skill-native-escalation-routing
- Repo stars 3,406
- Author updated Live
- Author repo claude-octopus
- Domain
- Security
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @nyldn · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Guided setup
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Shell exec
- Write / modify
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: skill-native-escalation-routing
description: Route ordinary init, review, and security requests to Claude-native capabilities first; escalate…
category: security
runtime: no special runtime
---
# skill-native-escalation-routing output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Route ordinary init, review, and security requests to Claude-native capabilities first; escalate to Octopus only when multi-LLM diversity adds value Use this skill when the user asks for repository initialization, code review, or security review and it is not yet clear whether Claude-native behavior is sufficient or whether Octopus escalation is warranted….
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Core Policy / Route to Claude-Native First / Escalate to Octopus” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Route ordinary init, review, and security requests to Claude-native capabilities first; escalate to Octopus only when multi-LLM diversity adds value Use this skill when the user asks for repository initialization, code review, or security review and it is not yet clear whether Claude-native behavior is sufficient or whether Octopus escalation is warranted…”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Core Policy / Route to Claude-Native First / Escalate to Octopus” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, run shell commands, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, run shell commands, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source mentions slash commands such as `/octo`, `/init`, `/review`, `/security-review`; use them first when your agent supports command triggers.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, run shell commands, write/modify files.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Core Policy / Route to Claude-Native First / Escalate to Octopus”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: skill-native-escalation-routing
description: Route ordinary init, review, and security requests to Claude-native capabilities first; escalate…
category: security
source: nyldn/claude-octopus
---
# skill-native-escalation-routing
## When to use
- Route ordinary init, review, and security requests to Claude-native capabilities first; escalate to Octopus only when…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Core Policy / Route to Claude-Native First / Escalate to Octopus” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, run shell commands, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "skill-native-escalation-routing" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Core Policy / Route to Claude-Native First / Escalate to Octopus
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, run shell commands, write/modify files | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} Host: Codex CLI — This skill was designed for Claude Code and adapted for Codex. Cross-reference commands use installed skill names in Codex rather than
/octo:*slash commands. Use the active Codex shell and subagent tools. Do not claim a provider, model, or host subagent is available until the current session exposes it. For host tool equivalents, seeskills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md.
Native-First Escalation Routing
Use this skill when the user asks for repository initialization, code review, or security review and it is not yet clear whether Claude-native behavior is sufficient or whether Octopus escalation is warranted.
Core Policy
Claude-native first:
/init/review/security-review
Octopus for escalation:
/octo:review/octo:security/octo:debate/octo:multi
Route to Claude-Native First
Prefer Claude-native behavior when all of the following are true:
- the request maps directly to init, review, or security review
- the user did not ask for multiple model opinions
- the user did not ask for Codex, Gemini, or another provider explicitly
- the task does not require adversarial debate, consensus scoring, or external-provider specialization
Examples:
- "initialize this repo"
- "review my staged changes"
- "security review this auth module"
Escalate to Octopus
Escalate when the user asks for or clearly benefits from:
- multiple model opinions
- adversarial review
- debate between providers
- provider-specific analysis
- autonomous codegen verification
- elevated rigor for complex or high-risk work
Examples:
- "get multiple model opinions on this PR"
- "have Codex and Gemini review this architecture"
- "do an adversarial security review"
- "verify this AI-generated implementation before merge"
Execution Guidance
- If Claude-native is sufficient, do not wrap the task in Octopus unnecessarily.
- If the user explicitly invokes
/octo:reviewor/octo:security, treat that as an escalation request. - If the request is ambiguous, prefer Claude-native first and mention Octopus as the escalation path.
Suggested User Framing
Use wording like:
Claude-native first, Octopus for escalation. Use Claude-native
/reviewor/security-reviewfor ordinary requests. Use Octopus when you want multiple model opinions, adversarial review, or stricter multi-LLM workflows.
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review