dotnet-slopwatch
- Repo stars 1,012
- Forks 98
- Author updated Apr 16, 2026, 02:05 AM
- Author repo dotnet-skills
- Domain
- AI
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @Aaronontheweb · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Linux
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: dotnet-slopwatch
description: Use Slopwatch to detect LLM reward hacking in .NET code changes. Run after every code modificati…
category: ai
runtime: no special runtime
---
# dotnet-slopwatch output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Use Slopwatch to detect LLM reward hacking in .NET code changes. Run after every code modification to catch disabled tests, suppressed warnings, empty catch blocks, and other shortcuts that mask real problems..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “When to Use This Skill / What is Slop? / Common Slop Patterns” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Use Slopwatch to detect LLM reward hacking in .NET code changes. Run after every code modification to catch disabled tests, suppressed warnings, empty catch blocks, and other shortcuts that mask real problems.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “When to Use This Skill / What is Slop? / Common Slop Patterns” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source does not require a stable slash command. After installation, invoke the skill by name and describe the task.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “When to Use This Skill / What is Slop? / Common Slop Patterns”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: dotnet-slopwatch
description: Use Slopwatch to detect LLM reward hacking in .NET code changes. Run after every code modificati…
category: ai
source: Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills
---
# dotnet-slopwatch
## When to use
- Use Slopwatch to detect LLM reward hacking in .NET code changes. Run after every code modification to catch disabled t…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “When to Use This Skill / What is Slop? / Common Slop Patterns” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "dotnet-slopwatch" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> When to Use This Skill / What is Slop? / Common Slop Patterns
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} Slopwatch: LLM Anti-Cheat for .NET
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill constantly. Every time an LLM (including Claude) makes changes to:
- C# source files (.cs)
- Project files (.csproj)
- Props files (Directory.Build.props, Directory.Packages.props)
- Test files
Run slopwatch to validate the changes don't introduce "slop."
What is Slop?
"Slop" refers to shortcuts LLMs take that make tests pass or builds succeed without actually solving the underlying problem. These are reward hacking behaviors - the LLM optimizes for apparent success rather than real fixes.
Common Slop Patterns
| Pattern | Example | Why It's Bad |
|---|---|---|
| Disabled tests | [Fact(Skip="flaky")] |
Hides failures instead of fixing them |
| Warning suppression | #pragma warning disable CS8618 |
Silences compiler without fixing issue |
| Empty catch blocks | catch (Exception) { } |
Swallows errors, hides bugs |
| Arbitrary delays | await Task.Delay(1000); |
Masks race conditions, makes tests slow |
| Project-level suppression | <NoWarn>CS1591</NoWarn> |
Disables warnings project-wide |
| CPM bypass | Version="1.0.0" inline |
Undermines central package management |
Never accept these patterns. If an LLM introduces slop, reject the change and require a proper fix.
Installation
As a Local Tool (Recommended)
Add to .config/dotnet-tools.json:
{
"version": 1,
"isRoot": true,
"tools": {
"slopwatch.cmd": {
"version": "0.2.0",
"commands": ["slopwatch"],
"rollForward": false
}
}
}
Then restore:
dotnet tool restore
As a Global Tool
dotnet tool install --global Slopwatch.Cmd
First-Time Setup: Establish a Baseline
Before using slopwatch on an existing project, create a baseline of current issues:
# Initialize baseline from existing code
slopwatch init
# This creates .slopwatch/baseline.json
git add .slopwatch/baseline.json
git commit -m "Add slopwatch baseline"
Why baseline? Legacy code may have existing issues. The baseline ensures slopwatch only catches new slop being introduced, not pre-existing technical debt.
Usage During LLM Sessions
After Every Code Change
Run slopwatch after any LLM-generated code modification:
# Analyze for new issues (uses baseline)
slopwatch analyze
# Use strict mode - fail on warnings too
slopwatch analyze --fail-on warning
When Slopwatch Flags an Issue
Do not ignore it. Instead:
- Understand why the LLM took the shortcut
- Request a proper fix - be specific about what's wrong
- Verify the fix doesn't introduce different slop
# Example: LLM disabled a test
❌ SW001 [Error]: Disabled test detected
File: tests/MyApp.Tests/OrderTests.cs:45
Pattern: [Fact(Skip="Test is flaky")]
# Correct response: Ask for actual fix
"This test was disabled instead of fixed. Please investigate why
it's flaky and fix the underlying timing/race condition issue."
Updating the Baseline (Rare)
Only update the baseline when slop is truly justified and documented:
# Add current detections to baseline (use sparingly!)
slopwatch analyze --update-baseline
Justification examples:
- Third-party library forces a pattern (e.g., must suppress specific warning)
- Intentional delay for rate limiting (not test flakiness)
- Generated code that can't be modified
Document why in a code comment when updating baseline.
Claude Code Hook Integration
Add slopwatch as a hook to automatically validate every edit. Create or update .claude/settings.json:
{
"hooks": {
"PostToolUse": [
{
"matcher": "Write|Edit|MultiEdit",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "slopwatch analyze -d . --hook",
"timeout": 60000
}
]
}
]
}
}
The --hook flag:
- Only analyzes git dirty files (fast, even on large repos)
- Outputs errors to stderr in readable format
- Blocks the edit on warnings/errors (exit code 2)
- Claude sees the error and can fix it immediately
CI/CD Integration
Add slopwatch to your CI pipeline as a quality gate:
GitHub Actions
jobs:
slopwatch:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Setup .NET
uses: actions/setup-dotnet@v4
with:
dotnet-version: '9.0.x'
- name: Install Slopwatch
run: dotnet tool install --global Slopwatch.Cmd
- name: Run Slopwatch
run: slopwatch analyze -d . --fail-on warning
Azure Pipelines
- task: DotNetCoreCLI@2
displayName: 'Install Slopwatch'
inputs:
command: 'custom'
custom: 'tool'
arguments: 'install --global Slopwatch.Cmd'
- script: slopwatch analyze -d . --fail-on warning
displayName: 'Slopwatch Analysis'
Detection Rules
| Rule | Severity | What It Catches |
|---|---|---|
| SW001 | Error | Disabled tests (Skip=, Ignore, #if false) |
| SW002 | Warning | Warning suppression (#pragma warning disable, SuppressMessage) |
| SW003 | Error | Empty catch blocks that swallow exceptions |
| SW004 | Warning | Arbitrary delays in tests (Task.Delay, Thread.Sleep) |
| SW005 | Warning | Project file slop (NoWarn, TreatWarningsAsErrors=false) |
| SW006 | Warning | CPM bypass (VersionOverride, inline Version attributes) |
Configuration
Create .slopwatch/slopwatch.json to customize:
{
"minSeverity": "warning",
"rules": {
"SW001": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW002": { "enabled": true, "severity": "warning" },
"SW003": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW004": { "enabled": true, "severity": "warning" },
"SW005": { "enabled": true, "severity": "warning" },
"SW006": { "enabled": true, "severity": "warning" }
},
"exclude": [
"**/Generated/**",
"**/obj/**",
"**/bin/**"
]
}
Strict Mode (Recommended for LLM Sessions)
For maximum protection during LLM coding sessions, elevate all rules to errors:
{
"minSeverity": "warning",
"rules": {
"SW001": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW002": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW003": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW004": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW005": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW006": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" }
}
}
The Philosophy: Zero Tolerance for New Slop
- Baseline captures legacy - Existing issues are acknowledged but isolated
- New slop is blocked - Any new shortcut fails the build/edit
- Exceptions require justification - If you must update baseline, document why
- LLMs are not special - The same rules apply to human and AI-generated code
The goal is to prevent the gradual accumulation of technical debt that occurs when LLMs optimize for "make the test pass" rather than "fix the actual problem."
Quick Reference
# First time setup
slopwatch init
git add .slopwatch/baseline.json
# After every LLM code change
slopwatch analyze
# Strict mode (recommended)
slopwatch analyze --fail-on warning
# With stats (performance debugging)
slopwatch analyze --stats
# Update baseline (rare, document why)
slopwatch analyze --update-baseline
# JSON output for tooling
slopwatch analyze --output json
When to Override (Almost Never)
The only valid reasons to update baseline or disable a rule:
| Scenario | Action | Required |
|---|---|---|
| Third-party forces pattern | Update baseline | Code comment explaining why |
| Generated code (not editable) | Add to exclude list | Document in config |
| Intentional rate limiting delay | Update baseline | Code comment, not in test |
| Legacy code cleanup | One-time baseline update | PR description |
Invalid reasons:
- "The test is flaky" → Fix the flakiness
- "The warning is annoying" → Fix the code
- "It works on my machine" → Fix the race condition
- "We'll fix it later" → Fix it now
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review