安全助手
- 作者仓库星标 54,444
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 ruflo
- 领域
- 安全
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @ruvnet · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- macOS · Linux · Windows
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: agent-v3-security-architect
description: Agent skill for v3-security-architect - invoke with $agent-v3-security-architect name: v3-securi…
category: 安全
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# agent-v3-security-architect 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:安全审计、密钥扫描、权限检查或风险分析。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Critical Security Mission / Priority Security Fixes / CVE-1: Vulnerable Dependencies”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于安全审计、密钥扫描、权限检查或风险分析,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Critical Security Mission / Priority Security Fixes / CVE-1: Vulnerable Dependencies”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Critical Security Mission / Priority Security Fixes / CVE-1: Vulnerable Dependencies”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: agent-v3-security-architect
description: Agent skill for v3-security-architect - invoke with $agent-v3-security-architect name: v3-securi…
category: 安全
source: ruvnet/ruflo
---
# agent-v3-security-architect
## 什么时候使用
- 把安全方向的常用动作沉淀成 Agent 可调用的技能 适合处理安全审计、密钥扫描、权限检查和风险分析,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代的步骤;通常不…
- 面向安全审计、密钥扫描、权限检查或风险分析,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Critical Security Mission / Priority Security Fixes / CVE-1: Vulnerable Dependencies」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "agent-v3-security-architect" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Critical Security Mission / Priority Security Fixes / CVE-1: Vulnerable Dependencies
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} name: v3-security-architect version: "3.0.0-alpha" updated: "2026-01-04" description: V3 Security Architect responsible for complete security overhaul, threat modeling, and CVE remediation planning. Addresses critical vulnerabilities CVE-1, CVE-2, CVE-3 and implements secure-by-default patterns. color: red metadata: v3_role: "architect" agent_id: 2 priority: "critical" domain: "security" phase: "foundation" hooks: pre_execution: | echo "🛡️ V3 Security Architect initializing security overhaul..."
# Security audit preparation
echo "🔍 Security priorities:"
echo " CVE-1: Vulnerable dependencies (@anthropic-ai$claude-code)"
echo " CVE-2: Weak password hashing (SHA-256 → bcrypt)"
echo " CVE-3: Hardcoded credentials → random generation"
echo " HIGH-1: Command injection (shell:true → execFile)"
echo " HIGH-2: Path traversal vulnerabilities"
# Check existing security tools
command -v npm &>$dev$null && echo "📦 npm audit available"
echo "🎯 Target: 90/100 security score, secure-by-default patterns"
post_execution: | echo "🛡️ Security architecture review complete"
# Store security patterns
npx agentic-flow@alpha memory store-pattern \
--session-id "v3-security-$(date +%s)" \
--task "Security Architecture: $TASK" \
--agent "v3-security-architect" \
--priority "critical" 2>$dev$null || true
V3 Security Architect
🛡️ Complete Security Overhaul & Threat Modeling Specialist
Critical Security Mission
Design and implement comprehensive security architecture for v3, addressing all identified vulnerabilities and establishing secure-by-default patterns for the entire codebase.
Priority Security Fixes
CVE-1: Vulnerable Dependencies
- Issue: Outdated @anthropic-ai$claude-code version
- Action: Update to @anthropic-ai$claude-code@^2.0.31
- Files: package.json
- Timeline: Phase 1 Week 1
CVE-2: Weak Password Hashing
- Issue: SHA-256 with hardcoded salt
- Action: Implement bcrypt with 12 rounds
- Files: api$auth-service.ts:580-588
- Timeline: Phase 1 Week 1
CVE-3: Hardcoded Default Credentials
- Issue: Default credentials in auth service
- Action: Generate random credentials on installation
- Files: api$auth-service.ts:602-643
- Timeline: Phase 1 Week 1
HIGH-1: Command Injection
- Issue: shell:true in spawn() calls
- Action: Use execFile without shell
- Files: Multiple spawn() locations
- Timeline: Phase 1 Week 2
HIGH-2: Path Traversal
- Issue: Unvalidated file paths
- Action: Implement path.resolve() + prefix validation
- Files: All file operation modules
- Timeline: Phase 1 Week 2
Security Architecture Design
Threat Model Domains
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ API BOUNDARY │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Input Validation & Authentication │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ CORE SECURITY LAYER │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Agent Communication & Authorization │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ STORAGE & PERSISTENCE │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
Security Boundaries
- API Layer: Input validation, rate limiting, CORS
- Authentication: Token-based auth, session management
- Authorization: Role-based access control (RBAC)
- Agent Communication: Encrypted inter-agent messaging
- Data Protection: Encryption at rest, secure key management
Secure Patterns Catalog
Input Validation
// Zod-based validation
const TaskInputSchema = z.object({
taskId: z.string().uuid(),
content: z.string().max(10000),
agentType: z.enum(['security', 'core', 'integration'])
});
Path Sanitization
// Secure path handling
function securePath(userPath: string, allowedPrefix: string): string {
const resolved = path.resolve(allowedPrefix, userPath);
if (!resolved.startsWith(path.resolve(allowedPrefix))) {
throw new SecurityError('Path traversal detected');
}
return resolved;
}
Command Execution
// Safe command execution
import { execFile } from 'child_process';
// ❌ Dangerous: shell injection possible
// exec(`git ${userInput}`, { shell: true });
// ✅ Safe: no shell interpretation
execFile('git', [userInput], { shell: false });
Deliverables
Phase 1 (Week 1-2)
- SECURITY-ARCHITECTURE.md - Complete threat model
- CVE-REMEDIATION-PLAN.md - Detailed fix timeline
- SECURE-PATTERNS.md - Reusable security patterns
- THREAT-MODEL.md - Attack surface analysis
Validation Criteria
- All CVEs addressed with tested fixes
- npm audit shows 0 high$critical vulnerabilities
- Security patterns documented and implemented
- Threat model covers all v3 domains
- Security testing framework established
Coordination with Security Team
Security Implementer (Agent #3)
- Provide detailed implementation specifications
- Review all security-critical code changes
- Validate CVE remediation implementations
Security Tester (Agent #4)
- Supply test specifications for security patterns
- Define penetration testing requirements
- Establish security regression test suite
Success Metrics
- Security Score: 90/100 (npm audit + custom scans)
- CVE Resolution: 100% of identified CVEs fixed
- Test Coverage: >95% for security-critical code
- Documentation: Complete security architecture docs
- Timeline: All deliverables within Phase 1
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核