运维测试
- 作者仓库星标 0
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 skills-registry
- 领域
- 运维部署
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @tomevault-io · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- Shell 执行
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 允许外网请求
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: verify-deployment
description: Use this skill when the user asks to "verify my deployment", "check if everything is working", "…
category: 运维部署
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# verify-deployment 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:部署、CI、环境检查、发布或运维排障。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Step 1: Read DEPLOYMENTDOCS/DEPLOYEDENV.md / Step 2: HTTP health checks for all services / Step 3: agent-browser visual check of frontend”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于部署、CI、环境检查、发布或运维排障,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Step 1: Read DEPLOYMENTDOCS/DEPLOYEDENV.md / Step 2: HTTP health checks for all services / Step 3: agent-browser visual check of frontend”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、执行终端命令、写入/修改文件、会按任务需要访问外部网络、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、执行终端命令、写入/修改文件;会按任务需要访问外部网络;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文出现了 `/dev`、`/health`、`/api` 这类斜杠命令;如果你的 Agent 支持命令触发,优先用命令开场,再补充目标和边界。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、执行终端命令、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Step 1: Read DEPLOYMENTDOCS/DEPLOYEDENV.md / Step 2: HTTP health checks for all services / Step 3: agent-browser visual check of frontend”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: verify-deployment
description: Use this skill when the user asks to "verify my deployment", "check if everything is working", "…
category: 运维部署
source: tomevault-io/skills-registry
---
# verify-deployment
## 什么时候使用
- 用于让 Agent 打开、操作和验证浏览器页面 适合处理部署、CI、发布、回滚、环境检查和运维排障,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代的步骤;通常不需…
- 面向部署、CI、环境检查、发布或运维排障,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Step 1: Read DEPLOYMENTDOCS/DEPLOYEDENV.md / Step 2: HTTP health checks for all services / Step 3: agent-browser visual check of frontend」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、执行终端命令、写入/修改文件;会按任务需要访问外部网络;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "verify-deployment" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Step 1: Read DEPLOYMENTDOCS/DEPLOYEDENV.md / Step 2: HTTP health checks for all services / Step 3: agent-browser visual check of frontend
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、执行终端命令、写入/修改文件 | 会按任务需要访问外部网络
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} verify-deployment
Confirms all deployed services are live, reachable, and communicating correctly. Produces a pass/fail summary table and a frontend screenshot.
Step 1: Read DEPLOYMENT_DOCS/DEPLOYED_ENV.md
Extract: FRONTEND_URL, BACKEND_URL, and any other service URLs.
If the file doesn't exist:
"No DEPLOYED_ENV.md found. Please provide your deployed service URLs manually, or run deploy-project first."
Load the values into shell variables for use in the checks below.
Step 2: HTTP health checks for all services
check_url() {
local name=$1 url=$2 max_retries=${3:-1}
for i in $(seq 1 $max_retries); do
STATUS=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" --max-time 30 "$url" 2>/dev/null || echo "000")
if [ "$STATUS" -ge 200 ] && [ "$STATUS" -lt 400 ]; then
echo "✓ $name → HTTP $STATUS"
return 0
fi
if [ $i -lt $max_retries ]; then
echo " $name: HTTP $STATUS, retrying in 30s (attempt $i/$max_retries)..."
sleep 30
fi
done
echo "✗ $name → HTTP $STATUS (FAILED)"
return 1
}
# Frontend (2 attempts — no cold start)
check_url "Frontend" "$FRONTEND_URL" 2
# Backend health endpoint (3 attempts — Render free tier cold start ~30s)
check_url "Backend /health" "$BACKEND_URL/health" 3
Track whether each check passed or failed for the summary table in Step 5.
Step 3: agent-browser visual check of frontend
agent-browser open "$FRONTEND_URL"
agent-browser wait --load networkidle
agent-browser screenshot DEPLOYMENT_DOCS/verify-frontend.png
agent-browser snapshot -i
After getting the snapshot, inspect the HTML for error indicators:
- If snapshot contains any of:
"Error","404","Cannot GET","Application error","Something went wrong"→ mark frontend visual check as FAILED - If snapshot shows normal UI elements (nav, content, buttons, forms) → mark as PASSED
agent-browser close
Step 4: Cross-service connectivity test
# Test backend API health endpoint that also checks DB connectivity
API_RESPONSE=$(curl -s --max-time 30 "$BACKEND_URL/api/health" 2>/dev/null)
if echo "$API_RESPONSE" | python3 -c "import sys,json; d=json.load(sys.stdin); assert d.get('status') in ['ok','healthy','up'], f'unexpected: {d}'" 2>/dev/null; then
echo "✓ Backend API responding correctly"
else
echo "ℹ Backend /api/health returned: $API_RESPONSE"
echo " (This is OK if your backend doesn't have a /api/health endpoint)"
fi
# Test DB connectivity via backend (if backend exposes it)
DB_RESPONSE=$(curl -s --max-time 30 "$BACKEND_URL/api/health/db" 2>/dev/null)
if [ -n "$DB_RESPONSE" ]; then
if echo "$DB_RESPONSE" | python3 -c "import sys,json; d=json.load(sys.stdin); assert d.get('db') in ['connected','ok','healthy']" 2>/dev/null; then
echo "✓ Database connection verified via backend"
else
echo "ℹ DB health response: $DB_RESPONSE"
fi
else
echo "ℹ No /api/health/db endpoint — skipping DB connectivity check"
fi
Step 5: Print summary table
=== Deployment Verification Summary ===
Service Status URL
─────────────────────────────────────
Frontend ✓ PASS <FRONTEND_URL>
Backend ✓ PASS <BACKEND_URL>
Backend API ✓ PASS /api/health
Database ✓ PASS via backend
Screenshot saved: DEPLOYMENT_DOCS/verify-frontend.png
═══════════════════════════════════════
Fill in actual URLs and actual pass/fail results from Steps 2–4. Use ✗ FAIL for any check that did not pass.
Step 6: On failure
If any check FAILS:
- Print clearly:
"VERIFICATION FAILED: [service name] is not responding" - Suggest a specific fix based on which service failed:
- Frontend fails: "Check Vercel/Netlify dashboard for build errors"
- Backend fails: "Check Render dashboard for deploy status — free tier may still be cold-starting (up to 30s)"
- DB fails: "Check Supabase/Neon dashboard — project may have paused"
- Ask the user:
"Would you like me to re-run verification after you've checked? (yes/no)" - Do NOT claim the deployment is successful if any check fails.
Source: AayushMS/deploy-skills — distributed by TomeVault.
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核