github-stars-analyzer

AI Community
Fluxly profile Facts only: domain, agents, trust score, runtime, permissions and network
Domain
AI
Compatible agents
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Cline
  • Codex
  • Windsurf
  • Gemini CLI
  • +20
Trust score
88 / 100 · community maintained
Author / version / license
@tomevault-io · no license declared
Token usage
Lean
Setup complexity
Manual integration
External API key
Required · Vendor-specific
Operating systems
Docker
Runtime requirements
Python · Docker
Permissions
  • Read-only
  • Write / modify
Network behavior
External requests
Install commands
26 variants

Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.

Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。

Output preview github-stars-analyzer.preview
---
name: github-stars-analyzer
description: 通过 GitHub 公开 API 抓取用户所有 starred 仓库,按大类自动分组,生成标准化中文 Markdown 报告文件。 github-stars-analyzer/ ├── SKI…
category: ai
runtime: Python / Docker
---

# github-stars-analyzer output preview

## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: 通过 GitHub 公开 API 抓取用户所有 starred 仓库,按大类自动分组,生成标准化中文 Markdown 报告文件。 github-stars-analyzer/ ├── SKILL.md ← 本文件 │ └── fetch_stars.py ← 抓取 + 报告生成脚本 └── template.md ← 标准化报告模板(说明格式规范) requires Vendor-specific API key; runs on Python. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “技能概述 / 文件结构 / 执行流程” and do not present inference as author intent.

## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “通过 GitHub 公开 API 抓取用户所有 starred 仓库,按大类自动分组,生成标准化中文 Markdown 报告文件。 github-stars-analyzer/ ├── SKILL.md ← 本文件 │ └── fetch_stars.py ← 抓取 + 报告生成脚本 └── template.md ← 标准化报告模板(说明格式规范) requires Vendor-specific API key; runs on Python. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “技能概述 / 文件结构 / 执行流程” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; may access external network resources; requires Vendor-specific API keys.

## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; may access external network resources; requires Vendor-specific API keys.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options.
Interpretation is structured for decision-making; original keeps the upstream SKILL.md unchanged.

Decide Fit First

  • Core job: 通过 GitHub 公开 API 抓取用户所有 starred 仓库,按大类自动分组,生成标准化中文 Markdown 报告文件。 github-stars-analyzer/ ├── SKILL.md ← 本文件 │ └── fetch_stars.py…
  • Best fit: Use it when the task has reusable inputs, steps, and validation criteria rather than a one-off answer.
  • Avoid forcing it: If the source lacks commands, platform support, or external-service evidence, keep those fields unknown instead of guessing.

Design Intent

  • Structure: The skill is organized around “技能概述”, “文件结构”, “执行流程”, “第一步:解析用户名”, showing how the author expects the agent to judge fit, collect context, and produce verifiable output.
  • Trigger evidence: Prioritize the author’s wording around when to use it, what context to collect, and what output shape to produce.
  • Evidence boundary: Author text states facts, repository files prove commands and paths, and Fluxly only adds fit, limits, and usage judgment.

How To Use It

  • Inputs: Provide target material, scope, expected result, forbidden changes, and validation method.
  • Invocation: Name github-stars-analyzer directly; if the source includes slash commands, start with the command and then add task context.
  • Validation: Start small and check whether the result follows “技能概述 / 文件结构 / 执行流程” before expanding.

Boundaries And Review

  • Dependencies: Prepare Vendor-specific API keys before running a full task.
  • Permissions: Declared permissions include read / write; ask the agent to state file, command, and rollback boundaries before acting.
  • Quality bar: A useful result names the deliverable, evidence, and next action. Generic prose means the task needs tighter context.

Discussion

Powered by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with GitHub to comment, react, or subscribe.