论文生成
- 作者仓库星标 8,497
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 blog
- 领域
- 写作
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @digoal · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 即装即用
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: paper-interpretation
description: 从论文 PDF 文件或论文 PDF URL 生成通俗易懂、图文并茂、带批判性评估的中文 Markdown 解读,并保存到当前项目的 markdown 目录。Use when the user…
category: 写作
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# paper-interpretation 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:文章、文案、发言稿、润色或结构化表达。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Goal / Intake / Extraction Workflow”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于文章、文案、发言稿、润色或结构化表达,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Goal / Intake / Extraction Workflow”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文出现了 `/users` 这类斜杠命令;如果你的 Agent 支持命令触发,优先用命令开场,再补充目标和边界。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Goal / Intake / Extraction Workflow”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: paper-interpretation
description: 从论文 PDF 文件或论文 PDF URL 生成通俗易懂、图文并茂、带批判性评估的中文 Markdown 解读,并保存到当前项目的 markdown 目录。Use when the user…
category: 写作
source: digoal/blog
---
# paper-interpretation
## 什么时候使用
- 把写作方向的常用动作沉淀成 Agent 可调用的技能 适合处理文章、文案、润色、翻译、总结和结构化表达,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代的步骤;通常…
- 面向文章、文案、发言稿、润色或结构化表达,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Goal / Intake / Extraction Workflow」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "paper-interpretation" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Goal / Intake / Extraction Workflow
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Paper Interpretation
Goal
Read the whole paper, including text, tables, figures, captions, appendices, and experiment details, then write a Chinese Markdown article that helps non-specialists understand the paper while preserving its academic and industrial value.
Always save the final Markdown under the current project's markdown/ directory. Create the directory if missing. Use a descriptive filename derived from the paper title, for example markdown/论文标题-通俗解读.md.
Intake
Accept either:
- A local PDF path.
- A PDF URL.
If the user gives a URL, download the PDF or use scripts/extract_paper_assets.py to download and extract it. If the PDF is scanned or extraction is incomplete, use OCR or available PDF/image tooling before writing. Do not rely only on abstract/introduction unless the PDF cannot be fully processed; state any limitation explicitly.
Extraction Workflow
Use the helper script when useful:
python3 /Users/digoal/.codex/skills/paper-interpretation/scripts/extract_paper_assets.py INPUT_PDF_OR_URL --out .paper-work
The script creates:
paper.pdffor the normalized PDF.paper_text.mdwith page-level text.paper_tables.mdwith table candidates whenpdfplumberis available.figures/with extracted embedded images whenPyMuPDFis available.manifest.jsonwith extraction status and warnings.
Read the extracted files and inspect important figures/tables directly when they carry evidence, architecture, or results. If a library is unavailable, use other local tools if present; otherwise continue with the available extraction and mention the gap only if it affects confidence.
Reading Checklist
Before writing, identify:
- Paper title, authors, venue/date when available.
- Research problem and practical motivation.
- Prior methods or baselines the paper contrasts against.
- Proposed method, system architecture, algorithm, data, or theory.
- Main experiments, metrics, datasets, tables, and figures.
- Claimed academic contributions and industrial implications.
- Assumptions, limitations, failure cases, and future work.
Article Structure
Write in Chinese. Make the result accessible, but do not dilute technical substance.
1. 论文定位
Start by answering "这是什么、跟我有什么关系、值不值得读":
- Use 1-3 sentences to explain the real-world problem.
- State academic value: what gap it fills or what new capability/evidence it adds.
- State industrial value: where it can be used or what decision it can improve.
- Give one intuitive analogy tailored to the paper. Avoid reusing examples blindly; for a multi-agent finance paper, an analogy like "给 AI 配了一个完整的投资团队" is appropriate.
2. 前置知识地图
Build a prerequisite knowledge map:
核心概念(必须懂) -> 支撑概念(有助于理解) -> 扩展概念(感兴趣再看)
For each important concept, explain with:
- A chart or structured list.
- An analogy.
- A concrete example.
Use Mermaid when it improves clarity:
flowchart LR A["核心概念"] --> B["支撑概念"] B --> C["扩展概念"]
3. 论文精读
Use the 5W1H frame and map it to the paper:
| 问题 | 对应论文结构 | 写作要求 |
|---|---|---|
| Why:为什么要做这个研究? | Introduction / Motivation | 讲清痛点和旧方法不足 |
| What:提出了什么方法/系统? | Method / Architecture | 用一句话先讲总方案 |
| How:具体怎么实现? | Technical Details | 拆成模块、流程、公式或伪代码 |
| So What:结果怎么样? | Experiments / Results | 引用关键表格/图/指标,解释数字意味着什么 |
| Now What:对我们意味着什么? | Value / Discussion | 总结工业和学术启发 |
Prefer comparison over isolated explanation:
- Compare with prior methods or baselines.
- Compare with a reader's intuitive expectation.
- Explain what changes in the workflow, cost, accuracy, robustness, or scalability.
4. 术语解释
Include a glossary for important terms. Use this template:
**Term(中文名)**
- 是什么:...
- 为什么重要:...
- 现实类比:...
Explain why the term is named that way when useful. Keep terms short and selective; prioritize terms required to understand the paper.
5. 批判性评估:论文强在哪里,边界在哪里
Evaluate, do not merely praise:
- Which assumptions must hold in real deployments?
- Are datasets, baselines, metrics, ablations, or statistical claims convincing?
- Where might the method fail?
- What cost, latency, safety, privacy, reproducibility, or integration risks exist?
- What future improvements are realistic?
Separate paper claims from your inference. Use wording like "论文证明了..." for supported claims and "可推断..." for reasoned extrapolation.
Visual Requirements
Use Markdown-supported visuals at key points:
- Mermaid for process, architecture, concept maps, causal chains, and experiment flow.
- Markdown tables for comparisons, result interpretation, limitations, and term dictionaries.
- Simple SVG only when a static diagram is clearer than Mermaid.
- Text diagrams when they are more readable than formal charts.
Do not add decorative diagrams. Every visual must help explain a concept, method, result, or critique.
Source Discipline
- Cite page numbers, section names, table numbers, or figure numbers whenever possible.
- Do not invent results, claims, datasets, or author intent.
- If extraction is incomplete, clearly label uncertain parts.
- Preserve important formulas or algorithms, but explain them in plain language.
- If the paper has supplementary material or appendices inside the PDF, include relevant evidence from them.
Output Checklist
The final Markdown must include:
- Title.
- Paper metadata.
- 1-3 sentence overview.
- Academic value and industrial value.
- Knowledge map.
- Problem-solution-validation deep read.
- Key figure/table interpretations.
- Term glossary.
- Critical evaluation and future directions.
- References/source notes pointing back to paper sections, pages, figures, or tables.
After saving, report the absolute output path and any extraction limitations.
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核