CodeReview
- Repo stars 175
- Author updated Live
- Author repo pai-opencode
- Domain
- Security
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @Steffen025 · no license declared
- Token usage
- Moderate
- Setup complexity
- Guided setup
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- macOS · Linux
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Shell exec
- Write / modify
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: CodeReview
description: AI-powered code review via roborev. USE WHEN review code, check code quality, roborev, audit cha…
category: security
runtime: no special runtime
---
# CodeReview output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: AI-powered code review via roborev. USE WHEN review code, check code quality, roborev, audit changes, review before commit, review before PR, code quality check, lint review, architecture review..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “USE WHEN / MANDATORY / OPTIONAL” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “AI-powered code review via roborev. USE WHEN review code, check code quality, roborev, audit changes, review before commit, review before PR, code quality check, lint review, architecture review.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “USE WHEN / MANDATORY / OPTIONAL” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, run shell commands, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, run shell commands, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source does not require a stable slash command. After installation, invoke the skill by name and describe the task.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, run shell commands, write/modify files.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “USE WHEN / MANDATORY / OPTIONAL”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: CodeReview
description: AI-powered code review via roborev. USE WHEN review code, check code quality, roborev, audit cha…
category: security
source: Steffen025/pai-opencode
---
# CodeReview
## When to use
- AI-powered code review via roborev. USE WHEN review code, check code quality, roborev, audit changes, review before co…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “USE WHEN / MANDATORY / OPTIONAL” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, run shell commands, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "CodeReview" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> USE WHEN / MANDATORY / OPTIONAL
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, run shell commands, write/modify files | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} CodeReview Skill
Use this skill to run AI-powered code review via roborev — a local, MIT-licensed review tool with explicit OpenCode support.
USE WHEN
- Completing a BUILD phase and want to catch issues before committing
- Running VERIFY phase and need reproducible quality evidence
- Reviewing a PR diff before merging
- Auditing plugin handler code for pattern violations (no
console.log, handler structure) - You want AI-powered architectural review of your changes
- Trigger phrases: "review code", "check my changes", "roborev", "code quality check"
MANDATORY
- roborev must be installed —
brew install roborev-dev/tap/roborev - One-time init —
roborev init(installs post-commit git hook) .roborev.tomlmust exist at repo root withagent = "opencode"andreview_guidelines- Invoke via
code_reviewtool (preferred) orroborev review --dirtyin EXECUTE phase - Cite exit code 0 as VERIFY evidence:
code_review tool returned exit 0 — no findings
OPTIONAL
roborev skills install— installs the roborev OpenCode skill (adds roborev commands to agent)mode: "last-commit"— review the last git commit instead of dirty working treemode: "fix"— feed findings to the agent for automatic fixesmode: "refine"— run auto-fix loop until review passespathargument — focus review on a specific file or glob
What roborev Does
roborev analyzes your staged/uncommitted changes (or last commit) using an LLM and surfaces:
- Code quality issues
- Security concerns
- Architectural violations
- Style inconsistencies
- Bugs and edge cases
All review runs locally. No account or cloud service required.
Quick Reference
# Review uncommitted changes (most common)
roborev review --dirty
# Review last commit
roborev review
# Feed findings to agent for fixes
roborev fix
# Auto-fix loop until review passes
roborev refine
# Install git post-commit hook (one-time)
roborev init
# Install OpenCode skill for roborev
roborev skills install
Algorithm Integration
When to invoke
The Algorithm invokes code review in two ways:
1. Via code_review tool (plugin-provided)
Call the code_review tool directly from any Algorithm phase:
Use code_review tool with mode="dirty" to review uncommitted changes before commit.
2. Via roborev CLI in EXECUTE/VERIFY phase
# In EXECUTE: review before committing
roborev review --dirty
# In VERIFY: evidence that review passed
roborev review --dirty && echo "PASS" || echo "FINDINGS"
Recommended Algorithm workflow
BUILD → commit changes
EXECUTE: roborev review --dirty
→ If PASS: continue to VERIFY
→ If FINDINGS: address in next BUILD iteration
VERIFY: cite roborev exit code 0 as evidence
Installation
macOS / Linux (Homebrew)
brew install roborev-dev/tap/roborev
Go
go install github.com/roborev-dev/roborev@latest
Verify
roborev --version
One-Time Setup
# 1. Install git post-commit hook (auto-reviews on every commit)
roborev init
# 2. Install OpenCode skill (adds roborev commands to agent)
roborev skills install
# 3. Verify config exists at repo root
cat .roborev.toml
Configuration (.roborev.toml)
This repo's config is at .roborev.toml in the root. Key settings:
agent = "opencode"
review_guidelines = """
# PAI-OpenCode Review Guidelines
...
"""
The review_guidelines field gives roborev domain-specific rules for this project —
including the no-console.log constraint, file-logger pattern, and model routing rules.
Troubleshooting
roborev not found
# Install via Homebrew
brew install roborev-dev/tap/roborev
# Or check if it's in PATH
which roborev
echo $PATH
Review times out
Default timeout is 2 minutes. For large changesets, focus the review:
roborev review --dirty -- src/specific/file.ts
No changes found
Make sure you have uncommitted changes:
git diff
git diff --cached # staged changes
Post-commit hook not running
Re-run roborev init to reinstall the hook:
cat .git/hooks/post-commit # verify hook exists
roborev init # reinstall if missing
PAI-OpenCode Specific Guidelines
When running code review on this project, roborev checks for:
- No console.log — all plugin logging via
fileLog()/fileLogError() - Handler pattern — new capabilities = new handler file + import + registration
- No hardcoded models — model routing via
opencode.jsononly - TypeScript strict — no implicit any, explicit return types on exports
- Biome formatting — tabs, 100 char line width, double quotes
Related
.roborev.toml— project review configurationADR-018— architectural decision for roborev integration.opencode/plugins/handlers/roborev-trigger.ts— plugin handler providingcode_reviewtool.github/workflows/code-quality.yml— CI pipeline (Biome check on PRs)
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review