文档抓取
- 作者仓库星标 1,187
- 叉子 185
- 作者更新于 2026年6月14日 10:01
- 作者仓库 claude-code-skills
- 领域
- 文档
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @daymade · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 较高消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需手动接入
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- macOS · Linux · Windows
- 底层运行要求
- Node.js · Python
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- Shell 执行
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 允许外网请求
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: feishu-doc-scraper
description: Extract Feishu (Lark) Docs, Wiki pages/collections, spreadsheets, and Minutes (妙记) transcripts i…
category: 文档
runtime: Node.js / Python
---
# feishu-doc-scraper 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:PRD、RFC、README、项目说明或知识库整理。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Scope (read this first) / Choose the path / Path A — lark-cli API extraction (primary)”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于PRD、RFC、README、项目说明或知识库整理,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Scope (read this first) / Choose the path / Path A — lark-cli API extraction (primary)”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、执行终端命令、写入/修改文件、会按任务需要访问外部网络、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、执行终端命令、写入/修改文件;会按任务需要访问外部网络;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文出现了 `/tmp`、`/scripts`、`/script`、`/cross-tenant`、`/daymade-docs` 这类斜杠命令;如果你的 Agent 支持命令触发,优先用命令开场,再补充目标和边界。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、执行终端命令、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Scope (read this first) / Choose the path / Path A — lark-cli API extraction (primary)”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: feishu-doc-scraper
description: Extract Feishu (Lark) Docs, Wiki pages/collections, spreadsheets, and Minutes (妙记) transcripts i…
category: 文档
source: daymade/claude-code-skills
---
# feishu-doc-scraper
## 什么时候使用
- feishu-doc-scraper 是文档方向的技能,对外说明 适合处理README、PRD、RFC、教程和知识库文档,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继…
- 面向PRD、RFC、README、项目说明或知识库整理,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Scope (read this first) / Choose the path / Path A — lark-cli API extraction (primary)」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、执行终端命令、写入/修改文件;会按任务需要访问外部网络;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "feishu-doc-scraper" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Scope (read this first) / Choose the path / Path A — lark-cli API extraction (primary)
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> Node.js / Python | 读取文件、执行终端命令、写入/修改文件 | 会按任务需要访问外部网络
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Feishu Doc Scraper
Extract a Feishu/Lark source into faithful local Markdown. Prefer the lark-cli API — it extracts the body programmatically (no model paraphrasing), follows a collection's reference graph, and reads permission boundaries from error codes instead of guessing. Treat the rendered browser page as a fallback, not the source of truth: in real collection-scraping work the API path consistently does the whole job while the browser path is never needed.
Scope (read this first)
This skill's contract is faithful per-source Markdown + a record of what was extracted. It does not decide how the resulting files are named, indexed, deduplicated against existing notes, or organized into a knowledge base — that belongs to the host PKM / the user's own conventions. Stopping at faithful extraction keeps this skill orthogonal and reusable. When the user wants the output filed into a vault, extract first, then hand the clean Markdown to their organizing workflow.
Choose the path
Is the source a Feishu/Lark URL (wiki / docx / sheets / minutes / base)?
├── YES → is lark-cli installed and authenticated to that tenant?
│ ├── YES → PATH A: lark-cli API extraction (primary — start here)
│ │ └── hit code 131006 / 99991679 (permission denied)?
│ │ └── PATH B: owner-exported .docx → faithful Markdown
│ └── NO → install/auth lark-cli first (it is worth it); only if
│ truly impossible → PATH D: browser DOM fallback
├── the URL is a Minutes / 妙记 link, or a doc references one → PATH C: Minutes transcript
└── you were handed an exported .docx (not a URL) → PATH B
A collection/hub is just a docx whose body references other docs — Path A handles it by recursively following the reference graph, not by visiting pages in a browser.
Path A — lark-cli API extraction (primary)
Full command catalog, recursion engine, cross-tenant and personal-space nuances: references/lark-cli-api-extraction.md. The essentials for the common case:
1. Disable the proxy for Feishu domestic domains. Feishu's *.feishu.cn endpoints are direct-connect in mainland China; routing them through a local proxy leaks credentials through the proxy and gets DNS-hijacked. lark-cli itself warns about this. Always:
export LARK_CLI_NO_PROXY=1
This does not conflict with any "Claude/Anthropic domains must use the proxy" rule — Feishu is a different host and is direct.
2. Classify the URL, then resolve to a fetchable doc token.
…/wiki/<node_token>— a wiki node token is not a doc token. Resolve it first:lark-cli wiki spaces get_node --params '{"token":"<node_token>"}' # → .data.node.obj_token and .data.node.obj_type (e.g. "docx")…/docx/<doc_token>— already a doc token, fetch directly.…/sheets/<token>— spreadsheet, use the sheets commands (see reference).…/minutes/<token>— Minutes, go to Path C.
3. Fetch the body as Markdown — programmatically, never via the model.
lark-cli docs +fetch --doc <obj_token> --format json > /tmp/fetch.json 2> /tmp/fetch.err
# body is .data.markdown — extract with jq, do NOT retype or summarize it
jq -r '.data.markdown' /tmp/fetch.json > source.md
Keep stdout and stderr separate. A harmless [deprecated] docs +fetch with v1 API is deprecated goes to stderr; piping 2>/dev/null and jq together produced a false Exit code 5 in practice — redirect to files and inspect, don't blind-pipe. The body must reach disk without passing through the model (paraphrasing silently corrupts source text — this is the single most important fidelity rule).
4. If it's a collection/hub, follow the reference graph (BFS). The hub body contains <mention-doc>, <sheet>, <image> tags and cross-tenant / Minutes / Tencent-Meeting URLs. Extract every reference, dispatch by type, fetch, and repeat on each newly fetched doc until no new references remain (leaf nodes). Use the bundled extractor so nothing is silently missed (a missed reference = a missing document, the #1 hub-scraping failure):
python3 scripts/feishu_extract_refs.py source.md # → JSON list of {type, token, title}
Recursion loop, dispatch table, and the cross-tenant/my.feishu.cn personal-space rules are in the reference.
5. Final residual-tag check (acceptance gate for collections). Every rich-media reference must have been resolved and rendered:
grep -rlE '<(lark-table|lark-tr|sheet token=|mention-doc|view type=)' . && echo "UNRESOLVED — keep recursing" || echo "clean"
Must be empty before you stop.
Path B — permission denied → owner-exported .docx
lark-cli wiki spaces get_node returning code 131006 … node permission denied, user needs read permission (or fetch returning it) is a hard Feishu-side boundary. lark-cli, anonymous curl, and the browser all fail it — this has been verified exhaustively; do not spend cycles trying to bypass it. The only correct move: ask the permission holder to export the doc as .docx and send it back out-of-band, then convert with fidelity (font-size→heading and w:shd→highlight restoration, then visual verification). Full procedure: references/docx-export-to-markdown.md.
Path C — Feishu Minutes (妙记) transcript
lark-cli minutes only returns metadata and can download audio/video — it cannot export the text transcript. The transcript comes from a native endpoint called through lark-cli api, and needs an extra scope granted via a device-flow login. Native AI transcription is far better than downloading the media and re-running ASR — never do the latter. Endpoint, scope name, the device-flow timeout trap, and per-minute (not per-tenant) permission behavior: references/feishu-minutes-transcript.md.
Path D — browser DOM fallback (last resort)
Only when lark-cli genuinely cannot reach the content (no install possible, and the doc is not permission-walled). This is the old virtual-scroll / TOC-driven DOM capture workflow. It is slower, depends on a connected browser surface (the in-browser extension frequently fails to connect), and an anonymous debugging Chrome can only tell you whether a page is publicly reachable — it cannot read login-walled content. Workflow: references/browser-dom-fallback.md. Battle-tested DOM rules (virtual scroll, data-block-id ordering, table/bullet extraction, image streams): references/browser-failure-rules.md.
Hard rules
These are the rules whose violation silently ruins the output. Each has a reason — follow the reason, not just the letter.
- Never let the document body pass through the model. Extract with
jq/cat/scripts straight to disk. The model paraphrasing source text is undetectable later and destroys fidelity. This is why Path A beats the browser path structurally. export LARK_CLI_NO_PROXY=1for*.feishu.cn. Otherwise credentials transit a local proxy and DNS is hijacked.- Transcripts come from the platform's native transcription, never re-ASR. Downloading media and transcribing again loses speaker labels, timestamps, and accuracy.
- A generated docx Markdown is not done until it has been visually verified against the source (render to image, read it). Feishu-exported docx uses font-size+bold for headings rather than Word heading styles, so a "no errors, word count matches" check passes while the entire heading hierarchy is silently flat. Text-level checks cannot catch this.
- Do not 死磕 (grind) on docx embedded-image download. lark-cli (through 1.0.32) cannot download
<image>tokens from a docx — exhaustively verified. Register the image tokens and note "needs document owner to right-click → save"; the text is the value, images are a tracked gap. - HTTP 200 from anonymous curl ≠ accessible. A Feishu login wall returns 200 with a body containing
accounts.feishu.cn/login/passport/ an empty<title>. Check the body, never infer "public" from the status code. - A file "not found" by a search agent is not authoritative. Verify against authoritative sources before concluding (this is general Inference Discipline; relevant when locating where ingested content already lives).
- U+FFFD final check on every produced file:
LC_ALL=C grep -rl $'\xef\xbf\xbd' .must be empty. A replacement character means an encoding step corrupted the text.
Acceptance contract
Stop only when all that apply are true:
- Every fetched body reached disk via
jq/script, not retyped by the model. - Collections: the residual rich-media-tag grep (Path A step 5) is empty — every
mention-doc/sheet/cross-tenant reference was followed to a leaf. LC_ALL=C grep -rl $'\xef\xbf\xbd' .is empty.- docx path: rendered to an image and visually compared to the source; heading hierarchy and highlights match (see docx reference's checklist).
- Browser fallback only: TOC coverage + scale check (see browser-failure-rules.md).
- Each output file's frontmatter records
source(the original URL/token) and, if any post-processing was applied, apost_processprovenance line. - Permission gaps (131006 docs not exported yet, undownloadable images) are explicitly listed for the user — a transparent gap beats a silent omission.
Do NOT attempt
Verified dead-ends — retrying them only wastes the session. Full table with failure modes and root causes: references/permission-and-failure-boundaries.md. The top ones:
- Bypassing
131006permission-denied by any means (lark-cli / curl / anonymous browser) — it is a server-side boundary. - Downloading docx embedded images via
docs +media-download,api …/drive/v1/medias/<t>/download(with or withoutextra), orschema drive.medias.download— none work; lark-cli even mis-reports the real HTTP 400 as "empty JSON". WebFetchagainstopen.feishu.cn/document/server-docs/...for API specs — backend is flaky; useopen.feishu.cn/llms-docs/zh-CN/llms-<module>.txtinstead (LLM-friendly, stable).- AppleScript/JXA
executeJavaScript, Chrome CDP on port 9222 — disabled/empty in this environment (browser path only). - Using
minimax-docxto convert docx→md — it is a docx authoring tool; use the doc-to-markdown skill instead.
Bundled resources
scripts/feishu_extract_refs.py— deterministic reference-token extractor; the recursion engine's core. Run it on every fetched body to enumerate<mention-doc>/<sheet>/<image>/cross-tenant/Minutes/Tencent-Meeting references as JSON.scripts/restore_docx_headings.py— for Path B: reads true font sizes via python-docx, maps them to heading levels, restoresw:shdhighlights to Obsidian==…==, without retyping body text.scripts/feishu_dom_capture.js— Path D: injectable end-to-end browser DOM capture.scripts/download_feishu_images.py— Path D: SSR image extraction when browser automation is unavailable.scripts/build_feishu_markdown.py— Path D: render a capture manifest into Markdown.scripts/check_heading_coverage.py— coverage verification (both paths).references/lark-cli-api-extraction.md— Path A full reference (commands, recursion, sheets, cross-tenant).references/feishu-minutes-transcript.md— Path C native transcript API + scope auth.references/permission-and-failure-boundaries.md— error codes + the full Do-NOT-attempt table.references/docx-export-to-markdown.md— Path B faithful conversion procedure.references/browser-dom-fallback.md+references/browser-failure-rules.md— Path D.references/capture-manifest.md— manifest shape forbuild_feishu_markdown.py.
Next step
After extraction completes, the clean Markdown typically feeds the user's own knowledge-base ingestion (filing, indexing, dedup) — which is deliberately out of this skill's scope. If the source went through Path B (a docx), the doc-to-markdown skill is already part of that flow. Offer the handoff; do not auto-organize:
Extraction complete: [N] sources → faithful Markdown ([M] permission/image gaps listed).
Options:
A) Hand off to your PKM/organizing workflow — file & index these (Recommended if part of a vault)
B) Run /daymade-docs:docs-cleaner — consolidate redundant content across the extracted files
C) Stop here — the faithful Markdown is the deliverable
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核