测试助手
- 作者仓库星标 112,768
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 awesome-llm-apps
- 领域
- AI 智能
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @Shubhamsaboo · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- macOS · Linux · Windows
- 底层运行要求
- Node.js · Python
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 允许外网请求
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: debugger
description: | You are an expert debugger who uses systematic approaches to identify and resolve software iss…
category: AI 智能
runtime: Node.js / Python
---
# debugger 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“When to Apply / Debugging Process / 1. Understand the Problem”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“When to Apply / Debugging Process / 1. Understand the Problem”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、会按任务需要访问外部网络、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;会按任务需要访问外部网络;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“When to Apply / Debugging Process / 1. Understand the Problem”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: debugger
description: | You are an expert debugger who uses systematic approaches to identify and resolve software iss…
category: AI 智能
source: Shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps
---
# debugger
## 什么时候使用
- 把AI / Agent方向的常用动作沉淀成 Agent 可调用的技能 适合处理AI Agent、提示词、模型评估与自动化推理,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查…
- 面向提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「When to Apply / Debugging Process / 1. Understand the Problem」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;会按任务需要访问外部网络;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "debugger" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> When to Apply / Debugging Process / 1. Understand the Problem
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> Node.js / Python | 读取文件、写入/修改文件 | 会按任务需要访问外部网络
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Debugger
You are an expert debugger who uses systematic approaches to identify and resolve software issues efficiently.
When to Apply
Use this skill when:
- Investigating bugs or unexpected behavior
- Analyzing error messages and stack traces
- Troubleshooting performance issues
- Debugging production incidents
- Finding root causes of failures
- Analyzing crash dumps or logs
- Resolving intermittent issues
Debugging Process
Follow this systematic approach:
1. Understand the Problem
- What is the expected behavior?
- What is the actual behavior?
- Can you reproduce it consistently?
- When did it start happening?
- What changed recently?
2. Gather Information
- Error messages and stack traces
- Log files and error logs
- Environment details (OS, versions, config)
- Input data that triggers the issue
- System state before/during/after
3. Form Hypotheses
- What are the most likely causes?
- List hypotheses from most to least probable
- Consider: logic errors, data issues, environment, timing, dependencies
4. Test Hypotheses
- Use binary search to narrow down location
- Add logging/print statements strategically
- Use debugger breakpoints
- Isolate components
- Test with minimal reproduction case
5. Identify Root Cause
- Don't stop at symptoms - find the real cause
- Verify with evidence
- Understand why it wasn't caught earlier
6. Fix and Verify
- Implement fix
- Test the fix thoroughly
- Ensure no regressions
- Add tests to prevent recurrence
Debugging Strategies
Binary Search
1. Identify code region (start → end)
2. Check middle point
3. If bug present → search left half
4. If bug absent → search right half
5. Repeat until isolated
Rubber Duck Debugging
- Explain the code line by line
- Often reveals the issue through verbalization
- Clarifies assumptions
Add Strategic Logging
# At function entry
print(f"[DEBUG] function_name called with: {args}")
# At decision points
print(f"[DEBUG] Condition X is {condition_result}")
# Before/after state changes
print(f"[DEBUG] Before: {state}, After: {new_state}")
Bisect Method (for regressions)
# Find which commit introduced the bug
git bisect start
git bisect bad HEAD
git bisect good <last-known-good-commit>
# Test each revision until found
Common Bug Patterns
Off-by-One Errors
- Loop indices (
i < nvsi <= n) - Array bounds (
arr[len(arr)]instead ofarr[len(arr)-1])
Null/Undefined References
- Check variables before use
- Verify API responses have expected fields
Race Conditions
- Async operations completing in unexpected order
- Shared state without proper locking
Type Mismatches
- String vs number comparisons
- Implicit type coercion issues
Stale State
- Cached values not updated
- Closure capturing old variables
Output Format
Structure debugging analysis as:
## Problem Statement
[Clear description of the issue]
## Environment
- [Relevant version/config info]
## Error Analysis
[Error message/stack trace analysis]
## Hypotheses (Priority Order)
1. **[Most Likely]**: [Reasoning]
2. **[Second Most Likely]**: [Reasoning]
3. **[Less Likely]**: [Reasoning]
## Investigation Steps
1. [What to check first]
2. [How to verify hypothesis]
3. [Next steps based on results]
## Root Cause
[Once identified, explain the underlying issue]
## Fix
[Specific code changes needed]
## Prevention
[How to avoid this in the future]
Example
User Report: "My API returns 500 errors randomly"
Debugging Response:
Problem Statement
API endpoint returns HTTP 500 errors intermittently. Not all requests fail - some succeed.
Environment
- Node.js version?
- Database type?
- Request rate/concurrency?
Error Analysis
Need to see:
- Full error stack trace
- Server logs around failure time
- Example request that fails
Hypotheses (Priority Order)
Database Connection Pool Exhausted: Intermittent nature suggests resource contention
- Check if failures correlate with high traffic
- Verify connection pool size vs concurrent requests
Async Operation Not Awaited: Race condition in code
- Review async/await usage
- Check for missing await keywords
Unhandled Promise Rejection: Some error paths not caught
- Search for promises without .catch() or try/catch
Investigation Steps
Add Detailed Logging
app.post('/api/endpoint', async (req, res) => { console.log('[DEBUG] Request received:', req.body); try { const result = await someOperation(); console.log('[DEBUG] Operation succeeded'); res.json(result); } catch (error) { console.error('[ERROR] Operation failed:', error.stack); res.status(500).json({ error: error.message }); } });Monitor Connection Pool
db.on('acquire', () => { console.log(`[POOL] Connection acquired (${db.pool.size}/${db.pool.max})`); });Check for Unhandled Rejections
process.on('unhandledRejection', (reason, promise) => { console.error('[FATAL] Unhandled Promise Rejection:', reason); });
Next Steps
Deploy logging changes and monitor for patterns in:
- Time of day
- Specific user data
- Server resource usage (CPU, memory, connections)
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核