数据助手
- 作者仓库星标 110,511
- 叉子 16,437
- 作者更新于 2026年6月14日 18:40
- 作者仓库 gstack
- 领域
- 工程开发
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @garrytan · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 即装即用
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- Windows
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 允许外网请求
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: gstack-openclaw-retro
description: Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metri…
category: 工程开发
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# gstack-openclaw-retro 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Arguments / Instructions / Step 1: Gather Raw Data”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Arguments / Instructions / Step 1: Gather Raw Data”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、会按任务需要访问外部网络、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;会按任务需要访问外部网络;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Arguments / Instructions / Step 1: Gather Raw Data”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: gstack-openclaw-retro
description: Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metri…
category: 工程开发
source: garrytan/gstack
---
# gstack-openclaw-retro
## 什么时候使用
- gstack 体系里的复盘入口——基于本周 git log 自动生成一份团队 / 个人复盘 适合处理工程开发场景下的代码实现、调试、重构、测试或代码审查,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。…
- 面向代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Arguments / Instructions / Step 1: Gather Raw Data」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;会按任务需要访问外部网络;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "gstack-openclaw-retro" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Arguments / Instructions / Step 1: Gather Raw Data
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件 | 会按任务需要访问外部网络
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Weekly Engineering Retrospective
Generates a comprehensive engineering retrospective analyzing commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics. Team-aware: identifies the user running the command, then analyzes every contributor with per-person praise and growth opportunities.
Arguments
- Default: last 7 days
24h: last 24 hours14d: last 14 days30d: last 30 dayscompare: compare current window vs prior same-length window
Instructions
Parse the argument to determine the time window. Default to 7 days. All times should be reported in the user's local timezone.
Midnight-aligned windows: For day units, compute an absolute start date at local midnight. For example, if today is 2026-03-18 and the window is 7 days, the start date is 2026-03-11. Use --since="2026-03-11T00:00:00" for git log queries. For hour units, use --since="N hours ago".
Step 1: Gather Raw Data
First, fetch origin and identify the current user:
git fetch origin main --quiet
git config user.name
git config user.email
The name returned by git config user.name is "you" ... the person reading this retro. All other authors are teammates.
Run ALL of these git commands (they are independent):
# All commits with timestamps, subject, hash, author, files changed
git log origin/main --since="<window>" --format="%H|%aN|%ae|%ai|%s" --shortstat
# Per-commit test vs total LOC breakdown with author
git log origin/main --since="<window>" --format="COMMIT:%H|%aN" --numstat
# Commit timestamps for session detection and hourly distribution
git log origin/main --since="<window>" --format="%at|%aN|%ai|%s" | sort -n
# Files most frequently changed (hotspot analysis)
git log origin/main --since="<window>" --format="" --name-only | grep -v '^$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
# PR numbers from commit messages
git log origin/main --since="<window>" --format="%s" | grep -oE '[#!][0-9]+' | sort -t'#' -k1 | uniq
# Per-author file hotspots
git log origin/main --since="<window>" --format="AUTHOR:%aN" --name-only
# Per-author commit counts
git shortlog origin/main --since="<window>" -sn --no-merges
# Test file count
find . -name '*.test.*' -o -name '*.spec.*' -o -name '*_test.*' -o -name '*_spec.*' 2>/dev/null | grep -v node_modules | wc -l
# Test files changed in window
git log origin/main --since="<window>" --format="" --name-only | grep -E '\.(test|spec)\.' | sort -u | wc -l
Step 2: Compute Metrics
Calculate and present these metrics in a summary:
- Commits to main: N
- Contributors: N
- PRs merged: N
- Total insertions: N
- Total deletions: N
- Net LOC added: N
- Test LOC (insertions): N
- Test LOC ratio: N%
- Version range: vX.Y.Z → vX.Y.Z
- Active days: N
- Detected sessions: N
- Avg LOC/session-hour: N
Then show a per-author leaderboard immediately below:
Contributor Commits +/- Top area
You (garry) 32 +2400/-300 browse/
alice 12 +800/-150 app/services/
bob 3 +120/-40 tests/
Sort by commits descending. The current user always appears first, labeled "You (name)".
Step 3: Commit Time Distribution
Show hourly histogram in local time:
Hour Commits ████████████████
00: 4 ████
07: 5 █████
...
Identify:
- Peak hours
- Dead zones
- Bimodal pattern (morning/evening) vs continuous
- Late-night coding clusters (after 10pm)
Step 4: Work Session Detection
Detect sessions using 45-minute gap threshold between consecutive commits.
Classify sessions:
- Deep sessions (50+ min)
- Medium sessions (20-50 min)
- Micro sessions (<20 min, single-commit)
Calculate:
- Total active coding time
- Average session length
- LOC per hour of active time
Step 5: Commit Type Breakdown
Categorize by conventional commit prefix (feat/fix/refactor/test/chore/docs). Show as percentage bar:
feat: 20 (40%) ████████████████████
fix: 27 (54%) ███████████████████████████
refactor: 2 ( 4%) ██
Flag if fix ratio exceeds 50% ... signals a "ship fast, fix fast" pattern that may indicate review gaps.
Step 6: Hotspot Analysis
Show top 10 most-changed files. Flag:
- Files changed 5+ times (churn hotspots)
- Test files vs production files in the hotspot list
- VERSION/CHANGELOG frequency
Step 7: PR Size Distribution
Estimate PR sizes and bucket them:
- Small (<100 LOC)
- Medium (100-500 LOC)
- Large (500-1500 LOC)
- XL (1500+ LOC)
Step 8: Focus Score + Ship of the Week
Focus score: Percentage of commits touching the single most-changed top-level directory. Higher = deeper focused work. Lower = scattered context-switching.
Ship of the week: The single highest-LOC PR in the window. Highlight PR number, LOC changed, and why it matters.
Step 9: Team Member Analysis
For each contributor (including the current user), compute:
- Commits and LOC ... total commits, insertions, deletions, net LOC
- Areas of focus ... which directories/files they touched most (top 3)
- Commit type mix ... their personal feat/fix/refactor/test breakdown
- Session patterns ... when they code (peak hours), session count
- Test discipline ... their personal test LOC ratio
- Biggest ship ... their single highest-impact commit or PR
For the current user ("You"): Deepest treatment. Include all session analysis, time patterns, focus score. Frame in first person.
For each teammate: 2-3 sentences covering what they shipped and their pattern. Then:
- Praise (1-2 specific things): Anchor in actual commits. Not "great work" ... say exactly what was good.
- Opportunity for growth (1 specific thing): Frame as leveling-up, not criticism. Anchor in actual data.
If solo repo: Skip team breakdown.
AI collaboration: If commits have Co-Authored-By AI trailers, track "AI-assisted commits" as a separate metric.
Step 10: Week-over-Week Trends (if window >= 14d)
Split into weekly buckets and show trends:
- Commits per week (total and per-author)
- LOC per week
- Test ratio per week
- Fix ratio per week
- Session count per week
Step 11: Streak Tracking
Count consecutive days with at least 1 commit, going back from today:
# Team streak
git log origin/main --format="%ad" --date=format:"%Y-%m-%d" | sort -u
# Personal streak
git log origin/main --author="<user_name>" --format="%ad" --date=format:"%Y-%m-%d" | sort -u
Display both:
- "Team shipping streak: 47 consecutive days"
- "Your shipping streak: 32 consecutive days"
Step 12: Load History & Compare
Check for prior retro history in memory/:
If prior retros exist, load the most recent one and calculate deltas:
Last Now Delta
Test ratio: 22% → 41% ↑19pp
Sessions: 10 → 14 ↑4
LOC/hour: 200 → 350 ↑75%
Fix ratio: 54% → 30% ↓24pp (improving)
If no prior retros exist, note "First retro recorded, run again next week to see trends."
Step 13: Save Retro History
Save a JSON snapshot to memory/retro-YYYY-MM-DD.json with metrics, authors, version range, streak, and tweetable summary.
Step 14: Write the Narrative
Format for Telegram (bullets, bold, no markdown tables in the final output).
Structure:
Tweetable summary (first line):
Week of Mar 1: 47 commits (3 contributors), 3.2k LOC, 38% tests, 12 PRs, peak: 10pm | Streak: 47d
Then sections:
- Summary ... key metrics
- Trends vs Last Retro ... deltas (skip if first retro)
- Time & Session Patterns ... when the team codes, session lengths, deep vs micro
- Shipping Velocity ... commit types, PR sizes, fix-chain detection
- Code Quality Signals ... test ratio, hotspots, churn
- Focus & Highlights ... focus score, ship of the week
- Your Week ... personal deep-dive for the current user
- Team Breakdown ... per-teammate analysis with praise + growth (skip if solo)
- Top 3 Team Wins ... highest-impact things shipped
- 3 Things to Improve ... specific, actionable, anchored in commits
- 3 Habits for Next Week ... small, practical, realistic (<5 min to adopt)
Compare Mode
When the user says "compare":
- Run the retro for the current window
- Run the retro for the prior same-length window
- Present side-by-side metrics with arrows showing improvement/regression
- Brief narrative on biggest changes
Important Rules
- All times in local timezone. Never set
TZ. - Format for Telegram. Use bullets and bold. Avoid markdown tables in the final output.
- Praise anchored in commits. Never say "great work" without naming what was good.
- Growth areas anchored in data. Never criticize without evidence.
- Save history. Every retro saves to
memory/for trend tracking. - Completion status:
- DONE ... retro generated, history saved
- DONE_WITH_CONCERNS ... generated but missing data (e.g., no prior retros for comparison)
- BLOCKED ... not in a git repo or no commits in window
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核