技能 Council
- 作者仓库星标 3,406
- 作者仓库 claude-octopus
Council
Use this skill for /octo:council and council-style requests.
Phase 0: Preflight
Collect or infer:
- goal:
advice,decision,plan,implement, orreview - domain:
auto,architecture,product,security,business,research, ordocs - style:
balanced,adversarial,implementation,executive, orred-team - depth:
quick,standard, ordeep - members:
auto,3,5, or7 - budget cap in USD
- providers and provider availability
- pinned personas
- implementation permission and worktree isolation
Show the selected council, provider availability, benchmark freshness, quorum requirement, and cost estimate before provider fanout. Re-check the budget before critique, revision, synthesis, and implementation planning so the run stops before the next phase would exceed --max-cost. If the run is a dry run, stop after this preflight and write summary.json.
Quorum
- quick requires at least one non-chair response plus a synthesis-capable chair
- standard and deep require at least two non-chair responses plus a synthesis-capable chair
- if the chair fails, retry once with the highest-scoring synthesis-capable fallback
- if quorum is lost, stop by default and present partial artifacts instead of pretending consensus exists
Council Procedure
- Independent advice: ask each selected persona for recommendation, assumptions, risks, implementation notes, and confidence.
- Cross-critique: for standard/deep runs, semi-anonymize responses and ask members to critique gaps, assumptions, and risks.
- Revision: for deep runs or high disagreement, let members revise their positions after critique.
- Chair synthesis: produce agreement, disagreement, minority reports, risk register, implementation path, confidence, and conditions that would change the recommendation.
- Ratify / veto: verifier, red-team, security, legal, finance, and medical roles can veto implementation for critical risks.
Implementation Gates
- Gate A: user accepts the council synthesis or asks for revision.
- Gate B: user accepts the concrete implementation plan generated from the synthesis.
- Gate C: execution proceeds through existing Octopus implementation safety behavior. This is a one-shot authorization for the accepted plan, not per-file approval, unless existing safety hooks detect destructive or risky actions.
Never implement from council output without explicit approval. Preserve disagreement, summarize risks, and keep vetoes visible in the final answer and artifacts.
- 流狐分类
- AI 智能
- 作者声明 Agent
- 未找到明确声明;不据此推断已兼容或已测试
- 静态检查
- 88 / 100 · 启发式扫描,不代表运行安全
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @nyldn · 未声明 license
- 流狐 Token 估算
- 低消耗
- 流狐接入估算
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 未发现要求
- 检测到的系统要求
- 未声明
- 底层运行要求
- 未声明
- 检测到的文件与系统行为
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 检测到的网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 无(仅作为资料)
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
作者没有在当前 SKILL.md 中定义固定输出样例。 Collect or infer: goal: advice, decision, plan, implement, or review domain: auto, architecture, product, security, business, research, or docs
quick requires at least one non-chair response plus a synthesis-capable chair standard and deep require at least two non-chair responses plus a synthesis-capable chair if the chair fails, retry once with the highest-scoring synthesis-capable fallback
Independent advice: ask each selected persona for recommendation, assumptions, risks, implementation notes, and confidence. Cross-critique: for standard/deep runs, semi-anonymize responses and ask members to critique gaps, assumptions, and risks.
Gate A: user accepts the council synthesis or asks for revision. Gate B: user accepts the concrete implementation plan generated from the synthesis. Gate C: execution proceeds through existing Octopus implementation safety behavior. This is a one-shot…
# Council
Use this skill for `/octo:council` and council-style requests.
## Phase 0: Preflight
Collect or infer:
- goal: `advice`, `decision`, `plan`, `implement`, or `review`
- domain: `auto`, `architecture`, `product`, `security`, `business`, `research`, or `docs`
- style: `balanced`, `adversarial`, `implementation`, `executive`, or `red-team`
- depth: `quick`, `standard`, or `deep`
- members: `auto`, `3`, `5`, or `7`
- budget cap in USD
- providers and provider availability
- pinned personas
- implementation permission and worktree isolation
Show the selected council, provider availability, benchmark freshness, quorum requirement, and cost estimate before provider fanout. Re-check the budget before critique, revision, synthesis, and implementation planning so the run stops before the next phase would exceed `--max-cost`. If the run is a dry run, stop after this preflight and write `summary.json`.
## Quorum
- quick requires at least one non-chair response plus a synthesis-capable chair
- standard and deep require at least two non-chair responses plus a synthesis-capable chair
- if the chair fails, retry once with the highest-scoring synthesis-capable fallback
- if quorum is lost, stop by default and present partial artifacts instead of pretending consensus exists
## Council Procedure
1. **Independent advice:** ask each selected persona for recommendation, assumptions, risks, implementation notes, and confidence.
2. **Cross-critique:** for standard/deep runs, semi-anonymize responses and ask members to critique gaps, assumptions, and risks.
3. **Revision:** for deep runs or high disagreement, let members revise their positions after critique.
… 作者原文负责流程事实;流狐只索引当前章节、要点、文件与命令。
章节 -> Phase 0: Preflight → Quorum → Council Procedure → Implementation Gates
要点 -> Independent advice · Cross-critique · Revision · Chair synthesis · Ratify / veto · Gate A · Gate B · Gate C
文件/命令 -> /octo:council · advice · decision · plan · implement · review · auto · architecture
内容 SHA-256 -> 6f4726da57ef
方法与流程
适用与边界
原文中的明确线索
/octo:council、advice、decision、plan、implement、review、auto、architecture