gemini-reviewer
- Repo stars 0
- Author repo skills-registry
Gemini Reviewer Skill
IMPORTANT: This skill executes automatically. When invoked, follow these steps precisely.
Execution Protocol
When this skill is invoked, you MUST:
Identify the review target from conversation context:
- Look for PR/MR numbers mentioned
- Look for commit hashes mentioned
- Look for code snippets or implementation plans
- Check recent tool calls (glab mr view, gh pr view, git diff, etc.)
Prepare comprehensive review context file:
- Include MR/PR title and description
- Include all code changes (diff)
- Include relevant file contents
- Include upstream issues or comments
- Include helper functions or related code
Execute Gemini review using Bash tool with read-only security:
gemini --approval-mode plan -o text -p "You are an expert code reviewer. Review this [MR/PR/code] and provide detailed feedback on correctness, security, performance, code quality, and testing. Be specific and reference line numbers or code sections." < /tmp/gemini_context.txtSECURITY NOTE:
--approval-mode plan: Read-only mode preventing all tool execution- Gemini can only analyze the provided context and return text feedback
- No file system modifications, git operations, or shell commands possible
- Note: Docker
--sandboxnot used due to enterprise UID compatibility issues
Return the complete Gemini output - do not summarize or filter
Context File Template
Create /tmp/gemini_context.txt with this structure:
Review [GitLab MR/GitHub PR/Commit] #[NUMBER]: "[TITLE]"
## CONTEXT
**Purpose:** [What this change does]
**Related Issues:** [Links to upstream issues, bugs, etc.]
**Rationale:** [Why this change is needed]
**CI Status:** [Pipeline/test results if available]
## CHANGES SUMMARY
[High-level summary of what files changed and why]
## DETAILED CODE CHANGES
### File: [filename]
```[language]
[Show diff with - and + for removed/added lines]
File: [filename2]
[Show diff]
HELPER FUNCTION CONTEXT
[Include any related helper functions or dependencies that aren't in the diff]
REVIEW FOCUS
Please review focusing on:
- Correctness: Logic errors, edge cases
- Security: Input validation, vulnerabilities
- Performance: Scalability, efficiency concerns
- Edge Cases: Null handling, error conditions
- Architecture: Design soundness, alternatives
- Code Quality: Readability, maintainability
- Testing: What tests should be added?
- Configuration: Impact of config changes
Provide specific, actionable feedback with line references.
## Example Execution
**Scenario:** /code-review command called with MR 44
Following the execution protocol above, here's a concrete example:
```bash
# Step 2: Prepare context file
cat > /tmp/gemini_context.txt << 'EOF'
Review GitLab Merge Request #44: "Tuning rag score thresholds"
## CONTEXT
[Full MR description, purpose, rationale]
## DETAILED CODE CHANGES
[Complete diff from glab mr diff]
## REVIEW FOCUS
[Specific areas to examine]
EOF
# Step 3: Execute Gemini in read-only plan mode
gemini --approval-mode plan -o text -p "You are an expert code reviewer. Review this merge request and provide detailed feedback on correctness, security, performance, and code quality. Be specific and reference line numbers." < /tmp/gemini_context.txt
Critical Rules
- ALWAYS use
--approval-mode plan- Read-only mode preventing all tool execution - ALWAYS use
-pflag - Required for prompts when using stdin input - NEVER use
-y/YOLO mode - Auto-approves dangerous operations (rm, git reset, etc.) - ALWAYS use
-o text- Clean text output format - DO NOT use
--sandbox- Has compatibility issues with enterprise UID ranges (4212687 > 60000) - DO NOT summarize or filter Gemini's output - return it verbatim
- DO gather sufficient context - include diffs, descriptions, related code
- DO focus the prompt - tell Gemini what to look for
- DO use temporary files (
/tmp/gemini_context.txt) for large context
Troubleshooting
If Gemini is not installed:
- Report to user that Gemini CLI is not available
- Skip Gemini review and note it in the combined output
If Gemini returns an error:
- Include the error in the output
- Note that Gemini review failed but continue with other reviews
Integration with /code-review
This skill is automatically invoked by /code-review command alongside Claude's code-reviewer agent. Both run in parallel for comprehensive coverage.
<!-- tomevault:4.0:skill_md:2026-05-23 -->Source: ccronca/dotfiles — distributed by TomeVault.
- Fluxly category
- Engineering
- Author-declared agents
- No explicit declaration found; this is not inferred or tested compatibility
- Static check
- 88 / 100 · heuristic scan, not runtime safety proof
- Author / version / license
- @tomevault-io · no license declared
- Fluxly token estimate
- Lean
- Fluxly setup estimate
- Manual integration
- External API key
- No requirement detected
- Detected OS requirements
- Docker
- Runtime requirements
- Docker
- Detected file/system behavior
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Shell exec
- Detected network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- None (reference only)
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
The current SKILL.md does not define a fixed output example. When this skill is invoked, you MUST: Identify the review target from conversation context: Look for PR/MR numbers mentioned
Create /tmp/geminicontext.txt with this structure:
Purpose: [What this change does] Related Issues: [Links to upstream issues, bugs, etc.] Rationale: [Why this change is needed]
[High-level summary of what files changed and why]
DETAILED CODE CHANGES
File: [filename]
# Gemini Reviewer Skill
**IMPORTANT:** This skill executes automatically. When invoked, follow these steps precisely.
## Execution Protocol
When this skill is invoked, you MUST:
1. **Identify the review target** from conversation context:
- Look for PR/MR numbers mentioned
- Look for commit hashes mentioned
- Look for code snippets or implementation plans
- Check recent tool calls (glab mr view, gh pr view, git diff, etc.)
2. **Prepare comprehensive review context** file:
- Include MR/PR title and description
- Include all code changes (diff)
- Include relevant file contents
- Include upstream issues or comments
- Include helper functions or related code
3. **Execute Gemini review** using Bash tool with read-only security:
```bash
gemini --approval-mode plan -o text -p "You are an expert code reviewer. Review this [MR/PR/code] and provide detailed feedback on correctness, security, performance, code quality, and testing. Be specific and reference line numbers or code sections." < /tmp/gemini_context.txt
```
**SECURITY NOTE**:
- `--approval-mode plan`: Read-only mode preventing all tool execution
- Gemini can only analyze the provided context and return text feedback
- No file system modifications, git operations, or shell commands possible
- Note: Docker `--sandbox` not used due to enterprise UID compatibility issues
4. **Return the complete Gemini output** - do not summarize or filter
## Context File Template
Create `/tmp/gemini_context.txt` with this structure:
```
Review [GitLab MR/GitHub PR/Commit] #[NUMBER]: "[TITLE]"
## CONTEXT
**Purpose:** [What this change does]
**Related Issues:** [Links to upstream issues, bugs, etc.]
**Rationale:** [Why this change is needed]
… Author text anchors workflow facts; Fluxly only indexes current sections, terms, files, and commands.
sections -> Execution Protocol → Context File Template → CONTEXT → CHANGES SUMMARY → DETAILED CODE CHANGES → File: [filename]
terms -> IMPORTANT · Identify the review target · Prepare comprehensive review context · Execute Gemini review · SECURITY NOTE · Return the complete Gemini output · Purpose · Related Issues
files/cmd -> --approval-mode plan · --sandbox · /tmp/geminicontext.txt · -o text · /code-review
body sha256 -> fbbc13046eb2
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review