安全安装
- 作者仓库星标 0
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 dotagents
- 领域
- 安全
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @bastienlimbour · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 即装即用
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: authoring-skills
description: Creates, updates, improves, and audits Agent Skills. Use when the task directly involves creatin…
category: 安全
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# authoring-skills 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:安全审计、密钥扫描、权限检查或风险分析。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Overview / When To Use / Core Principle”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于安全审计、密钥扫描、权限检查或风险分析,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Overview / When To Use / Core Principle”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Overview / When To Use / Core Principle”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: authoring-skills
description: Creates, updates, improves, and audits Agent Skills. Use when the task directly involves creatin…
category: 安全
source: bastienlimbour/dotagents
---
# authoring-skills
## 什么时候使用
- authoring-skills 是安全方向的技能,由 Agent 做扫描 / 风险检查 适合处理安全审计、密钥扫描、权限检查和风险分析,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执…
- 面向安全审计、密钥扫描、权限检查或风险分析,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Overview / When To Use / Core Principle」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "authoring-skills" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Overview / When To Use / Core Principle
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Authoring Skills
Overview
Create, update, improve, and audit portable Agent Skills. The goal is to make agents reliably better at a repeatable job without bloating context or forcing unnecessary structure.
When To Use
- Creating a new Agent Skill or
SKILL.md - Updating, refactoring, or improving an existing skill
- Designing a skill's name, description, trigger surface, or exclusions
- Organizing bundled skill files such as
references/,assets/,scripts/, orevals/ - Auditing a skill for structure, discovery, progressive disclosure, scripts, security, or eval coverage
When NOT to use:
- Standalone prompts that are not being packaged as Agent Skills
AGENTS.md, hooks, MCP setup, app config, or other non-skill agent configuration- General documentation, READMEs, or writing tasks unrelated to skill authoring
If the user explicitly wants one of these artifacts packaged as a skill, use this skill for the packaging work.
Core Principle
Write the simplest and smallest skill that does the job. Add structure, examples, references, assets, scripts, or evals only when they improve the output quality or make the skill easier to discover, follow, verify, or maintain.
Workflow
For non-trivial work, track your progress with a checklist.
Phase 1 - Classify
Determine the path before editing:
- Creating a skill: run the full workflow.
- Updating a skill: inspect the existing skill and edit only the parts needed for the requested change.
- Improving a skill with vague goals: audit first, then fix the highest-value gaps.
- Auditing a skill: report findings first and stop unless the user asks for edits.
Phase 2 - Gather Evidence
Inspect existing skill files, source material, real workflows, examples, previous failures, and adjacent skills when available.
Ask one targeted question at a time only when missing information would materially change the skill. For substantial new skills or major rewrites, summarize the intended files and ask to proceed unless the user already approved that exact work.
Phase 3 - Define The Boundary
Identify the repeatable job, users, inputs, outputs, constraints, non-goals, success criteria, and near-miss tasks that should not trigger the skill.
Prefer one coherent job over a broad toolbox. If the proposed skill covers unrelated jobs, split it or narrow the first version.
Phase 4 - Design Discovery
Read discovery-and-descriptions.md.
Choose a portable lowercase hyphenated name that matches the directory. Write a description that states what the skill does and when to use it. Front-load core trigger terms and include exclusions only when they prevent likely false positives.
Phase 5 - Shape The Package
Read spec-and-structure.md for required format.
Start with only SKILL.md. Add bundled files only when they earn their keep.
| Need | Default action |
|---|---|
| Core instructions every run | Keep in SKILL.md |
| Rare, long, or conditional detail | Move to references/ |
| Static templates, sample files, schemas, or images | Put in assets/ |
| Deterministic, repeated, fragile, or machine-verifiable work | Consider scripts/ after risk review |
| Non-trivial activation or output quality | Add evals/ or a lightweight eval plan |
Use minimal frontmatter by default: name and description. Add optional fields only for concrete compatibility, licensing, metadata, or tool needs.
Phase 6 - Write The Body
Read content-patterns.md.
Write operational instructions for the agent, not explanatory documentation for humans. Use a scannable structure that fits the skill instead of copying a fixed template.
Keep Overview to 1-2 sentences about what the skill does and why it matters. Keep When To Use focused on activation guidance. Use phase headings, tables, examples, red flags, rationalizations, or verification only when they improve behavior.
Phase 7 - Evaluate
Read evaluation.md.
Every creation or material update must include a lightweight eval plan or a clear reason evals are unnecessary. Add full eval files for non-trivial skills, risky workflows, scripts, complex activation boundaries, or repeated future use.
Phase 8 - Review
Read audit-checklist.md.
Fix checklist failures and re-check until the skill is valid, focused, and usable. If auditing only, return findings ordered by severity with concrete fixes.
Reference Map
Load only the reference needed for the current decision:
- Skill format and frontmatter: spec-and-structure.md
- Names, triggers, and descriptions: discovery-and-descriptions.md
- Body organization and progressive disclosure: content-patterns.md
- Evals and iteration: evaluation.md
- Scripts, dependencies, and security: scripts-and-security.md
- Final review or audits: audit-checklist.md
Do not preload all references.
Defaults
- Author portable Agent Skills first. When a local choice is needed, prefer Opencode-compatible
.agents/skillsconventions. - Keep changes minimal. Do not add backward-compatibility or migration logic without persisted data, external consumers, shipped behavior, or explicit user need.
- Prefer concrete examples and gotchas over generic best-practice prose.
- Use forward-slash relative paths from the skill root.
- Avoid time-sensitive claims unless they are isolated as legacy context.
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "This skill should include every best practice." | Skills should include only guidance that changes agent behavior for the target job. |
| "A fixed template will keep skills consistent." | Consistency helps, but unnecessary sections create noise. Choose sections by need. |
| "Evals are optional polish." | Every material skill change needs at least a lightweight eval plan or an explicit reason evals are unnecessary. |
| "A script would make this look more capable." | Scripts add maintenance and security risk. Add them only when they improve reliability. |
Red Flags
- The description says "helps with" but does not name concrete triggers.
- The skill tries to cover multiple unrelated jobs.
- References exist but
SKILL.mddoes not say when to load them. - Scripts are present without a clear interface, dependency story, or risk check.
- A non-trivial skill has no eval plan.
Output
For creation or update tasks, return the files changed, the key design choices, and the eval or validation performed. For audits, return findings first, then suggested fixes. Keep summaries concise.
Verification
Before finalizing a created or modified skill, confirm:
-
Overviewexplains what the skill does in 1-2 sentences. -
When To Usefocuses on activation guidance and near-miss exclusions. - The structure is scannable and adaptive, not a forced template.
- The description is specific enough to trigger correctly among many skills.
- Bundled files are justified and referenced with load conditions.
- Scripts, network access, or third-party content received a risk check when present.
- Evals are included or the reason they are unnecessary is explicit.
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核