测试助手
- 作者仓库星标 1,012
- 叉子 98
- 作者更新于 2026年4月16日 02:05
- 作者仓库 dotnet-skills
- 领域
- AI 智能
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @Aaronontheweb · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 即装即用
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- Linux
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: dotnet-slopwatch
description: Use Slopwatch to detect LLM reward hacking in .NET code changes. Run after every code modificati…
category: AI 智能
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# dotnet-slopwatch 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“When to Use This Skill / What is Slop? / Common Slop Patterns”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“When to Use This Skill / What is Slop? / Common Slop Patterns”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“When to Use This Skill / What is Slop? / Common Slop Patterns”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: dotnet-slopwatch
description: Use Slopwatch to detect LLM reward hacking in .NET code changes. Run after every code modificati…
category: AI 智能
source: Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills
---
# dotnet-slopwatch
## 什么时候使用
- 防止 LLM 改 .NET 代码时用捷径掩盖问题 每次改动 C#、测试、csproj 或 props 后运行,检查跳过测试、警告抑制、空 catch 等 slop 适合处理AI Agent、提示词、模型评估与自动化推理,核心价值是把输入…
- 面向提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「When to Use This Skill / What is Slop? / Common Slop Patterns」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "dotnet-slopwatch" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> When to Use This Skill / What is Slop? / Common Slop Patterns
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Slopwatch: LLM Anti-Cheat for .NET
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill constantly. Every time an LLM (including Claude) makes changes to:
- C# source files (.cs)
- Project files (.csproj)
- Props files (Directory.Build.props, Directory.Packages.props)
- Test files
Run slopwatch to validate the changes don't introduce "slop."
What is Slop?
"Slop" refers to shortcuts LLMs take that make tests pass or builds succeed without actually solving the underlying problem. These are reward hacking behaviors - the LLM optimizes for apparent success rather than real fixes.
Common Slop Patterns
| Pattern | Example | Why It's Bad |
|---|---|---|
| Disabled tests | [Fact(Skip="flaky")] |
Hides failures instead of fixing them |
| Warning suppression | #pragma warning disable CS8618 |
Silences compiler without fixing issue |
| Empty catch blocks | catch (Exception) { } |
Swallows errors, hides bugs |
| Arbitrary delays | await Task.Delay(1000); |
Masks race conditions, makes tests slow |
| Project-level suppression | <NoWarn>CS1591</NoWarn> |
Disables warnings project-wide |
| CPM bypass | Version="1.0.0" inline |
Undermines central package management |
Never accept these patterns. If an LLM introduces slop, reject the change and require a proper fix.
Installation
As a Local Tool (Recommended)
Add to .config/dotnet-tools.json:
{
"version": 1,
"isRoot": true,
"tools": {
"slopwatch.cmd": {
"version": "0.2.0",
"commands": ["slopwatch"],
"rollForward": false
}
}
}
Then restore:
dotnet tool restore
As a Global Tool
dotnet tool install --global Slopwatch.Cmd
First-Time Setup: Establish a Baseline
Before using slopwatch on an existing project, create a baseline of current issues:
# Initialize baseline from existing code
slopwatch init
# This creates .slopwatch/baseline.json
git add .slopwatch/baseline.json
git commit -m "Add slopwatch baseline"
Why baseline? Legacy code may have existing issues. The baseline ensures slopwatch only catches new slop being introduced, not pre-existing technical debt.
Usage During LLM Sessions
After Every Code Change
Run slopwatch after any LLM-generated code modification:
# Analyze for new issues (uses baseline)
slopwatch analyze
# Use strict mode - fail on warnings too
slopwatch analyze --fail-on warning
When Slopwatch Flags an Issue
Do not ignore it. Instead:
- Understand why the LLM took the shortcut
- Request a proper fix - be specific about what's wrong
- Verify the fix doesn't introduce different slop
# Example: LLM disabled a test
❌ SW001 [Error]: Disabled test detected
File: tests/MyApp.Tests/OrderTests.cs:45
Pattern: [Fact(Skip="Test is flaky")]
# Correct response: Ask for actual fix
"This test was disabled instead of fixed. Please investigate why
it's flaky and fix the underlying timing/race condition issue."
Updating the Baseline (Rare)
Only update the baseline when slop is truly justified and documented:
# Add current detections to baseline (use sparingly!)
slopwatch analyze --update-baseline
Justification examples:
- Third-party library forces a pattern (e.g., must suppress specific warning)
- Intentional delay for rate limiting (not test flakiness)
- Generated code that can't be modified
Document why in a code comment when updating baseline.
Claude Code Hook Integration
Add slopwatch as a hook to automatically validate every edit. Create or update .claude/settings.json:
{
"hooks": {
"PostToolUse": [
{
"matcher": "Write|Edit|MultiEdit",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "slopwatch analyze -d . --hook",
"timeout": 60000
}
]
}
]
}
}
The --hook flag:
- Only analyzes git dirty files (fast, even on large repos)
- Outputs errors to stderr in readable format
- Blocks the edit on warnings/errors (exit code 2)
- Claude sees the error and can fix it immediately
CI/CD Integration
Add slopwatch to your CI pipeline as a quality gate:
GitHub Actions
jobs:
slopwatch:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Setup .NET
uses: actions/setup-dotnet@v4
with:
dotnet-version: '9.0.x'
- name: Install Slopwatch
run: dotnet tool install --global Slopwatch.Cmd
- name: Run Slopwatch
run: slopwatch analyze -d . --fail-on warning
Azure Pipelines
- task: DotNetCoreCLI@2
displayName: 'Install Slopwatch'
inputs:
command: 'custom'
custom: 'tool'
arguments: 'install --global Slopwatch.Cmd'
- script: slopwatch analyze -d . --fail-on warning
displayName: 'Slopwatch Analysis'
Detection Rules
| Rule | Severity | What It Catches |
|---|---|---|
| SW001 | Error | Disabled tests (Skip=, Ignore, #if false) |
| SW002 | Warning | Warning suppression (#pragma warning disable, SuppressMessage) |
| SW003 | Error | Empty catch blocks that swallow exceptions |
| SW004 | Warning | Arbitrary delays in tests (Task.Delay, Thread.Sleep) |
| SW005 | Warning | Project file slop (NoWarn, TreatWarningsAsErrors=false) |
| SW006 | Warning | CPM bypass (VersionOverride, inline Version attributes) |
Configuration
Create .slopwatch/slopwatch.json to customize:
{
"minSeverity": "warning",
"rules": {
"SW001": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW002": { "enabled": true, "severity": "warning" },
"SW003": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW004": { "enabled": true, "severity": "warning" },
"SW005": { "enabled": true, "severity": "warning" },
"SW006": { "enabled": true, "severity": "warning" }
},
"exclude": [
"**/Generated/**",
"**/obj/**",
"**/bin/**"
]
}
Strict Mode (Recommended for LLM Sessions)
For maximum protection during LLM coding sessions, elevate all rules to errors:
{
"minSeverity": "warning",
"rules": {
"SW001": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW002": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW003": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW004": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW005": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW006": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" }
}
}
The Philosophy: Zero Tolerance for New Slop
- Baseline captures legacy - Existing issues are acknowledged but isolated
- New slop is blocked - Any new shortcut fails the build/edit
- Exceptions require justification - If you must update baseline, document why
- LLMs are not special - The same rules apply to human and AI-generated code
The goal is to prevent the gradual accumulation of technical debt that occurs when LLMs optimize for "make the test pass" rather than "fix the actual problem."
Quick Reference
# First time setup
slopwatch init
git add .slopwatch/baseline.json
# After every LLM code change
slopwatch analyze
# Strict mode (recommended)
slopwatch analyze --fail-on warning
# With stats (performance debugging)
slopwatch analyze --stats
# Update baseline (rare, document why)
slopwatch analyze --update-baseline
# JSON output for tooling
slopwatch analyze --output json
When to Override (Almost Never)
The only valid reasons to update baseline or disable a rule:
| Scenario | Action | Required |
|---|---|---|
| Third-party forces pattern | Update baseline | Code comment explaining why |
| Generated code (not editable) | Add to exclude list | Document in config |
| Intentional rate limiting delay | Update baseline | Code comment, not in test |
| Legacy code cleanup | One-time baseline update | PR description |
Invalid reasons:
- "The test is flaky" → Fix the flakiness
- "The warning is annoying" → Fix the code
- "It works on my machine" → Fix the race condition
- "We'll fix it later" → Fix it now
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核