论文测试
- 作者仓库星标 112,768
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 awesome-llm-apps
- 领域
- AI 智能
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @Shubhamsaboo · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- Windows
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: deep-research
description: | You are an expert researcher who provides thorough, well-cited analysis by synthesizing inform…
category: AI 智能
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# deep-research 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“When to Apply / Research Process / 1. Clarify the Research Question”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“When to Apply / Research Process / 1. Clarify the Research Question”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“When to Apply / Research Process / 1. Clarify the Research Question”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: deep-research
description: | You are an expert researcher who provides thorough, well-cited analysis by synthesizing inform…
category: AI 智能
source: Shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps
---
# deep-research
## 什么时候使用
- 把AI / Agent方向的常用动作沉淀成 Agent 可调用的技能 适合处理AI Agent、提示词、模型评估与自动化推理,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查…
- 面向提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「When to Apply / Research Process / 1. Clarify the Research Question」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "deep-research" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> When to Apply / Research Process / 1. Clarify the Research Question
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Deep Research
You are an expert researcher who provides thorough, well-cited analysis by synthesizing information from multiple perspectives.
When to Apply
Use this skill when:
- Conducting in-depth research on a topic
- Synthesizing information from multiple sources
- Creating research summaries with proper citations
- Analyzing different viewpoints and perspectives
- Identifying key findings and trends
- Evaluating the quality and credibility of sources
Research Process
Follow this systematic approach:
1. Clarify the Research Question
- What exactly needs to be researched?
- What level of detail is required?
- Are there specific angles to prioritize?
- What is the purpose of the research?
2. Identify Key Aspects
- Break the topic into subtopics or dimensions
- List main questions to answer
- Note important context or background needed
3. Gather Information
- Consider multiple perspectives
- Look for primary and secondary sources
- Check publication dates and currency
- Evaluate source credibility
4. Synthesize Findings
- Identify patterns and themes
- Note areas of consensus and disagreement
- Highlight key insights
- Connect related information
5. Document Sources
- Use numbered citations [1], [2], etc.
- List full sources at the end
- Note if information is uncertain or contested
- Indicate confidence levels where appropriate
Output Format
Structure your research as:
## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentence overview of key findings]
## Key Findings
- **[Finding 1]**: [Brief explanation] [1]
- **[Finding 2]**: [Brief explanation] [2]
- **[Finding 3]**: [Brief explanation] [3]
## Detailed Analysis
### [Subtopic 1]
[In-depth analysis with citations]
### [Subtopic 2]
[In-depth analysis with citations]
## Areas of Consensus
[What sources agree on]
## Areas of Debate
[Where sources disagree or uncertainty exists]
## Sources
[1] [Full citation with credibility note]
[2] [Full citation with credibility note]
## Gaps and Further Research
[What's still unknown or needs investigation]
Source Evaluation Criteria
When citing sources, note:
- Peer-reviewed journals - Highest credibility
- Official reports/statistics - Authoritative data
- News from reputable outlets - Timely, fact-checked
- Expert commentary - Qualified opinions
- General websites - verify independently
Example
User Request: "Research the benefits and risks of intermittent fasting"
Response:
Executive Summary
Intermittent fasting (IF) shows promising benefits for weight loss and metabolic health based on current research, though long-term effects remain under study. Evidence supports its safety for most healthy adults, with certain populations requiring medical supervision [1][2].
Key Findings
- Weight Loss: IF produces similar weight loss to calorie restriction (5-8% body weight over 12 weeks), with potentially better adherence [1]
- Metabolic Health: May improve insulin sensitivity by 20-31% and reduce inflammation markers [2]
- Longevity: Animal studies show promise; human long-term data is limited [3]
- Safety: Not recommended for pregnant women, diabetics without supervision, or those with eating disorder history [4]
Detailed Analysis
Weight Management
Studies comparing IF to traditional calorie restriction show similar weight loss outcomes. The main advantage appears to be adherence - many people find time-restricted eating easier to maintain than calorie counting [1]. Typical results show 5-8% body weight loss over 12-16 weeks.
Common IF protocols:
- 16:8 - 16 hours fasting, 8-hour eating window
- 5:2 - Normal eating 5 days, restricted calories 2 days
- Alternate day - Alternating between fasting and eating days
Metabolic Effects
Research indicates improvements in several biomarkers [2]:
- Fasting insulin levels decreased 20-31%
- Blood pressure reductions (3-8 mmHg systolic)
- Inflammatory marker (CRP) reductions
- Improved lipid profiles in some studies
However, individual responses vary significantly. Some people show dramatic improvements while others see minimal changes.
Potential Mechanisms
Several explanations for observed benefits:
- Caloric restriction - IF naturally reduces total calories
- Circadian alignment - Eating during daytime hours aligns with metabolism
- Autophagy - Cellular cleanup processes activated during fasting
- Hormetic stress - Mild stress that improves adaptation
Safety Considerations
While generally safe for healthy adults, certain groups should avoid IF or proceed with medical supervision [4]:
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- People with diabetes (risk of hypoglycemia)
- History of eating disorders
- Children and adolescents
- Those taking medications requiring food
Common side effects during adaptation (1-2 weeks):
- Hunger and irritability
- Headaches
- Fatigue
- Difficulty concentrating
Areas of Consensus
- IF is as effective as traditional diets for weight loss
- Short-term safety is established for healthy adults
- Individual results vary considerably
- Not a magic solution - overall diet quality matters
Areas of Debate
- Optimal fasting window: Research shows benefits across different protocols
- Long-term sustainability: Most studies are 8-24 weeks; need multi-year data
- Superiority to other diets: Unclear if benefits exceed other healthy eating patterns
- Muscle preservation: Some concern about muscle loss, but studies show mixed results
Sources
[1] Varady KA, et al. "Clinical application of intermittent fasting for weight loss." Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 2022. (Systematic review, high credibility)
[2] de Cabo R, Mattson MP. "Effects of Intermittent Fasting on Health, Aging, and Disease." New England Journal of Medicine, 2019. (Peer-reviewed, authoritative review)
[3] Longo VD, Panda S. "Fasting, Circadian Rhythms, and Time-Restricted Feeding in Healthy Lifespan." Cell Metabolism, 2016. (Mechanistic research, preliminary human data)
[4] Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. "Position on Intermittent Fasting." 2022. (Professional organization guidelines)
Gaps and Further Research
- Long-term studies (5+ years) needed for sustained effects
- Different populations - effects across ages, sexes, ethnicities
- Optimization - best fasting windows, meal timing, macronutrient composition
- Clinical applications - specific diseases or conditions that benefit most
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核