wordpress-router
- Repo stars 1,627
- Author updated Live
- Author repo agent-skills
- Domain
- Security
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @WordPress · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- macOS · Linux · Windows
- Runtime requirements
- Node.js
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools，默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: wordpress-router
description: Use when the user asks about WordPress codebases (plugins, themes, block themes, Gutenberg block…
category: security
runtime: Node.js
---
# wordpress-router output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Use when the user asks about WordPress codebases (plugins, themes, block themes, Gutenberg blocks, WP core checkouts) and you need to quickly classify the repo and route to the correct workflow/skill (blocks, theme.json, REST API, WP-CLI, performance, security, testing, release packaging)..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “When to use / Inputs required / Procedure” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Use when the user asks about WordPress codebases (plugins, themes, block themes, Gutenberg blocks, WP core checkouts) and you need to quickly classify the repo and route to the correct workflow/skill (blocks, theme.json, REST API, WP-CLI, performance, security, testing, release packaging).”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “When to use / Inputs required / Procedure” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. Choose the trigger
The source does not require a stable slash command. After installation, invoke the skill by name and describe the task.
Provide inputs and boundaries
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files.
Validate with a small run
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “When to use / Inputs required / Procedure”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Review before delivery
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: wordpress-router
description: Use when the user asks about WordPress codebases (plugins, themes, block themes, Gutenberg block…
category: security
source: WordPress/agent-skills
---
# wordpress-router
## When to use
- Use when the user asks about WordPress codebases (plugins, themes, block themes, Gutenberg blocks, WP core checkouts)…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “When to use / Inputs required / Procedure” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. Evidence boundary and execution chain
The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "wordpress-router" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> When to use / Inputs required / Procedure
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> Node.js | read files, write/modify files | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
}WordPress Router
When to use
Use this skill at the start of most WordPress tasks to:
- identify what kind of WordPress codebase this is (plugin vs theme vs block theme vs WP core checkout vs full site),
- pick the right workflow and guardrails,
- delegate to the most relevant domain skill(s).
Inputs required
- Repo root (current working directory).
- The user’s intent (what they want changed) and any constraints (WP version targets, WP.com specifics, release requirements).
Procedure
- Run the project triage script:
node skills/wp-project-triage/scripts/detect_wp_project.mjs
- Read the triage output and classify:
- primary project kind(s),
- tooling available (PHP/Composer, Node, @wordpress/scripts),
- tests present (PHPUnit, Playwright, wp-env),
- any version hints.
- Route to domain workflows based on user intent + repo kind:
- For the decision tree, read:
skills/wordpress-router/references/decision-tree.md.
- For the decision tree, read:
- Apply guardrails before making changes:
- Confirm any version constraints if unclear.
- Prefer the repo’s existing tooling and conventions for builds/tests.
Verification
- Re-run the triage script if you create or restructure significant files.
- Run the repo’s lint/test/build commands that the triage output recommends (if available).
Failure modes / debugging
- If triage reports
kind: unknown, inspect:- root
composer.json,package.json,style.css,block.json,theme.json,wp-content/.
- root
- If the repo is huge, consider narrowing scanning scope or adding ignore rules to the triage script.
Escalation
- If routing is ambiguous, ask one question:
- “Is this intended to be a WordPress plugin, a theme (classic/block), or a full site repo?”
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review