Agent规划
- 作者仓库星标 929
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 pm-claude-skills
- 领域
- 设计与多媒体
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @mohitagw15856 · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 即装即用
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: teaching-lesson-plan
description: Design a structured lesson plan for any subject, audience, or format. Use when asked to write a…
category: 设计与多媒体
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# teaching-lesson-plan 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:视觉内容、演示材料、信息图或设计交付。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Required Inputs / Output Structure / Learning Objectives”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于视觉内容、演示材料、信息图或设计交付,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Required Inputs / Output Structure / Learning Objectives”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Required Inputs / Output Structure / Learning Objectives”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: teaching-lesson-plan
description: Design a structured lesson plan for any subject, audience, or format. Use when asked to write a…
category: 设计与多媒体
source: mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
---
# teaching-lesson-plan
## 什么时候使用
- 把设计与视觉方向的常用动作沉淀成 Agent 可调用的技能 适合处理界面、视觉、封面、信息图或演示材料交付,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代的步骤…
- 面向视觉内容、演示材料、信息图或设计交付,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Required Inputs / Output Structure / Learning Objectives」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "teaching-lesson-plan" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Required Inputs / Output Structure / Learning Objectives
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Teaching Lesson Plan Skill
Produces a complete, structured lesson plan for any subject, age group, or setting — from a one-hour corporate training to a full school lesson. Built around clear learning objectives, varied activities, and formative assessment.
Required Inputs
Ask the user for these if not provided:
- Subject or topic
- Audience (age group, experience level, group size)
- Session length (30 / 45 / 60 / 90 / 120 minutes)
- Setting (classroom / workshop / online / corporate training / one-to-one)
- Learning goal (what should participants know or be able to do by the end?)
- Prior knowledge (what can you assume they already know?)
Output Structure
Lesson Plan: [Topic]
Subject: [Subject] | Audience: [Description] | Duration: [X minutes] Setting: [Setting] | Group size: [N]
Learning Objectives
By the end of this session, participants will be able to:
- [Objective 1 — use Bloom's taxonomy verbs: recall, explain, apply, analyse, evaluate, create]
- [Objective 2]
- [Objective 3 — maximum 3–4 objectives per session]
Key vocabulary: [3–5 terms participants will need to know]
Materials and Preparation
- [Resource 1 — slides, handout, equipment]
- [Resource 2]
- Room setup: [configuration — rows / circles / tables / breakout spaces]
Lesson Structure
| Time | Phase | Activity | Format |
|---|---|---|---|
| [00:00] | Hook / Opener | [How you grab attention and establish relevance] | [Whole group / Individual / Pairs] |
| [00:05] | Prior knowledge | [How you connect to what they already know] | [Discussion / Quiz / Think-pair-share] |
| [00:15] | Instruction | [Direct teaching of new content] | [Explanation / Demo / Video] |
| [00:30] | Guided practice | [Supported practice with feedback] | [Worked examples / Group task] |
| [00:50] | Independent practice | [Students apply learning independently] | [Task / Problem / Discussion] |
| [01:05] | Check for understanding | [Formative assessment] | [Exit ticket / Quiz / Q&A] |
| [01:15] | Closure | [Summarise, connect to next session] | [Whole group] |
Key Explanations and Worked Examples
[Concept 1]
[Clear explanation + one concrete worked example. Explain the concept the way a good teacher would — no jargon without definition, one idea at a time.]
[Concept 2]
[Explanation + example]
Differentiation
For those who need more support:
- [Scaffold: e.g. sentence starters, worked examples, vocabulary cards]
- [Modified task or reduced scope]
For those ready for a challenge:
- [Extension: e.g. apply to a new context, evaluate, create something]
Formative Assessment (Check for Understanding)
During session:
- [Method 1: e.g. Cold calling with no-stakes approach, thumbs up/down, mini whiteboards]
- [Method 2: e.g. Think-pair-share before moving on]
Exit ticket (last 5 minutes): [One specific question that directly tests the learning objective — not "what did you enjoy?" but "solve this problem" or "explain this concept in your own words"]
Common Misconceptions to Address
| Misconception | Correct understanding | How to address it |
|---|---|---|
| [What learners often get wrong] | [The correct version] | [Specific activity or explanation] |
Quality Checks
- Learning objectives use action verbs (not "understand" or "know")
- Session has a clear hook that establishes relevance
- Activities are varied (not all listening)
- Formative assessment checks the actual learning objective
- Differentiation is specified for both support and extension
- Timing adds up to session length
Example Trigger Phrases
- "Write a lesson plan on [topic] for [audience]"
- "Design a 60-minute session on [subject]"
- "Create a training module on [skill]"
- "Plan a workshop on [topic] for [group]"
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核