Agent诊断
- 作者仓库星标 263
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 audio-plugin-coder
- 领域
- AI 智能
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @Noizefield · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- macOS · Linux · Windows
- 底层运行要求
- Node.js · Python
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: skill_debug
description: Autonomous Debugging Instructions for Visual Studio Code: for [plugin]. This document defines a…
category: AI 智能
runtime: Node.js / Python
---
# skill_debug 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Purpose / High-Level Debugging Strategy / Step 1: Workspace Reconnaissance”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Purpose / High-Level Debugging Strategy / Step 1: Workspace Reconnaissance”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Purpose / High-Level Debugging Strategy / Step 1: Workspace Reconnaissance”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: skill_debug
description: Autonomous Debugging Instructions for Visual Studio Code: for [plugin]. This document defines a…
category: AI 智能
source: Noizefield/audio-plugin-coder
---
# skill_debug
## 什么时候使用
- 把 AI / Agent方向的常用动作沉淀成 Agent 可调用的技能 适合处理AI Agent、提示词、模型评估与自动化推理,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查…
- 面向提示词、Agent 工作流、模型评估或自动化推理,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Purpose / High-Level Debugging Strategy / Step 1: Workspace Reconnaissance」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "skill_debug" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Purpose / High-Level Debugging Strategy / Step 1: Workspace Reconnaissance
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> Node.js / Python | 读取文件、写入/修改文件、执行终端命令 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Purpose
This document defines a self-directed debugging workflow for a Large Language Model (LLM) operating inside or alongside Visual Studio Code: (VS Code:). The goal is for the LLM to:
- Inspect a codebase without human intervention
- Identify likely failure points
- Insert breakpoints programmatically
- Generate a valid VS Code:
launch.jsondebugging configuration - Enter VS Code: debug mode
- Capture runtime errors, logs, and stack traces
- Filter noise while preserving full raw error telemetry
- Transmit all collected diagnostic data back to the LLM for analysis
This workflow assumes the LLM has:
- Read access to the workspace
- Write access to configuration files
- The ability to invoke VS Code: commands (directly or via an agent/tooling layer)
High-Level Debugging Strategy
The LLM must operate as a deterministic debugger, not a conversational assistant.
Core principles:
- Prefer evidence over speculation
- Favor runtime inspection over static guesses
- Never suppress errors at source
- Always preserve original error output
Step 1: Workspace Reconnaissance
- Enumerate the workspace root
- Identify:
- Primary language(s)
- Entry points (e.g.
main.py,index.js,app.ts,Program.cs) - Existing test suites
- Existing
.vscodeconfiguration
- Detect build systems and runtimes:
- Node.js, Python, Java, .NET, Go, etc.
Output a workspace map internally before proceeding.
Step 2: Static Code Analysis
For each execution path:
- Parse the AST (or equivalent)
- Identify:
- Unhandled exceptions
- Unsafe casts
- Null/undefined dereferences
- Infinite loops
- Race conditions (async / threading)
- External I/O boundaries (filesystem, network, DB)
Mark all high-risk lines.
Step 3: Breakpoint Placement Heuristics
Automatically insert breakpoints at:
- Program entry point
- All caught and uncaught exception blocks
- Function boundaries with:
- Complex conditionals
- State mutation
- External side effects
- Before and after async boundaries
- Any line referenced in stack traces from prior runs
Breakpoint Rules
- Prefer conditional breakpoints when possible
- Avoid breakpoints inside tight loops unless gated
- Label each breakpoint with intent (comment or metadata)
Step 4: Generate VS Code: Debug Configuration
Create or update:
.vscode/launch.json
Requirements
- Use the correct debugger type for the detected runtime
- Ensure
stopOnEntryis enabled - Enable verbose logging
- Capture stdout and stderr
- Do NOT suppress framework-level warnings
Example (Node.js)
{
"version": "0.2.0",
"configurations": [
{
"type": "node",
"request": "launch",
"name": "LLM Autonomous Debug",
"program": "${workspaceFolder}/index.js",
"console": "integratedTerminal",
"internalConsoleOptions": "neverOpen",
"stopOnEntry": true,
"outputCapture": "std",
"env": {
"NODE_ENV": "development"
}
}
]
}
Adapt as required for other languages.
Step 5: Enter Debug Mode
- Invoke VS Code: command:
Debug: Start Debugging
- Confirm debugger attachment
- Verify all breakpoints are registered
If debugger fails to attach, halt and report configuration errors.
Step 6: Runtime Observation
While execution is paused or running:
Capture:
- Call stacks
- Variable states
- Heap/closure values (where available)
- Thread or async task states
On error or crash, collect:
- Full stack trace
- Error type
- Error message
- Source location
- Runtime version
- OS and architecture
Step 7: Error Telemetry Handling
DO NOT discard information
The LLM must:
- Capture raw error output verbatim
- Separately derive:
- A cleaned summary
- A probable root cause
- A confidence score
Noise Handling
- Framework warnings
- Deprecation notices
- Transitive dependency logs
These must be tagged as low-signal, not removed.
Step 8: Transmission Back to the LLM
Transmit a structured payload containing:
- Workspace map
- Breakpoint list
launch.json- Execution timeline
- Raw stderr/stdout
- Stack traces
- Memory snapshots (if available)
Suggested Format
{
"environment": {},
"breakpoints": [],
"errors": [],
"rawLogs": "",
"analysisHints": []
}
Step 9: Iterative Debugging Loop
If the root cause is not definitive:
- Adjust breakpoints
- Restart debug session
- Narrow scope
- Repeat until failure is explained by evidence
Never apply fixes without isolating the cause.
Termination Criteria
Stop only when:
- The error is fully reproducible
- The root cause is identified
- The exact line(s) responsible are known
At that point, transition from debugging mode to remediation mode.
Final Note
This document defines behavior, not intent.
The LLM must act as a debugger first, a theorist second, and a code generator last.
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核