Gemini 审查
- 作者仓库星标 0
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 skills-registry
- 领域
- 工程开发
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @tomevault-io · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需手动接入
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- Docker
- 底层运行要求
- Docker
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: gemini-reviewer
description: Use Google Gemini for parallel code reviews, complex task validation, and second opinions. Runs…
category: 工程开发
runtime: Docker
---
# gemini-reviewer 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Execution Protocol / Context File Template / CONTEXT”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Execution Protocol / Context File Template / CONTEXT”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文出现了 `/tmp`、`/code-review`、`/yolo` 这类斜杠命令;如果你的 Agent 支持命令触发,优先用命令开场,再补充目标和边界。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Execution Protocol / Context File Template / CONTEXT”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: gemini-reviewer
description: Use Google Gemini for parallel code reviews, complex task validation, and second opinions. Runs…
category: 工程开发
source: tomevault-io/skills-registry
---
# gemini-reviewer
## 什么时候使用
- 用于审阅代码、文档或方案并给出可执行反馈 适合处理工程开发场景下的代码实现、调试、重构、测试或代码审查,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代的步骤;通常…
- 面向代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Execution Protocol / Context File Template / CONTEXT」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "gemini-reviewer" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Execution Protocol / Context File Template / CONTEXT
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> Docker | 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Gemini Reviewer Skill
IMPORTANT: This skill executes automatically. When invoked, follow these steps precisely.
Execution Protocol
When this skill is invoked, you MUST:
Identify the review target from conversation context:
- Look for PR/MR numbers mentioned
- Look for commit hashes mentioned
- Look for code snippets or implementation plans
- Check recent tool calls (glab mr view, gh pr view, git diff, etc.)
Prepare comprehensive review context file:
- Include MR/PR title and description
- Include all code changes (diff)
- Include relevant file contents
- Include upstream issues or comments
- Include helper functions or related code
Execute Gemini review using Bash tool with read-only security:
gemini --approval-mode plan -o text -p "You are an expert code reviewer. Review this [MR/PR/code] and provide detailed feedback on correctness, security, performance, code quality, and testing. Be specific and reference line numbers or code sections." < /tmp/gemini_context.txtSECURITY NOTE:
--approval-mode plan: Read-only mode preventing all tool execution- Gemini can only analyze the provided context and return text feedback
- No file system modifications, git operations, or shell commands possible
- Note: Docker
--sandboxnot used due to enterprise UID compatibility issues
Return the complete Gemini output - do not summarize or filter
Context File Template
Create /tmp/gemini_context.txt with this structure:
Review [GitLab MR/GitHub PR/Commit] #[NUMBER]: "[TITLE]"
## CONTEXT
**Purpose:** [What this change does]
**Related Issues:** [Links to upstream issues, bugs, etc.]
**Rationale:** [Why this change is needed]
**CI Status:** [Pipeline/test results if available]
## CHANGES SUMMARY
[High-level summary of what files changed and why]
## DETAILED CODE CHANGES
### File: [filename]
```[language]
[Show diff with - and + for removed/added lines]
File: [filename2]
[Show diff]
HELPER FUNCTION CONTEXT
[Include any related helper functions or dependencies that aren't in the diff]
REVIEW FOCUS
Please review focusing on:
- Correctness: Logic errors, edge cases
- Security: Input validation, vulnerabilities
- Performance: Scalability, efficiency concerns
- Edge Cases: Null handling, error conditions
- Architecture: Design soundness, alternatives
- Code Quality: Readability, maintainability
- Testing: What tests should be added?
- Configuration: Impact of config changes
Provide specific, actionable feedback with line references.
## Example Execution
**Scenario:** /code-review command called with MR 44
Following the execution protocol above, here's a concrete example:
```bash
# Step 2: Prepare context file
cat > /tmp/gemini_context.txt << 'EOF'
Review GitLab Merge Request #44: "Tuning rag score thresholds"
## CONTEXT
[Full MR description, purpose, rationale]
## DETAILED CODE CHANGES
[Complete diff from glab mr diff]
## REVIEW FOCUS
[Specific areas to examine]
EOF
# Step 3: Execute Gemini in read-only plan mode
gemini --approval-mode plan -o text -p "You are an expert code reviewer. Review this merge request and provide detailed feedback on correctness, security, performance, and code quality. Be specific and reference line numbers." < /tmp/gemini_context.txt
Critical Rules
- ALWAYS use
--approval-mode plan- Read-only mode preventing all tool execution - ALWAYS use
-pflag - Required for prompts when using stdin input - NEVER use
-y/YOLO mode - Auto-approves dangerous operations (rm, git reset, etc.) - ALWAYS use
-o text- Clean text output format - DO NOT use
--sandbox- Has compatibility issues with enterprise UID ranges (4212687 > 60000) - DO NOT summarize or filter Gemini's output - return it verbatim
- DO gather sufficient context - include diffs, descriptions, related code
- DO focus the prompt - tell Gemini what to look for
- DO use temporary files (
/tmp/gemini_context.txt) for large context
Troubleshooting
If Gemini is not installed:
- Report to user that Gemini CLI is not available
- Skip Gemini review and note it in the combined output
If Gemini returns an error:
- Include the error in the output
- Note that Gemini review failed but continue with other reviews
Integration with /code-review
This skill is automatically invoked by /code-review command alongside Claude's code-reviewer agent. Both run in parallel for comprehensive coverage.
Source: ccronca/dotfiles — distributed by TomeVault.
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核