API审查
- 作者仓库星标 1
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 Ralph-Anti-loop-Bundle-Skill
- 领域
- 工程开发
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @00Blacksheep00 · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 中等消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需手动接入
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- Docker
- 底层运行要求
- Docker
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 读取环境变量
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: self-improvement
description: Captures learnings, errors, and corrections to enable continuous improvement. Use when: (1) A co…
category: 工程开发
runtime: Docker
---
# self-improvement 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“First-Use Initialisation / Quick Reference / OpenClaw Setup (Recommended)”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“First-Use Initialisation / Quick Reference / OpenClaw Setup (Recommended)”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、读取环境变量、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、读取环境变量;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、读取环境变量。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“First-Use Initialisation / Quick Reference / OpenClaw Setup (Recommended)”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: self-improvement
description: Captures learnings, errors, and corrections to enable continuous improvement. Use when: (1) A co…
category: 工程开发
source: 00Blacksheep00/Ralph-Anti-loop-Bundle-Skill
---
# self-improvement
## 什么时候使用
- self-improvement 是一个工程开发方向的技能,扩展 Agent 在写代码、做 review、跑测试这类场景下的能力 适合处理工程开发场景下的代码实现、调试、重构、测试或代码审查,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界…
- 面向代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「First-Use Initialisation / Quick Reference / OpenClaw Setup (Recommended)」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、读取环境变量;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "self-improvement" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> First-Use Initialisation / Quick Reference / OpenClaw Setup (Recommended)
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> Docker | 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、读取环境变量 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Self-Improvement Skill
Log learnings and errors to markdown files for continuous improvement. Coding agents can later process these into fixes, and important learnings get promoted to project memory.
First-Use Initialisation
Before logging anything, ensure the .learnings/ directory and files exist in the project or workspace root. If any are missing, create them:
mkdir -p .learnings
[ -f .learnings/LEARNINGS.md ] || printf "# Learnings\n\nCorrections, insights, and knowledge gaps captured during development.\n\n**Categories**: correction | insight | knowledge_gap | best_practice\n\n---\n" > .learnings/LEARNINGS.md
[ -f .learnings/ERRORS.md ] || printf "# Errors\n\nCommand failures and integration errors.\n\n---\n" > .learnings/ERRORS.md
[ -f .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md ] || printf "# Feature Requests\n\nCapabilities requested by the user.\n\n---\n" > .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md
Never overwrite existing files. This is a no-op if .learnings/ is already initialised.
Do not log secrets, tokens, private keys, environment variables, or full source/config files unless the user explicitly asks for that level of detail. Prefer short summaries or redacted excerpts over raw command output or full transcripts.
If you want automatic reminders or setup assistance, use the opt-in hook workflow described in Hook Integration.
Quick Reference
| Situation | Action |
|---|---|
| Command/operation fails | Log to .learnings/ERRORS.md |
| User corrects you | Log to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with category correction |
| User wants missing feature | Log to .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md |
| API/external tool fails | Log to .learnings/ERRORS.md with integration details |
| Knowledge was outdated | Log to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with category knowledge_gap |
| Found better approach | Log to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with category best_practice |
| Simplify/Harden recurring patterns | Log/update .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with Source: simplify-and-harden and a stable Pattern-Key |
| Similar to existing entry | Link with **See Also**, consider priority bump |
| Broadly applicable learning | Promote to AGENTS.md, SOUL.md, TOOLS.md, or MEMORY.md (OpenClaw); in repo generici anche .github/copilot-instructions.md se lo usi |
| Workflow improvements | Promote to AGENTS.md (OpenClaw workspace) |
| Tool gotchas | Promote to TOOLS.md (OpenClaw workspace) |
| Behavioral patterns | Promote to SOUL.md (OpenClaw workspace) |
OpenClaw Setup (Recommended)
OpenClaw is the primary platform for this skill. It uses workspace-based prompt injection with automatic skill loading.
Installation
Via ClawdHub (recommended):
clawdhub install self-improving-agent
Manual:
git clone https://github.com/peterskoett/self-improving-agent.git ~/.openclaw/skills/self-improving-agent
Remade for openclaw from original repo : https://github.com/pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills - https://github.com/pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills/tree/main/skills/self-improvement
Workspace Structure
OpenClaw injects files from the agent’s workspace (each agent has its own tree). Example:
~/.openclaw/workspace/ # White (default)
├── AGENTS.md
├── SOUL.md
├── TOOLS.md
├── MEMORY.md
├── memory/
│ └── YYYY-MM-DD.md
└── .learnings/ # White — do not share with other agents
├── LEARNINGS.md
├── ERRORS.md
└── FEATURE_REQUESTS.md
~/.openclaw/workspace-zero/ # Zero — same layout, own .learnings/
~/.openclaw/workspace-wolf/ # Wolf — same layout, own .learnings/
Log learnings in .learnings/ inside the workspace you are running in (not a single shared folder).
Create Learning Files
mkdir -p ~/.openclaw/workspace/.learnings
mkdir -p ~/.openclaw/workspace-zero/.learnings
mkdir -p ~/.openclaw/workspace-wolf/.learnings
Then create the log files (or copy from assets/):
LEARNINGS.md— corrections, knowledge gaps, best practicesERRORS.md— command failures, exceptionsFEATURE_REQUESTS.md— user-requested capabilities
Promotion Targets
When learnings prove broadly applicable, promote them to workspace files:
| Learning Type | Promote To | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Behavioral patterns | SOUL.md |
"Be concise, avoid disclaimers" |
| Workflow improvements | AGENTS.md |
"Spawn sub-agents for long tasks" |
| Tool gotchas | TOOLS.md |
"Git push needs auth configured first" |
Inter-Session Communication
OpenClaw provides tools to share learnings across sessions:
- sessions_list — View active/recent sessions
- sessions_history — Read another session's transcript
- sessions_send — Send a learning to another session
- sessions_spawn — Spawn a sub-agent for background work
Use these only in trusted environments and only when the user explicitly wants cross-session sharing. Prefer sending a short sanitized summary and relevant file paths, not raw transcripts, secrets, or full command output.
Integration with Ralph (anti-loop)
If the task was executed under ralph-router plus ralph-small, ralph-medium, or ralph-huge, each of those skills ends with Closure: self-improvement: after verified success, evaluate a short entry in .learnings/ or promotion to TOOLS.md / AGENTS.md, and skill extraction only when this skill’s criteria (or the user) say so. Hooks cannot detect “Ralph finished”; this closure is the reliable trigger.
Optional: Enable Hook
Istruzioni aggiornate (copia file, openclaw hooks, riavvio gateway): references/openclaw-integration.md.
Altri contesti (non OpenClaw)
Se l’agente lavora in un repo Git normale senza workspace OpenClaw: crea .learnings/ nella root del progetto come in First-Use Initialisation. Promuovi i learning nei file di contesto che quel flusso legge (es. AGENTS.md, README, istruzioni team) — non mescolare con i path sotto ~/.openclaw/workspace/.
Logging Format
Learning Entry
Append to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md:
## [LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX] category
**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: low | medium | high | critical
**Status**: pending
**Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config
### Summary
One-line description of what was learned
### Details
Full context: what happened, what was wrong, what's correct
### Suggested Action
Specific fix or improvement to make
### Metadata
- Source: conversation | error | user_feedback
- Related Files: path/to/file.ext
- Tags: tag1, tag2
- See Also: LRN-20250110-001 (if related to existing entry)
- Pattern-Key: simplify.dead_code | harden.input_validation (optional, for recurring-pattern tracking)
- Recurrence-Count: 1 (optional)
- First-Seen: 2025-01-15 (optional)
- Last-Seen: 2025-01-15 (optional)
---
Error Entry
Append to .learnings/ERRORS.md:
## [ERR-YYYYMMDD-XXX] skill_or_command_name
**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: high
**Status**: pending
**Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config
### Summary
Brief description of what failed
### Error
Actual error message or output
### Context
- Command/operation attempted
- Input or parameters used
- Environment details if relevant
- Summary or redacted excerpt of relevant output (avoid full transcripts and secret-bearing data by default)
### Suggested Fix
If identifiable, what might resolve this
### Metadata
- Reproducible: yes | no | unknown
- Related Files: path/to/file.ext
- See Also: ERR-20250110-001 (if recurring)
---
Feature Request Entry
Append to .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md:
## [FEAT-YYYYMMDD-XXX] capability_name
**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: medium
**Status**: pending
**Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config
### Requested Capability
What the user wanted to do
### User Context
Why they needed it, what problem they're solving
### Complexity Estimate
simple | medium | complex
### Suggested Implementation
How this could be built, what it might extend
### Metadata
- Frequency: first_time | recurring
- Related Features: existing_feature_name
---
ID Generation
Format: TYPE-YYYYMMDD-XXX
- TYPE:
LRN(learning),ERR(error),FEAT(feature) - YYYYMMDD: Current date
- XXX: Sequential number or random 3 chars (e.g.,
001,A7B)
Examples: LRN-20250115-001, ERR-20250115-A3F, FEAT-20250115-002
Resolving Entries
When an issue is fixed, update the entry:
- Change
**Status**: pending→**Status**: resolved - Add resolution block after Metadata:
### Resolution
- **Resolved**: 2025-01-16T09:00:00Z
- **Commit/PR**: abc123 or #42
- **Notes**: Brief description of what was done
Other status values:
in_progress- Actively being worked onwont_fix- Decided not to address (add reason in Resolution notes)promoted- Elevated to workspace memory (AGENTS.md,SOUL.md,TOOLS.md, …) or altri file di contesto del progetto
Promoting to Project Memory
When a learning is broadly applicable (not a one-off fix), promote it to permanent project memory.
When to Promote
- Learning applies across multiple files/features
- Knowledge any contributor (human or AI) should know
- Prevents recurring mistakes
- Documents project-specific conventions
Promotion Targets
| Target | What Belongs There |
|---|---|
AGENTS.md |
Procedure operative, workflow, regole runtime (OpenClaw o repo) |
SOUL.md |
Comportamento, stile, anti-pattern (OpenClaw workspace) |
TOOLS.md |
Integrazioni, path, comandi, limiti tool (OpenClaw workspace) |
MEMORY.md |
Memoria curata a lungo termine (OpenClaw, sessione principale) |
.github/copilot-instructions.md |
Solo se usi Copilot in quel repo |
How to Promote
- Distill the learning into a concise rule or fact
- Add to appropriate section in target file (create file if needed)
- Update original entry:
- Change
**Status**: pending→**Status**: promoted - Add
**Promoted**:con il file usato (es.AGENTS.md,TOOLS.md)
- Change
Promotion Examples
Learning (verbose):
Project uses pnpm workspaces. Attempted
npm installbut failed. Lock file ispnpm-lock.yaml. Must usepnpm install.
In AGENTS.md o README di progetto (conciso):
## Build & Dependencies
- Package manager: pnpm (not npm) - use `pnpm install`
Learning (verbose):
When modifying API endpoints, must regenerate TypeScript client. Forgetting this causes type mismatches at runtime.
In AGENTS.md (actionable):
## After API Changes
1. Regenerate client: `pnpm run generate:api`
2. Check for type errors: `pnpm tsc --noEmit`
Recurring Pattern Detection
If logging something similar to an existing entry:
- Search first:
grep -r "keyword" .learnings/ - Link entries: Add
**See Also**: ERR-20250110-001in Metadata - Bump priority if issue keeps recurring
- Consider systemic fix: Recurring issues often indicate:
- Missing documentation (→ promuovi in
AGENTS.md,TOOLS.md, o istruzioni repo) - Missing automation (→ add to AGENTS.md)
- Architectural problem (→ create tech debt ticket)
- Missing documentation (→ promuovi in
Simplify & Harden Feed
Use this workflow to ingest recurring patterns from the simplify-and-harden
skill and turn them into durable prompt guidance.
Ingestion Workflow
- Read
simplify_and_harden.learning_loop.candidatesfrom the task summary. - For each candidate, use
pattern_keyas the stable dedupe key. - Search
.learnings/LEARNINGS.mdfor an existing entry with that key:grep -n "Pattern-Key: <pattern_key>" .learnings/LEARNINGS.md
- If found:
- Increment
Recurrence-Count - Update
Last-Seen - Add
See Alsolinks to related entries/tasks
- Increment
- If not found:
- Create a new
LRN-...entry - Set
Source: simplify-and-harden - Set
Pattern-Key,Recurrence-Count: 1, andFirst-Seen/Last-Seen
- Create a new
Promotion Rule (System Prompt Feedback)
Promote recurring patterns into agent context/system prompt files when all are true:
Recurrence-Count >= 3- Seen across at least 2 distinct tasks
- Occurred within a 30-day window
Promotion targets (OpenClaw prima):
AGENTS.md,SOUL.md,TOOLS.md,MEMORY.md.github/copilot-instructions.mdsolo se usi Copilot in quel repo
Write promoted rules as short prevention rules (what to do before/while coding), not long incident write-ups.
Periodic Review
Review .learnings/ at natural breakpoints:
When to Review
- Before starting a new major task
- After completing a feature
- When working in an area with past learnings
- Weekly during active development
Quick Status Check
# Count pending items
grep -h "Status\*\*: pending" .learnings/*.md | wc -l
# List pending high-priority items
grep -B5 "Priority\*\*: high" .learnings/*.md | grep "^## \["
# Find learnings for a specific area
grep -l "Area\*\*: backend" .learnings/*.md
Review Actions
- Resolve fixed items
- Promote applicable learnings
- Link related entries
- Escalate recurring issues
Detection Triggers
Automatically log when you notice:
Corrections (→ learning with correction category):
- "No, that's not right..."
- "Actually, it should be..."
- "You're wrong about..."
- "That's outdated..."
Feature Requests (→ feature request):
- "Can you also..."
- "I wish you could..."
- "Is there a way to..."
- "Why can't you..."
Knowledge Gaps (→ learning with knowledge_gap category):
- User provides information you didn't know
- Documentation you referenced is outdated
- API behavior differs from your understanding
Errors (→ error entry):
- Command returns non-zero exit code
- Exception or stack trace
- Unexpected output or behavior
- Timeout or connection failure
Priority Guidelines
| Priority | When to Use |
|---|---|
critical |
Blocks core functionality, data loss risk, security issue |
high |
Significant impact, affects common workflows, recurring issue |
medium |
Moderate impact, workaround exists |
low |
Minor inconvenience, edge case, nice-to-have |
Area Tags
Use to filter learnings by codebase region:
| Area | Scope |
|---|---|
frontend |
UI, components, client-side code |
backend |
API, services, server-side code |
infra |
CI/CD, deployment, Docker, cloud |
tests |
Test files, testing utilities, coverage |
docs |
Documentation, comments, READMEs |
config |
Configuration files, environment, settings |
Best Practices
- Log immediately - context is freshest right after the issue
- Be specific - future agents need to understand quickly
- Include reproduction steps - especially for errors
- Link related files - makes fixes easier
- Suggest concrete fixes - not just "investigate"
- Use consistent categories - enables filtering
- Promote aggressively - if in doubt, add to
AGENTS.mdorTOOLS.md(OpenClaw) o al file di contesto del repo - Review regularly - stale learnings lose value
Gitignore Options
Keep learnings local (per-developer):
.learnings/
This repo uses that default to avoid committing sensitive or noisy local logs by accident.
Track learnings in repo (team-wide): Don't add to .gitignore - learnings become shared knowledge.
Hybrid (track templates, ignore entries):
.learnings/*.md
!.learnings/.gitkeep
Hook Integration
OpenClaw (gateway): hook gestito in ~/.openclaw/hooks/self-improvement/ (HOOK.md + handler.js), evento before_prompt_build. Richiede hooks.internal.enabled e riavvio gateway dopo modifiche. Dettagli: references/openclaw-integration.md.
Script in scripts/ (activator.sh, error-detector.sh): opzionali; servono solo se usi un altro client che espone hook da shell (es. prompt-submit / post-tool). Su OpenClaw con l’hook gateway non servono. Non documentiamo qui JSON di altri editor per evitare confusione con OpenClaw.
Automatic Skill Extraction
When a learning is valuable enough to become a reusable skill, extract it using the provided helper.
Skill Extraction Criteria
A learning qualifies for skill extraction when ANY of these apply:
| Criterion | Description |
|---|---|
| Recurring | Has See Also links to 2+ similar issues |
| Verified | Status is resolved with working fix |
| Non-obvious | Required actual debugging/investigation to discover |
| Broadly applicable | Not project-specific; useful across codebases |
| User-flagged | User says "save this as a skill" or similar |
Extraction Workflow
- Identify candidate: Learning meets extraction criteria
- Run helper (or create manually):
./skills/self-improvement/scripts/extract-skill.sh skill-name --dry-run ./skills/self-improvement/scripts/extract-skill.sh skill-name - Customize SKILL.md: Fill in template with learning content
- Update learning: Set status to
promoted_to_skill, addSkill-Path - Verify: Read skill in fresh session to ensure it's self-contained
Manual Extraction
If you prefer manual creation:
- Create
skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md - Use template from
assets/SKILL-TEMPLATE.md - Follow Agent Skills spec:
- YAML frontmatter with
nameanddescription - Name must match folder name
- No README.md inside skill folder
- YAML frontmatter with
Extraction Detection Triggers
Watch for these signals that a learning should become a skill:
In conversation:
- "Save this as a skill"
- "I keep running into this"
- "This would be useful for other projects"
- "Remember this pattern"
In learning entries:
- Multiple
See Alsolinks (recurring issue) - High priority + resolved status
- Category:
best_practicewith broad applicability - User feedback praising the solution
Skill Quality Gates
Before extraction, verify:
- Solution is tested and working
- Description is clear without original context
- Code examples are self-contained
- No project-specific hardcoded values
- Follows skill naming conventions (lowercase, hyphens)
Quando applicare (qualsiasi agente)
- Discover something non-obvious — la soluzione non era immediata
- Correct yourself — l’approccio iniziale era sbagliato
- Learn project conventions — pattern non documentati
- Hit unexpected errors — soprattutto se la diagnosi è stata difficile
- Find better approaches — miglior rispetto alla prima ipotesi
Su OpenClaw: contesto da workspace (AGENTS.md, …), hook opzionale, tool tra sessioni come in Inter-Session Communication.
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核