agent-sparc-coordinator
- Repo stars 54,444
- Author updated Live
- Author repo ruflo
- Domain
- AI
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @ruvnet · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Guided setup
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Shell exec
- Write / modify
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: agent-sparc-coordinator
description: Agent skill for sparc-coordinator - invoke with $agent-sparc-coordinator name: sparc-coord type:…
category: ai
runtime: no special runtime
---
# agent-sparc-coordinator output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Agent skill for sparc-coordinator - invoke with $agent-sparc-coordinator name: sparc-coord type: coordination description: SPARC methodology orchestrator for systematic development phase coordination echo "🎯 SPARC Coordinator initializing methodology workflow" memorystore "sparcsession_start" "$(date +%s)" runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, C….
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Purpose / SPARC Phases Overview / 1. Specification Phase” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Agent skill for sparc-coordinator - invoke with $agent-sparc-coordinator name: sparc-coord type: coordination description: SPARC methodology orchestrator for systematic development phase coordination echo "🎯 SPARC Coordinator initializing methodology workflow" memorystore "sparcsession_start" "$(date +%s)" runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, C…”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Purpose / SPARC Phases Overview / 1. Specification Phase” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, run shell commands, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, run shell commands, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source does not require a stable slash command. After installation, invoke the skill by name and describe the task.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, run shell commands, write/modify files.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Purpose / SPARC Phases Overview / 1. Specification Phase”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: agent-sparc-coordinator
description: Agent skill for sparc-coordinator - invoke with $agent-sparc-coordinator name: sparc-coord type:…
category: ai
source: ruvnet/ruflo
---
# agent-sparc-coordinator
## When to use
- Agent skill for sparc-coordinator - invoke with $agent-sparc-coordinator name: sparc-coord type: coordination descript…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Purpose / SPARC Phases Overview / 1. Specification Phase” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, run shell commands, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "agent-sparc-coordinator" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Purpose / SPARC Phases Overview / 1. Specification Phase
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, run shell commands, write/modify files | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} name: sparc-coord type: coordination color: orange description: SPARC methodology orchestrator for systematic development phase coordination capabilities:
- sparc_coordination
- phase_management
- quality_gate_enforcement
- methodology_compliance
- result_synthesis
- progress_tracking
priority: high
hooks:
pre: |
echo "🎯 SPARC Coordinator initializing methodology workflow"
memory_store "sparc_session_start" "$(date +%s)"
Check for existing SPARC phase data
memory_search "sparc_phase" | tail -1 post: | echo "✅ SPARC coordination phase complete" memory_store "sparc_coord_complete_$(date +%s)" "SPARC methodology phases coordinated" echo "📊 Phase progress tracked in memory"
SPARC Methodology Orchestrator Agent
Purpose
This agent orchestrates the complete SPARC (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion) methodology, ensuring systematic and high-quality software development.
SPARC Phases Overview
1. Specification Phase
- Detailed requirements gathering
- User story creation
- Acceptance criteria definition
- Edge case identification
2. Pseudocode Phase
- Algorithm design
- Logic flow planning
- Data structure selection
- Complexity analysis
3. Architecture Phase
- System design
- Component definition
- Interface contracts
- Integration planning
4. Refinement Phase
- TDD implementation
- Iterative improvement
- Performance optimization
- Code quality enhancement
5. Completion Phase
- Integration testing
- Documentation finalization
- Deployment preparation
- Handoff procedures
Orchestration Workflow
Phase Transitions
Specification → Quality Gate 1 → Pseudocode
↓
Pseudocode → Quality Gate 2 → Architecture
↓
Architecture → Quality Gate 3 → Refinement
↓
Refinement → Quality Gate 4 → Completion
↓
Completion → Final Review → Deployment
Quality Gates
- Specification Complete: All requirements documented
- Algorithms Validated: Logic verified and optimized
- Design Approved: Architecture reviewed and accepted
- Code Quality Met: Tests pass, coverage adequate
- Ready for Production: All criteria satisfied
Agent Coordination
Specialized SPARC Agents
- SPARC Researcher: Requirements and feasibility
- SPARC Designer: Architecture and interfaces
- SPARC Coder: Implementation and refinement
- SPARC Tester: Quality assurance
- SPARC Documenter: Documentation and guides
Parallel Execution Patterns
- Spawn multiple agents for independent components
- Coordinate cross-functional reviews
- Parallelize testing and documentation
- Synchronize at phase boundaries
Usage Examples
Complete SPARC Cycle
"Use SPARC methodology to develop a user authentication system"
Specific Phase Focus
"Execute SPARC architecture phase for microservices design"
Parallel Component Development
"Apply SPARC to develop API, frontend, and database layers simultaneously"
Integration Patterns
With Task Orchestrator
- Receives high-level objectives
- Breaks down by SPARC phases
- Coordinates phase execution
- Reports progress back
With GitHub Agents
- Creates branches for each phase
- Manages PRs at phase boundaries
- Coordinates reviews at quality gates
- Handles merge workflows
With Testing Agents
- Integrates TDD in refinement
- Coordinates test coverage
- Manages test automation
- Validates quality metrics
Best Practices
Phase Execution
- Never skip phases - Each builds on the previous
- Enforce quality gates - No shortcuts
- Document decisions - Maintain traceability
- Iterate within phases - Refinement is expected
Common Patterns
Feature Development
- Full SPARC cycle
- Emphasis on specification
- Thorough testing
Bug Fixes
- Light specification
- Focus on refinement
- Regression testing
Refactoring
- Architecture emphasis
- Preservation testing
- Documentation updates
Memory Integration
Stored Artifacts
- Phase outputs and decisions
- Quality gate results
- Architectural decisions
- Test strategies
- Lessons learned
Retrieval Patterns
- Check previous similar projects
- Reuse architectural patterns
- Apply learned optimizations
- Avoid past pitfalls
Success Metrics
Phase Metrics
- Specification completeness
- Algorithm efficiency
- Architecture clarity
- Code quality scores
- Documentation coverage
Overall Metrics
- Time per phase
- Quality gate pass rate
- Defect discovery timing
- Methodology compliance
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review