安全生成
- 作者仓库星标 5,723
- 叉子 499
- 作者更新于 2026年6月15日 16:05
- 作者仓库 skills
- 领域
- 工程开发
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @trailofbits · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 低消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 即装即用
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 仅限本地
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: semgrep-rule-variant-creator
description: Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specifie…
category: 工程开发
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# semgrep-rule-variant-creator 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“When to Use / When NOT to Use / Input Specification”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“When to Use / When NOT to Use / Input Specification”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、主要在本地完成、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文没有稳定的斜杠命令要求。安装验证后通常全局生效,直接在对话里点名这个 Skill 并描述任务即可。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“When to Use / When NOT to Use / Input Specification”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: semgrep-rule-variant-creator
description: Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specifie…
category: 工程开发
source: trailofbits/skills
---
# semgrep-rule-variant-creator
## 什么时候使用
- semgrep-rule-variant-creator 是一个工程开发方向的技能,扩展 Agent 在写代码、做 review、跑测试这类场景下的能力 适合处理工程开发场景下的代码实现、调试、重构、测试或代码审查,核心价值是把输入、判…
- 面向代码实现、重构、调试或代码审查,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「When to Use / When NOT to Use / Input Specification」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;主要在本地完成;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "semgrep-rule-variant-creator" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> When to Use / When NOT to Use / Input Specification
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件 | 主要在本地完成
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Semgrep Rule Variant Creator
Port existing Semgrep rules to new target languages with proper applicability analysis and test-driven validation.
When to Use
Ideal scenarios:
- Porting an existing Semgrep rule to one or more target languages
- Creating language-specific variants of a universal vulnerability pattern
- Expanding rule coverage across a polyglot codebase
- Translating rules between languages with equivalent constructs
When NOT to Use
Do NOT use this skill for:
- Creating a new Semgrep rule from scratch (use
semgrep-rule-creatorinstead) - Running existing rules against code
- Languages where the vulnerability pattern fundamentally doesn't apply
- Minor syntax variations within the same language
Input Specification
This skill requires:
- Existing Semgrep rule - YAML file path or YAML rule content
- Target languages - One or more languages to port to (e.g., "Golang and Java")
Output Specification
For each applicable target language, produces:
<original-rule-id>-<language>/
├── <original-rule-id>-<language>.yaml # Ported Semgrep rule
└── <original-rule-id>-<language>.<ext> # Test file with annotations
Example output for porting sql-injection to Go and Java:
sql-injection-golang/
├── sql-injection-golang.yaml
└── sql-injection-golang.go
sql-injection-java/
├── sql-injection-java.yaml
└── sql-injection-java.java
Rationalizations to Reject
When porting Semgrep rules, reject these common shortcuts:
| Rationalization | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| "Pattern structure is identical" | Different ASTs across languages | Always dump AST for target language |
| "Same vulnerability, same detection" | Data flow differs between languages | Analyze target language idioms |
| "Rule doesn't need tests since original worked" | Language edge cases differ | Write NEW test cases for target |
| "Skip applicability - it obviously applies" | Some patterns are language-specific | Complete applicability analysis first |
| "I'll create all variants then test" | Errors compound, hard to debug | Complete full cycle per language |
| "Library equivalent is close enough" | Surface similarity hides differences | Verify API semantics match |
| "Just translate the syntax 1:1" | Languages have different idioms | Research target language patterns |
Strictness Level
This workflow is strict - do not skip steps:
- Applicability analysis is mandatory: Don't assume patterns translate
- Each language is independent: Complete full cycle before moving to next
- Test-first for each variant: Never write a rule without test cases
- 100% test pass required: "Most tests pass" is not acceptable
Overview
This skill guides the creation of language-specific variants of existing Semgrep rules. Each target language goes through an independent 4-phase cycle:
FOR EACH target language:
Phase 1: Applicability Analysis → Verdict
Phase 2: Test Creation (Test-First)
Phase 3: Rule Creation
Phase 4: Validation
(Complete full cycle before moving to next language)
Foundational Knowledge
The semgrep-rule-creator skill is the authoritative reference for Semgrep rule creation fundamentals. While this skill focuses on porting existing rules to new languages, the core principles of writing quality rules remain the same.
Consult semgrep-rule-creator for guidance on:
- When to use taint mode vs pattern matching - Choosing the right approach for the vulnerability type
- Test-first methodology - Why tests come before rules and how to write effective test cases
- Anti-patterns to avoid - Common mistakes like overly broad or overly specific patterns
- Iterating until tests pass - The validation loop and debugging techniques
- Rule optimization - Removing redundant patterns after tests pass
When porting a rule, you're applying these same principles in a new language context. If uncertain about rule structure or approach, refer to semgrep-rule-creator first.
Four-Phase Workflow
Phase 1: Applicability Analysis
Before porting, determine if the pattern applies to the target language.
Analysis criteria:
- Does the vulnerability class exist in the target language?
- Does an equivalent construct exist (function, pattern, library)?
- Are the semantics similar enough for meaningful detection?
Verdict options:
APPLICABLE→ Proceed with variant creationAPPLICABLE_WITH_ADAPTATION→ Proceed but significant changes neededNOT_APPLICABLE→ Skip this language, document why
See applicability-analysis.md for detailed guidance.
Phase 2: Test Creation (Test-First)
Always write tests before the rule.
Create test file with target language idioms:
- Minimum 2 vulnerable cases (
ruleid:) - Minimum 2 safe cases (
ok:) - Include language-specific edge cases
// ruleid: sql-injection-golang
db.Query("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = " + userInput)
// ok: sql-injection-golang
db.Query("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?", userInput)
Phase 3: Rule Creation
- Analyze AST:
semgrep --dump-ast -l <lang> test-file - Translate patterns to target language syntax
- Update metadata: language key, message, rule ID
- Adapt for idioms: Handle language-specific constructs
See language-syntax-guide.md for translation guidance.
Phase 4: Validation
# Validate YAML
semgrep --validate --config rule.yaml
# Run tests
semgrep --test --config rule.yaml test-file
Checkpoint: Output MUST show All tests passed.
For taint rule debugging:
semgrep --dataflow-traces -f rule.yaml test-file
See workflow.md for detailed workflow and troubleshooting.
Quick Reference
| Task | Command |
|---|---|
| Run tests | semgrep --test --config rule.yaml test-file |
| Validate YAML | semgrep --validate --config rule.yaml |
| Dump AST | semgrep --dump-ast -l <lang> <file> |
| Debug taint flow | semgrep --dataflow-traces -f rule.yaml file |
Key Differences from Rule Creation
| Aspect | semgrep-rule-creator | This skill |
|---|---|---|
| Input | Bug pattern description | Existing rule + target languages |
| Output | Single rule+test | Multiple rule+test directories |
| Workflow | Single creation cycle | Independent cycle per language |
| Phase 1 | Problem analysis | Applicability analysis per language |
| Library research | Always relevant | Optional (when original uses libraries) |
Documentation
REQUIRED: Before porting rules, read relevant Semgrep documentation:
- Rule Syntax - YAML structure and operators
- Pattern Syntax - Pattern matching and metavariables
- Pattern Examples - Per-language pattern references
- Testing Rules - Testing annotations
- Trail of Bits Testing Handbook - Advanced patterns
Next Steps
- For applicability analysis guidance, see applicability-analysis.md
- For language translation guidance, see language-syntax-guide.md
- For detailed workflow and examples, see workflow.md
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核