MCP 生成
- 作者仓库星标 151,342
- 叉子 17,856
- 许可证 Complete terms in LICENSE.txt
- 作者更新于 2026年6月9日 20:35
- 作者仓库 skills
- 领域
- AI 智能
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 94 / 100 · 已通过审计
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @anthropics · Complete terms in LICENSE.txt
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- macOS · Linux · Windows
- 底层运行要求
- Python
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 网络行为
- 允许外网请求
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: mcp-builder
description: Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interac…
category: AI 智能
runtime: Python
---
# mcp-builder 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Overview / 🚀 High-Level Workflow / Phase 1: Deep Research and Planning”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Overview / 🚀 High-Level Workflow / Phase 1: Deep Research and Planning”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、会按任务需要访问外部网络、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;会按任务需要访问外部网络;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Overview / 🚀 High-Level Workflow / Phase 1: Deep Research and Planning”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: mcp-builder
description: Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interac…
category: AI 智能
source: anthropics/skills
---
# mcp-builder
## 什么时候使用
- 想给大模型多接一根「外置工具」时打开它 适合处理AI Agent、提示词、模型评估与自动化推理,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代的步骤;通常不需要额…
- 面向提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Overview / 🚀 High-Level Workflow / Phase 1: Deep Research and Planning」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;会按任务需要访问外部网络;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "mcp-builder" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Overview / 🚀 High-Level Workflow / Phase 1: Deep Research and Planning
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> Python | 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令 | 会按任务需要访问外部网络
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} MCP Server Development Guide
Overview
Create MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. The quality of an MCP server is measured by how well it enables LLMs to accomplish real-world tasks.
Process
🚀 High-Level Workflow
Creating a high-quality MCP server involves four main phases:
Phase 1: Deep Research and Planning
1.1 Understand Modern MCP Design
API Coverage vs. Workflow Tools: Balance comprehensive API endpoint coverage with specialized workflow tools. Workflow tools can be more convenient for specific tasks, while comprehensive coverage gives agents flexibility to compose operations. Performance varies by client—some clients benefit from code execution that combines basic tools, while others work better with higher-level workflows. When uncertain, prioritize comprehensive API coverage.
Tool Naming and Discoverability:
Clear, descriptive tool names help agents find the right tools quickly. Use consistent prefixes (e.g., github_create_issue, github_list_repos) and action-oriented naming.
Context Management: Agents benefit from concise tool descriptions and the ability to filter/paginate results. Design tools that return focused, relevant data. Some clients support code execution which can help agents filter and process data efficiently.
Actionable Error Messages: Error messages should guide agents toward solutions with specific suggestions and next steps.
1.2 Study MCP Protocol Documentation
Navigate the MCP specification:
Start with the sitemap to find relevant pages: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/sitemap.xml
Then fetch specific pages with .md suffix for markdown format (e.g., https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/draft.md).
Key pages to review:
- Specification overview and architecture
- Transport mechanisms (streamable HTTP, stdio)
- Tool, resource, and prompt definitions
1.3 Study Framework Documentation
Recommended stack:
- Language: TypeScript (high-quality SDK support and good compatibility in many execution environments e.g. MCPB. Plus AI models are good at generating TypeScript code, benefiting from its broad usage, static typing and good linting tools)
- Transport: Streamable HTTP for remote servers, using stateless JSON (simpler to scale and maintain, as opposed to stateful sessions and streaming responses). stdio for local servers.
Load framework documentation:
- MCP Best Practices: 📋 View Best Practices - Core guidelines
For TypeScript (recommended):
- TypeScript SDK: Use WebFetch to load
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/main/README.md - ⚡ TypeScript Guide - TypeScript patterns and examples
For Python:
- Python SDK: Use WebFetch to load
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/main/README.md - 🐍 Python Guide - Python patterns and examples
1.4 Plan Your Implementation
Understand the API: Review the service's API documentation to identify key endpoints, authentication requirements, and data models. Use web search and WebFetch as needed.
Tool Selection: Prioritize comprehensive API coverage. List endpoints to implement, starting with the most common operations.
Phase 2: Implementation
2.1 Set Up Project Structure
See language-specific guides for project setup:
- ⚡ TypeScript Guide - Project structure, package.json, tsconfig.json
- 🐍 Python Guide - Module organization, dependencies
2.2 Implement Core Infrastructure
Create shared utilities:
- API client with authentication
- Error handling helpers
- Response formatting (JSON/Markdown)
- Pagination support
2.3 Implement Tools
For each tool:
Input Schema:
- Use Zod (TypeScript) or Pydantic (Python)
- Include constraints and clear descriptions
- Add examples in field descriptions
Output Schema:
- Define
outputSchemawhere possible for structured data - Use
structuredContentin tool responses (TypeScript SDK feature) - Helps clients understand and process tool outputs
Tool Description:
- Concise summary of functionality
- Parameter descriptions
- Return type schema
Implementation:
- Async/await for I/O operations
- Proper error handling with actionable messages
- Support pagination where applicable
- Return both text content and structured data when using modern SDKs
Annotations:
readOnlyHint: true/falsedestructiveHint: true/falseidempotentHint: true/falseopenWorldHint: true/false
Phase 3: Review and Test
3.1 Code Quality
Review for:
- No duplicated code (DRY principle)
- Consistent error handling
- Full type coverage
- Clear tool descriptions
3.2 Build and Test
TypeScript:
- Run
npm run buildto verify compilation - Test with MCP Inspector:
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector
Python:
- Verify syntax:
python -m py_compile your_server.py - Test with MCP Inspector
See language-specific guides for detailed testing approaches and quality checklists.
Phase 4: Create Evaluations
After implementing your MCP server, create comprehensive evaluations to test its effectiveness.
Load ✅ Evaluation Guide for complete evaluation guidelines.
4.1 Understand Evaluation Purpose
Use evaluations to test whether LLMs can effectively use your MCP server to answer realistic, complex questions.
4.2 Create 10 Evaluation Questions
To create effective evaluations, follow the process outlined in the evaluation guide:
- Tool Inspection: List available tools and understand their capabilities
- Content Exploration: Use READ-ONLY operations to explore available data
- Question Generation: Create 10 complex, realistic questions
- Answer Verification: Solve each question yourself to verify answers
4.3 Evaluation Requirements
Ensure each question is:
- Independent: Not dependent on other questions
- Read-only: Only non-destructive operations required
- Complex: Requiring multiple tool calls and deep exploration
- Realistic: Based on real use cases humans would care about
- Verifiable: Single, clear answer that can be verified by string comparison
- Stable: Answer won't change over time
4.4 Output Format
Create an XML file with this structure:
<evaluation>
<qa_pair>
<question>Find discussions about AI model launches with animal codenames. One model needed a specific safety designation that uses the format ASL-X. What number X was being determined for the model named after a spotted wild cat?</question>
<answer>3</answer>
</qa_pair>
<!-- More qa_pairs... -->
</evaluation>
Reference Files
📚 Documentation Library
Load these resources as needed during development:
Core MCP Documentation (Load First)
- MCP Protocol: Start with sitemap at
https://modelcontextprotocol.io/sitemap.xml, then fetch specific pages with.mdsuffix - 📋 MCP Best Practices - Universal MCP guidelines including:
- Server and tool naming conventions
- Response format guidelines (JSON vs Markdown)
- Pagination best practices
- Transport selection (streamable HTTP vs stdio)
- Security and error handling standards
SDK Documentation (Load During Phase 1/2)
- Python SDK: Fetch from
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/main/README.md - TypeScript SDK: Fetch from
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/main/README.md
Language-Specific Implementation Guides (Load During Phase 2)
🐍 Python Implementation Guide - Complete Python/FastMCP guide with:
- Server initialization patterns
- Pydantic model examples
- Tool registration with
@mcp.tool - Complete working examples
- Quality checklist
⚡ TypeScript Implementation Guide - Complete TypeScript guide with:
- Project structure
- Zod schema patterns
- Tool registration with
server.registerTool - Complete working examples
- Quality checklist
Evaluation Guide (Load During Phase 4)
- ✅ Evaluation Guide - Complete evaluation creation guide with:
- Question creation guidelines
- Answer verification strategies
- XML format specifications
- Example questions and answers
- Running an evaluation with the provided scripts
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核