数据设计
- 作者仓库星标 36,312
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 agents
- 领域
- 设计与多媒体
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @wshobson · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- Python
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: kpi-dashboard-design
description: Design effective KPI dashboards with metrics selection, visualization best practices, and real-t…
category: 设计与多媒体
runtime: Python
---
# kpi-dashboard-design 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:视觉内容、演示材料、信息图或设计交付。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“When to Use This Skill / Core Concepts / 1. KPI Framework”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于视觉内容、演示材料、信息图或设计交付,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“When to Use This Skill / Core Concepts / 1. KPI Framework”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“When to Use This Skill / Core Concepts / 1. KPI Framework”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: kpi-dashboard-design
description: Design effective KPI dashboards with metrics selection, visualization best practices, and real-t…
category: 设计与多媒体
source: wshobson/agents
---
# kpi-dashboard-design
## 什么时候使用
- 把设计与视觉方向的常用动作沉淀成 Agent 可调用的技能 适合处理界面、视觉、封面、信息图或演示材料交付,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代的步骤…
- 面向视觉内容、演示材料、信息图或设计交付,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「When to Use This Skill / Core Concepts / 1. KPI Framework」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "kpi-dashboard-design" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> When to Use This Skill / Core Concepts / 1. KPI Framework
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> Python | 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} KPI Dashboard Design
Comprehensive patterns for designing effective Key Performance Indicator (KPI) dashboards that drive business decisions.
When to Use This Skill
- Designing executive dashboards
- Selecting meaningful KPIs
- Building real-time monitoring displays
- Creating department-specific metrics views
- Improving existing dashboard layouts
- Establishing metric governance
Core Concepts
1. KPI Framework
| Level | Focus | Update Frequency | Audience |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic | Long-term goals | Monthly/Quarterly | Executives |
| Tactical | Department goals | Weekly/Monthly | Managers |
| Operational | Day-to-day | Real-time/Daily | Teams |
2. SMART KPIs
Specific: Clear definition
Measurable: Quantifiable
Achievable: Realistic targets
Relevant: Aligned to goals
Time-bound: Defined period
3. Dashboard Hierarchy
├── Executive Summary (1 page)
│ ├── 4-6 headline KPIs
│ ├── Trend indicators
│ └── Key alerts
├── Department Views
│ ├── Sales Dashboard
│ ├── Marketing Dashboard
│ ├── Operations Dashboard
│ └── Finance Dashboard
└── Detailed Drilldowns
├── Individual metrics
└── Root cause analysis
Detailed worked examples and patterns
Detailed sections (starting with ## Common KPIs by Department) live in references/details.md. Read that file when the navigation summary above is insufficient.
Best Practices
Do's
- Limit to 5-7 KPIs - Focus on what matters
- Show context - Comparisons, trends, targets
- Use consistent colors - Red=bad, green=good
- Enable drilldown - From summary to detail
- Update appropriately - Match metric frequency
Don'ts
- Don't show vanity metrics - Focus on actionable data
- Don't overcrowd - White space aids comprehension
- Don't use 3D charts - They distort perception
- Don't hide methodology - Document calculations
- Don't ignore mobile - Ensure responsive design
Troubleshooting
MRR shown on dashboard contradicts finance's number
The most common cause is inconsistent treatment of annual plans. Finance may prorate to a daily rate while the dashboard normalizes to monthly. Align on a single formula and document it directly on the dashboard card:
-- Explicit formula shown in tooltip / data dictionary
-- Annual plans: divide total contract value by 12
-- Quarterly plans: divide by 3
-- Monthly plans: use as-is
CASE subscription_interval
WHEN 'monthly' THEN amount
WHEN 'quarterly' THEN amount / 3.0
WHEN 'yearly' THEN amount / 12.0
END AS normalized_mrr
Dashboard shows green but product team reports users complaining
The dashboard likely tracks system uptime (a lagging indicator) but not user-facing quality metrics. Add customer-perceived metrics alongside infrastructure metrics:
| Infrastructure (green) | User-perceived (add these) |
|---|---|
| API uptime 99.9% | P95 page load time |
| Error rate 0.1% | Task completion rate |
| Queue depth normal | Support ticket volume |
Retention cohort looks flat — no variation between cohorts
Check whether the cohort query is partitioning by signup month correctly. A common bug is using created_at::date instead of DATE_TRUNC('month', created_at), which groups by day and produces cohorts too small to show trends:
-- Wrong: too granular, cohorts are too small
DATE_TRUNC('day', created_at) AS cohort_date
-- Correct: monthly cohorts
DATE_TRUNC('month', created_at) AS cohort_month
Real-time dashboard hammers the database
A live dashboard refreshing every 10 seconds with complex cohort SQL will degrade production query performance. Separate OLAP workloads from OLTP by writing pre-aggregated metrics to a summary table via a scheduled job, and have the dashboard read from that:
# Scheduled every 5 minutes via cron/Celery
def refresh_mrr_summary():
conn.execute("""
INSERT INTO kpi_snapshot (metric, value, snapshot_at)
SELECT 'mrr', SUM(...), NOW()
FROM subscriptions WHERE status = 'active'
ON CONFLICT (metric) DO UPDATE SET value = EXCLUDED.value
""")
Alert thresholds fire constantly, team ignores them
Static thresholds set once and never reviewed cause alert fatigue. Use dynamic thresholds based on rolling averages so alerts fire only when the metric deviates significantly from its own baseline:
# Alert if current value is > 2 standard deviations from 30-day rolling mean
def is_anomalous(current: float, history: list[float]) -> bool:
mean = statistics.mean(history)
stdev = statistics.stdev(history)
return abs(current - mean) > 2 * stdev
Related Skills
data-storytelling- Turn dashboard findings into narratives that drive executive decisions
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核