authoring-skills
- Repo stars 0
- Author updated Live
- Author repo dotagents
- Domain
- Security
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @bastienlimbour · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: authoring-skills
description: Creates, updates, improves, and audits Agent Skills. Use when the task directly involves creatin…
category: security
runtime: no special runtime
---
# authoring-skills output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Creates, updates, improves, and audits Agent Skills. Use when the task directly involves creating or updating an agent skill, SKILL.md, skill description, skill directory, skill bundled files, or skill evals. Do not use for standalone prompts or if the current task is not directly related to authoring agent skills..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Overview / When To Use / Core Principle” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Creates, updates, improves, and audits Agent Skills. Use when the task directly involves creating or updating an agent skill, SKILL.md, skill description, skill directory, skill bundled files, or skill evals. Do not use for standalone prompts or if the current task is not directly related to authoring agent skills.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Overview / When To Use / Core Principle” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source does not require a stable slash command. After installation, invoke the skill by name and describe the task.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Overview / When To Use / Core Principle”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: authoring-skills
description: Creates, updates, improves, and audits Agent Skills. Use when the task directly involves creatin…
category: security
source: bastienlimbour/dotagents
---
# authoring-skills
## When to use
- Creates, updates, improves, and audits Agent Skills. Use when the task directly involves creating or updating an agent…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Overview / When To Use / Core Principle” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "authoring-skills" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Overview / When To Use / Core Principle
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} Authoring Skills
Overview
Create, update, improve, and audit portable Agent Skills. The goal is to make agents reliably better at a repeatable job without bloating context or forcing unnecessary structure.
When To Use
- Creating a new Agent Skill or
SKILL.md - Updating, refactoring, or improving an existing skill
- Designing a skill's name, description, trigger surface, or exclusions
- Organizing bundled skill files such as
references/,assets/,scripts/, orevals/ - Auditing a skill for structure, discovery, progressive disclosure, scripts, security, or eval coverage
When NOT to use:
- Standalone prompts that are not being packaged as Agent Skills
AGENTS.md, hooks, MCP setup, app config, or other non-skill agent configuration- General documentation, READMEs, or writing tasks unrelated to skill authoring
If the user explicitly wants one of these artifacts packaged as a skill, use this skill for the packaging work.
Core Principle
Write the simplest and smallest skill that does the job. Add structure, examples, references, assets, scripts, or evals only when they improve the output quality or make the skill easier to discover, follow, verify, or maintain.
Workflow
For non-trivial work, track your progress with a checklist.
Phase 1 - Classify
Determine the path before editing:
- Creating a skill: run the full workflow.
- Updating a skill: inspect the existing skill and edit only the parts needed for the requested change.
- Improving a skill with vague goals: audit first, then fix the highest-value gaps.
- Auditing a skill: report findings first and stop unless the user asks for edits.
Phase 2 - Gather Evidence
Inspect existing skill files, source material, real workflows, examples, previous failures, and adjacent skills when available.
Ask one targeted question at a time only when missing information would materially change the skill. For substantial new skills or major rewrites, summarize the intended files and ask to proceed unless the user already approved that exact work.
Phase 3 - Define The Boundary
Identify the repeatable job, users, inputs, outputs, constraints, non-goals, success criteria, and near-miss tasks that should not trigger the skill.
Prefer one coherent job over a broad toolbox. If the proposed skill covers unrelated jobs, split it or narrow the first version.
Phase 4 - Design Discovery
Read discovery-and-descriptions.md.
Choose a portable lowercase hyphenated name that matches the directory. Write a description that states what the skill does and when to use it. Front-load core trigger terms and include exclusions only when they prevent likely false positives.
Phase 5 - Shape The Package
Read spec-and-structure.md for required format.
Start with only SKILL.md. Add bundled files only when they earn their keep.
| Need | Default action |
|---|---|
| Core instructions every run | Keep in SKILL.md |
| Rare, long, or conditional detail | Move to references/ |
| Static templates, sample files, schemas, or images | Put in assets/ |
| Deterministic, repeated, fragile, or machine-verifiable work | Consider scripts/ after risk review |
| Non-trivial activation or output quality | Add evals/ or a lightweight eval plan |
Use minimal frontmatter by default: name and description. Add optional fields only for concrete compatibility, licensing, metadata, or tool needs.
Phase 6 - Write The Body
Read content-patterns.md.
Write operational instructions for the agent, not explanatory documentation for humans. Use a scannable structure that fits the skill instead of copying a fixed template.
Keep Overview to 1-2 sentences about what the skill does and why it matters. Keep When To Use focused on activation guidance. Use phase headings, tables, examples, red flags, rationalizations, or verification only when they improve behavior.
Phase 7 - Evaluate
Read evaluation.md.
Every creation or material update must include a lightweight eval plan or a clear reason evals are unnecessary. Add full eval files for non-trivial skills, risky workflows, scripts, complex activation boundaries, or repeated future use.
Phase 8 - Review
Read audit-checklist.md.
Fix checklist failures and re-check until the skill is valid, focused, and usable. If auditing only, return findings ordered by severity with concrete fixes.
Reference Map
Load only the reference needed for the current decision:
- Skill format and frontmatter: spec-and-structure.md
- Names, triggers, and descriptions: discovery-and-descriptions.md
- Body organization and progressive disclosure: content-patterns.md
- Evals and iteration: evaluation.md
- Scripts, dependencies, and security: scripts-and-security.md
- Final review or audits: audit-checklist.md
Do not preload all references.
Defaults
- Author portable Agent Skills first. When a local choice is needed, prefer Opencode-compatible
.agents/skillsconventions. - Keep changes minimal. Do not add backward-compatibility or migration logic without persisted data, external consumers, shipped behavior, or explicit user need.
- Prefer concrete examples and gotchas over generic best-practice prose.
- Use forward-slash relative paths from the skill root.
- Avoid time-sensitive claims unless they are isolated as legacy context.
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "This skill should include every best practice." | Skills should include only guidance that changes agent behavior for the target job. |
| "A fixed template will keep skills consistent." | Consistency helps, but unnecessary sections create noise. Choose sections by need. |
| "Evals are optional polish." | Every material skill change needs at least a lightweight eval plan or an explicit reason evals are unnecessary. |
| "A script would make this look more capable." | Scripts add maintenance and security risk. Add them only when they improve reliability. |
Red Flags
- The description says "helps with" but does not name concrete triggers.
- The skill tries to cover multiple unrelated jobs.
- References exist but
SKILL.mddoes not say when to load them. - Scripts are present without a clear interface, dependency story, or risk check.
- A non-trivial skill has no eval plan.
Output
For creation or update tasks, return the files changed, the key design choices, and the eval or validation performed. For audits, return findings first, then suggested fixes. Keep summaries concise.
Verification
Before finalizing a created or modified skill, confirm:
-
Overviewexplains what the skill does in 1-2 sentences. -
When To Usefocuses on activation guidance and near-miss exclusions. - The structure is scannable and adaptive, not a forced template.
- The description is specific enough to trigger correctly among many skills.
- Bundled files are justified and referenced with load conditions.
- Scripts, network access, or third-party content received a risk check when present.
- Evals are included or the reason they are unnecessary is explicit.
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review