compliance-evidence-collector
- Repo stars 1
- Author repo claude-skills
Compliance Evidence Collector
Overview
Gather code, config, docs, and operational proof points for audits and internal compliance reviews.
Core Workflow
- Survey the relevant files, configs, runtime signals, or artifacts to identify the important components and boundaries.
- Map the relationships, dependencies, or graph structure that explain how the system or corpus fits together.
- Highlight missing links, risky assumptions, or ambiguous edges that affect understanding or change safety.
- Return a concise map plus the next best checks or follow-up actions.
Deliver
- A structured map of components, dependencies, or graph relationships.
- The highest-risk gaps, missing links, or ambiguous edges.
- Concrete next checks or actions based on the mapped structure.
Guardrails
- Do not infer strong relationships without evidence from code, config, or runtime artifacts.
- Separate confirmed connections from plausible but unverified ones.
- Prefer a smaller high-confidence map over a speculative complete one.
- Do not invent metrics, policy decisions, customer commitments, or ownership that the inputs do not support.
- Fluxly category
- Security
- Author-declared agents
- No explicit declaration found; this is not inferred or tested compatibility
- Static check
- 88 / 100 · heuristic scan, not runtime safety proof
- Author / version / license
- @00PrabalK00 · no license declared
- Fluxly token estimate
- Lean
- Fluxly setup estimate
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- No requirement detected
- Detected OS requirements
- Unspecified
- Runtime requirements
- Unspecified
- Detected file/system behavior
-
- Read-only
- Detected network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- None (reference only)
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
The current SKILL.md does not define a fixed output example. Gather code, config, docs, and operational proof points for audits and internal compliance reviews.
Survey the relevant files, configs, runtime signals, or artifacts to identify the important components and boundaries. Map the relationships, dependencies, or graph structure that explain how the system or corpus fits together.
A structured map of components, dependencies, or graph relationships. The highest-risk gaps, missing links, or ambiguous edges. Concrete next checks or actions based on the mapped structure.
Do not infer strong relationships without evidence from code, config, or runtime artifacts. Separate confirmed connections from plausible but unverified ones. Prefer a smaller high-confidence map over a speculative complete one.
# Compliance Evidence Collector
## Overview
Gather code, config, docs, and operational proof points for audits and internal compliance reviews.
## Core Workflow
1. Survey the relevant files, configs, runtime signals, or artifacts to identify the important components and boundaries.
2. Map the relationships, dependencies, or graph structure that explain how the system or corpus fits together.
3. Highlight missing links, risky assumptions, or ambiguous edges that affect understanding or change safety.
4. Return a concise map plus the next best checks or follow-up actions.
## Deliver
- A structured map of components, dependencies, or graph relationships.
- The highest-risk gaps, missing links, or ambiguous edges.
- Concrete next checks or actions based on the mapped structure.
## Guardrails
- Do not infer strong relationships without evidence from code, config, or runtime artifacts.
- Separate confirmed connections from plausible but unverified ones.
- Prefer a smaller high-confidence map over a speculative complete one.
- Do not invent metrics, policy decisions, customer commitments, or ownership that the inputs do not support. Author text anchors workflow facts; Fluxly only indexes current sections, terms, files, and commands.
sections -> Overview → Core Workflow → Deliver → Guardrails
terms -> Gather code, config, docs, and operational proof points for audits and internal compliance reviews. · 1. Survey the relevant files, configs, runtime signals, or artifacts to identify the important components and boundaries. · - A structured map of components, dependencies, or graph relationships. · - Do not infer strong relationships without evidence from code, config, or runtime artifacts.
files/cmd -> no explicit files or commands
body sha256 -> 15c37442d5eb
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review