - Test every permutation of utility functions:
happy path, malformed input, empty values, edge cases
### 3. Component Tests (HIGH)
- `testing-component-tests-ui-only` - Only write component tests for complex UI
interaction logic, not business logic
### 4. E2E Tests (HIGH)
- `testing-e2e-shared-features` - Write E2E tests for features used in both
self-hosted and platform; cover clicks AND keyboard shortcuts
## Decision Tree: Which Test Type?
```
Is the logic a pure transformation (parse, format, validate, compute)?
… 作者原文负责流程事实;流狐只索引当前章节、要点、文件与命令。
章节 -> When to Apply → Rule Categories by Priority → Quick Reference → 1. Logic Extraction (CRITICAL) → 2. Test Coverage (CRITICAL) → 3. Component Tests (HIGH)
要点 -> File naming · Valid reasons · Not valid · How to write and structure tests for apps/studio/. · Remove as much logic from components as possible. · Once logic is extracted, test exhaustively. · // ✅ Every permutation test('parses valid filter', () => { ... · Only write component tests when there is complex UI interaction logic that cannot be captured by testing utility functions alone.
文件/命令 -> apps/studio/ · testing- · testing-extract-logic · .utils.ts · testing-exhaustive-permutations · testing-component-tests-ui-only · testing-e2e-shared-features · ComponentName.utils.ts
内容 SHA-256 -> bd0cddecb383
原文结构
适用与边界
原文中的明确线索
apps/studio/、testing-、testing-extract-logic、.utils.ts、testing-exhaustive-permutations、testing-component-tests-ui-only、testing-e2e-shared-features、ComponentName.utils.ts