Quality 技能审查
- 作者仓库星标 672
- 许可证 MIT
- 作者仓库 kiro
Quality Assurance
Ensure quality throughout the spec-driven development process with validation techniques, quality gates, and testing strategies.
When to Use This Skill
Use quality assurance practices when:
- Completing any spec phase (requirements, design, tasks)
- Transitioning between phases
- Implementing features from specs
- Reviewing completed work
- Establishing team quality standards
Core Principles
- Requirements-Driven Testing: Every test traces to a requirement
- Phase-Appropriate Validation: Different techniques for each phase
- Continuous Quality: Checks throughout development
- Automated Where Possible: Reduce manual effort
- Fast Feedback: Catch issues early
Phase-Specific Validation
Requirements Phase Validation
Quality Checklist:
- All user stories have acceptance criteria
- Requirements are unambiguous and specific
- Each requirement can be validated/tested
- EARS format used consistently
- Requirements link to business objectives
- No conflicting requirements
Review Process:
- Self Review: Author checks completeness
- Stakeholder Review: Business validates requirements
- Technical Review: Team assesses feasibility
- Approval: Formal sign-off before design
Validation Techniques:
- Scenario Walkthroughs: Step through user journeys
- Edge Case Analysis: Identify boundary conditions
- Conflict Detection: Check for contradictions
- Completeness Analysis: Ensure all needs covered
Design Phase Validation
Quality Checklist:
- Design addresses all requirements
- Scalability considerations documented
- Maintainability assessed
- Security addressed
- Performance requirements considered
- External integrations defined
Review Process:
- Architecture Review: Senior team validates design
- Security Review: Security implications assessed
- Performance Review: Performance characteristics evaluated
- Integration Review: External dependencies validated
Validation Techniques:
- Design Walkthroughs: Step through system interactions
- Threat Modeling: Identify security vulnerabilities
- Performance Modeling: Estimate system performance
- Dependency Analysis: Map external requirements
Tasks Phase Validation
Quality Checklist:
- Each task has clear deliverables
- Task sequence is logical
- All design elements covered
- Each task can be validated
- Tasks appropriately sized (2-4 hours)
- Dependencies clearly defined
Review Process:
- Completeness Review: All design elements have tasks
- Sequencing Review: Task order is logical
- Scope Review: Tasks are appropriately sized
- Dependency Review: Dependencies clear
Quality Gates
Requirements Phase Exit Criteria
- All user stories follow proper format
- Acceptance criteria use EARS format
- Requirements are testable and measurable
- No conflicting requirements
- Stakeholders have approved
- Edge cases documented
Design Phase Exit Criteria
- Architecture addresses all requirements
- Non-functional requirements addressed
- External dependencies identified
- Data models clearly defined
- Error handling documented
- Security considerations addressed
- Technical review completed
Tasks Phase Exit Criteria
- All design elements have tasks
- Tasks properly sequenced
- Each task is actionable
- Requirements references included
- Test approach defined
- Task breakdown reviewed
Task-Level Quality Gates
Before Starting:
- Task requirements understood
- Test strategy defined
- Dependencies available
- Environment ready
During Implementation:
- Code follows standards
- Tests written alongside code
- Coverage meets thresholds (80%+)
- No critical vulnerabilities
Before Marking Complete:
- All tests pass
- Code review completed
- Documentation updated
- Requirements validated
Testing Strategies
Test Pyramid
/\
/ \ E2E Tests (10%)
/____\ Integration Tests (20%)
/ \
/________\ Unit Tests (70%)
Unit Testing
- Fast execution (< 1 second per test)
- Test individual functions/classes
- Mock external dependencies
- Target 80%+ coverage
Integration Testing
- Test component interactions
- Use real dependencies where practical
- Validate API contracts
- Test critical workflows
End-to-End Testing
- Test complete user journeys
- Production-like environment
- Focus on critical business flows
- Minimal but comprehensive
Test-Driven Development
For each task:
- Write tests first based on acceptance criteria
- Run tests - verify they fail (red)
- Write code - minimal to pass tests (green)
- Refactor - improve while keeping tests green
- Validate - ensure requirements satisfied
Quality Metrics
Code Quality
- Line Coverage: % of code lines executed
- Branch Coverage: % of code branches tested
- Cyclomatic Complexity: Code complexity
- Technical Debt: Accumulated issues
Testing Effectiveness
- Test Pass Rate: % of tests passing
- Execution Time: Time to run tests
- Defect Detection Rate: Bugs found by tests vs production
- Test Maintenance: Time spent maintaining tests
Common Quality Issues
Flaky Tests
Symptoms: Tests pass/fail inconsistently Solutions:
- Identify timing dependencies
- Use proper wait conditions
- Isolate test data
- Fix race conditions
Slow Test Suites
Symptoms: Tests take too long Solutions:
- Parallelize execution
- Optimize database operations
- Use test doubles for external services
- Profile and optimize slow tests
Low Coverage
Symptoms: Insufficient code coverage Solutions:
- Add tests for uncovered paths
- Focus on critical business logic
- Use mutation testing
- Set coverage gates in CI
Test Maintenance Burden
Symptoms: Tests require frequent updates Solutions:
- Improve test design
- Use page object patterns for UI
- Reduce coupling to implementation
- Regular test refactoring
Validation Checklists
Requirements Validation
## Requirements Review
**Completeness:**
- [ ] All user roles addressed
- [ ] Happy path scenarios covered
- [ ] Edge cases documented
- [ ] Error cases handled
- [ ] Business rules captured
**Clarity:**
- [ ] Precise language used
- [ ] No ambiguous terms
- [ ] Technical jargon avoided
- [ ] Behaviors are specific
**Testability:**
- [ ] Each requirement verifiable
- [ ] Success criteria observable
- [ ] Inputs/outputs specified
Design Validation
## Design Review
**Architecture:**
- [ ] Requirements addressed
- [ ] Components well-defined
- [ ] Interfaces specified
- [ ] Data flow documented
**Quality Attributes:**
- [ ] Performance considered
- [ ] Security addressed
- [ ] Scalability planned
- [ ] Maintainability assessed
**Risks:**
- [ ] Single points of failure identified
- [ ] Bottlenecks documented
- [ ] Mitigations planned
Implementation Validation
## Implementation Review
**Code Quality:**
- [ ] Follows standards
- [ ] Well-documented
- [ ] Tests included
- [ ] No security issues
**Requirements:**
- [ ] All criteria met
- [ ] Edge cases handled
- [ ] Error handling complete
**Integration:**
- [ ] Works with existing code
- [ ] APIs functioning
- [ ] Performance acceptable
Best Practices
Testing Best Practices
- Write tests first when possible
- Each test verifies one thing
- Use descriptive test names
- Maintain test independence
- Keep tests up-to-date
Quality Assurance Best Practices
- Find issues early (shift left)
- Automate everything possible
- Use metrics to drive improvements
- Make quality everyone's responsibility
- Continuous learning and improvement
Process Integration
- Link tests to requirements
- Provide quick feedback
- Focus testing on high-risk areas
- Keep documentation current
- Integrate tools with workflow
Quick Reference
Phase Transition Questions:
- Requirements → Design: "Does design address all requirements?"
- Design → Tasks: "Do tasks cover all design elements?"
- Tasks → Implementation: "Does code satisfy task specifications?"
Quality Gate Questions:
- "Is this testable and measurable?"
- "Have we considered what could go wrong?"
- "Would another developer understand this?"
- "Does this meet our standards?"
- 流狐分类
- 工程开发
- 作者声明 Agent
- 未找到明确声明;不据此推断已兼容或已测试
- 静态检查
- 94 / 100 · 启发式扫描,不代表运行安全
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @jasonkneen · MIT
- 流狐 Token 估算
- 低消耗
- 流狐接入估算
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 未发现要求
- 检测到的系统要求
- 未声明
- 底层运行要求
- 未声明
- 检测到的文件与系统行为
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- Shell 执行
- 检测到的网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 无(仅作为资料)
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
作者没有在当前 SKILL.md 中定义固定输出样例。 Phase-Specific Validation
Quality Checklist: [ ] All user stories have acceptance criteria [ ] Requirements are unambiguous and specific
Quality Checklist: [ ] Design addresses all requirements [ ] Scalability considerations documented
Quality Checklist: [ ] Each task has clear deliverables [ ] Task sequence is logical
[ ] All user stories follow proper format [ ] Acceptance criteria use EARS format [ ] Requirements are testable and measurable
[ ] Architecture addresses all requirements [ ] Non-functional requirements addressed [ ] External dependencies identified
# Quality Assurance
Ensure quality throughout the spec-driven development process with validation techniques, quality gates, and testing strategies.
## When to Use This Skill
Use quality assurance practices when:
- Completing any spec phase (requirements, design, tasks)
- Transitioning between phases
- Implementing features from specs
- Reviewing completed work
- Establishing team quality standards
## Core Principles
1. **Requirements-Driven Testing:** Every test traces to a requirement
2. **Phase-Appropriate Validation:** Different techniques for each phase
3. **Continuous Quality:** Checks throughout development
4. **Automated Where Possible:** Reduce manual effort
5. **Fast Feedback:** Catch issues early
## Phase-Specific Validation
### Requirements Phase Validation
**Quality Checklist:**
- [ ] All user stories have acceptance criteria
- [ ] Requirements are unambiguous and specific
- [ ] Each requirement can be validated/tested
- [ ] EARS format used consistently
- [ ] Requirements link to business objectives
- [ ] No conflicting requirements
**Review Process:**
1. **Self Review:** Author checks completeness
2. **Stakeholder Review:** Business validates requirements
3. **Technical Review:** Team assesses feasibility
4. **Approval:** Formal sign-off before design
**Validation Techniques:**
- **Scenario Walkthroughs:** Step through user journeys
- **Edge Case Analysis:** Identify boundary conditions
- **Conflict Detection:** Check for contradictions
- **Completeness Analysis:** Ensure all needs covered
### Design Phase Validation
**Quality Checklist:**
- [ ] Design addresses all requirements
- [ ] Scalability considerations documented
- [ ] Maintainability assessed
- [ ] Security addressed
- [ ] Performance requirements considered
… 作者原文负责流程事实;流狐只索引当前章节、要点、文件与命令。
章节 -> When to Use This Skill → Core Principles → Phase-Specific Validation → Requirements Phase Validation → Design Phase Validation → Tasks Phase Validation
要点 -> Requirements-Driven Testing · Phase-Appropriate Validation · Continuous Quality · Automated Where Possible · Fast Feedback · Quality Checklist · Review Process · Self Review
文件/命令 -> validated/tested · functions/classes · pass/fail · Inputs/outputs
内容 SHA-256 -> 56432aa1b9e9
方法与流程
适用与边界
原文中的明确线索
validated/tested、functions/classes、pass/fail、Inputs/outputs