Codex 迁移
- 作者仓库星标 0
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 skills-registry
- 领域
- AI 智能
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @tomevault-io · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 较高消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- Python >=3.11
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: migrate-agents-to-codex
description: >- Use when this capability is needed. <!-- Generated by the ccode-to-codex mirror sync on 2026-…
category: AI 智能
runtime: Python
---
# migrate-agents-to-codex 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Purpose / Conversation-First Entry / Advanced CLI”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Purpose / Conversation-First Entry / Advanced CLI”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文出现了 `/users`、`/tmp` 这类斜杠命令;如果你的 Agent 支持命令触发,优先用命令开场,再补充目标和边界。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Purpose / Conversation-First Entry / Advanced CLI”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: migrate-agents-to-codex
description: >- Use when this capability is needed. <!-- Generated by the ccode-to-codex mirror sync on 2026-…
category: AI 智能
source: tomevault-io/skills-registry
---
# migrate-agents-to-codex
## 什么时候使用
- 把「迁移」相关任务沉淀成 Agent 可调用的技能 适合处理AI Agent、提示词、模型评估与自动化推理,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代的步骤…
- 面向提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Purpose / Conversation-First Entry / Advanced CLI」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "migrate-agents-to-codex" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Purpose / Conversation-First Entry / Advanced CLI
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> Python | 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Migrate Agents to Codex
Purpose
Migrates Claude agent definitions from .claude/agents/*.md (YAML frontmatter
- markdown body) to Codex-compatible outputs under
.codex/agents/.
Preferred output: standalone TOML custom-agent files. Backward-compatible output only: pure-markdown behavioral specifications.
The migration strips frontmatter, maps fields to native Codex contracts,
preserves runtime hints such as model, effort, reasoning_effort, and
model_reasoning_effort, normalizes MCP namespaces, and extracts large domain
content into companion reference files.
After migration, a native Codex compliance audit (GPT-5.4 inline sub-agent) validates every migrated file passes as a native Codex sub-agent — not a ported Claude artifact. Mechanical output is never final on write alone: every mechanically generated agent requires a recorded manual nativeness review before it may be treated as native. Findings are auto-addressed and a convergence check confirms no regressions were introduced by the fixes.
Pipeline position: CODE → VERIFY (runs during implementation phase). Covers 2 stages: CODE (migration) + VERIFY (adversarial review loop).
Canonical conversation wrapper:
.codex/skills/migrate-agents-to-codex/scripts/run_agent_migration_workflow.py
Deterministic engine:
.codex/skills/migrate-agents-to-codex/scripts/migrate_claude_agents_to_codex.py
Conversation-First Entry
Bare requests should start with a user-facing action menu, not a wall of CLI
flags. Follow the shared contract in
../migrate-to-codex/references/conversational-migration-contract.md.
Default menu for underspecified requests:
- Assess one agent
- Preview one agent as TOML
- Migrate one agent live
- Batch preflight all agents
- Review one migrated agent for nativeness
- Explain MCP or skill blockers
Routing rules:
- If the user already says
preview example-agent-e,migrate example-agent-c, orreview example-agent-e, route directly. - In Plan mode, use
request_user_inputonly for the action choice. - Outside Plan mode, render the same action set as a numbered text menu.
- If the action still needs an agent name, ask for it in plain text.
- Require explicit confirmation before any live write into
.codex/agents/or any--forceoverwrite.
Advanced CLI
- Preferred wrappers:
python3 .codex/skills/migrate-agents-to-codex/scripts/migrate_claude_agents_to_codex.py --agent example-agent-a --dry-run --jsonpython3 .codex/skills/migrate-agents-to-codex/scripts/run_agent_migration_workflow.py --preview --agent example-agent-a --jsonpython3 .codex/skills/migrate-agents-to-codex/scripts/run_agent_migration_workflow.py --agent example-agent-a --json
- Power-user engine:
python3 .codex/skills/migrate-agents-to-codex/scripts/migrate_claude_agents_to_codex.py --all --format toml
Prerequisites
- Python 3.11+ available
- Sibling skill exists:
.codex/skills/migrate-to-codex/(provides shared functions) .codex/agents/directory will be created by the script if missing.codex/config.tomlexists with MCP server definitions- Gold standard reference if present: a previously migrated agent artifact under
.codex/agents/ - Shared conversation contract available at
../migrate-to-codex/references/conversational-migration-contract.md
Format: Markdown vs TOML
Official Codex custom-agent format is TOML under .codex/agents/*.toml.
Use:
--format tomlfor new migrations--format mdonly for backward-compatible markdown outputs
Rules:
- If both
.mdand.tomlexist for the same agent, treat.tomlas the runtime-preferred artifact. - Markdown remains useful as documentation and as a bridge for older migration runs, but new custom agents should default to TOML.
- Validation must branch by format. A TOML migration is not complete if the workflow still validates only markdown headings.
Step 1: Assess Complexity & Resolve Dependencies
Context: User provides an agent name, a list, --all, or a bare request
that still needs the menu/front-door routing.
Before running the backend:
- bare request -> show the family menu from the shared conversational contract
- explicit action + explicit target -> route directly
- explicit action + missing target -> ask for the target name
- explicit
review <agent>on an already migrated agent -> skip migration write logic and jump to Step 5 as a read-only nativeness audit - live migration -> require confirmation before the write step
1a. Classify
Classify each target agent using the decision tree in agent-complexity-classifier.md.
Run the assessment path through the backend wrapper or execute directly:
python3 .codex/skills/migrate-agents-to-codex/scripts/run_agent_migration_workflow.py --preview --agent example-agent-a --json
python3 .codex/skills/migrate-agents-to-codex/scripts/migrate_claude_agents_to_codex.py --all --dry-run --json
The script parses each .claude/agents/*.md, extracts frontmatter, counts
MCP tools, detects hooks/orchestration patterns, and outputs a classification
table with tier, readiness score, sandbox recommendation, dependency blockers,
and next actions.
Skip rules:
- Agents with existing native
.codex/agents/{name}.tomlor legacy.codex/agents/{name}.md→ SKIP (validate only) - Use
--forceto overwrite existing agents
Classification output:
Use generated classification output from the current input batch. Do not hard-code source-agent rosters in this skill.
1b. MCP Dependency Preflight
Before resolving skill dependencies or writing any migrated agent, run an MCP
dependency preflight against the project-level .codex/config.toml.
Rules:
- Source of truth is the Claude agent frontmatter
tools:list only. - Extract required MCP servers only from tools matching
mcp__<server>__<tool>. - Treat
ideas a Claude-only built-in integration, not a project MCP dependency. Record it as unsupported source tooling and drop it from migrated agent dependency requirements. - Normalize server ids to project config-key form before comparison
(
example_server_g→example-server-g,chrome_devtools→chrome-devtools). - Read only top-level
[mcp_servers.<id>]entries from.codex/config.toml. Nested tables such as[mcp_servers.<id>.tools.*]do not count as separate servers. - Agent-local output must not synthesize
[mcp_servers.*]stanzas. Missing server config is resolved only by editing project.codex/config.toml.
Blocker behavior:
--agent <name> --dry-run: always print required/configured/missing MCP servers and preview the generated output.--agent <name>in write mode: ifmissing_mcp_serversis non-empty, print a blocker report, write nothing, and exit non-zero.--all --dry-run: report MCP status for every agent, including all blocked agents and their missing servers.--allin write mode: preflight the full batch first. If any target agent is blocked, write nothing for the whole batch and exit non-zero.
Source-specific dependency notes:
- Treat unsupported source tooling such as
ideas input data, not as an MCP blocker. - Do not hard-code the current repository's agent roster or dependency state into public guidance.
1c. Resolve Skill Dependencies
For each agent being migrated, cross-reference its skills: frontmatter
against what exists in .codex/skills/:
# Extract skills from Claude agent
grep '^ - ' .claude/agents/{name}.md | sed 's/^ - //'
# Check which exist in Codex
ls .codex/skills/
Produce a dependency table:
Agent: <example role> (Tier 3)
Skills: 5 declared, 3 available, 2 MISSING
✅ api-proxy-pattern-example → .codex/skills/api-proxy-pattern-example/SKILL.md
✅ frontend-interaction-example → .codex/skills/frontend-interaction-example/SKILL.md
✅ api-contracts-example → .codex/skills/api-contracts-example/SKILL.md
❌ example-url-validator → NOT IN .codex/skills/
❌ example-feature-implementation → NOT IN .codex/skills/
If all skills are available → READY. Proceed to Step 2.
If any skills are missing → BLOCKED. For each missing skill, choose a resolution:
| Resolution | When to Use | Action |
|---|---|---|
| MIGRATE | Skill is essential to the agent's core workflow | Invoke $migrate-to-codex for this skill BEFORE continuing agent migration |
| SUBSTITUTE | A similar Codex skill covers the same domain | Map to the substitute in References, document the rationale |
| DROP | Skill is deprecated, merged, or redundant with agent body content | Omit from References, document the rationale |
Present the dependency table to the user with recommended resolutions. Only proceed to Step 2 after all missing skills are resolved (migrated, substituted, or explicitly dropped).
Example resolution table:
| Missing Skill | Recommendation | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
example-url-validator |
SUBSTITUTE → developing-website-features |
URL validation rules are covered in agent body Constraints section |
example-feature-implementation |
SUBSTITUTE → integration-testing |
Testing patterns overlap; fullstack patterns are in companion ref |
Batch migration note: When migrating --all, run Step 1c across ALL agents
first to collect the full set of missing skills. Migrate missing skills in one
batch before starting any agent migrations. This prevents redundant skill
migrations when multiple agents share the same dependency.
Step 2: Map Fields
Apply the field mapping from agent-field-mapping.md.
Key transformations:
| Claude Field | Codex Section |
|---|---|
name |
# Agent: {Title} |
description |
## Purpose |
tools + disallowedTools |
## Recommended Sandbox + ## Constraints |
model + effort / reasoning_effort / model_reasoning_effort |
## Runtime Configuration |
skills |
## References (.codex/skills/ paths) |
hooks.Stop |
## Runtime Configuration → completion gate |
color, permissionMode |
Dropped (documented loss) |
MCP namespace normalization (automated by script):
example-server-gconfig server id →mcp__example_server_g__*chrome-devtoolsconfig server id →mcp__chrome_devtools__*
Skills → References mapping: All skill dependencies were resolved in Step 1b.
Map each resolved skill 1:1 to .codex/skills/{name}/SKILL.md. Substituted
or dropped skills use the resolution documented in Step 1b.
Runtime hint preservation: If the Claude source already carries concrete
Codex runtime hints such as model = "gpt-5.4-mini" and
model_reasoning_effort = "medium", preserve them in TOML output instead of
down-mapping them to legacy advisory prose.
Body preservation: Preserve as much Claude agent content as possible. Agent
spec hard limit: ≤1000 lines. Extract to
.codex/agents/references/{name}-domain.md only if exceeding the limit.
Step 2.6: Convert Embedded Delegation Sites
If the source agent or its companion references contain embedded delegation sites, apply the decision process in subagent-migration-guide.md.
Decision rules:
- Reusable named role → create
.codex/agents/<name>.toml - One-off workflow-local prompt slice → keep inline via
spawn_agent(...) - Thin proxy around one MCP call → usually keep inline
- Routing table with several named roles → every reachable role must have a real Codex agent file before the migration is considered complete
Model guidance:
- Use the intent-based mapping in subagent-migration-guide.md Section 2.
- Treat that table as this migration package's policy informed by Codex runtime guidance, not as an official OpenAI Claude-to-Codex table.
Format note:
- File-backed custom agents should use
--format toml. - Markdown output remains valid for compatibility, but it is not the preferred target for new reusable sub-agent roles.
Step 2.5: Verify Domain Content (Tier 2-3 only)
WHY THIS STEP EXISTS: Claude agent bodies drift from the codebase. Route constants get renamed, helper functions get deleted, test infrastructure gets replaced. If you copy stale domain examples into the companion reference, the Codex audit will catch them — but at the cost of an extra audit cycle (~500K-1.5M tokens). Verify first, write once.
For every code example, symbol, path, or config pattern in the Claude agent body, verify against the live codebase before including in the Codex output:
| Content Type | Verification Method |
|---|---|
Configuration constants (EXAMPLE_CONSTANTS.*) |
grep -n "EXAMPLE_" example-project/src/config/settings.config.ts |
| Helper function names | grep -rn "functionName(" path/to/module/ |
Directory paths (locales/, i18n/) |
ls path/to/directory/ |
| Locale directory aliases | Check actual directory names |
Router meta patterns (meta.role vs meta.roles) |
grep -n "meta.*role" example-project/src/router/ |
| Test infrastructure (stub dependency vs real dependency) | Read test setup files: example-project/tests/fixtures/ |
| MCP tools referenced | Check config.toml entries |
Decision rule: If a code example can't be verified in <30 seconds, replace it with a neutral description (e.g., "use the module's existing pattern") rather than copying potentially stale specifics. The companion reference should be accurate over detailed.
Skip for Tier 1: Mechanical agents have no domain examples to verify.
Step 3: Execute Migration
Tier 1 (Mechanical)
python3 .codex/skills/migrate-agents-to-codex/scripts/migrate_claude_agents_to_codex.py --agent <agent_name>
Output is structurally complete, but it is not final on write alone. Record a manual nativeness review before treating the generated agent as native.
Tier 2 (Assisted)
python3 .codex/skills/migrate-agents-to-codex/scripts/migrate_claude_agents_to_codex.py --agent <agent_name> --format toml
Script output contains [REVIEW: ...] annotations. Review:
- MCP preflight status: confirm project
.codex/config.tomlsatisfied all required top-level MCP servers before write mode - Sandbox recommendation: confirm matches agent's access pattern
- Knowledge Priority ordering: adjust for agent's actual tool preference
initialPrompt→ Initial Action conversion: verify prose is accurate
Tier 3 (Hand-Authored)
python3 .codex/skills/migrate-agents-to-codex/scripts/migrate_claude_agents_to_codex.py --agent <agent_name> --format toml
Script generates a skeleton with [TODO: hand-author] placeholders.
- Read a representative migrated agent artifact under
.codex/agents/ - Read template: codex-agent-template.md
- Fill domain sections manually (keep ≤40 lines each)
- Extract verbose content to
.codex/agents/references/{name}-domain.md - For orchestrator roles: restructure Supervisor Pattern per architectural-patterns.md Pattern 4 + 6
Batch Mode
python3 .codex/skills/migrate-agents-to-codex/scripts/migrate_claude_agents_to_codex.py --all --format toml
Processes all agents. Preflight MCP dependencies → assess → migrate by tier → report.
Step 4: Validate
Automated Checks
Native Codex output is TOML. Use markdown-only checks only when you explicitly
request --format md.
# Markdown compatibility output only:
# 1. No frontmatter delimiters (line 1 must NOT be --- or +++)
head -1 .codex/agents/{name}.md | grep -Ev '^(---|\+\+\+)$'
# 2. No Claude primitives or hyphenated MCP namespaces
python3 tools/migration_support/validate_names.py --scan-dir .codex/agents/
# 3. Required sections present
grep -c '## Purpose\|## Constraints\|## Output Contract' .codex/agents/{name}.md
# 4. Under 1000 lines (hard limit)
wc -l .codex/agents/{name}.md
# 5. Starts with # Agent:
head -1 .codex/agents/{name}.md | grep '^# Agent:'
# Native TOML output:
# 1. Valid TOML syntax
python3 - <<'PY'
from pathlib import Path
import tomllib
tomllib.loads(Path(".codex/agents/{name}.toml").read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
print("OK")
PY
# 2. Required keys present
python3 - <<'PY'
from pathlib import Path
import tomllib
data = tomllib.loads(Path(".codex/agents/{name}.toml").read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
required = ["name", "description", "developer_instructions"]
missing = [key for key in required if not data.get(key)]
assert not missing, f"Missing keys: {missing}"
print("OK")
PY
# 3. No Claude primitives or hyphenated MCP namespaces in developer instructions
python3 tools/migration_support/validate_names.py --scan-dir .codex/agents/
Tier 2 Manual Checklist
- MCP preflight passed against project
.codex/config.toml - Sandbox recommendation matches agent's access pattern
- Knowledge Priority reflects actual tool preference
- Skills referenced exist in
.codex/skills/ - No
[REVIEW: ...]annotations remain
Tier 3 Manual Checklist (adds)
- Companion reference file created and referenced
- Hooks mapped to completion gate in Runtime Configuration
- Orchestration patterns (example-agent-m) restructured
- No absolute file paths leaked through
- No
[TODO: ...]placeholders remain - Domain sections ≤40 lines each
Step 5: Native Codex Compliance Audit (inline native sub-agent)
When: After Step 4 validation passes — before reporting to the user.
Review-only entry: If an agent already exists under .codex/agents/ and
the tracker says it is pending_native_review, this step may be invoked
directly as a read-only single-agent review flow. In that entry path, audit
first, present findings plus next actions, and auto-record native by default
when the final audit result is NO_FINDINGS unless the user explicitly asked
for audit-only behavior.
Dashboard routing note:
migration-dashboardmay use this review-only entry as a bounded Verify phase afterreview next,review <number>, orreview <name>.- In that entry path, the parent dashboard remains a thin router. This skill owns the reviewer prompt, delegated lifecycle, review-report guidance, and tracker close-out instructions.
- Shared nativeness handoff helpers live in
tools/migration_support/; workflow scripts bootstrap that package before importing shared migration-family helpers.
Tracker close-out: For a clean review, record the outcome automatically with:
python3 tools/migration_support/tracker.py --write --record-review agent:<name>=nativepython3 tools/migration_support/tracker.py --write --record-review agent:<name>=codex_compatible_but_not_native
Use the native path by default when the final audit or convergence result is
NO_FINDINGS, attaching summary No findings after convergence. Keep manual
close-out only when MEDIUM findings remain, when the user requested audit-only
behavior, or when the tracker write fails. Do not leave the tracker at
pending_native_review after a clean nativeness audit.
Purpose: The migrated agent must pass as a native Codex sub-agent — not
a ported Claude artifact. A format-correct file that still thinks in Claude
primitives, references .claude/ paths, or assumes Claude-only tools is a
failed migration regardless of validation results. GPT-5.4 running as an
inline native sub-agent audits from inside the Codex ecosystem, judging
whether it would accept these agents as its own peers.
MANDATORY: Step 5 MUST use inline spawn_agent(...) — NEVER
external Codex review proxy or external large-context reviewer. Only the Codex ecosystem model
(GPT-5.4) can judge whether an agent reads as a native Codex sub-agent. Gemini
cannot assess Codex nativeness.
5a. Compliance Audit
Spawn one inline nativeness-audit sub-agent with model: "gpt-5.4" and
reasoning_effort: "high". Keep this agent alive for the entire Step 5 loop.
The parent workflow remains the only writer; the auditor stays read-only.
Workflow contract for this skill:
- Spawn the auditor once with the full first-pass audit prompt
wait_agent({"targets": [agent.id]})for findings- Parent applies fixes locally
- Reuse the same live auditor via
send_input(...)for convergence wait_agent({"targets": [agent.id]})againclose_agent(...)once Step 5 completes or escalates
Rationale for the legacy feature choices in this workflow:
- Adopt:
send_input(...),close_agent(...) - Keep as-is:
model,reasoning_effort - Defer:
fork_context, structureditems,resume_agent(...) - Avoid here:
send_input(interrupt=true)
See legacy-subagent-roi.md for the feature-by-feature ROI table.
Example shape:
agent = spawn_agent({
agent_type: "default",
model: "gpt-5.4",
reasoning_effort: "high",
message: `You are a Codex ecosystem compliance auditor.
This is a READ-ONLY audit.
- Do not edit files
- Do not call apply_patch
- Do not rerun migration scripts
- Verify paths and symbols through read-only inspection when the runtime permits
${dynamicAuditPrompt}`
})
result = wait_agent({"targets": [agent.id]})
Prompt (substitute {MIGRATED}, {SOURCES} with actual absolute paths):
You are a Codex ecosystem compliance auditor. Your job: determine whether
each migrated agent file would pass as a NATIVE Codex sub-agent — as if it
was designed for Codex from day one, not ported from another system.
This is a READ-ONLY audit.
- Do not edit files
- Do not call apply_patch
- Do not rerun migration scripts
- Verify paths and symbols through read-only inspection when the runtime permits
READ FIRST (gold standard): {reference migrated agent artifact under .codex/agents/}
READ NEXT (Codex MCP config): .codex/config.toml
THEN READ each migrated file and its Claude source side by side:
MIGRATED: {MIGRATED}
SOURCES: {SOURCES}
AUDIT DIMENSIONS (ordered by severity):
CRITICAL — Ecosystem incompatibility:
- Frontmatter delimiters present (Codex markdown agents are pure markdown)
- References old tool or primitive spellings that don't exist in Codex
- MCP config server ids are used directly as callable namespaces instead of underscore-normalized names (`example-server-g` config id → `mcp__example_server_g__`)
- References .claude/ paths instead of .codex/ paths
- Absolute /Users/... paths leaked through
HIGH — Semantic fidelity:
- Purpose section lost the agent's core responsibility vs Claude source
- The agent's execution contract was not re-expressed in Codex sub-agent terms and instead was flattened into a generic helper, losing operational role, decision boundaries, or constraint model
- Safety-critical constraints dropped or weakened during migration (especially test guardrails, zero-mocking stances, cleanup lifecycle rules)
- Hard constraints softened during compression: MUST/NEVER/ONLY language becomes suggestions. Compare constraint strength between source and target — hard rules must survive verbatim
- MCP servers referenced but missing from .codex/config.toml
- Skill paths referenced but don't exist under .codex/skills/
- Companion reference files referenced but missing on disk
HIGH — Domain accuracy (VERIFY AGAINST LIVE CODEBASE):
Claude agent bodies drift from the codebase. Every code example, route
constant, helper function name, directory path, router meta pattern, and
test infrastructure detail in the migrated files is an implicit assertion.
Verify these against the actual repo with read-only inspection when the runtime permits:
- Configuration constants: grep the routes config file for the exact symbol name
- Directory paths: inspect the actual directory (e.g., locales/ vs i18n/, source-locale vs target-locale)
- Helper functions: grep for the function name in the relevant module
- Router meta patterns: read the actual router file (singular role vs roles array)
- Test infrastructure: check actual test setup files (stub dependency vs real dependency)
- API service names: grep for the class name to confirm it exists
If an example references something that doesn't exist in the live codebase,
that is a HIGH finding — a sub-agent copying it will produce broken code.
MEDIUM — Nativeness quality:
- Agent reads as a translation rather than a native spec (Claude jargon, hedging language about "in Codex this would be...")
- Knowledge Priority doesn't reflect actual Codex tool availability
- Sandbox recommendation mismatches agent's access pattern
- Leftover [REVIEW:] or [TODO:] annotations
- Sections exceed 40 lines (should extract to companion ref)
OUTPUT (per finding):
SEVERITY: {CRITICAL|HIGH|MEDIUM}
FILE: {path}
ISSUE: {one-line}
FIX: {concrete instruction}
If clean: "NO_FINDINGS"
End with: "AUDIT_COMPLETE"
5b. Auto-Address Findings
Parse audit output. For each finding:
- CRITICAL/HIGH — Fix immediately via Edit tool. Surgical edits only — do NOT re-run the migration script.
- MEDIUM — Fix if mechanical. Flag to user only if the fix requires judgment.
Do not spawn a second auditor for fixes. The parent applies fixes, then reuses the same auditor thread for convergence.
For dashboard-driven review-only entry, keep the parent-thread return compact:
- verdict
- top findings or
NO_FINDINGS - next action
- review-report path when available
Do not paste the full audit transcript into the main thread unless the user explicitly asks for it.
5c. Convergence Check
Reuse the same live nativeness-audit sub-agent via send_input(...) for a
focused re-audit. Do not respawn the auditor unless the original agent died.
send_input({
target: agent.id,
message: `CONVERGENCE CHECK: Previous audit found {N} issues, all addressed.
This is a READ-ONLY audit.
- Do not edit files
- Do not call apply_patch
- Do not rerun migration scripts
- Verify paths and symbols through read-only inspection when the runtime permits
Re-read these files and verify:
1. Previous findings resolved
2. No new CRITICAL/HIGH issues introduced by fixes
3. Each agent still reads as a native Codex sub-agent
FILES: {paths that had findings}
GOLD STANDARD: {reference migrated agent artifact under .codex/agents/}
Same output format. "NO_FINDINGS" if clean. End with "AUDIT_COMPLETE".`
})
result = wait_agent({"targets": [agent.id]})
If the initial audit already returned NO_FINDINGS, skip convergence, record
native by default, and close the auditor immediately unless the user asked
for audit-only behavior.
5d. Convergence Decision
Native completion rule:
- The agent's execution contract must be re-expressed in Codex sub-agent terms without flattening its original operational role, decision boundaries, or constraint model. If the file is format-correct but semantically flattened, do not declare it native.
| Result | Action |
|---|---|
NO_FINDINGS |
Auto-record native, then proceed to Step 6 |
| Only MEDIUM | Proceed to Step 6, note as "Acknowledged minor items" |
| Any CRITICAL/HIGH | STOP — escalate to user. Do not declare complete. |
Hard cap: 2 cycles (audit + convergence). Persistent critical issues = systemic problem requiring human judgment.
Lifecycle rule:
- Always
close_agent({ target: agent.id })before leaving Step 5, whether the result is success, acknowledged-medium, or escalation. - Save the full nativeness review to a markdown report when the review is
meant to be recorded later. Reuse the existing agent-migration report
directories or an explicit
/tmpreview path, then attach that path through--review-evidenceat tracker close-out.
Step 6: Report
Single Agent
Migration Report: {name}
Tier: {1|2|3}
Source: .claude/agents/{name}.md ({N} lines)
Target: .codex/agents/{name}.toml ({M} lines)
Companion: .codex/agents/references/{name}-domain.md (if extracted)
Status: {COMPLETE|REVIEW_NEEDED|SKELETON_GENERATED|ALREADY_MIGRATED}
Sandbox: {read-only|workspace-write}
Validation: {PASS|FAIL (details)}
Codex Compliance: {NATIVE (0 findings)|NATIVE ({N} fixed)|ESCALATED (details)}
Fields mapped: {list}
Fields dropped: {list with reason}
Remaining gaps: {items needing attention}
Batch Summary
Table of migrated agents with tier, status, and validation result.
Migration Order
When migrating all agents, process in this order:
- example-agent-a (Tier 1) — simplest, validates the pipeline
- example-agent-i, example-agent-l, example-agent-j, example-agent-k (Tier 2)
- example-agent-h, example-agent-g (Tier 2, borderline complexity)
- example-agent-c, example-agent-f (Tier 3, companion ref extraction)
- example-agent-d, example-agent-e (Tier 3, MCP gap resolution needed)
- example-agent-m (Tier 3, LAST — depends on all leaf agents being stable)
Anti-Patterns
| Don't | Do Instead |
|---|---|
| Preserve frontmatter delimiters | Strip frontmatter, map to markdown sections |
| Exceed 1000 lines | Extract verbose domain content to companion refs |
| Convert hooks to comments | Map to completion gate in Runtime Configuration |
Map tools to a "Tools" section |
Use Constraints + Recommended Sandbox sections |
Keep absolute /Users/... paths |
Strip to repo-relative paths |
| Mechanical conversion on Tier 3 | Generate skeleton, hand-author domain sections |
| Use fabricated Codex primitives | Verify against official Codex docs |
| Skip compliance audit for "simple" agents | Always run — even T1 agents can have namespace drift |
| Let the nativeness auditor edit files directly | Keep the auditor read-only by prompt contract — parent workflow applies fixes |
| Loop audit >2 cycles | Escalate to user after convergence if CRITICAL remains |
| Report completion before audit passes | Step 5 must gate Step 6 |
| Treat format-correct as native-compliant | A file can pass validation but still read as a port |
| Trust Claude agent body as accurate | Agent bodies drift — verify domain examples against live codebase (Step 2.5) |
| Substitute or drop missing skills silently | Treat missing skills as a blocker — resolve via MIGRATE/SUBSTITUTE/DROP in Step 1b |
| Copy code examples verbatim from Claude source | Every route constant, helper name, meta pattern is an assertion — grep to confirm |
| Weaken safety constraints during compression | Preserve hard rules verbatim: "preserve setup boundaries", "preserve integration constraints", "preserve test-scope constraints" |
| Use port-artifact language in companion files | "Extracted during Codex migration" → "Reference for X agent. Use when Y." |
Migration Review Guidance
Rationale: Migration audits often find format issues and stale source knowledge carried over from the Claude agent body.
Key patterns:
- Claude agent bodies are NOT authoritative — they're cached snapshots of codebase knowledge. Configuration constants get renamed, test infrastructure gets replaced, helpers get deleted. Step 2.5 exists to catch this BEFORE writing.
- Companion references are assertion-dense — every code example is a claim about codebase state. More specific = more fragile. When in doubt, use neutral descriptions ("use the module's existing pattern") over stale specifics.
- The initial audit catches ecosystem issues; convergence catches domain drift — this asymmetry is by design now. The initial audit prompt includes "Domain accuracy: VERIFY AGAINST LIVE CODEBASE" to push more domain checks into the first cycle, reducing convergence-cycle findings and token cost.
- Unmigrated skill references are invisible until audit —
ls .codex/skills/takes 1 second but saves an entire audit finding + fix cycle. - Specific constraints need review — "real dependencies over simplified fixtures" is not the same rigor as "specific external dependency requirements — no lightweight stand-ins, no simplified fixtures." Keep the actionable requirement clear.
Shared References
These references are symlinked from the sibling migrate-to-codex skill:
- primitive-mapping.md — Claude→Codex tool mapping
- architectural-patterns.md — 6 migration patterns
Agent-specific references:
- agent-complexity-classifier.md — Tier decision tree
- agent-field-mapping.md — Frontmatter→section mapping
- codex-agent-template.md — Gold standard template
- legacy-subagent-roi.md — Which legacy sub-agent features are worth using in this migration workflow
Source: coltongerber/ccode-to-codex — distributed by TomeVault.
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核